oksana markarova, but this is just a sign of this, i would say, such a harsh reaction, but precisely... could such a scandal have been avoided in some way, from the point of view of our authorities , to build either a visit or a behavioral model in order to smooth out the corners as much as possible and avoid this scandal as much as possible, or after all the scandal that arose because of the visit to the zelensky plant in pennsylvania, it was already too... invested, and it could not be avoided at all, well, look, zelenskyy is not the first time visiting a military factory, he was still cozy at the factory of such a republican governor there, it was earlier, in a few months before the elections, and it didn't cause anyone any reactions. of course, from this, i would say, purely professional point of view, if you come to the states a few weeks before the election campaign, you don't need to meet anyone at all, no. not to go anywhere, not to visit any factories, limit yourself to three meetings: biden, harris, trump and all. but i would like to remind you of one important thing, we are

arrived, his plan was not accepted, he was humiliated, they wiped their feet on him, they said: fire markarova says: no, you have no right to tell me this, and to tell this to the leader of the republican majority, he will not push anything through congress now, that is scary, and if he does not push it through congress, he will not have the money to bribe the same americans, give them election funds, that's it, tsuk tsvank, let me try to summarize. so, look, there is such a moment, there is logic in this, maybe they will somehow push through, but i think, in the current conditions, they will not hold these elections, legitimately, semi-legitimately, illegitimately, in the word not at all, i think that no matter how the situation develops today, the task will be solved differently, with this person, obviously, on whom they are now, well, first of all, they are not betting on anyone else, if so, let's say, then there are no conditions for holding elections in ukraine, and i believe that there will be some others here. to fulfill, because, let me remind you, zelensky's security is carried out by

short-sighted deliberate political move resulted in republicans losing confidence in ambassador markarova'shonestly and effectively perform her diplomatic functions in this country. mike johnson, speaker of the us house of representatives. these were the first signs of the political tornado that the ukrainian delegation was caught in. republican candidate donald trump, who has so far tried to talk about ukraine and its president, discreetly and avoiding specifics, abruptly changed the record. he accused zelensky of the quote "dirty small attacks against him." and also complained that the ukrainian leader does not want to make an agreement with putin to end the war. ukraine is no more, it is no longer ukraine. you cannot replace these cities and towns, and you will never be able to replace the dead people , so many dead people, any deal, even the worst, would be better than what we have now. perhaps the narcissistic politician was offended by zelensky's statements, which he made on the eve of his visit to the us in an interview with the new yorker the president of ukraine, in particular, sug

markarova, the ambassador of ukraine to the united states of america, and and we remember this speech by mr. trump, where he so not quite correctly... spoke about ukraine, well, let's not mention it now, because there is really no time, but here is this sharp rhetoric, the change in rhetoric that took place in the last there are two days of zelensky's stay, why did trump still decide to meet, mr. dickinson actually explains it by the fact that ukraine plays a big role during the elections, or rather on the day of the elections. and the polish diaspora, and it is clear that the same trump does not want, even after his eccentric ones statement, does not want to reject these votes, and i will remind you, there are hundreds of thousands, and maybe millions of votes, in your opinion, it is true or not, whether you can really confirm such a hypothesis, and how much, how much do you think... did you like or not like this meeting with zelensky trump, how trump behaved there, support or not support for ukraine, after all? well, what started the week with, as you said, such an undiplomatic lett

oksana markarova, but this is just a sign of this, i would say, tough such reaction, but clarification.

afterwards, but as i understand it, before that there was a letter from johnson to fire ambassador markarovans interfered in the electoral processes on the side of the democratic administration, but today here yesterday we were talking. colleagues from american centers came, we always ask ourselves: what is the goal, the true goal of american policy in ukraine, what do they want, after all, you know, well, by god, everyone i talked to, they said the same thing: of course, representatives of the former american administration do not want russia to win in ukraine, but they understand perfectly well that it is impossible to inflict a strategic defeat on russia. and this is an understanding, it is just that high-ranking officials do not want to talk about it, that is why this project, it will be continued, i told the americans, i told my colleagues in the white house in the state department that you are pushing the world towards a nuclear catastrophe, if you use these missiles to strike deep into russian territory, where, among other things , the nuclear deterrent forces may be affected, then th