one more thing was needed: it was necessary for joseph veslionovich stalin, in his fight against tratzkyism, to gradually reject the global hegemonic demands, which were initially the participation of the bolsheviks. these claims they left with trotsky, the heirs, who, by the way, are founding fathers of the non-conservative movement. the soviet union dissolved the commentary, the soviet union, back in the thirties, began to support communist parties in a very limited way, the overthrow of existing regimes, you know, i am sure that in spain stalin pursued, in general, a completely restrained, responsible policy, and his emphasis was on something to stop. in general, if we hope for some kind of fundamental reconciliation with the west, then one thing will be required from it: they must stop being crusaders, they must agree to recognize ourselves as normal states, but you said, in order for this to happen, we must stop hoping for reconciliation, you can win only without hoping for reconciliation, if you... understood perfectly well that in this case stalin may have refused to do this , becaus