iwill turn are ready to rescue our country from labour. i will turn us from labour. labour, you cannot afford labour, you cannot afford labour, i cannot afford labour, lord alli cannot afford labour! cheering and applause let us be honest, as a patriot, i want what is best for our country. so i always want our country. so i always want our country to succeed. labour have already shown us who they are. they are the most venal and vindictive administration in decades. keir starmer is not just making pensioners pay for his union paymasters, he is undermining freedom of speech in our universities, he is trashing our border security and instead of keeping us safe, he want to police smoking in beer gardens. he is freeing criminals, not standing up for the police. i know what it is like when a labour government does not have your back. the last labour government left our trips without body armour in iraq and without helicopters in afghanistan and as your prime minister, i will never abandon those on the front line. applause. because, friends... i will always stand up for th

what annoys me even more, i have been in the labour party— more, i have been in the labour party all—in the labour party all of— more, i have been in the labour party all of my life, angela rayner. _ party all of my life, angela rayner, who i prefer as labour leader. — rayner, who i prefer as labour leader, the notion we have not broken — leader, the notion we have not broken any rules, we hear the same — broken any rules, we hear the same coming from labour supporters, you have not broken any rules, — supporters, you have not broken any rules, it _ supporters, you have not broken any rules, it is not the point. what — any rules, it is not the point. what you _ any rules, it is not the point. what you have done is disgusting and obnoxious. why is it disgusting _ disgusting and obnoxious. tang is it disgusting and disgusting and obnoxious. “tie"uy is it disgusting and obnoxious? go ahead, please. you is it disgusting and obnoxious? go ahead, please.— is it disgusting and obnoxious? go ahead, please. you go ahead. labour is supposed _ go ahead, please. you go ahead. labour is supposed t

there — wish i hadn't voted labour. there are _ wish i hadn't voted labour.e millions like him out there worried about your budget. what would you say to billy poynter and was he rightm _ billy poynter and was he right... was he wrong to vote for you? _ right... was he wrong to vote for ou? ~ ., ., right. .. was he wrong to vote for you?— right... was he wrong to vote for ou? ., ., , for you? what i would say is, i do understand _ for you? what i would say is, i do understand the _ for you? what i would say is, i do understand the concerns i for you? what i would say is, i. do understand the concerns that people have. i genuinely do. that is why we are protecting the most vulnerable with pension credit, making sure that everybody he is entitled to pension credit takes up the pension credit which guarantees winter payments. we are fixing the foundations and stabilising the foundations and stabilising the economy. what that allows us to do is commit absolutely to the triple lock and that means that for millions of pensioners next year, the pensions go up to up

so i think it does labour. i think having boris back on the scene is a great boon for labour. s the heat off labour's own problems over the last couple of weeks. distraction, absolutely. it's a good distraction and also it reminds you of the chaos because, you know, it wasn't just the chaos of changing prime ministers, it was the chaos. whilst boris was prime minister. this, as we say, complete split personality between, you know, is he going to are we going to wake up and find it's kind of, you know, tough boris, a right wing boris or net zero woke, you know , pro mass migration boris. know, pro mass migration boris. so it just reminds us of the absolute inconsistency that we had under the tories, as well as personnel. but in terms of policy, it does highlight, however, how boring keir starmer is by comparison. well i think i mean, yes i mean i don't think, i don't think when and i hope it's not for many years to come. you do the key interview, to be honest, just because i think that bigger political characters are better for copy, they might not be better for the country . no

i think it's crazy. andy, you must be tearing your hair out. as on paper, a labourrmer's decision to hand back 5% of the cash that he's accrued since 2019. >> i mean , i'm more than a >> i mean, i'm more than a labour supporter, just just on papenl labour supporter, just just on paper, i am a paid up member. i have my direct debit every month, but i mean , yeah, i think month, but i mean, yeah, i think the way that alex has been painting it isn't quite accurate. i mean, this isn't just you know, 100,000 or whomever or whatever from one person. it is a few different people in different organisations. so i think it's a bit disingenuous to go, oh, well, he's only given back £6,000 out of the x that he's been given when it's actually all he's given that back to that person. and yeah, i think we are getting kind of bogged down in this six grand means that we're talking about it all over again. >> doesn't that represent his terrible political, you know, poor antenna, his terrible judgement? >> i mean, i'm sure number 10 have made the decision and the reasons that they've

