ethics group and said we'll take it with that ninth circuit doing. that was the way it developed. no more dangerous and a set of ethics committee or house ethics committee which by the way i believe both exists. but go to nikki new york independent. independent. >> "good morning p america." how i wonder sometimes how do nine supreme court justices when there are 13 judicial districts. i also wonder that how it is every other federal judge including irene cannon donald trump court master whose presidess over his last criminl trial was decided to be a special master over the supreme court gave the current sitting president, joe biden, and immunity from a any criminal ac. including removing the supreme court today. and he can be prosecuted. he can be. >> you have any thoughts? >> look, my organization does not deal directly with the supreme court opinions. we are talkingt more about the institution and how we think it should be a good steward of ethical and moral leadership and frankly it's falling short of that party first point about the other nine justices currently the country has expanded since they were created. it's not difficult for chief

of their ministers in the cabinet who said that killing the palestinian is something you know ethical, ethical to kill the palestinians regardless whether he hamas or not, this is even not that matter, any palestinian is you know it's it's they are allowed to... kill the palestinians, because palestinians are less than them, they are unhuman and remind you also with the beginning of the war when the defense minister said we are going to cut the electricity, the water and the oil and everything, and they we are dealing with with animals, so with this kind of mentality, what did you expect from the israeli society? yes after this rain happened in ciditiman, the mob of settlers, they attacked the the this prison. because they don't want these soldiers who commit this crime to be arrested and when they were arrested and taken to bit lead center in the middle of of of the country those mob also they storm the the the center the police center there to release those prisoners who are you know commit a crime in front of camera and yet these mob still you know defending them and saying that they should

experience that i do not have, and i just meant that there is like... education, erudition and ethics, ethics that element that gives you the opportunity to make a decision, you take responsibility for yourself when you show the paradox when on... yes, now i will joke so that it will be surprising for everyone, but someone will be offended, and you begin to weigh, so to speak, weigh mercantilely, that is, you begin to benefit consider, i will destroy this one, i will offend him, all these people will be upset, but look how much they will laugh, but you again think from the industry, yes, that i will go on stage there, no, i am not even talking about the stage, i am talking about... the same charlie abdo, that is, to say that they did not understand, and do not understand some of these things, they understand perfectly well, but they are doing this provocation consciously, no, not just, they believe that this is actually, that they are the forest rangers, yes, that they are actually changing the world for the better with this, i don’t know, everything is intuitive, everything, a person, there

ethics reform. there are op-ed's from larry tribe, all of these people on the commission. that they were not allowed to give recommendation. to the other points, this ethics code is something that almost existed for the supreme court. after watergate there were a lot of good government rules being put into effect. also laws that would establish the ethics commission that could have investigated any unethical behavior of the justices. unfortunately, they lobbied against their inclusion. we voted for five people, jesse helms, barry goldwater, joe biden, pat lahey. we are talking about a bipartisan bill 45-50 years ago. there should be a way to file a complaint, it is not a radical idea. it was put into place before mitch mcconnell's favor court, the ninth circuit, they said we will just take what the ninth circuit is doing. that was the way it developed. it is no more dangerous than having the senate ethics committee or house ethics committee. host: we will go to nikki, rockaway park, new york, independent. caller: good morning, america. i wonder sometimes how did our nine supreme court justices when there are 13 judicial district? i also wonder how did any other federal judge including aileen cannon, donald trump's court master who presides over his last criminal trial was decided to be a special master over the supreme court. it just g

form 700 ethics ethic's policies and startedg developed a presentation the next step is s training forh department and you wanted the on boarding gets hired we have a big group sat down and go t with the nile hiring class. cultivate a workforce. and here as impelemented the new process and training as a group early 30 begun implementing a program years we are doing all of this internal areas we worked on we had one of todd 2 a year and another for and then we have been patrick as i understands an e mail an among to all staff for process changesebody got a letter of appreciation from a customer and d this twice a month. the left thing you see identify and deploy best practices for candidates. help we hire new people we stay. we are look to make sure they are modern prop and qualified people as possible. last goal produce sufficient revenue. the goal here to identify how much people andd to meet our operational targets? make sure we have enough funds to fund the technology investments and targets this group potential revenue opportunities. now those are vetted by services team. understan

ethics, about religious ethics and so on, just come down to earth and think about - the practical meaning of what we want to talk about, because we know that... the results of termination of pregnancy, that is, the embryo, it can be used for treatment, rescue, even saving other people from various diseases, but let's turn to the dictionary of biomedical these, here's what it says there: the basis of the ban on the use of an embryo or its tissues for the purposes of biomedical research is the opposition. this is a lot, what else, this is regeneration in a broad sense, then we need mechanisms, we need a certain degree of scientific and medical freedom, obviously, at some stages you can quite calmly try to replace, move away from organ transplantation and the patient save his life by transplanting fetal, that is... cells - liver or mesanchymal stem cells, taken from second-trimester fetuses. in this video , gennady tikhonovich sukhikh explains that aborted human embryos can be used as medicinal raw materials for sick people, using so-called fetal cells, but it is impossible to obtain them without, so to speak, killing the fetus. moreover, a fairly large one, as is believed, having reached 12 weeks of its, so to speak, existence, i want to immediately make a reservation, gennady tikhonovich sukhikh is a great professional, he is a doctor of medical sciences, he heads the center of obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology named after academician kulakov, his merits are noted by the state, he is a knight of the order. servants to the fatherland, he is a laureate of the state prize in the field of science in 2022 and so on and so forth, he accepts the most difficult cases of his life, saves a huge number of people, his role is huge in increasing the birth rate, he says something absolutely fair, with which it is impossible not to agree, so so-called fetal therapy, it can save from a huge number of diseases, for example, from diseases of the central nervous system. why can't this be done? however, in russia there is a law from june 23, 2016 , number 180 fz on biomedical cell products, according to which in our country it is unacceptable to use for the development, production and application of biomedical cell products biological material obtained by interrupting the development process of a human embryo or fetus or disrupting such a process. all this is prohibited. well, look at the picture. i will quote once again the words of academician gennady tikhonovich sukhikh, with which it is impossible not to agree. listen, the thing is that research in the field of embryonic stem cells is associated with something controversial. the right to decide whether this pregnancy will develop or not belongs to. my woman, tell me, where is the ethicsthical to flush biologically invaluable material that can not only save, but also revive another life down the drain, an absolutely fair remark. and they continue this thought of the authors of the monograph, high-risk newborns. if abortion is considered a violation of the fetus's right to life, how... should we treat the fact that in 2000 alone , about 2 million artificial abortions were performed in our country, if 2 million abortions were performed in the country in 2000 alone, then why can't the results of this abortion be used to save another person, well, that's fair, or is it better to just flush it down the drain, but here the question arises, why were 2 million abortions performed, and what number of these 2 million abortions were mandatory, necessary to save, say, a woman's life, here a conflict arises between in the cause-and-effect relationship, you understand what i'm talking about, and now let's see how this... law number 180 fz correlates with article 17, paragraph 2 of

