about this , this is a film by a russian director, the one who says that she is not russian, but russian-canadiancause daria posel wrote a very resonant post, so she told me that you also had to see it all, i sympathize with you once again, although i myself sometimes watch some kind of propaganda, as... for reviews, but it's all terrible hard to watch please tell us your impressions of this russian film. he is still russian, although he is positioned as french-canadian. and what was the most important impression you observed from the audience at the venice film festival, because we are all constantly frightened by the fact that russia is pushing its propaganda and everyone is following it in a row, is it really so, or is it really going down very well? to the audience of the film festival, and yes, this film is made to the maximum, and this film is made for, it is precisely aimed at an international audience, which, let's say, plays pacifism and is lulled by this darkness, it seems to me that it is already darkness when you have to... to justify everyone, but it seems to me that this is the just

now being encrypted no no as a russian woman, that is, she positions herself everywhere as a russian-canadian director, and the producers also call their film french-canadian, not russian, we see these russian soldiers with whom the director spent seven years. those of their lives, who let her there, again, we ourselves understand, and judging by what dasha described, the film evokes sympathy for the russian military, she also writes that the director in no way emphasizes that russia started this war in 2014, a war it starts on the 22nd, and in general, one wonders how ukraine could do such a thing, after all, this has never happened, that is, again, there is no reflection that russia has been constantly attacking various countries for many, many years, and this is no wonder, that is, aggression in ukraine, well, on sorry, not surprising. and i want to quote daria baselya, here she writes, i quote: she addresses, by the way, she wrote her post in english, she addresses foreigners, this is very important, because... we need to communicate, and while the new our minister is getting used to a ne

cinematographers, she is now coded as a russian woman, that is, she positions herself everywhere as a russian-canadian director, and the producers also call their film french-canadian, not russian, we we see these russian soldiers, with whom the director spent seven months of her life, who let her there, again... we understand the same thing, and judging by what dasha described, the film evokes sympathy for the russian soldiers, she also writes, that the director does not at all emphasize that russia started this war in 2014, it starts the war from the 22nd, and in general she is very surprised how my country could do such a thing, after all, such a thing... has never happened, that is, again after all, there is no reflection that russia is constantly attacking different countries for many, many years, and this is not surprising, that is, aggression in ukraine, unfortunately, is not surprising. and i want to quote daria baselya, here she writes, i quote, she addresses, by the way, she wrote her post in english, she addresses foreigners, this is very important, because we need to communicate, and while

wanted to ask olya about this film by a russian director who says that she is not russian, but russian-canadianuse daria pysel wrote a very resonant post, so she told me that you also had to watch it all, i sympathize with you once again, although i myself sometimes watch some russian propaganda for reviews, but it is all terribly difficult to watch, please tell me your impression of it. a russian film, it is still russian, although it is positioned as a french-canadian one, and what is most important, you observed the impression of the audience at the venice film festival, because we are all constantly scared that russia is pushing its propaganda and that everyone in a row it is conducted, is it really so, does it really go down very well with the film festival audience, huh? so this film is made as much as possible, and this film is made for the fact that it is precisely aimed at the international audience, which, let's say, plays pacifism and is under the spell of this dark, it seems to me that this is already the dark side of europeanism, when you try to all justify, but it seems to me that

ask olya about this, this film by a russian director, who says that she is not russian, but russian-canadianbecause daria the deputy wrote a very resonant post, so on... they said that you also had to watch it all, i sympathize with you once again, although i myself sometimes watch some russian propaganda for reviews, but it is all terribly difficult to watch, and please tell me your impressions of this film in russian, it is still russian, although it is positioned as french-canadian, and most importantly, what impressions did you observe from the audience at the venice film festival, because we are all constantly scared that... russia is pushing its propaganda and everyone is following it in a row, is it really is that true or is she really goes down very well with the film festival audience. and yes, this film is made to the maximum, and this film is made for the fact that it is just hidden for this international audience, which, let's say, plays pacifism and is lulled into this dark, i think it's already dark, when you try to all to justify, but it seems to me that this is the justificat

let me remind you that it was shot by the russian-canadian director anastasia trofimova. film justifies the actions of the russian occupiers, it was already shown at the venice film festival. strategy of resistance. a book by a military journalist, colonel yevgeny silkin, was presented in the capital. the event took place within the framework of the book country festival, which started yesterday at vdng. the publication contains facts, comments, images of the military, as well as stories about fierce battles with the enemy. the author of the publication also answers many questions about the actions of the armed forces in the first weeks of the full-scale war. this book tells about what strategic decisions and what operational, tactical changes in the situation were in the period from the beginning of the invasion to june 2022. it should be understood why this is important, because the initial period of the war, the one that russia is waging against ukraine, it played a significant role in the further history of ukraine, what ukraine endured. there is also a share of those