i think it is of concern to the labour party. ly of concern to everybody, the, you know, the impact it has not just on children actually, but on all of us as we as we live in an increasingly online world. i don't think we've got the situation here, which you have in the states where the democratic party and except mr musk , you know, are close to a musk, you know, are close to a lot of other tech interests. you know, that kind of californian vibe. obviously, kamala harris was a californian senator. so i think we don't have i don't i don't think we need to worry that anybody is in is in hock to the tech interests, except that tiktok is clearly a geopolitical risk as well as, you know, making our children. >> i don't think we'll be putting it back on government phones because james is there. >> i mean, i don't know, but it's surely it makes it less likely that the government will regulate against tiktok. no, i think i mean, i think that he won't be involved in, in those discussions. i mean, his job is on strategic comms. it's not a

i think it's crazy. andy, you must be tearing your hair out. as on paper, a labourstarmer's decision to hand back 5% of the cash that he's accrued since 2019. >> i mean , i'm more than a >> i mean, i'm more than a labour supporter, just just on papenl labour supporter, just just on paper, i am a paid up member. i have my direct debit every month, but i mean , yeah, i think month, but i mean, yeah, i think the way that alex has been painting it isn't quite accurate. i mean, this isn't just you know, 100,000 or whomever or whatever from one person. it is a few different people in different organisations. so i think it's a bit disingenuous to go, oh, well, he's only given back £6,000 out of the x that he's been given when it's actually all he's given that back to that person. and yeah, i think we are getting kind of bogged down in this six grand means that we're talking about it all over again. >> doesn't that represent his terrible political, you know, poor antenna, his terrible judgement? >> i mean, i'm sure number 10 have made the decision and the reasons that they'

is co-chair of the labour growth grow) i — budget. ir of the labour growth group i welcome - budget. is co-chair of the labour growth group i welcome the - budget. is co-chair of the labour- growth group i welcome the decision to unlace investment in britain but the capital we must invest in is not just physical but digital. for years the members opposite cut capital investment in technology, depressing productivity and leaving workers with less money in their pocket. and asked the chancellor what steps she is taking to boost long—term investment, especially in digital and technology? i investment, especially in digital and technology?— investment, especially in digital and technolo: ? . ~' ., ., and technology? i thank him for that auestion and technology? i thank him for that question and — and technology? i thank him for that question and also _ and technology? i thank him for that question and also for— and technology? i thank him for that question and also for the _ and technology? i thank him for that question and also for the ex

and i can tell you what the people that i speak to out there are really upset at the way this labour i think it will hopefully get better because if it gets worse and what is their vision for the future? i mean, you talk, you know , private schools talk, you know, private schools and not only is it about just all children going to private school, there's many there with special needs and special things that need help in the private sector. they are being affected by it as well, just purely because it's a political thing that they will not allow to happenin that they will not allow to happen in ’ all’ that they will not allow to happen in ’ all the stuff that and i think all the stuff that rachel reeves is going to bring in with taxes is actually going to slow up the economy, not actually build it up. and i quite agree with you that there have been the pensioners really did not expect £300 to be taken away from them, and at the same time, you know, keir starmer said well, it's within the rules. i could have this, these gifts given to me, but pensioners are having money, real money tak

in germany it - when it comes to labour market protections. in germany it has is high levels of— protections. in germany it has high levels of investment _ protections. in germany it has high levels of investment and _ protections. in germany it has high levels of investment and better - levels of investment and better employment _ levels of investment and better employment protections. - levels of investment and betteri employment protections. there levels of investment and better. employment protections. there is levels of investment and better - employment protections. there is no question— employment protections. there is no question that — employment protections. there is no question that we _ employment protections. there is no question that we could _ employment protections. there is no question that we could be _ employment protections. there is no question that we could be in - employment protections. there is no question that we could be in that - question that we could be in that place _ question that we could be in that place it— question that we coul