tell me, where is the ethics here? is it ethical to flush biologically invaluable material that can not only save, but also revive another life down the drain, an absolutely fair remark. and the authors of the monograph high-risk newborns continue this thought. if abortion is considered a violation of the fetus's right to life, how should we treat the fact that in 2000 alone in our country there were about 2 million artificial abortions were performed. if in the country. to use in order to save another person, well , it is fair, or is it better to simply flush it down the drain, but here the question arises, why were 2 million abortions performed, and what number of these 2 million abortions were mandatory, necessary to save, say, a woman's life, here a conflict arises between in the cause-and-effect relationship, you understand what i'm talking about. and now let's see how this law number 180 fz correlates with article 17, paragraph 2 of the constitution of the russian federation. look, the basic rights and freedoms of a person are

ethics sounds good. who could be against ethics? judges being ethical, not being corrupt, that's all a -- that's great. gment as a it were the over the supreme court, over their bosses, there's something wrong there. if it's a congressional committee, there's a separation of powers issue. there is no super duper court. you can impeach the justices. that's the check. and this is also a solution in search of a problem. the justices have complied with various ethics and disclosure rules, the same ones that apply to lower court judges. they've complied with them voluntarily. and earlier this year they unanimously adopted a strong cored. so, look, if we want to completely eliminate gifts and travel and things like this even though there's been no allegation of quid pro quo corruption or that, say, justice alito voted to overturn roe v. wade because he went on a luxury fishing trip or some of this nonsense that's come out in the press, if we want to eliminate all of that, let's do it across government including congress. but that would be a nonstarter. people wring their hands and complain about the court's l

ethics, about religious ethics and so on, let's just come down to earth and think about - the practical significance of what we want to talk about, because we know that the results of interruption pregnancy, that is, this embryo, it can be used for treatment, salvation, even rescue. other people from various diseases. but let's turn to the dictionary of biomedical ethicsit says: the basis of the ban on the use of an embryo or its tissue for the purposes of biomedical research is the opposition of the hypothetical benefit to humanity and the real rights of a specific embryo. here, watch a short video, quite old, 2002. so that our national perspective is not closed to us by talk about ethics, about morality, about religion, everything this is very important, all of this is very necessary, but at the same time we need to understand that there is a goal, fatal diseases, we can say, this is neurodegeneration, neurodegenerative diseases of the brain, these are the problems of diabetes, the first and second types, these are the problems of accelerated aging, these are autoimmune diseases, this is... there is much more, this is regeneration in a broad sense, then, we need mechanisms, we need a certain degree of scientific and medical freedom, obviously, at some stages we can quite calmly try to replace, move away from organ transplantation and patient to save

ethics, a constitutional amendment overturning the court's decision allowing sitting presidents to violate criminal law. sen. durbin: focus on ethics. the other two require a 60 vote majority as well as constitutional vision, some people believe. when it comes to ethics can do that by stature. we should do it on a bipartisan basis. there is no excuse and no defense. generous gifts from billionaires, some of whom appear before the court and he refuses to recuse himself. it is a clear case on a bipartisan basis where ethics is required. geoff: you say democrats don't have the 60 votes. we spoke with gary peters on this program last night. he chairs the senate campaign arm and he says he thinks democrats, even with this tough senate map can't get to 51 democrats in this next election. are you that optimistic? sen. durbin: gary is our quarterback, retaining a democratic majority in the senate so i stand by his analysis. he's got much better information than i have. the spirit of this chicago convention i think is going to help a lot of challengers as well as incumbents running for reelection. amna: what do you expect to hear from barack obama tonight? you were instrumental inis decision to run into thousand eight and he probably could not have done it wi

and integrity commission— establish a new ethics and integrity commission with _ establish a new ethics and integrity commission with its _ establish a new ethicsendent chair. you have been in _ commission with its own independent chair. you have been in downing - chair. you have been in downing street— chair. you have been in downing street more _ chair. you have been in downing street more than _ chair. you have been in downing street more than 50 _ chair. you have been in downing street more than 50 days - chair. you have been in downing street more than 50 days now. i chair. you have been in downing i street more than 50 days now. can you commit— street more than 50 days now. can you commit to _ street more than 50 days now. can you commit to telling _ street more than 50 days now. can you commit to telling us _ street more than 50 days now. can you commit to telling us when - street more than 50 days now. can you commit to telling us when youi you commit to telling us when you will launch— you commit to telling us when you will launch this _ you commit to telling us when you will launch this commission - you commit to telling us when you w

this pregnancy will develop or not, belongs to the woman herself, tell me, where is the ethics here, is it ethical? priceless material from a biological point of view, which can not only save, but also revive another life, to flush down the drain, an absolutely fair remark. and the authors of the monograph continue this thought, high-risk newborns. if abortion is considered a violation of the fetus's right to life, how should we treat the fact that in 2000 alone in our country. about 2 million artificial abortions were performed, if in the country 2 million abortions were performed in 2000 alone, so why can't the results of this abortion be used to save another person, well, that's fair, or is it better to just flush it down the drain, but here the question arises: why? his rights are protected from birth, that is, in other words, our left hand does not know what the right hand is doing, on the one hand. it is immoral to use an unborn embryo, as if considering it protected by the state as a person, on the other hand , according to the constitution, only a person is considered a person someone who

ethics in business. a global study last year found 96% of business leaders were overwhelmingly convinced that addressing ethical issues is critical to the future of their industries. most bosses say they are having to tackle more ethicaly equipped to do it. david rodin is a moral philosoper and global authority on ethics — he spent two decades at oxford university and now runs principia advisory — which advises some of the world's largest private and public organizations. hello and a warm welcome to the programme. when we talk about the ethical issues today, what are they? what are the main topics? are they? what are the main toics? . ~' ,, are they? what are the main toics? . ~ i., , . are they? what are the main toics? . ~ , . .,, topics? thank you. great to be with ou topics? thank you. great to be with you this — topics? thank you. great to be with you this morning. - topics? thank you. great to be with you this morning. so, i topics? thank you. great to be with you this morning. so, we| with you this morning. so, we set up this ten years ago the omission to be the first consulting and advisory firm on ethics by which we just mean everything that happens within the organisation that allows a business to operate re

