messages. hints that time is running out, the clock is ticking, a friend of evgenia saenkova, vasily lechkinuty chairman of the public chamber of the ramensky district. according to him , evgenia really communicated with reputable entrepreneurs in the moscow region. maybe it really had something to do with what she was deciding. i also have an assumption that she was in the lock-up area like an eminence grise. so why did the state association have difficulties with the evidence base and how did it happen? it turned out that there were a lot of inconsistencies in the case, for example, going on the supposed last date, and saenkova had all three. i left my smartphone at home and took my daughter’s mobile phone instead. the route has been built. she did not call or write to anyone from it, and from applications she used only a navigator, in which she plotted the route to an address sent to her from an unknown number. when examining this phone , a fingerprint was found on it that did not belong to either kulakov or isainkova. and none of her family members. on the door of a white mercedes the vi

evgenia's friend saenkova, vasily lechkin, was privy to many of the affairs of the deputy chairman ofamensky district. according to him, evgenia really communicated with authoritative entrepreneurs of the moscow region, maybe this is really due to the fact that she was deciding, i also have an assumption that. she was with the kulak as a gray eminence, that is, she held an insignificant official position, but at the same time she had quite a strong influence on politics in the ramensky district and on decision-making, i think that she had quite a lot of information, not only on kulakov, i have not heard about that . that he had enemies in general, there were a lot of ill-wishers, let’s say, but in order to kill, well, if only returning again to the question of compromising evidence, who could have framed kulakov in this way, well, that’s also a moot point, because well, in 2019 a year was enough there are a lot of questions for him, because there... there are quite a lot of cameras along the route to the site of the tragedy and not a single camera provided information, so why did the

evgenia saenkova’s friend, vasily lechkin, was privy to many affairs of the deputy chairman of the ramensky, evgenia really communicated with reputable entrepreneurs in the moscow region. maybe it really had something to do with what she was deciding. i also have an assumption that she was under kulakov like an eminence grise. that is, she occupied a minor official position. but at the same time, she had quite a strong influence on politics in the ramensky district and on decision-making, i think that she had quite a lot of information, not only on kulakov, but i didn’t hear that he had any enemies at all, there were a lot of ill-wishers , let's put it this way, but in order to kill, well, if only returning again to the issue of compromising evidence, someone? could kulakov be framed in this way? well, that’s also a moot point, because well, for 2019, it was there are quite a lot of questions for him, because there are quite a lot of cameras along the route to the scene of the tragedy and not a single camera provided information. so why did the government have problems with the evidence bas