each other, but you need to remember this, well, you heard a wonderful essay from the lips of evgeniy vodolazkingment from a novel, but i want not an essay, but such a gelertorsky one. as he formulated it, this device that we all have in our pockets, it accustoms us to something else, yes, that there is simply the naked truth, you spied the memory, and it’s as if you appropriated it, nothing like that, you need to make it yours, assign with a hyphen, but still, in your example from the gospel, i it seems that another difference is that scientific knowledge, well, if you like, is violent, yes, i learned that twice is 2:4, and if i argue with this, then maybe they will take me, but only to kashchenkaevsky speaks twice. this is a collective memory, yes, and a person is an individual memory, but what happens is, perhaps, such a bold generalization, although in essence it seems to me true, any information revolution, it gives a serious increase in collective memory, begins the invention of writing, yes, typography, yes, it always hits the individual, yes, the odyssey’s iliad appears in oral culture,