tell me, where is the ethics here? is it ethicalwaste biologically invaluable material that can not only save, but also revive another life, in ... lie to everyone from birth, that is, legally , a child who is here in the hands of his mother, he is not considered a person, his rights are protected from birth, that is, in other words, our left hand does not know what the right hand is doing, on the one hand we consider it immoral use an embryo that has not yet been born, as if considering it protected by the state as a person, on the other hand... according to the constitution , only someone who has already been born is considered a person, let's remember once again who wrote this constitution for us in 1993, american advisers were sitting on two floors in the white house, writing laws for us and writing a constitution for us, by the way, and all the laws, all the decrees that yeltsin and gaidar adopted, i was a member of the government, i remember. they bring all this in english, and then they sit there they urgently translate, tran

ethics, but the code of ethics in football was forgotten, but is a player who the team plays with a lot of fans and the attitude of many youths and teenagers and their morals and behavior allows them to do anything . the player who is in the national media shows their games every week. in my opinion , we have nothing to do with anyone's personal life. he is watching the game, in my personal opinion, too much it is not interesting that these movements should be very meditative, that is, they should be so meditative. their behavior is the smallest wrong behavior will cause a young person to go towards this mistake, maybe it's not bad , the code of ethics with updated rules will be implemented in our football again. mohammad talked about the performance of this discipline in the 2024 olympic games in paris. the head of the weightlifting federation started this meeting with an apology, the result of the olympics, our friends criticized, yes, we did not win a medal, it was our result. we apologize to the people for being weak. anoushi was mentally ill and was full of some unkindness. are the friends who are the main source of this weightlifting situation and our hands were empty since the first day when mr. nava said that we did not have a star to replace behdad. salimi, who was handed over to us , replaced sohrab moradi, who was 10 to 12 years old, from 12 years ago until now, all the results were given to us in the name of inakianoush rostami, and we won. jalal also says that he expected these results in the conditions we went to, and in my opinion, the kid's technical performance compared to themselves, maybe compared to competitors.

decency, the warmth of an olympic champion, but i think that he also has a great work ethic, this athlete has a great work ethic perseverance leads to such significant , weighty results. became the first for our country at this olympics; a little earlier, let us remind you, violetta bardelovskaya won silver. the belarusian trampoline jumping school has once again made people talk loudly about themselves. let us make the conclusion even louder. from now on, it is our country that is the trendsetter in this olympic sport. stanislav filipsky and alesya chuchura, tv news agency. the whole world knows that this... guy, this athlete, is the strongest athlete from belarus and he is truly the strongest on the planet at the moment. well, today we are cheering together for evgeniy zolotoy in academic rowing. his jealousy caused the bus to break down. the tentative new start time is 12:30. the olympics of scandals are yet another in women's boxing. another transgender person was beaten. scandals at the olympics have already created a wave critics. memes are appearing on social networks about how paris, under pressure from

this she's the ethics adviser without any ethics adviser without any ethics . we've seen two tier policing and two tier free speech, and now it's two tier ethics. >> but hang on, hang on. there's nothing illegal or against ethical rules to make a donation to an mp. >> no , but given the power sun, >> no, but given the power sun, give it. yes, exactly. >> it doesn't matter whether sue gray sun or not. >> it does. i think giving a pass as well. >> people give donations to mps all the time. virtually every tory mp has had donations from business people fine , but business people fine, but they're entitled to do that. >> but i didn't give him a parliamentary pass. when i've had money from you, i don't think i don't think the donor got a pass, did they? >> he got a pass to number 10. this is the media mogul, lord ali. yeah but that's not the donor who donated £10,000. yeah it is. he gave, he gave. so this is this is an update to the story i was talking about at the top of the show. he gave 500 k top of the show. he gave 500 k to labour during the election , to labour

ethics and just as important, ethics at large. when it comes to educating the next generation of lawyers, now is also the time to breath life into our best traditions. not out of some sent men attachment to times gone by. anyhow is a moment to focus on the practices of the past because those traditions matter so much to our future. we are members of an honorable profession with shared values, shared obligations in a community and mind you, the reason that teaching basic professional values feels so urgent to educators across the country is in part because this generation of students is coming to us with a very different set of civic habits than in years past. this is a group chose entire adult life has been steeped in social media, marinated in an often toxic partisan environment and marked by political gridlock and failure. i admire this generation. i actually love them. i'm deeply sympathetic for their desire to change and seriousness about affecting it but today's political cauldron are sometimes incompatible with the values of our profession and no one in this room should think that i'm telling the story about young people alone. this is a story about all of us. that is precisely why if left written by the deans after joon 6 warn the role that some of our own graduates played in the etc. leading to the talk on the capitol were lawyers who filed based not on the fact. they weren't willing lawyers, in other words. so the reason the deans across the country are redoubling to teach the fundamentals is that the everyday habits of lawyers are precisely the habits of citizenship that we all need to require. the harped work of lawyer criers -- lawyering requires humility and a relentless questioning of yourself. you cannot be a lawyer unless you understand deep in your bones what's honorable in our opponents' commits and the weaknesses in your own. lawyers don't just stand on the sideline, they get things done. they have to learn to reach agreement in communities defined in part by difference. lawyers are among the rare creatures to know how to go to war and go out for drinks afterwards. i always tell my students we don't just expect them to have conversations across the divides but friendships across the divides. it means habits of mind and community to be lawyers. we have always taught those values from the moment our students walk into the classroom to make the best argument from the other side, argument in which they disagree. that comes from putting people from radically different places and having to live and learn under the same room. that used to be enough but it is no longer. that's why in the list of commitments made by the deans to support our democracy. one of those included something simple and basic which is to teach our students to engage across partisan and ideological divides. it is quite telling that the deans felt it important to make that commitment in order to preserve the rule of law because today students, like the rest of us, are finding it a lot harder to bridge divides and sometimes with good reasons, a lot is on the line. right are under attack. detroitic values are eroding but while in movement makes it hard to hold fast to the values of the profession it's never been more important to do so. if lawyers and judges train to seek the truth, to think rigorously, to distance themselveses from their own commitments to see clearly. if they become polarized what, home is interest for everyone else? as the deans remarked in 2020, some members of profession covered themselves in shame but many put professional values above personal politics. so new programs and centers and clinics and classes to help address the erosion of our democratic norm. just as importantly we're doing all we can to reinforce values of the past might have gone unmentioned and untaught. we are saturating the schools with discussions about our own values. at yale it is not just the dean at orientation who talks about what it means to be a lawyer at these times but i asked the entire faculty to do so on the first day of class. we built a little program. we're launching a center on free speech. we have started teaching classes on ethics at large, the ethics of leadership. our faculty is hiring a more intellectually group of faculty member. we have democratically increased the number of veterans on our campus because they know better than anyone else how to work across differences. it was about 1% when i started. 7% now and tune in for my first year of class where the number has gone up even higher. every dean in this room could give you a list of the things that they are doing to double down on our commitments and all of these effort matter as much as the excellent work being done in clinics and classes and work shops on the rule of law because it can only hold when laurels and judges resist the gale forces of polarization. when they can distinguish fact from opinion. the rule of law is based on a profession that is trained to recognize we can argument about everything but we need to know there is no argument on the other side. the hardest thing to teach to our students these dayses is to explain how these two core v

