you about and we will have you back another time to talk about what is going on your department of science and technology. we know there is a new bit of law, online safety bill, the regulator ofcom is consulting on exactly how the new rules will work. will you connect to use your power to get the regulator to fill in some of the loopholes that containers for kids and digital safety experts have already identified, for example the rules as they stand would allow unknown adults to ask their kids to be a friend online, to send friend requests? just one example. you have the power to tell ofcom to fill in the power to tell ofcom to fill in the gaps that some campaigners are worried about. will you do that? i have already exercise those powers since i was appointed, and i will close loopholes. i really hope i can come back on the show on talk about all the opportunities we have if we get technology and the harnessing of the digital world we are moving towards right. we can only exploit these opportunities if we get safety right at the beginning, i am looking at all the international evidence at the moment, be

office of science and technology policy to the white house where persistent directors or love for the voiceover portfolios portfolios entitled ares i worked on. i do that i was a programmatic departments of defense and justice. >> i'm great, director of the security and surveillance project at the center for democracy and technology. cdt is washington, d.c. based civil rights and civil liberties organization. we've gotten into ai in a big way. in fact, we do a weekly meeting that we call a big ai meeting. it involves roughly a third of the staff, because a lot of the different projects at cdt are involved in one aspect of ai or another. my piece of the pie is to try to keep government surveillance in line and to make it so we surveilled the right people and not the wrong people, and ai is going to play a part in that. before i got to cdt 17 years ago, i was at the american civil liberties union here in washington for 12 years. >> so thank you for that. hopefully will have no hallucinations during the spell, but we will first turn, peter, to you. as you beginning to do give that broad overview with a kind of cargoes are an what you know doj's think a. >> i think greg set up the challen

and more of an impact in deterring certain students in certain departments ? >> in s.t.e.m., it is the most pronounced. one s.t.e.m. faculty member -- science, technology, engineering and math. one s.t.e.m. chemist professor ken higher as many students as an entire office. one chemistry student can hire 21 students and the dean of students willie harris 15. when we think what's needed to go to graduate school for any science and or to get into any job, having an internship is huge but yet the gatekeeping that happens in s.t.e.m. at the funneling out hurt students of color, women and lower income college students. what i show in the book is it doesn't just affect -- both present and future prospects. if you can't get the job because you're not comfortable in office hours, you can't get opportunities until it's too late. i would say that the way in which s.t.e.m. faculty needs to grapple with this, -- high knowledge disciplines like philosophy or history. all those things where you are going to major in it in undergrad and probably go to law school type of major. discipline does matter. >> thank you very much. >> >> book tv brings you the latest from c-s

of science, research and technology, article 13 , specifically states that if any public or private company which requires research work and it is developed, if he signs a contract with other departments such as universities, research institutes, even scientific companies, the amount that is actually contracted will be deducted from the tax amount of that year or even from the tax of the next year . a hardware was prepared in the company. in cooperation with ayatollah boruj erdi university, we wanted the artificial intelligence of this university to design and research the software of this device . we defined a project with the university to complete the project. according to the capacities provided by this law, universities can attract research credits to have the necessity and method of cooperation between scientific and executive centers, the guidelines for the use of tax credits in article 13 of the law on the leaps of knowledge-based production, the methods of developing mission orientation and focusing on provincial issues in universities are among the axes of this meeting. about 550 companies in the country have been able to use the so-called capacity of this law. now, either t

science and even creating it. >> like discovering new ways to integrate technology with the human body it's unique culture of transformation that leads to solutions that best serve our veterans. >> that departmentrans affairs were innovation ensures those who served our nation are served by the barrier best see our career at va can transform your future this situation room with wolf blitzer week night at six, cnn former president barack obama had a message for black men thinking about voting for donald trump thinking about sitting out, or supporting somebody denigrating you sign of strength. because that's what being a man is >> and you all know some of those runs commentator bakari sellers, he's also a former south carolina state representative and author of the moment thoughts on the race reckoning that wasn't and how we can all move forward now, bakari, good to see you good to see you. thank you for having me. >> i'm so i'm so glad you're here to have this conversation because when the former president gave that, he gave a campaign rally speech later that night. but this was what we just watched it with a clip of him stopping by field office there in pittsburgh. it made so many waves and eve

. >> chris bryant chris bryant is the department of science and technology at questions, which is immediately before prime minister's questions. of course, as soon as it starts, we go right to you. that was the manifesto commitment, say laboun manifesto commitment, say labour. it was to not increase taxes on working people for the duration of this parliament. >> well, first of all, it said in black and white we will not increase national insurance. it didn't draw a distinction between employers and employees on this ridiculous working people sort of loophole. they're trying to winkle out rachel reeves herself about two years ago, when rishi sunak tried to do the same thing. thankfully, since reversed, she said that this was a tax on working people. so rachel reeves own analysis of this tax rise says that it's a tax on working people. they've really got nowhere to go here. it is a straightforward black and white breach of a manifesto promise, and the public are going to feel like they were lied to during the election campaign. >> they are afraid it is a problem. having a budget so far, 16 week