i wouldn't say the uk. the labour— them out again. i wouldn't say the uk. _ uk. the labour government, yes, and people in— uk. the labour government, yes, and people in mauritius are doing what could _ people in mauritius are doing what could be _ people in mauritius are doing what could be things that are being influenced...? could be things that are being influenced. . . ?— could be things that are being influenced...? ~ �* , ., influenced. . . ? weren't these talks started by james _ influenced. . . ? weren't these talks started by james cleverly - influenced. . . ? weren't these talks| started by james cleverly customer yes, after liz truss had a meeting started by james cleverly customer yes, after liz truss had a mee the have traded it away, a base in the indian ocean and we have done a deal, and china could have the island next door. i deal, and china could have the island next door.— deal, and china could have the island next door. i don't want to live in a world _ island next door. i don't want to live in a world where _ island next door. i don't wa

but yes, i remember being on the phones when labour thought it was going to gain a by—election. i think there were two by elections that they hoped to gain in the few months, certainly after the 97 election. and at the moment somebody said to me, oh , we should get andy to me, oh, we should get andy burnham back. i said, we should find him a seat. i said, where is where would you find a seat that was safe enough to get him in? and that's a pretty extraordinary start. so yes, i mean , nobody's going to disguise mean, nobody's going to disguise the fact that the government has got a big job on its hands. >> aubrey, what did you think about the list of measures i mentioned that i was implicitly arguing would actually counter the objective of growing the economy ? economy? >> i think the difficulty labour have got is that they've left this very sizeable vacuum over the last three months between announcing that there is a huge £22 billion fiscal black hole and then the budget itself, and into that sort of pause , all of into that sort of pause, all of the concerns about labour's star

, and i think that was and labour, and i thinknow is that labour are showing their socialist colours . obviously socialist colours. obviously this is a political row, but in the other policies that they're bringing forward, the loss of the chagos island, the vat on private schools, all these other things, actually, now there is a very clear difference between labour and conservatives. so maybe in the long term that's good for our politics. >> yeah, i mean it's a national reminder isn't it, of what you get really. but i wonder then on the point of, you know, stephen poundis the point of, you know, stephen pound is next to me right now , pound is next to me right now, and he's been spinning like a sort of hot plate on goodness only knows what. but stephen pound says , look, this shows pound says, look, this shows that sir keir starmer is strong. he's willing to take the tough decisions and get rid of those who may be distractions to his government of change. what say you may well be true and certainly boris johnson tried the same th

i basically think that's the labour party's view of a working person. ine it, but they know what they mean. and i think a lot of this comes back to it's sort of westminster, uh, _ learning bit by bit that this new government has a very different conception of who its voters are and who it's in politics for than the successive conservative governments of the last 14 years. arguably, actually also of the new labour governments, uh, which was a different age when economic growth was in a very different place, and that basically the left had a different and more relaxed attitude to business than actually a lot of politicians in keir starmer's government do. and i think for all the definitional uncertainty, this government basically knows who it's in politics for. and it's not people who own four properties, even if their day to day income from those four properties is lower than bridget philipson's day to day income from being education secretary, i think that is what we're learning bit by bit, through every difficult interview, where they can't quite define

>> i want labour, isn't it as well?y, it's a problem for labour because they are economic growth, fiscal discipline, but they're also about to introduce a whole raft of workers rights, which is going to potentially impact upon productivity and state spending. i mean, you can't have both, can you? you can't have both, can you? you can't have both, can you? you can't have the flexible labour market and growth and also hand over lots of powers to the unions. >> it's hardly handing over power to the unions. i believe in workers rights, and i think if you actually look. i think apprentices. apprentices should have a minimum wage that isn't £4 an hour. i think the minimum wage shouldn't depend on whether you're 18 or 20 or 21. i think a lot of these sensible reforms that are being pushed through were promised by the blair and brown governments were never delivered and have actually been a long time coming. and i think the market have had a long time. >> and we must get you back on to talk about workers rights, because i think