ethics of imam reza, peace be upon him , embodied in his speech and behavior, is a model. it is perfect for the world. our conference, which was seen under the title of ethics and education in the life and teachings of imam reza, peace be upon him, is necessary due to the fact that ethics sometimes feels like a missing link in society. religion and if we have to go towards it and form a community of faith and form the most perfect example of those innocent gentlemen (peace be upon them) and we are at the head of the table of imam reza (peace be upon them) and with the discussion he had with the elite professors in this field , he came to the conclusion that these two days, the conference will be held with the presence of top ethics professors who are researchers in the field of ethics. . it was held by zahra fasa. in this ceremony, the memory of this divine scholar who was the imam of this mosque for many years, as well as the martyrs i was honored for its position. ayatollah seyyed mohammad hossein arsanjani was a member of the council of leadership experts and the late friday imam of fasa city, who in 1992 proclaimed the da'wa haq. thank you for your attention and cooperation with this series. good news, god bless you. in the name of god, greetings to you, with the p

ethics, the results of termination of pregnancy, that is , this embryo, it can be used for treatment, salvation, even saving other people from various diseases. but let's turn to the dictionary on biomedical ethics, here's what's written there: the ban on using an embryo or its tissue for biomedical research is based on the opposition... we need mechanisms, we need a certain degree of scientific and medical freedom. obviously, at some stages it is possible to do so quite calmly. and it is possible to use aborted human embryos, so-called fetal cells are used, but it is impossible to obtain them without, so to speak, killing the fetus, and a fairly large one, as is considered to have reached 12 weeks of its, so to speak, existence, i want to make a reservation right away, gennady tikhonovich sukhikh is a great professional, he is... a doctor of medical sciences, he heads the academician ulakov center for obstetrics and gynecology and perinatology, where his merits have been recognized by the state, he is a knight of the order of merit for the fatherland, he is a laureate of the state prize in science in 2022, and so on and so forth, he accepts the most difficult cases of his life, saves a huge number of people, his role is enormous in increasing the birth rate, he says something completely... fair, with which it is impossible not to agree, the so-called fetal therapy, it can save from a huge number of diseases, for example, from diseases of the central nervous system, down's disease, parkinson's, alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, kidney disease, male infertility, impotence, diabetes and many, many other diseases, and if you look at it from the point of view. the fact is that research in the field of embryonic stem cells is associated with something controversial, the right to decide whether this pregnancy will develop or not, belongs to the woman herself. tell me, where is the ethicsush biologically invaluable material that can not only save, but also revive another life down the drain, it is absolutely fair. sewer, but here the question arises: why were 2 million abortions performed? and what number of these 2 million abortions were mandatory, necessary to save, say, a woman's life, here a conflict arises between in the cause-and-effect relationship, you understand what i'm talking about, let's now look at how this law. number 180 fz correlates with article 17, paragraph 2 of the constitution of the russian federation. look, the basic human rights and freedoms are inalienable and belong to everyone from birth. that is , legally, a child in the womb of the mother, he is not considered a person. his rights are protected from birth, that is. pages and even the translation is so crudely done there unsuccessfully there these you know how not in russian everything from there sits uh jeffrey sachs uh sat under yeltsin that's what they did and what did they do on this fo

ethic was incredible. _ and his legacy. his work ethic was incredible. he _ and his legacy. his work ethic was incredible.day~ he — wrapping and he worked every day. he had a huge passion for what _ day. he had a huge passion for what he — day. he had a huge passion for what he did. he loved what he did~ _ what he did. he loved what he did~ his — what he did. he loved what he did. his records will be always be a _ did. his records will be always be a part— did. his records will be always be a part of hip—hop culture. if be a part of hip—hop culture. if you — be a part of hip—hop culture. if you are _ be a part of hip—hop culture. if you are in any club anywhere in if you are in any club anywhere ihlhe— if you are in any club anywhere in the world, you will be able to hear— in the world, you will be able to hear his _ in the world, you will be able to hear his voice. it in the world, you will be able to hear his voice.— to hear his voice. it was a very sad _ to hear his voice. it was a very sad way _ to hear his voice. it was a very sad way for- to hear his voice. it was a very sad way for him - to hear hi

help, both moral and ethical, political, and informational, and financial and military, but when i talk about the moral and ethical side, these people of course have no morals or ethicsyes, we are seeing this now, in my opinion, in real current life, we see from the outside what they themselves are doing there, but - these people have no... in fact, no morals or ethics, there are only their interests, we seem to have known about this for decades and centuries, but it is impossible to get used to this, of course, this tragedy will certainly remain an unhealed wound in the historical memory of all of russia, well, and for those who suffered, for you and for yours... shadows for those who lost the most precious thing a person has, children, these will be crows bleeding all their lives, so first of all i want to express my condolences once again, i will say about myself, my friends, i did not think that we would survive these long 20 years, but then as it turned out, life is stronger, and there are children, and there is responsibility that must be taken. for others, for those who are alive. in beslan itself, over the past years , old schools have been renovated and new

ethics did but the code of ethics in football was forgotten. but is a player who plays in a popular team and is looked upon by many young people and has morals and behavior allowed to do anything, a player who is in the national media every week. he is showing his games, in my opinion, we have nothing to do with anyone's personal life, but since he is a young teenager watching the game, in my personal opinion , this move is not very interesting. it is possible for a young person to go towards this mistake. don't have a code of ethics again the updated rules should be implemented in our football. hamid reza ajazi, radio and television news agency. but some countries, such as the persian gulf countries, due to the weakness in training athletes or the lack of manpower, went to buy medal winning athletes. this is a topic that does not match the spirit of competition between countries in sports. who defeated our amir ali azarpira with difficulty. this medal was named after bahrain, but where is the origin of this athlete? tajudinov is originally from dagestan and has been living in bahrain for several years and has been winning medals for this country. bahrain has four aryan athletes. it reached the 33rd place of the paris olympics. the republic of azerbaijan also has a coach. and rented athletes finished in the olympics and maybe this is the most ugly situation for a country to win a medal with the champion of another country. among the countries of the persian gulf region, after bahrain, jordan took the 74th place wi

