i think this mutual benefit and, and in return china promises not to get involved in your politics. no matter what. by the way, china's involvement isn't the same in every port. for example, it can vary from 100 percent ownership to a minority steak, but the pitch has been successful in the global south, especially in african countries, out of around $160.00 ports with china has stakes and 53 are on the african continent. now shooting the point you see on the bus, it could be a bit good then this is all that good, that dom across the lot. but overall niles on golf. i left this yonder job or lead me out the 6. yeah. last shooting the alaska add to where it says that there are some guys you some so some point they say point issue and how to key itself is in. i'm off at the pallet be ok. so you don't do it. another reason why african countries might be wary of western investment is well, the last few 100 years of western colonialism changed in that box. should it, should you go book a board or the chinese. she finally said that parts in china, a sound good quantum about father and langu

finally said that parts in town to some good quantum about 5 and really good jobs by law central for not. china still calls itself a developing country and says it's an equal partner, as opposed to the west. but china is deals with global south countries, still serve china's interests like increasing. because as we'll see, each of these ports is just one small part of a bigger strategy. the enter the belts and road initiatives by building roads, railways and seaports, china wants to connect the world. and one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects ever conceived. jones young man, hold your dish. when the belgian road initiative launched in 2013, it was initially suppose to connect china and europe just like china's ancient silk road bay facing now china is tapping into markets in the global south. so we need to find a new money for our time and those countries also be equal to share. the experience is kind of wondering as a like a chinese smoking coast equal one could have reached go that route. here's the network. china has delta, the orange lines, or overland roads. the blue lines are

it's not china that is building blocks, have a new station. i don't want to, i'm a has china's advocate, but i believe i understand there are many internal issues because there are always in the fields and that's good neighbors. i'm not just opinion, don't know, sharing any secret was you there are certain difficulties on the chinese indian food, but whereas somebody shoes 242 people teach care about the future of the nations that are in the the only question for compromises. now the premium used to arrive at them. this is what in 5 minutes of india and china as president, do able to just to just see if they're in gauged and a dialect to zillow. he goes and they continue to that dial. i mean, like during the breaks summers and cars at gmail tonight, i'm hopeful this is glen drive and positive feet in the same patch up on future. still considered chinese indian relation to a solution i have to regarding the gum disease creation anastasia to see you as a, oh, it's not china that is building blocks over that. it's the u. s. that is doing that one

and the idea is not to shun china 5 years, not to, you know, a couple of from china in a certain sense. the idea maybe to some extent disk from china about that. but the deal with that and those capacities guaranteed do not exist in india. so the broad idea is that we need to work with john who's day we will be very careful by doing so. but really to work the time, china will always be viewed as a rival and always at the same time as a development model to emulate. so think that these 2 will always exist side by side. for some countries, the rivalry will be what out the way the con, the, the, the kind of the, the cooperation and for other countries is going to be the other way around. but i think rival reason was going to be there, it's a high wire balancing act. most of the emerging economies of the global says, walking down the line without tripping up, may hold the key to their economic success the and that's all for this episode of business beyond. if you want to see more of our episodes, you'll find our playlist and the video description. thanks a lot for watching until the next t

, including china. we a not sure what with donald trump stands. but what about the republican national convention, which for the 1st time since 1980? i did not mention taiwan and it's potty platform. okay, i think i do. i'll do difference to my colleagues. i think they're misreading the situation. amazing is very happy to hear that trump's reactions or anything which is not military. it would be economic that signals that the us is not going to try to push the envelope and create an a military situation. it's also made a very clear in the past that he expects any country that enjoys us protection to pay for it. so he's going to be putting a lot of pressure on taiwan and part of that pressure is going to be saying to them . if you want our projection, they're going to have to put ship factors in the united states. so i think it's very clear what the trump is going to do. and this is actually going to de escalate the situation there. china has no interest in doing a forceful take over of taiwan. taiwan is there, i

china is not allowing us to come into china. why?handling all kinds of challenges in the world. you may or may not be on their radar screen. >> smith: victor gao is a well-known figure who travels the world speaking in defense of xi's china. we interviewed him in new york. what is it about xi jinping's presidency that has fomented this hostility between the u.s. and china? >> i disagree with the way you characterize the situation. >> smith: but after 2012, when he comes into power... >> i would say, fundamentally, china and the united states need to deal with each other as equals, but china-u.s. relations are moving in a direction which is proving to be difficult and dangerous. ♪ ♪ >> smith: to begin, i wanted to know where xi jinping came from and how his past shaped him into the man he is today. he grew up during a tortured time in chinese history, but he was a child of privilege with red roots. xi's father had fought alongside mao zedong, and, after the revolution, had risen to become a high-ranking communist party official. young

