she was meeting with goebbels at the hotel where hitler was staying. hitler had a sweet tooth.oering introduced them. he kissed her hands. she said there's a right way to kiss hands and a wrong day. what he did, she said, was the wrong way. he stared into her eyes and kissed her hand. she didn't like that approach, she stiffened up. he noticed, he stiffened up as well. it started off their relationship on a difficult footing. he never tried to kiss her hand again. she said in the future she got a good handshake. despite the mutual disdain, she had one of the rare one-on-one interviews with him in 1931. that was an important interview. in that interview he basically made it clear that he didn't have to take germany by force. that he was giving more -- he was given more and more pow we are every election. and he really thought he'd be in control within a year. he missed that by only a month. and he also made id clear that once he and the nazis were in power they intended to undo the weimar republic and create a republic of what she described with some irony as truly germanic men.

so you know, as noam chomsky said, you know, joseph goebbels and joseph stalin, they were all for free speech. if you agreed with them. so the free speech, the stuff that they don't like and, it has to be all of it. and it's messier. but, you know, once you start getting into people's feeling that they you're protecting people who gets to decide what free speech is. so i think it's a pretty simple thing. it's all of it or none of it. and i'm for all of it. from your book in human history ability for humans to have free unfettered speech is remark doubly short rare and for very privileged few. that's true. i mean, if you look at the history of humanity, there's not been a as a real sustained time for this individual particular liberty. and there is there is a reason why founding fathers in the united states made it the first amendment. they could have made guns first, but they seemed to think they wanted to arm the citizenry with something that they could truly defend themselves. and that's with their ability to stand up against potential tyranny and actual tyranny from own government.

she was meeting with goebbels at the hotel where hitler was staying. hitler had a sweet tooth.oering introduced them. he kissed her hands. she said there's a right way to kiss hands and a wrong day. what he did, she said, was the wrong way. he stared into her eyes and kissed her hand. she didn't like that approach, she stiffened up. he noticed, he stiffened up as well. it started off their relationship on a difficult footing. he never tried to kiss her hand again. she said in the future she got a good handshake. despite the mutual disdain, she had one of the rare one-on-one interviews with him in 1931. that was an important interview. in that interview he basically made it clear that he didn't have to take germany by force. that he was giving more -- he was given more and more pow we are every election. and he really thought he'd be in control within a year. he missed that by only a month. and he also made id clear that once he and the nazis were in power they intended to undo the weimar republic and create a republic of what she described with some irony as truly germanic men.

even nazi minister of propaganda joseph goebbels viewed film recording in his diary that it was a moronic piece of rubbish. conservative randolph hearst editorialized that the movie was inflammatory and communist. specifically objecting to air is prolog. other papers followed suit in slam and both mother and son for their lack of neutrality. in chicago, the film was initially banned because it would quote, wield undesirable influence with subject matter that creates tension between races. even though the censorship board had previously approved pro movies like blitzkrieg in poland. but at the end of the year, box office barometer called the film one of 1940s biggest successes, and the production received honorable mention in the film daily annual critics for the year's ten best pictures. the senate subcommittee was disbanded shortly after the december 1941 attack on pearl harbor. but these efforts at film censorship set the stage for the house un-american activities committee hearings to come. director roy bolting and his twin brother john would be put under invested nation. by who? jack

time she was doinge some socializing with hermann goring and attended press conferences with joseph goebbels>> yes. she socialized with the gÖng because she wanted to find a high-ranking nazi that she could build a relationship with. after the 1930 reichstag election which is thesh point at which the nazis will become a political power, they go from having 12 seats to 107. they are suddenly the second-largest party in the reichstag. and she sends her assistant out to find high-ranking nazi who she says has good enough table manners that she can fight him to her home. that's important because during the early years of her career she and her mother basically created an alternate social politicians and journalists in the house. everyone came to the parties. they had veryer typical german kind of gathering data been pretty much ag stag event intel she came along. they had a being party. famous throughout the berlin social circles. so she wanted to find a high-ranking german that she could comfortably invite to parties at her home. and her assistant came back with hermann goring. obviously a bett

or, you know, you know, but i guess so was goebbels. but but, you know that's the comparative for me. but you have to pay attention to what they're saying. and so i read all of steve bannon. i read all of peter's, and some of them were terrible like when he when he and david sachs rape to belated regret, said rape was belated regret. and i wrote a about that that's why they don't like kara swisher but they wrote it. i didn't write it. they wrote it. so they should take responsibility for their stupidity and cruelty. but one of the things about him that's interesting is he's got a viewpoint about the world, which is let's break it completely down, destroy it. right. and create a new in which an uber ceo runs everything right. he has a point of view and it's not authoritarianism. it's a new way of thinking. it's like a ceo. it's like founder mode or whatever. that kind thing. and so i think he is very behind the scenes. he's the one that j.d. vance and which my favorite expression, rachel maddow calls him peter thiel's failed. and i would

goebbels. but but, you know, that's the comparative for me. but you have to pay attention to what saying and so i read all of steve bannon. i read all of peter's books and some of them were terrible. like when he when he and david sacks compared rape to belated regret he said rape, was belated regret. and i wrote a story about that why they don't like kara swisher, but they wrote it. i didn't write it. they wrote it. so they should take responsibility for their stupidity. stupidity and cruelty. but one of the things about him that's interesting is he's got a viewpoint about world, which is let's let's break it completely down. let's destroy. right. and create something a new in which an uber ceo runs everything right. he has a point of view and it's not authoritarianism, a new way of thinking. it's like a it's like founder mode, whatever, that kind of thing. and so think he is very behind the scenes. he's the one that paid j.d. and which my favorite rachel maddow calls him, peter thiel's failed intern. and i would agree he wasn't very good at

goebbels. but but, you know, that's the comparative for me.but you have to pay attention to what saying and so i read all of steve bannon. i read all of peter's books and some of them were terrible. like when he when he and david sacks compared rape to belated regret he said rape, was belated regret. and i wrote a story about that why they don't like kara swisher, but they wrote it. i didn't write it. they wrote it. so they should take responsibility for their stupidity. stupidity and cruelty. but one of the things about him that's interesting is he's got a viewpoint about world, which is let's let's break it completely down. let's destroy. right. and create something a new in which an uber ceo runs everything right. he has a point of view and it's not authoritarianism, a new way of thinking. it's like a it's like founder mode, whatever, that kind of thing. and so think he is very behind the scenes. he's the one that paid j.d. and which my favorite rachel maddow calls him, peter thiel's failed intern. and i would agree he wasn't very good at t

or, you know, you know, but i guess so was goebbels. but but, you know that's the comparative for me. but you have to pay attention to what they're saying. and so i read all of steve bannon. i read all of peter's, and some of them were terrible like when he when he and david sachs rape to belated regret, said rape was belated regret. and i wrote a about that that's why they don't like kara swisher but they wrote it. i didn't write it. they wrote it. so they should take responsibility for their stupidity and cruelty. but one of the things about him that's interesting is he's got a viewpoint about the world, which is let's break it completely down, destroy it. right. and create a new in which an uber ceo runs everything right. he has a point of view and it's not authoritarianism. it's a new way of thinking. it's like a ceo. it's like founder mode or whatever. that kind thing. and so i think he is very behind the scenes. he's the one that j.d. vance and which my favorite expression, rachel maddow calls him peter thiel's failed. and i would