or prevent it as you say . in our football is famous for ethics, and now i think that i have seen a lot of movies about how he implemented ethics in football, and everyone can see that it is possible, or another example in my mind, which i will not name now, because the player is famous, the coach of a player comes in front of him with his hand. you are so strict that maybe now we will say that now that he is too strict, he is a player. we got it, and according to your words, those institutions that should be included in order for these teachings to remain , do not exist or do not take any action. personally , my question is this, for example, the cultural part of the ministry of sports. it should not be included in this section, if you allow it, it is very short because one of the most important missions of the media is actually the so-called enlightenment. we didn't have it and the pollution that came from so-called professional football is much more, but let's remember that in the same period, the late parviz dehdari, neither the physical education organization nor the football federation stood behind him, and we saw that on

it's an ethical morass and it's a substained resonance and ethical morass as we have seen what's happened. multi-billionaires from the right-wing giving gifts of millions of dollars to supreme court justices at the same time these right-wing billionaires are funding legal to go to the supreme court to chief justice roberts is derelict in his responsibility. he should be cleaning this up and he's not and that's why we in congress are going to do it and constantly moving to the hard maga right taking away people's rights away taking the rights away. taking away a woman's right to choose. and even violating our democracies with this decision that presents are kings and if they do something they think is official they can do what nixon said whatever they want. we have 38 co-sponsors and it just is this the bill and our on the floor and we will be pursuing the best way to get that done. it's very important to us and i believe the american people are with us all the way. the woman in the back. >> looking ahead to september. >> don't cut a short, three. >> are you confident that you can offer to

several years, and we'd just like to 2024 meeting of the san francisco ethics commission [music] welcome to this over vow of san franc ethic'smmission. we are excited introduce t serve as a resource for city officials. the ethicky commission voters in 1993. toowel and guidelines for i cleaner those work nothing or with local gollow the rn support and enforcement the commission shapes theake them strong practical and enforceable. the public expects and deserves the government this serves them. this means serving the public without impropereersonal gain. the government's decise fairly and open low. however, this i the case. for this reason rules and guide to steer people away from violating the engage nothing uneth the ethicky commissions education and assistness for people working with local ncdes city employees, officersca lobbyists and others engaged in or with government. here are our work. we create newpolicies. help officials avoid conflictsge public disclosures, over seen finances and including rec and the administration of campaign aid the registration and reporting of lobbyists, campaign permit consultants and mirjcam

he has that football coach ethic, he is going to work 15, i6, 18 ethic, he is going to work 15, 16, 18 hour days ethicch has a _ not bother him. every good coach has a good _ not bother him. every good coach has a good strategy i not bother him. every good i coach has a good strategy and at the moment we are seeing some of those attacks coming in from republicans, but his military record, but his political record. how do you think he will handle that going forward? he think he will handle that going forward? , ., ., , ., forward? he is an honest man. he has nothing _ forward? he is an honest man. he has nothing to _ forward? he is an honest man. he has nothing to say, - forward? he is an honest man. he has nothing to say, he - he has nothing to say, he didn't do anything wrong. he has served the country for more than 20 years and when he decided... than 20 years and when he decided. . ._ than 20 years and when he decided... , ., , decided... sorry to interrupt, but i'm decided... sorry to interrupt, but i'm going _ decided... sorry to interrupt, but i'm going to _ decided... sorry to interrupt, but i'

ethics and integrity commission , ethics and integrity commission, which he promised to set up because it was going to be able to start independent inquiries independently without prime ministerial authorisation. but the prime minister, if he were so anti—sleaze and so holy as he pretends to be, could actually give this authority to sir laurie today to decide whether or to not investigate the chancellor. it seems to me that he definitely should. but the sleaze, alas, does not end there. the sunday times revealed lord alli, another labour party donon lord alli, another labour party donor, has been given a no ten pass, which is unusual for anyone other than civil servants, politicians, political advisers . but he did donate advisers. but he did donate £10,000 to sue grey's son's campaign. but the hero gave £16,000 to pay for the now prime minister's clothing for his makeover. here's what sir keir starmer was wearing before the donation. and here's what he's wearing after the donation. isn't it an amazing transformation? don't you see the personification of beauty now standing before you ? doesn't now standing before you? doesn't that impress you? and don't you think that for £16,000, perhaps the prime minister could have done a little bit better? he could have gone for the liberace ? could have gone for the liberace? look, i think that would have been appealing with some of those fine dame edna glasses or even, yes, with that much money, he could have found himself a double breasted suit, a tie and a pair of oxfords. but sartorial advice to one side, it's the hypocrisy that stinks. the labour party spent years engaging in the utmost sanctimony . it attacked the tory sanctimony. it attacked the tory party for its supposed cronyism at every turn, it virtue signalled, and sir keir starmer even came up with the platitude we are returning politics to pubuc we are returning politics to public service. well, sir keir starmer has been throwing stones in the glass house of number 10, downing street, and he really ought to be careful that this cronyism scandal doesn't shatter the centre of power before his very eyes. as ever, let me know what you think about humbugs very eyes. as ever, let me know what you think about humbu and oldroyd bolt, and the author and broadcaster eamonn archewell turner. i'm going to come to you first, amy, because you're on the left and you're not unsympathetic to sir keir starmer but he's a silly old goose, isn't he , that if you goose, isn't he, that if you prance around pretending that you're very holy, you can't afford in your first weeks of office to have your chancellor, who may have broken the rules and to be giving money by your mates and then giving them a pass, i think it's really difficult because with the case of lord alli , he is a donor, but of lord alli, he is a donor, but then he's also a labour peer and we don't actually know at this point what this temporary pass was actually for. >> so for all we know , maybe >> so for all we know, maybe they're planning us a surprise one off bonus donation to all households. fingers crossed. maybe he's setting up big brother again in i mean, the big breakfast in number 10. i mean, we don't know. he's a tv executive, but my point is that it's difficult to know. it's a bit of a revolving door. what came first, the expertise or the donation. and as long as you have political donations, you're going to have this problem. so my point is you shouldn't really have these big donors. >> that's fair enough . >> that's fair enough. >> that's fair enough. >> that's fair enough. >> that's where the problem is. >> that's where the problem is. >> but what i'm concerned about, it's not so much the past as the hypocrisy that keir starmer , hypocrisy that keir starmer, whenever anybody gave any money to boris , said, oh, they're on to boris, said, oh, they're on to boris, said, oh, they're on to something, they want something in return. and you can't do that if you're taking money yourself. >> but again, this whole thing comes back to taking money because whenever you give money, what do you expect in return? people will always see influence. they will see some some sort of contractual reciprocal situation when it comes to money, however. well with the political system , how with the political system, how it is, if labour didn't take donations , the conservative donations, the conservative party still did, then it wouldn't be able to compete at all. so it's a problem with donations and do you think the £16,000 has been well spent on making him look really beautiful? >> absolutely not. you don't. he doesn't. >> it's outrageous. >> it's outrageous. >> right . okay, so amy doesn't >> right. okay, so amy doesn't think he's beautiful. >> he could have paid a stylist for half that. and looked half >> he could have paid a stylist for half that. and loctake half it is, if labour didn't take donations , the conservative donations, the conservative party still did, then it wouldn't be able to compete at all. so it's a problem with donations and do you think the £16,000 has been well spent on making him look really beautiful? >> absolutely not. you don't. he doesn't. >> it's outrageous. >> it's outrageous. >> right . okay, so amy doesn't >> right. okay, so amy doesn't think he's beautiful. >> he could have paid a stylist for half that. and looked half decent. >> but david, the gold standard is stuart wheeler, who gave £5 million to the conservative party and would not accept anything in return. he didn't want an honour, he didn't want access. he just believed in pubuc access. he just believed in public service. amy's got a point, though, that that is quite rare. >> it is . >> it is. >> it is. >> but i would say to amy, there are two things you have to bear in mind. one is do you wish the state to fund political parties and activity as happens in other countries? well, that would be brilliant . countries? well, that would be brilliant. but given countries? well, that would be brilliant . but given the brilliant. but given the dwindling nature of political membership in this country, that would mean that in fact, the labour party, with its union backing, was given far more money and the conservative party would go away, which i don't think is particularly good for democracy. we have to ask, do we want to return to a standard that existed under, say, lloyd george, where people bought titles and honours in to order give to the political system and get something back? or do we want to set a much more stringent standard? jacobs instance of stuart wheeler is, i think, a perfectly good one, where you do this almost with an understanding that you will get nothing. you are doing this because you believe in the philosophical and principled mission of those political parties. i should hope that would be the case that the labour party has been hoist by its own petard so soon into government is, i think, a great shame for labour members who expected more, and the country that has a right to be given more by its political representatives. >> but isn't the rachel reeves thing actually more serious? and sir laurie magnus must be feeling a bit of a muppet at the moment, because there he is. as the prime minister's ethicsister said he's going to be given this extra authority and this ethics and integrity commission. but he's left swinging in the wind, isn't he? he isn't able to instigate an investigation. this chap got offered a job, which i think has now been rescinded . think has now been rescinded. the civil service commission didn't get the full information because apparently rachel reeves hadnt because apparently rachel reeves hadn't filled out her declaration of interest, so didn't know that this £5,000 had been donated to her. that really adviser to the treasury, which should have been the case in the first instance, sir laurie magnus must be feeling slightly silly on two counts. one is that this power that was promised has not materialised, and the other is that the civil servant with whom he worked closest, sue gray, is now in number 10, and it is indeed her son who received the money from lord alli personally. £10,000 to beckenham and penge labour constituency party, which is said to have res

