there were our statements, but just recently we destroyed them near some gas station, the powerful rebovsky complex, it seems, right there he was refueling there and we destroyed it, that means , that we at least saw him, on the other hand, the russians also said that they managed to destroy them as far as kharkov district, when they stopped... our complex and they aimed there, and it is obvious that this was not the work of the agency, but that most likely , the interaction of a drone of some kind reconnaissance drone and their artillery. and here is the question, why don't we destroy them, these shock fists, well, after all, there are some, what is your answer to this, well, here it is obvious, again, the question is almost rhetorical, because they are on that distances where we cannot finish off our artillery or mlrs, a missile with drones is not an option, yes, no, well , drones, drones are already destroying tanks, well, armor when they are already advancing. of the front, which, well, these are mostly phividrons, which are controlled by the operator, he is far from, he is not can fly

, even old, new technologies, from, say, shotguns that shoot down small things, drones, to, say, rebovsky rifles, very diverse technologies, interceptors are very active now. squirm, the americans have already purchased as many as 600 coyotes, and such interceptors, and all this prompts experts to talk about certain changes. now there are opinions that, firstly, rap will influence more, secondly, there will be changes in in the sense that, for example, ground works will make up, well, the main part or the core. opportunities on the battlefield and already at the beginning of january, the ukrainians demonstrated several such interesting things, well, in particular, a kamikaze drone went as far as 4 km to the enemy and destroyed a bridge, this is a very similar trend, very interesting, shown by the deminers, who are literally in front of the enemy 100 m away yes to the enemy. can clear mines, and these are unmanned platforms, these are very serious things, then the development of underwater drones, mini, even mini-submarines, these are all moments, and of course the development of aerial sy

even old, new technologies, let's say from hunting pistols that shoot down small drones. to, say, rebovskyifles, very diverse technologies, interceptors are now being developed very actively, the americans, have already made a purchase for... 600 coyotes, yes, such interceptors, and all this prompts experts to talk about certain changes. now there are opinions that, firstly, rap will have a greater influence, and secondly, there will be changes in the sense that, for example, ground robots will make up, well, the main, or core, capabilities on the battlefield, and already at the beginning.. at the beginning of january , the ukrainians demonstrated several such interesting things, well, in particular, a kamikaze drone went as far as 4 km to the enemy and destroyed a bridge, this is a very interesting trend, as shown by the deminers, who are literally in front of the enemy 100 m to the enemy can be demined, and these are deserted platforms. these are very serious things, then the development of underwater drones, mini, even mini-submarines, these are all the moments, and of course the develo

look at such things, there were our statements, but literally recently we destroyed their powerful rebovskyomplex there near a gas station , it seems that he was refueling right there and we destroyed it, which means that we at least saw him, on the other hand, the russians also said: that they managed to destroy them as far as kharkov district, also when our complex stopped, and they aimed there, and it is obvious that it was not work agencies, and this is most likely the interaction of an unmanned reconnaissance drone of some kind and their artillery, and here is the question, how come, why don’t we destroy them with these shock fists, well , there are still some, what is your answer to this, well here obvious question again. almost rhetorically, because they are at a distance where we cannot finish off our artillery or mlrs, a missile, drones are not an option, yes, no, drones, drones are already destroying tanks, well, armor not far from the front line, which is mostly guided fividrons operator, he is far from it, he cannot fly for 100 km, well, he will simply reach beyond the horizon l

old and new technologies, say from hunting ... rifles that knock down small 'yu, drones to, say, rebovskyifles, very different technologies, interceptors now are developing very actively, the americans have already purchased as many as 600 coyotes, yes , such interceptors, and all this prompts experts to talk about certain changes, now there are opinions that, firstly... rap ​​will have more influence, secondly, there will be changes in the sense that, for example, ground operations will make up, well, the main, main, or core of capabilities on the battlefield, and already at the beginning of january, the ukrainians demonstrated several such interesting things, well, in particular, a kamikaze drone traveled as much as 4 km into... the enemy and destroyed the bridge, this is very such a trend, very interesting, they showed minesweepers, which can demine literally in front of the enemy 100 m and even to the enemy, and these are unmanned platforms, these are very serious things, then the development of underwater drones, mini, even mini-submarine shuttles, these are all the moments, and of c