anastasia trofimova, now we can see her, is a director who positions herself as russian-canadian, and she filmed for world languages. but she also shot for rasha then, she shot quite a lot of films and visited the hostilities, and here she filmed a documentary called russians at war, and here she tells us that now we can also see excerpts from this film, and she tells us that she met a military man, a ukrainian, on the train, who is fighting on the side of the dpr, and he says, let's anastasia, come to us and film our war without... problems - says anastasia, and for seven months, and she is filming this war, there she is just very much the same, and she it sits there for seven months completely unnoticed by various special services and simply communicates with the military and films them and then edits a tape from all this and sends it to the venice film festival, where it goes in the non-competitive program, by the way, together with our film, or with our two, or rather... tapes, and there she receives a lot positive reviews, we ukrainians, our ukrainian girls, producers, directors,

the toronto film festival cancelled the screening of the film by the russian-canadian directed by anastasia, russians at war. the film tells about the beginning of a special military operation and has already been shown at the venice film festival. even the day before , the festival organizers claimed that they would show the film, despite the protests of the ukrainian diaspora in canada, and its representatives stated that in their opinion the film justifies the russian military, while in toronto there were rallies for several days in the address open a discount season at the nearest gazprombank office at the megamarket, millions of goods at at favorable prices, for example, a high chair for feeding wounds for 6,930 rubles. megamarket, with bated breath and... he approached a huge house with friendship, what will he find here? his hands were terribly weak, he was afraid that he would let go and drop the axe, not a single moment could be lost anymore, a classic, if only vtb were there then, this is not a way out, i have nowhere to go, study, apartment, my sister got ready, read, i know what

toronto film festival , under pressure from the ukrainian diaspora , the screening of the film by russian-canadianector anastasia trofimova, russians at war, was cancelled. the protesters did not like the author's point of view. about this film, and i want to say that i also share this concern. ukraine is ready to show the world only its reality, if necessary, pay for it. the mayor of kievali ordered filming of himself and his family by german documentary filmmakers. the frame is brave. major countries from china to india and brazil are in favor of peace, and i support this. this is because of the position of the eu leaders. europe has become pro-war, we need to move away from this. this is possible if we seriously start talking about the fact that it is time to get out of the trenches and understand that this is not our war. there is no solution to the conflict on the battlefield. this idea was launched by our peace mission, thus we launched huge discussions in europe. even the main beneficiary conflict, it seems, is in no hurry with the next tranche. the us may suspend assistance. also, over the

toronto film festival, under pressure from the ukrainian diaspora, the screening of the film by russian-canadianector anastasia trofimova, russians at war, was cancelled. the protesters did not like the author's point of view, saying that it justifies moscow's actions. the canadian government, which is used to applauding the nazis, of course, agreed. ukrainian diplomats and the ukrainian-canadian community expressed great concern about this film. and i want to say that i share this concern. ukraine is ready to show the world only its reality, and if necessary, pay for it. kyiv mayor vitaliy klyuchko ordered filming from german documentary filmmakers, about himself and his family. in the frame, he bravely fights for freedom, and his children, not in the trenches, but abroad, talk about how they dream of becoming professional athletes. how will you rate masterpiece german viewers who sent kiev the lion's share of their taxes, it is still unclear. one thing is clear, more and more eu countries, including germany, are thinking about switching to the so-called peaceful one. europe has become pro-war,

at the toronto film festival, under pressure from the ukrainian diaspora, the screening of russian-canadian director anastasia trofimova's film russians at war was cancelled. protesters did not like the author's point of view, from china to india and brazil, they are in favor peace, and i support it. this is because of the position of the eu leaders. europe has become pro-war, we need to move away from this. this is possible if we seriously start talking about the fact that it is time to get out of the trenches and understand that this is not our war. there is no solution to the conflict on the battlefield. our peace mission launched this idea, thereby we launched huge discussions in europe. even the main beneficiary of the conflict seems to be in no hurry with the next tranche. the us may suspend assistance to ukraine of approximately $6 billion due to disagreements in congress on the new budget project, funds intended to extend the program of transferring weapons from the stockpiles of the american army, if the conservative democrats do not agree by the end of the month, kiev will receive