ethical choice. that was the ethics he adopted in that moment. >> bob bauer, author of the unraveling.e are been through it and then at the height of things as you have been through in so many presidencies really reflect, and this is a really reflective book. thank you for writing it, take you for being here, thank you for all of your service to our country, too. great to see you. i got one more thing to tell you about before we go today. we are back after a very quick break. break. rs. don't miss out. get started today. our biggest challenge? uncertainty. hidden fees, surcharges... who knows what to expect! turn shipping to your advantage. keep it simple...with clear, upfront pricing. with usps ground advantage®. ♪♪ announcer>>> what if you could whiten your teeth by simply brushing your teeth? now you can with smileactives, the teeth whitening breakthrough that safely gets your teeth white and keeps them white every day just by brushing your teeth. christine>>> i never thought that whitening my teeth could be so easy. i just put the gel on the brush, the toothpaste on it, brush and i

ethics that members of congress have. >> stephen: there would be a binding code of ethics. >> senator sanders: a binding code of ethics,he constitution provides lifetime tenure but not necessarily on the supreme court. there are other federal courts as well. the other things biden is talking about. if you're an elderly person today, you know, i deal with this. i'm chairman of the committee. elderly people can't afford dental care. they can't afford hearing aids. they can't afford eyeglasses. he's talking about expanding medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing. he's talking about forgiving, you want to hear one of the craziest things, i think most of us agree that our health care system is broken, is it not? all right. we are the only major country not to guarantee health care to all and one of the insane, cruel aspects of that, somebody gets cancer. they got to worry about getting well. a quarter of the people who get cancer end up going bankrupt or losing their homes because of the enormous expense they undertake. can you imagine dealing with cancer or some other serious illness and then worrying about the finan

tell you more, it’s not customary for us to chat, it’s something like professional ethics, what kind of professional ethicsmpliments, okay, don’t argue, don’t, uh, that means her name was valentina and she worked as a rural teacher, and how tall she is, 25, 28 years old, maybe older, she wore a wig, where is she from? -from near st. petersburg, from ivantsov, or something, or from vankin, or maybe from ivanov, i don’t remember, okay, girls, thank you very much, excuse me, we don’t have much money, we didn’t tell you anything, you didn’t tell us anything paid, bye, bye, happily, listen, let's go, let's shake this bastard right now, come on, he's probably sold this valentina, then when we met she remembered everything to him, what will she tell us? i’ve made up my mind, there’s nothing to say to me, okay, then i ’ll tell you this, oh, i would give when checking the documents. you caught one girl, but didn’t let her go, you handed her over to a den, or rather sold her, she probably asked to let you go, but you didn’t let go, you didn’t regret it, you’re strong, you carry a pistol and a cap, when you took it o

ethical standards, i mean, where are the ethical standards? i see that media exactly, on all levels, even in music, in entertainment, in movies and i mean, and the level, the cultural level of the production, media production has, has taken asset." back and moving forward you have some kind of you know more media that is more oriented towards sexual attraction things like that that are superficial, mean it is nice also to show some love and some real beauty and respect for human life and human dignity, mean one could do that away from this vulgarity of this consumption society that's only based on buying and selling even when it comes to humans and "i think this is absolutely ridiculous. i mean, we could have a certain media level that respects ethics, and that doesn't mean that we want to be more conservative or more locked up, and no, we can be open about things and show them in a respectable way, and mature, in immature way, so therefore my conclusion is that arab media is going through decadence, and it's going through the rules of who pays more, so if you pay more, you know, and we have so many colleagues and journalists here in lebanon that were given offers." by some you know amirs and cheikhs and they have announced this and uh you know in order for them to be to work against the resistance and make publicity against the resistance anyway the americans also did not hide the fact that they will do anything and they will pay like billions of dollars to actually shatter and uh you know destroy the image of at least 500 million yes i remember that and and that's not and that's not an estimation that is what uh what uh american said, in the congress in order to actually see how they're spending their money, so they want to spend