how did that go down with the labour party? i i've just had a text from a labour mp who said, grab your passport, we're all going to have to leave the country if either of these two end up. >> prime minister. so i think that, safe to say, the labour party are probably pleased at this. i think cleverly probably was the biggest threat in the sense of trying to win over so—called sensibles. i think also we probably know the viewers a bit of an apology. you promised them expert analysis at the top of the show. we've totally called it all wrong. >> well, the bookies got it wrong, everybody got it wrong, everybody in westminster is surprised. thank you gentlemen. now don't go anywhere. we'll have more reaction to the shock. news with james cleverly has been dramatically eliminated from the tory leadership race. i'm martin daubney on news, britain's news welcome back. it's 10 to 4. i'm martin daubney on gb news now. joining me in the studio. i'm still with the former labour adviser matthew talbot, and the former head of comms for reform

but let's not forget, i don't think labour won the election. i think the conservatives lost it. g credited for the huge success that labour had at the ballot box, i think that's actually wrong . and i think actually wrong. and i think that's another reason why labour have gone wrong so early on in their government campaign. they were swept in on a wave of popularity. they thought, i don't think that's right. it wasn't that they were popular. it's that the previous government was unpopular. >> john, briefly, if you can, it's been a turbulent three months for the three months for the prime minister. how tainted is his reputation, do you think? >> no. it has. it sounds quite right. it has been badly tainted . right. it has been badly tainted. i tell you what worries me about him. is he too much of a lawyer? and lawyers have a way of saying . and lawyers have a way of saying. well, you know, i think we'll be able to argue that case. i think we can defend ourselves. that's not the point. the point is, how will this go down? and suzanne is quite right about this . it is is quite right

i think labour may have gone wrong _ them. i think labour may have gone wrong in _ them. ven down some of their poll ratings. and being _ down some of their poll ratings. and being able _ down some of their poll ratings. and being able to give a positive message about life after difficult decisions is really important. in terms decisions is really important. terms of decisions is really important. in terms of voter expectations as i mentioned, rachel reeves talked about being ironclad, is that the right phrase? i about being ironclad, is that the right phrase?— right phrase? i fiscal discipline. and if the change _ right phrase? i fiscal discipline. and if the change comes - right phrase? i fiscal discipline. and if the change comes and i right phrase? i fiscal discipline. l and if the change comes and she right phrase? i fiscal discipline. - and if the change comes and she does change the fiscal rules that leaves it open to attack certainly from opposition parties and others that you talked about pension funds and wanting her to do this but what about investors? you wanti

this is an individual, a labour mp. >> she's a labour mp. i have been far less serious things that have gone out that have been seen. the labour party demanding, they're demanding the resignation of any conservative who's done anything like this. you have to concede, paul. this feels like she's got out of jail . feels like she's got out of jail. >> disagree. she's going to come under a lot of scrutiny for this. and she has got to now look at her own internal processes as what how this happenedin processes as what how this happened in the first place. it's obviously unacceptable. and you know , she didn't make the you know, she didn't make the video did she. but she obviously repeated something without checking out under her name. >> she's a member of parliament. if nigel farage has done anything even remotely in the same ballpark, you know, she'd be leading the pitchforks. >> she's not she's not standing by it. and saying, yes, these are great heroes. she said. these are terrible people. i don't stand by them. what they've said and done is hor

i visited with labour— reflecting on one year on. n one year on. i visited with labour friends of _ reflecting on one year on. i visited with labour friends of israel- reflecting on one year on. i visited | with labour friends of israel before the massacres took place and i visited a peaceful place, where people living there were friendly with the palestinian neighbours and sought peace. when i went there again a few months later injanuary, i saw a very different place, burned—out buildings, horrendous situations, photographs of young couples on the front door burned—out houses where they had been burned alive. a community destroyed. it was absolutely horrendous. and i think it is very important that piece is made but to do that, it requires hamas to come to agreement with israel, hamas to recognise the state of israel exists, and for iran, which is supporting hamas and indeed it has polemical in the north and the houthi is in yemen, to be held back so that these places are not used as proxies by iran, who really has no interest in th

