jeremy con as folks are calling in, page 37 of your book, previously superporf technological leaps, nle weapons, satellites and supercomputers were most often developed or at least funded by governments. the most is usually strategic any military or geopolitical vantage not finaia governments although often secretive were subject to some form of puic accountability in contrast, the way they develop artificial a general intelligence left with a handful of powerful technology companies, what does that mean for us? guest: it means we start to take some steps to think about how we can hold those companies that are developing this technology to account. i think government needs to step in and bring in some rules around the employment of the technology. we should not allow private corporations to develop in a complete vacuum and academy -- and give them a blank check. we are can and need some regulation around this. i also think we have to think about other ways of having leverage towards these companies which would include some of the agency we have as consumers, we don't have to necessarily