ethical standards, i mean, where are the ethical standards? i see that media exactly, on all levels, even in music, in entertainment, in movies and i mean, and the level, the... level of the production, media production has, you know, has taken a set back, and moving forward, you have some kind of, you know, more media that is more oriented towards sexual attraction, things like that, that are superficial, i mean, it is nice also to show some love and some real beauty and respect for human life and human dignity, i mean, one could do that away from this vulgarity of this consumption society that's... only based on buying and selling, even when it comes to humans, and i think this is absolutely ridiculous, i mean we could have a certain media level that respects ethics, and that doesn't mean that we want to be more conservative or more locked up and no, we can be open about things and show them in a respectable way, in a mature in a mature way, so therefore my conclusion is that arab media is going through decadence and it's going through the rules of who pays more. 'if you pay more, you know, and we have so many colleagues and journalists here in lebanon that were given offers by some you know amirs and sheiks and they have announced this and order for them to be to work against the resistance and make publicity against the resistance anyway, the americans also did not hide the fact that they will do anything and they will pay like billions of dollars to actually shatter and you know destroy the image of paid at least 500 million'. and then that's not and that's not an estimation, that is what uh what uh the americans said in the congress in order to actually see how they're spending their money, so they want to spend a large amount of money to des

ethics reform. there are op-ed's from larry tribe, all of these people on the commission. that they were not allowed to give recommendation. to the other points, this ethics code is something that almost existed for the supreme court. after watergate there were a lot of good government rules being put into effect. also laws that would establish the ethicsmission that could have investigated any unethical behavior of the justices. unfortunately, they lobbied against their inclusion. we voted for five people, jesse helms, barry goldwater, joe biden, pat lahey. we are talking about a bipartisan bill 45-50 years ago. there should be a way to file a complaint, it is not a radical idea. it was put into place before mitch mcconnell's favor court, the ninth circuit, they said we will just take what the ninth circuit is doing. that was the way it developed. it is no more dangerous than having the senate ethics committee or house ethics committee. host: we will go to nikki, rockaway park, new york, independent. caller: good morning, america. i wonder sometimes how did our nine supreme court justices when there are 13 judicial district? i also wonder how did any other federal judge including aileen cannon, donald trump's court master who presides over his last criminal trial was decided to be a special master over the supreme court. it just gave

ethics in that person's integrity? do that person have ethics? are they planning on using ethicsor the rest of the united states of america, that we might see who this person really is? we know who he is. he has already shown us that time and time again. we hear him every day on television continue to live it, so where's the ethics? -- to lie, so where's the ethics? host: it sounded like will manz or her own question, but henry, do you have any comments? guest 2: use on donald trump remain sharply polarized, they don't change very much. his friends see him as someone who fights for them. his foes see him as an unethical, sleazy manipulator who is bent on -- this is a glass is half full, half empty situation, and we will not get any closer to answering that. guest 1: a lot of republicans who might be inclined to vote for him would not call them ethical. i do not think he is a moral individual, but he might be overlooked at. i think it is worth sitting back and reminding ourselves, yes, 50/50, donald trump has never come close to a majority. even when he won in 2016, he lost the po

ethics in that person's integrity? do that person have ethics? are they planning on using ethicsor the rest of the united states of america, that we might see who this person really is? we know who he is. he has already shown us that time and time again. we hear him every day on television continue to live it, so where's the ethics? -- to lie, so where's the ethics? host: it sounded like will manz or her own question, but henry, do you have any comments? guest 2: use on donald trump remain sharply polarized, they don't change very much. his friends see him as someone who fights for them. his foes see him as an unethical, sleazy manipulator who is bent on -- this is a glass is half full, half empty situation, and we will not get any closer to answering that. guest 1: a lot of republicans who might be inclined to vote for him would not call them ethical. i do not think he is a moral individual, but he might be overlooked at. i think it is worth sitting back and reminding ourselves, yes, 50/50, donald trump has never come close to a majority. even when he won in 2016, he lost the po

ethical side, these people, of course, have no morals or ethics, and we are seeing this now, in my opinion, in real life current life, from the outside, we see what they themselves are doing there, but these people have no, in fact, no morals, no ethicse are only their interests, we seem to know about this, for decades and centuries, but it is impossible to get used to it, of course, this tragedy will certainly remain an unhealed wound in the historical memory of all of russia, first of all i want to express my condolences once again, of course, these days we remember the fighters of the special services, the fighters. in the fsb special forces, who covered children with their bodies, remember our fallen comrades from the ministry of internal affairs, the ministry of emergency situations, we - in previous years tried to help beslan, built a whole program. and there is responsibility that must be taken for others, for those who are alive, all these years they tried to help the former hostages, but as it was said at the meeting, some need support even today. as far as i understood, from the documents that i read, when i was on my way to meet you, there is a problem related to the fact that women who have children, small children still,

ethical side, then these people, of course, have no morals or ethics, yes, we are seeing this now, in my opinion, in real current life, from the outside we see what they themselves are doing there, but these people, in fact, have no morals or ethics, there are only their interests. we seem to know about this for decades and centuries, but it is impossible to get used to it, of course, this tragedy will certainly remain an unhealed wound in the historical memory of all of russia, first of all i want to express my condolences once again, of course, these days we remember the fighters. special services, fighters of the fsb special forces, who covered children with their bodies, remember our fallen comrades from the system of the ministry of internal affairs, the ministry of emergency situations, in previous years we tried to help beslan whole. program built in support of the city, the people who live here, we will certainly continue this, as for those opponents of our enemies that i mentioned, they continue this work, with an attempt to destabilize our country, this is obvious, and since we fought terrorists, today we have to fight those who commit crimes in the kurbsk region, in ... in donbass, in novorussiya, but just as in the fi

indeed, what's actually happened to starmer's ethics and integrity commission , ethics and integrityich he promised to set up because it was going to be able to start independent inquiries independently without prime ministerial authorisation. but the prime minister, if he were so anti—sleaze and so holy as he pretends to be, could actually give this authority to sir laurie today to decide whether or to not investigate the chancellor. it seems to me that he definitely should. but the sleaze, alas, does not end there. the sunday times revealed starmer was wearing before the donation. and here's what he's wearing after the donation. isn't it an amazing transformation? don't you see the personification of beauty now standing before you ? doesn't now standing before you? doesn't that impress you? and don't you think that for £16,000, perhaps the prime minister could have done a little bit better? he could have gone for the liberace ? could have gone for the liberace? look, i think that would have been appealing with some of those fine dame edna glasses or even, yes, with that much money,

