, well, general drapatoy has a correspondingly positive background, this is the strengthening of then, i.e. the creation of a rigid vertical line of subordination, er, about the intentions of the occupiers, well, at the moment, there is no record of their own redeployment of personnel of heavy armored vehicles, including in the territory of the belgorod region , which would indicate an increase. er of this contingent, i emphasize once again, i do not rule out a simultaneous strengthening of the offensive of the occupiers on another part of the ukrainian-russian border, we are talking about the sumy region, that is , several tension zones will be created, and in the sumy direction, the occupiers will solve several issues for themselves at the same time: a) this is a diversion of the reserve of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine, b utilization of kadyrov units, which are focused on subordinated to this direction. to colonel lapin, lapin has a personal conflict with kadyrov, therefore , in my opinion and on my conviction, the deployment of kadyrov's units precisely in the

operational-strategic commander of ukraine has been removed grouping of the kharkiv troops and mykhailo drapatoycombat brigadier general, who at one time still entered mariupol in the 14th year, was appointed in his place, so obviously there were problems. yes, because people are not changed so quickly in an emergency, if there are no problems. obviously, somewhere people may not have been up to the mark, they weren't ready, they weren't able to make certain decisions, they weren't able to take certain measures, they didn't have enough skills, abilities, or whatever, my god, this is war, you can change people in positions. the question is that it should be exactly the same the responsibility is not only of the military, who somehow failed to cope with something, and immediately, thank god that there is someone to replace, thank god that there are people with experience, thank god that there are combat people who have combat experience, who can.. to act adequately, to react quickly in certain actions, because you understand the risks of letting the enemy break through the front, thank god that we

will not go anywhere, i will defend our native land to the last, replacing galushkin with general drapatoyat did he do, what distinguished himself, for example, galushkin, who commanded the operational-tactical grouping of kharkiv troops? if it is changed during the hot period command, then i believe that it will be noted. very difficult, at the expense of mykhailo dropaty, you know, everyone, all the people i know, everyone said that he is very positive, very professional, and everyone speaks absolutely positively, highly about him, i know that in the military environment it is very difficult to earn authority difficult, that's why i think that the replacement is timely, drapaty was in kherson, he... managed the liberation of the left bank, he of the left bank, he managed the kherson group, so i think that this replacement is very correct, the only thing that is at the expense of timeliness, in the very hot period, it will be very difficult for a person to immediately determine, define clear priorities and clearly enter the command. on this site, but everyone responds positively and says

the muscovites in the information department, in particular regarding the appointment of general drapatoythe commander of the kharkiv grouping, at first it was quite strange their hysteria and... and such toxicity towards mr. general, but in in the end, they understand that a person has appointed a professional, and a worthy answer will be found to them in response to their offensive, that is why there are such very, very strange and interesting informational narratives in our informational field today in relation to kharkiv oblast. you mentioned journalistic investigations, well, i just have to clarify here that on the eve of the edition of ukranian pravda , the head of the anti-corruption, anti-corruption center of mezh, martyna bohuslavets, published a blog, she analyzed the public expenses of the kharkiv ova for building fortification and found that a significant part of the funds, in particular for supplies. they received companies that have a rather dubious origin and signs of efficiency, i asked this very question to your colleague on the committee, roman kostenko, the day before,