i don't think the labour party will fix it. arty that is advocating withdrawal from the echr. that's the reform party. we know that that is one route into which we can get out of bonkers britain, and i call it bonkers britain, and i call it bonkers britain, and i call it bonkers britain , because it is bonkers britain, because it is bonkers to most taxpayers that we are paying this amount of money to get criminals out of our country. >> so the bit that's missing is the notion there's nothing missing. well, i'm about to tell you what's missing. the bit that's missing is the notion that's missing is the notion that britain gets anything from being a part of a whole global legal community. you have to have law between nations. >> nobody is saying we don't have laws . no, no, we can just have laws. no, no, we can just have laws. no, no, we can just have a british bill of rights, or we can have an alternate legal regime which keeps the british people safe. why are the small boats still coming? >> you didn't. you either didn't hear or

>> i seriously think they are. and as we've seen what laboure with the private schools as well, i think they are just punishing aspiration . are just punishing aspiration. and i mean, regarding rental, i mean i have i've also got a constituent who is a leasehold property that they've got a mortgage on now. they cannot allow pets in this leasehold. it's a 99 year lease, but we're trying to bring pets into the rental. i mean i'm an animal lover, so it just shows you, you know, there's so many differences between rental and also people who's got mortgages as well . we've got to make it as well. we've got to make it fair for everybody. yeah. the answer is to build more homes, not on floodplains, as you were saying there, joe, but build them. >> but the answer is to provide affordable social housing. you know, however , that is going to know, however, that is going to get those social housing because, i mean, look, they've labour will not guarantee now it's going to go to our veterans. >> they will not rule out it's going to go to illegal migrants.

you can't blame labour for that. >> come on, we was okay with it. ie lots of support during lockdown as well to the hospitality industry, but the fact is look they've been hammered. if they labour go ahead with what they're proposing. and let's not look at the knock on effect of their not being able to smoke in beer gardens. what they're proposing. >> well, i think they've rowed back from that. and there is a possibility that labour might ban smoking but not vaping. >> they're under fire over last last orders are safe anyway. jacob jacob rees—mogg, welcome without a drink. you've got your show. i haven't got a drink with my beer. thank you. i'll survive sober for my next hour. i've got to ask you about today, jacob rees—mogg. what on earth is going on in your party? >> well, it even silenced you momentarily. and you're the great expert on understanding what's going on in the tory party. i will obviously be talking about this during my programme. what happened? how did james cleverly fall out? who is now the favourite between robert jenrick and kemi ba

iso i think what you're labour. sirjohn curtice said this over the weekend, is that the death of the two party system is what the last election revealed. and i think it makes it a really complicated job for whoever's going to be tory leader . now, whoever's going to be tory leader. now, i would disagree with what has just been said, because i actually think they should have a long leadership election as they are, because, look, it doesn't matter what political points you score at this point in a five year parliament, it's frankly irrelevant . it's not going to irrelevant. it's not going to change the result at the next general election. what might change it is if they have a serious conversation about what the tory party means, but they haven't had that labour are lucky they don't have the equivalent of reform biting at their ankles, do they? >> do you think the tories are in denial, >> yes, i do, and i think they've got to stop talking about reform kemi badenoch today said reform aren't real conservatives . nobody t

i didn't expect labour, you know, i can be perfectly blunt with you. to be a lot better than this. i can't understand why they've got themselves into so much trouble so quickly. >> well, let's have a look at jonathan reynolds's track record so far. pablo, you know this man stands accused, which no doubt he denies. but he stands accused of taking a free ticket to glastonbury from youtube shortly before labour were about to increase the taxation on online companies. the day after glastonbury that proposed tax appears to have been dropped. and now here he is with his face plastered all over. you know, labour literature. come on, give us your money. give us your money. you can pay money to come and meet and have breakfast with this guy. i believe. and this is according to other reports, that labour said that if you paid a certain amount of money, they would vet who your business was. but then according to the sun, if you paid a bit more money, then they wouldn't vet your business. that is straightforward. cash for access, and the only reason that i can gat