american were founded on work ethic and practice the work ethic and this is what we want.ortunity to hold a job in america. everyone here is to clock in and do a full day's work or just an to make it seem like a real job. spend a job as part of the american way of life and we are going to help you find a job so you can get a piece of the pie and you can pay taxes and become part of that american dream. >> the dream isn't working. schemes like this run under the government's comprehensive education and training act and have a high dropout rate and many trainees end up back where they began on welfare. the men and women who administer cbs and other similar programs to officials of the department of health education and welfare are dedicated people. their motives are good. their achievements are not. the results of these programs have been disappointing. why? >> i believe the basic reason is because it's very hard to achieve good objectives through bad means and that means we have been using are bad in two different perspectives. inin the first place all of thee programs invo

ethics. what is that morality? what is that ethics? well, in the modern day we can see that there's moral. relativism being thrown around this immorality and immorality are strongly in the field competing for for the rule of law competing within society generally from a cultural social political base. so what is, what is the the the fity, the natural, primordial uh and most fair and balanced uh sense of justice in this world? well, the quran is very clear, it gives some very clear guidelines and i think you know they're based on wisdom, a wisdom which is beyond human, because it requires the beyond human analysis of humanity itself and the in order to create a balanced uh sense of what justice really is. so i think islam is the only faith i think who has which has that that complete if you like if you like if you like holistic sense of what justice is and i think it's for us to explore and to look at the the principles and there are jurisprudents who do it a professional basis within the world of islam and they vary in their views etc. but there is something called which is there constantly to refresh justice based on time and and place. and circumstance and situation, this is something certainly with within the that exists, which is very powerful mechanism to ensure that justice is made relevant to every time and place. absolutely, brother maso, i don't - you wanted to come in on that that question as well, yes, i think i think is you're discussing something which is very vast, human right, justice, dignity, the fact is that allah says in the quran that he has given human being, social being, and what allah gives, no one could take it away, so no one has got the right of removing dignity from human beings, because this is a god given gift, and so within that, then there is the issue of sharia and so forth, if somebody does wrong, how they will be treated and everything, but it starts from the basic principle that allah has given dignity. to mankind and then the concept of the justice, then allah says in the quran, how could you not rise and fight for sake of those oppressed men, women and children who are saying your allah, send us a protector, now you know in the in the concept of gaza right now, you know where is this justice seeking community that rises up to this, you look at the streets of london and so forth, you see them, they're muslims, the... non-muslims and this call is not just to come and help muslims, it's to help any oppressed, so allah loves the oppressed people, you know, at one time, at the time of fron were the bani israel, and right now, right now today are people in gaza, so how do we do that, and i think basic principle of quran when it comes to the concept of justice and karama, dignity, is... "the quran has come to stop the law of jungle, you a law of jungle that you don't have to live in jungle, you could live in west right now, but the law of jungle is actually what is being implemented, look how netanyahu was praised in united state for doing what, killing children, women and so forth, so really what united states establishment is doing is plasing the law of..." jungle is promoting the law of jungle quran has come to stop that and and so really the guidance in there, the concept of justice, the concept of karama is all comes together to stop mankind going towards that destruction which is the law of jungle and the arrogance of power, yeah absolutely, and it's interesting becauseud the mentioned the west for example, "and there is a sense of lawlessness really in how world affairs a so-called rules-based order, which doesn't really exist, but for the last let's say 200 years, if not more, the west has weaponized in particular women's rights uh to then justify attacking the muslim world or intervening, we've seen actually physical military interventions as well on this uh pretext if you will, you know, but what rights does the quran actually afford women? well, when the quran is revealed, it's on in the backdrop of a..." what's the period of jahiliah in which they buried daughters alive, mean they buried them, this is the state of the situation when the prophet arrives, even in the the the persian sasenith empire or within the byzantine empire, the rights of women were not at the level that we would expect really a civilized society have in the modern age, and the prophet brings with with him equality, but not the kind of equality we're talking about now, it's a equity rather than equality, the term equality itself is a... tool, as you've kind of hinted, it's a political tool to really divide and to to create trouble and problems by telling somebody, oh you're not equal, it can be equally a method of being able to rile them up. so today we've got um, we've got race wars, we've got gender wars, we've got you, feminists moving in on on these issues, the lgbt movement, all of this is to me, i mean, i don't have a problem with equality, and the quran certainly doesn't have a problem with having people treated fairly and justly, but when you weaponize such things in a way where they become a means for the powerful, the already powerful to divide the ordinary people in order to create further oppression and to uh plunder even more, this... what the west is particularly doing these days and has has done for many, many centuries now, it's it's a lot of this is become a game, so women get used, the all the vulnerable minorities, they'll get used as a way of creating division and atomizing society. islam is not about atomization of society and just focusing on individualism, it's about the collective, it's about families, it's about community, it's about bringing the world together and the ummah is not just uh the... the muslims, uma is regarded as being all humanity, but under the umbrella of a just uh system, a system in which there can be moral, genuine moral guidance which which promotes mercy, compassion, love, kindness, all of these values which would all relate to, no matter who we are, black, white, brown, whatever religion, but somehow whilst the west says it is doing that, the reality is very, very different, they discriminate, they plunder, they divide, they rule based on the... lies and the use of narratives uh, which are all very benign and nice sounding, but in reality their tools for control. best example of that is the um, the different value given to life, so you saw the difference in ukraine for example, where refugees were welcomed, and you had news reporters and pundits and politicians literally using the words, oh but these are civilized people, but then in gaza, where even british citizens aren't given assistance by the consulate or the embassy there, unless they were working with the intelligence services and they were told you can't leave unless you collaborate, so uh there is even even when it comes to the value of life, those differences there - now another important source in the search for the rights of man is the treaties of rights or written by imam zain abidin, the son of imam hussein, we take a look at some of those rights outlined in the short but powerful work. the west mistakenly ts the magnacarta as the first charter of rights ever be documented, but if you go back in history, there are other documents that predate the magnacarta by 600 years, such as risalatul, the treatis and rights authored by zainal abedin, the fourth imam in the jaferi school of thought. it's a profoundly spiritual islamic text that delineates some of the rights and responsibilities that individuals owe to god, themselves, their family and society. comprising over 50 rights, this treatis serves as a comprehensive ethical framework that underscores the importance of justice, compassion and respect for all individuals. today, the politicians of the world claim to adopt the un declaration of human rights, but it is a well-known fact that their hypocrisy and their application all over the world shows the ineffectiveness of man-made laws, where individualism reigns and the... collective nature of humanity and nations are not accounted for, in the context of the modern world where human rights are frequently violated, imam zain abidin's work remains remarkably pertinent. for instance, in gaza palestine, the ongoing oppression illustrates the severe transgressions of basic human rights, the right to family life, bodily security and freedom from oppression, all emphasized in resal. are continuously undermined by military aggression, blockades and political instability. these inhumane conditions suffered by innocent civilians, facing daily threats to their lives and dignity, highlight the urgent need for moral