russians at war - a film by the russian-canadian director anastasia trofimova, which for more than six months spent with the russian occupiers in eastern ukraine. there will be russian oil now'. to be supplied not by lokoel, but by the hungarian energy company mol. and kyiv will not be able to stop deliveries, because it is impossible to impose sanctions on the supplier from the eu, as it is impossible to impose sanctions on russian manufacturers, - said the director of the a95 consulting company serhii kuyun. and accordingly, we all understand that the russians are making money from this, the hungarians will also make money from this, since... it is already obvious to everyone that there is a very large dependence there, and the dependence is rather economic, not economic, even, but political, since there is every reason to believe that russia provides huge discounts on this oil, and by earning money on this cheap oil, orban can finance his regime. and we ask you to join the collection, we need funds for drones and a charging station for reconnaissance of the third sso regiment. which

where it started, anastasia trofimova, now we can see her, a director who positions herself as russian-canadianed for world broadcasters, but also filmed for rashi tudei, she shot and visited quite a lot of films. in hostilities, and here she filmed a documentary called "russians at war", and now she tells us that now we can also excerpts from this film to see, and she tells that she met a military man on the train, a ukrainian who is fighting on the side of the dpr, and he says: "come on anastasia, come to us and stop our war, no problems, anastasia says, and seven months , and she is filming this war, just by herself, and she sits there for 7 months completely unnoticed by various special services and simply communicates with the military, and films them, and then edits a tape of all this and sends it to the venice film festival, where he is in a non-competitive program, by the way, together with our film, and with our two, more precisely, tapes, and there she receives a lot of positive feedback, we... ukrainians, our ukrainian girls, producers, directors, who went to the venice film festival

olya about this and this film by a russian director , and who says that she is not russian, but russian-canadian? because darya posel wrote a very resonant post, so she told me that you also had to see all this, i sincerely sympathize with you, although i myself sometimes watch some russian propaganda for reviews, but it's all terribly difficult to watch, but please tell us your impressions of this russian film, it is still russian, although it is positioned as a french-canadian one, and what were the main impressions you observed from the audience? at the venice film festival, because we are all constantly scared that russia is pushing its propaganda and everyone is following it, is it really so, does it really go down very well with the film festival audience? ah, yes, this movie is made to the max, and this movie is made to be just rocked on international audience. which, let's say, plays pacifism and is under the spell of this darkness, it seems to me that this is already a topic of shame when you try to... justify everyone, but it seems to me that this is the justification of war criminals

russians at war is a film by the russian-canadian director anastasia trofimova, who spent more than sixths with the russian occupiers in eastern ukraine. only 3% of the general news about crimea in foreign media is about human rights violations. such data were provided by representatives of the crimean law enforcement agency. groups on the peninsula are often mentioned in europe in the context of hostilities. the political prisoners we are fighting for are 1%. the topic, for example, the persecution of the crimean tatars, even less, than 1%, although we know that all these countries strongly support the crimean tatars, yes, and provide support, and help families and so on, but in their media, it is less than 1%, this is the topic. we will meet with you less. in less than an hour, read more news on our website espresso.tv, also on our social networks, join, put your favorites, my colleagues, oksana vysochanska and roman chaika, will continue, don't switch, stay with the espresso team. good morning to those who join teru espresso. we are glad to be here with you the qr code is an opportun

all started, anastasia trafima... and now we can see her, a director who positions herself as russian-canadiand she filmed for world broadcasters, but she also filmed for russia there, she shot quite a lot of films and visited combat operations, and here she filmed a documentary called russians at war, and here she tells that now we can also see excerpts from this film, and she tells us that on the train she met a military man, a ukrainian, fighting on the side of the dpr, and he says: come on anastasia, come to us and stop our war, no problem - she says anastasia, and 7 months, she this war films, she is just the same person there, and she sits there for seven months completely unnoticed by various special services and simply communicates with the military and films them, and then edits a tape of all this and sends it to... the venice film festival, where it goes in the out-of-competition program , by the way, together with our film, or with our two, more precisely, tapes, and there she receives a lot of positive feedback, we ukrainians, our ukrainian girls, producers, directors, who went to

against this background, all ukrainian russophobes were literally enraged by the film by the russian-canadian anastasia trofimova russian set wor, that is, russians at war, presented at the venice film festival. the ukrainian reaction was almost immediate. the head of the office also went into convulsions along with the telethon. what did the ukrainians dislike so much? it's simple: in her film, trofimova dared to show a ukrainian soldier who fights for russia, declaring that the war actually didn't start in 2022, but in 2014, when... even when i fight in a fight, i always need to know that i'm right. i went today so that my children wouldn't go tomorrow. the film, the film that is called anti-war, it tries to whitewash the russian soldiers, does not call them invaders who attacked another state, and does not talk about a full-scale invasion, a war of occupation of foreign territories. moreover, the film is filled with classic russian. this deep awareness that the talk can very quickly begin about a european continental war, about a global war, is understood by the establishment, and not all