i do remember that visit... invest with labour l thrive? i do remember that| visit... g further such investment announcements in the weeks to come. that is what will fix and stabilise our economy. it is because we are taking the tough decision the investment is flowing into this country and we will fulfil our obligation to raise living standards across the country. i to raise living standards across the country. i have one ofthe across the country. i have one of the most... _ across the country. i have one of the most... worst - across the country. i have one | of the most... worst blackspot in the midlands in my constituency. will the prime minister look at backing rules on maximum speed to protect people in my constituency? it people in my constituency? it is vital that as we invest we improve safety and deliver better journeys for drivers. the national highways is continuing to study the place for safety improvements to the road she mentions and will continue to do so. decisions will be set out under the third road investment strategy, and i know the roads minister w

i want to do something. renew, yes. rebuilt, yes. to deliverfor our party, yes. but mainly to deliver for our country, and the labournd in undoing our work, so we must not waste one second getting back to work. i can unite this party around conservative values. i can hold labour to account for their failure is and take us back into government in four short years. because the people in this room, standing for election in may, can't wait a day longer than is necessary for us to get our house in order. there is no time to lose and i don't lose. if you want a winner, choose someone who can deliver results, who can communicate effectively and to campaigns relentlessly. choose someone who you know and who is tested and he doesn't hide from the media. choose someone who is not afraid of the public but is popular with the public, and choose the candidate to nigel farage, keir starmer and ed davey fear the most because i will not accept the status quo. i will not accept defeatism and i will not accept defeat. everyone running in this leadership contest needs to ask themselves, do they want to be the leader or do they want to

i >> i want a labour government. i want a labour government to succeed. attack the labour government. i think it doesn't meet the expectations that the country has a right to have. and that's where i'll continue . i think where i'll continue. i think they should be a lot more progressive. and look, i'll tell you one thing, if they do good policy and they actually deliver and people can see they're delivering, we're not going to be talking about this kind of stuff in a couple of years. >> that's if that's a big if. well, let's have a look at what you've been saying. philip says i think sir keir starmer has dementia. he seems to have completely forgotten what was promised three months ago. linda says good on sir keir starmer for getting rid of sue gray. why are we piling on him for that? we're not really. we're talking about the state of the party as about the state of the party as a result of it. listen, if you lose your wing woman or wing man, then that's that says something . something's going on, something. something's going on, penny says. has keir sma

and i'm glad that labour hasn't continued it. >> i do, ijust want labour hasn't continued it. >> i dost want to respond to the culture wars and hard. right. and you know, i can't be bothered. it's friday, i'll move on. gareth, you never told me whether or not you think keir starmer needs a common sense. minister, get in touch and tell me your answer to your own question. look, i can tell you now, lee anderson, he's been speaking out. he says using words like political tsunami. he says the path to success in 2029 is now on track. what's he talking about? well, he's talking about? well, he's talking about? well, he's talking about the fact that reform uk , they gained a council reform uk, they gained a council seat in blackpool actually from labour last night. they got 38.8% of the vote. reform have tweeted out saying that they are the real opposition . are they the real opposition. are they ben habib? >> absolutely . ideologically, >> absolutely. ideologically, there is no doubt that the conservative party is not the opposition. it is reform because the conservative party, contrary to

that is where labour worked into a problem i give things away. --> 00:

labour party itself. this is individual people making their own choices as they are free to do. ihat there was a post on linkedin on social media from a labour party manager, which has now been deleted, but which was offering some kind of help for labour party members who went to america to help kamala harris�*s campaign. and that is what donald trump says is described as "reasonable inference" that the labour party was making, what he says, amount to illegalforeign national contributions to the american election. what do you say to that? well, none of this was organised directly by the labour party. as i say, what people choose to do in their free time and whether she's a part of a group linked to the democrats is entirely up to her and it's up to individuals if they want to use their holiday to go and campaign for a sister party in another country. people are free to do that. it's not against the law here, it's not against the law in the united states. but it certainly wasn't organised by the labour party itself. let's speak to our political correspondent henry zeffman. henry, w