’s look at such things, there were our statements, but just recently we destroyed their powerful rebovskyplex near some gas station, it seems, right there he was refueling there and we destroyed , this means that we at least saw him, on the other hand, the russians also said that they managed to destroy them all the way to kharkiv district, also when he stopped... our complex, and they aimed there, and it is obvious that this was not the work of the agency, but rather the interaction of an unmanned reconnaissance drone of some kind and their artillery, and here is the question, but why don’t we destroy these shock fists , well, there are still, what is your answer to this, well, here it is obvious that such questions are almost rhetorical, because they are at a distance where we cannot complete our... artillery or mlrs with drones is not an option yes no well drones are already destroying tanks with drones well, the armor is already not far from the front line, which , well, it is mainly the loaders that are controlled by the operator, it is far from it, it cannot fly for 100 km, well, it

our statements, but we were there just recently destroyed near some gas station. their powerful rebovskyeems to have refueled right there, and we destroyed it, which means that we at least saw it. on the other hand, the russians also said that they managed to destroy them as far as kharkov district, also when our complex stopped, and they aimed there, and it is obvious that this was not the work of the agency, but rather the interaction of an unmanned reconnaissance drone and their artillery, and here is the question, and... "how come , why don't we destroy these shock fists, well, there are still some, what is your answer to this, but here it is obvious, again, the question is almost rhetorical, because they are at a distance where we cannot finish our artillery, or mlrs, rocket, it is not with drones option, yes, no, well, with drones, drones are already destroying tanks, well, armor already not far from the front line, which is mostly "operator, he is far from it, he cannot fly beyond 100 km, well, he simply bends it behind the horizon line, simply put, the signal, well, it just won't

statements of ours, but literally recently we destroyed there near some gas station... their powerful rebovskyhat's how he was refueling there, and we destroyed , this means that we at least saw him, on the other hand, the russians also said that they were as far as kharkov district. they managed to destroy also when our complex stopped, and they aimed there, and it is obvious that this was not the work of the agency, but this is most likely the interaction of a drone of some kind reconnaissance drone and their artillery, and here is the question, but why don't we destroy them, these shock fists, well, there are still, what is your answer to this, well here it is obvious, again the question is almost rhetorical, so that they... is at a distance where we cannot finish off our artillery or mlrs, rocket launchers are not an option, yes, no, well , drones, drones destroy tanks already , well, armor already not far from the front line, which, well, these are mostly fividrons, which controlled by the operator, it is far from it, it cannot fly for 100 km, well, it simply bends behind the horizon line

’s look at such things, there were our statements, but just recently we destroyed their powerful rebovskystation, it seems, so he was refueling right there and we destroyed it, which means that we at least they saw it, on the other hand, the russians also said that they were able to destroy it as far as kharkiv district... they were also able to destroy it when our complex stopped and they aimed there, and it is obvious that this was not the work of the agency, but rather after all, the interaction of an unmanned reconnaissance drone of some kind and their artillery, and here is the question, how come, why don't we destroy these shock fists, well , anyway, what, what is your answer to this, well , here it is obvious, again the question is almost rhetorical because they find... it's at a distance where we can't finish ours artillery or anti-aircraft missiles, a large missile with drones is not an option, yes, no, well, drones, drones destroy tanks already, well , in armor, already not far from the front line, which , well, these are mostly fividrons, which are controlled by an operator, it

let's look at such things were our statements, that is just recently we destroyed their powerful rebovsky near some gas station, it seems that he was refueling there and we destroyed it, which means that we at least saw it, on the other hand, the russians also said that they managed to reach kharkiv district to destroy also when our complex stopped and they aimed there. and it is obvious that this was not the work of the agency, but rather the interaction of an unmanned reconnaissance drone of some kind and their artillery, and here is the question, but why do we not destroy they are these shock fists, well, there are some, what is your answer to this, well, here it is obvious, again the question...

the researchers believe that the first question of the second round is based on rebovsky, the hero oftin stanislavsky. time. it’s a complex question, it seems to me, and it will be all the more interesting to unravel it. nikolay, how did you answer? i answered option c. i don’t know the exact answer, but i’ll assume that this is so. i think that he showed logic, since chekhov was a playwright, a stanislavsky director, there was logic in this. who is konstantin stanislavsky? who is it? it seems to me? this is a director, producer, direct producer, perhaps, well, at that time there was probably no such thing as a producer, although now something tells me that konstantin sergeevich stanislavsky could cope with this task, but alas, then, of course, he was not a producer, and daria, well, let’s start with the fact that stanislavsky is a famous actor, the author of a famous phrase, i don’t believe it counting the actors, but the director, yes, the creator of the school, the acting school, yes, yes, that’s it. but i didn’t choose stanislavsky, i chose levittan and well done, because ryabovsk

the first question of the second round, researchers believe that the prototype of rebovsky, the heroanislavsky. time! it’s a complex question, it seems to me, and it will be all the more interesting to unravel it. nikolay, how did you answer? i answered option c. exact answer i don't know, but i'll guess. this is so, i think that he showed logic, since chekhov is a playwright, stanislavsky director, there was logic in this, who is konstantin stanislavsky, who is this, it seems to me, this is a director , producer, direct producer, perhaps, well, at that time there was no such thing , probably, concepts as a producer, although now something tells me that konstantin sergeevich stanislavsky could cope with this task, but alas, then, of course, he was not a producer. daria, well, let's start with this. but i didn’t choose stanislavsky, i chose levittan and well done, because ryabovsky, as it seems to me, was an artist, well, or vitan an artist, you are leading to this, i just didn’t immediately discover the connection, yes, yes, that’s why the prototype, the prototype of levovsky is levi