i mean the labour conference, i won't forget.t, joyful, back in power after 14 years. there was a sense of real dejection because they couldn't believe that this government had got themselves in such a mess over winter fuel and the freebies. >> and just to be clear, i mean, andrew might feel differently to me, but i don't wish this government ill. i don't want i don't want to see labour do badly. i genuinely i don't feel party political in that way. >> they drag the country down with us. >> but that's the issue is i don't take any satisfaction in the fact that it's the labour party that are managing to completely mess everything up, but i just, i wanted them to do well and it's appalling. right up next, why are 1 in 5 over 50. that's you andrew. >> no, i'm long over that. >> no, i'm long over that. >> hiding their age on their cv. this is britain's newsroom live across the uk on gb. news. welcome back to britain's newsroom on gb news with bev and andrew. >> studies reveal more than 1 in 5 job candidates over the age of 50 fail to

but i am joined now by labour activist and writer ayesha ali khan. l by alka sahgal cuthbert, who's the founder of don't divide us. so thank you very much for joining don't divide us. so thank you very much forjoining me. great to have you both on the show. alka. i'll start with you. do you think that this is racist? >> yes i do, you know, in the in this rather cringeworthy doggerel. >> dawn butler presents herself as a freedom fighter. you know, an african freedom fighter . and an african freedom fighter. and quite frankly, it's a travesty. it's a travesty of freedom. it's a travesty of struggle, a travesty of democracy. and last but not least, a complete travesty of poetry. i think the people of east brent are really ill served by this sort of narcissistic adolescent prancing from their mp . from their mp. >> okay, ayesha, look, i'll bnng >> okay, ayesha, look, i'll bring you in on this. >> okay, ayesha, look, i'll bring you in on this . now, if i bring you in on this. now, if i had released that video saying everything that she'd just said, but i w

that's the labour concern, i think about labour.ple living there want to remain british. but frankly, how long will that last for? and you know, the world is made up of countries jostling for attention , countries jostling for attention, jostling to get one over on each other. if we are seen to be weak on territory, that's bad. and just briefly, martin, about the tories, you might think that it's an easy hit for the tories. it isn't because james cleverly started these debates when he was foreign secretary under liz truss, he says weak , weak, weak. truss, he says weak, weak, weak. he's attacking labour for doing this and others are campaigning. tom tugendhat's team, of course, he's campaigned to be the next tory leader. he says this is started by james cleverly. he started by james cleverly. he started the negotiation and it raised questions about our commitment as a country to the falkland islands. he's saying they're british. he says no debate,. tom won't trade away sovereignty. so it's kicking off everywhere, across all of polit

i've been talking to lots of people across the labour party, and there's a basically a sort of inner gang and an outer gang, and iat's part of what's going on here. and one labour source actually asked me yesterday saying, oh, well, you know, wejust have to get on with moving her on. and also obviously she's somebody who'll be for the chop. i'm not saying that's someone who's speaking with authority, but itjust plays into that sense that there's — not a them and us, but even 100 days in, there's certainly the sort of special ones in the middle and then everybody else on the outside. and one thing to add to that, i completely agree, is that those cabinet ministers in the outer ring were generally empowered by sue gray when she came in as chief of staff, she in opposition. a year or so ago she kept saying, hang on, why are there no elected politicians in this meeting? and she would get members of the then shadow cabinet in people like louise haigh, who weren't necessarily in the sort of strategic core of starmer's operation and empowerthem. and actually, i think as it happens, louise haigh personally was was probab

you can't afford labour, i can't afford labour. lord alli can't afford . can't afford. labour. 's best for our country. so i always want our country. so i always want our country. so i always want our country to succeed . labour our country to succeed. labour have already shown us who they are . they are the most venal and are. they are the most venal and vindictive administration in decades. vindictive administration in decades . starmer isn't just decades. starmer isn't just making pensioners pay for his union paymasters. he's undermining freedom of speech in our universities. he's trashing our universities. he's trashing our border security instead of keeping us safe. he wants to police smoking in beer gardens. he's freeing criminals, not standing up for the police. now i know what it's like when a labour government doesn't have your back. the last labour government left our troops without body armour in iraq and without body armour in iraq and without helicopters in afghanistan. as your prime minister i will never abandon those on the frontline . those on the frontline. beca

there's a lot of labour, traditional labour voters who've sort of said, look, i want to get rid of thetifarious reasons. but, you know, this is not this is not the labour vote of old. it is now contested in a way that perhaps it hasn't been in the past. so reform will be putting a lot of energy into some of these labour battles. i mean, we've got, for example, you know, there's a mayoral contest that takes place in doncaster next may, which again, you know, reform i suspect will push very hard. there so there's lots of battlegrounds before the next general election. we'll get a sense of whether reform can keep building and keep riding that wave or not. but it's a major headache for the conservative party. whoever takes over from rishi sunak, i mean, as an outsider looking across the aisle, we've just seen some footage there of james cleverly with with chris hope, and i thought he did really, really well. he comes across as i think, more human and more rounded than the other candidates, and i think that's a massive strength for him. labour people will be hoping kemi badenoch wins, thoug

if you went to the lib dems, i want you to see the opportunities that only we can deliver. and if you went to the labouru stayed at home i want to make you proud to vote conservative again. next, james cleverly, the most experienced in government, who told his party to be more normal and try to sell conservatism with a smile. if you want to win then choose one. if you went to the lib dems, i want you to see the opportunities that only we can deliver. and if you went to the labour party i want to show you why freedom and not state control is how we build. if you stayed at home i want to make you proud to vote conservative again. next, james cleverly, the most experienced in government, who told his party to be more normal and try to sell conservatism with a smile. if you want to win then choose one. i apologise to that —— for the loss of sound but we will return to that story. let's show you the live pictures we are getting right now from the middle east where we are hearing the israeli military and also hezbollah are both talking about the ground fighting that is taking place inside southern lebanon at

is there some bias from the press towards this labour government? iolute loathing for labour. as i said, people like andrew marr, all the newspapers and broadcasters saying how nice it was to have the adults back in the room. do you remember that phrase? yeah. >> i mean, this freebie gate has done some damage, hasn't it? and the winter fuel payments to a lot of people voted labour and that wasn't in the manifesto, and they did not believe that they'd be taking welfare away from pensioners at the expense, by the way, of a £22 billion carbon capture scheme, which has been widely slammed for that. are you carbon capture? nobody is carbon capture. >> even the green zealots don't like it. they say it doesn't work. £11 billion in climate aid, £14 billion to public sector pay workers, two and a half grand spectacles, but 8 billion for gb energy, which is not going to produce any energy, but it might create a few office jobs. arsenal tickets, taylor swift tickets. you know , lord swift tickets. you know, lord alli new york penthouse over. >> he's paid back th

that was meant to make us think positively about the labour party . i do about the labour party. ing it was in foreign policy disaster. >> in fairness, in fairness, i don't think they think chagos was actually there for as a positive for labour. it was something that had to be done. the question obviously, is whether they should have done it this week when parliament had returned, given that they had a bit of a rollicking from the speaker today, trevor, all eyes of course, are on october the 30th. >> that's really the main event. and we're expecting to brace for a lot of pain , particularly a lot of pain, particularly pensioners, motorists, anybody , pensioners, motorists, anybody, perhaps the gas boiler, who knows where this will end . knows where this will end. pensioners, savers, isas , a lot pensioners, savers, isas, a lot of people getting very, very concerned. with that in mind. is there any way that the labour party can spin anything positive out of any of this? can they pull a rabbit out of the hat and make people like them again? >> well, i think that actually rachel reev

after labour came to power? - did but iices, which is interesting because we know that is what is made in budgets but the government is going to use that phrase today and say politics is always a choice and it is time to choose a clear path and embrace the harsh light of fiscal reality and what the government will try to do is draw a contrast with choices they say conservatives made and they say conservatives made and they are going to paint it as their approach to this as being honest about making hard choices and they are saying thatis choices and they are saying that is a choice we are making so interesting they are embracing that language while they prepare the ground. we have heard the language around the phrase working people, we have seen tested recently as to who the government was thinking of when they made the promise in their manifesto. partly that is linked to the specific pledge labour made that they would not increase taxes on working people and would not increase the rate of national insurance income tax or v