that's not what china has done. that's not what this coercion, harassment, strangulation, the strategy, the cyber intrusions are all about. when you think about the narrative coming out of china, you talk today the high niece, you're not going to shake hands with xi jinping, you say probably in your book. how do you think about the chinese approach to the narrative on the taiwan issue? >> i think you're very right in pointing out that chinese are very much trying to erode the status quo and we need reactions that are adapt to that because there isn't really status quo anymore. informal military line now that the chinese are crossing it every day so that's also how do we respond to that. it's on one china policy more broadly. it's been something that chinese, the way they've been lifting the bar kind of continuously, i mean, most europeans, i think, i was probably part of -- the danish prime minister back in 2009 and then as a serving diplomat and then i think a lot of europeans thought, now we have appeased to chines

will be a major — may very well not agree. chinaecond trump term. since a state visit, resident xijinping in trump term. since a state visit, resident xi jinping in 2017, trump term. since a state visit, resident xijinping in 2017, china has made big strides towards rivalling america as the world's strongest power. on the eve of the election, trump repeated his plan to put a big tax on imports from china and others, also known as a trade war. i and others, also known as a trade war. . ., war. i am doing the same thing with china. we war. i am doing the same thing with china- we are _ war. i am doing the same thing with china. we are going _ war. i am doing the same thing with china. we are going to _ war. i am doing the same thing with china. we are going to therapy - war. i am doing the same thing with china. we are going to therapy hell| china. we are going to therapy hell out of them. —— tarriff the hell out of them. out of them. -- tarriff the hell out of them. �* ., ., , . of them. before he leaves office, donald trump — of the

his china is not invincible. host: it airs tonight on pbs's frontline, also available to stream on their website and the pbs video app and martin smith is here to take your phone calls for about the next half hour this morning. we will start on the independent line. harry in maryland up next. caller: wouldn't you say that kissinger was partly responsible for the rise of china and our cozying up to the communist parties all over the world except for russia? and maybe even russia and the greed that goes along with it. i would think that we have been complicit in the rise of china. that is my question. guest: i don't think there's anything wrong with the rise of china. the people in china have every right to have their living standard raised. before the revolution it was one of the poorest countries in the world. the opening to the west, which you referenced the visit of kissinger with nixon in 1972, this was all going in a fairly good direction until we got to xi xinping. so it wasn't reasonable to think that we sh

he's not china is his, i me is this. we certainly haven't tablets on his info as an a g o to literally tens positive world vote from she thought washington children commitments to its allies. this is inside story, the hello and welcome to the program. i'm elizabeth put on the walls to biggest economy . the us in china are on a collision course. donald trump has promised to impose high tariffs on chinese import. once he's back in the white house, threatening to destabilize markets across asia, it could perhaps also open new ones. bosh at what cost comes to america 1st policies. and so raising security concerns will the us stand by its wow to defend taiwan sovereignty. and then there's north korea, ken this forge and closer ties of putin and testing bigger and more advanced missiles and the neighbors are getting nervous. so how will trans policies affect asian markets and with long held allies be left out in the cold? we'll explore all these issues with, i guess in a moment. but 1st this report 5, katia lopez, hold a on th

china relationship, it is far more complex than that. >> i think they would prefer trump as president than the democratic candidate. the track record shows donald trump is nots anti-china as he is perceived. >> trump has made it clear he would continue to take a hard-line approach on trade with china, threatening sizable tariff increases on all imports. >> outside of love and religion, it is the most beautiful word there is. tariff. >> he has this crazy notion that putting a tariff of 60% on every product imported from china is a good idea. this man has so little understanding of tariffs he thinks that china pays for them. >> inflation no doubt is on the mind of u.s. borders and terrorists -- and harris has blasted the plan as a sales tax. the current biden administration has maintained trump era tariffs on $350 billion worth of chinese goods and added billions more on other chinese products, including electric vehicles. perhaps by design not to antagonize american workers in manufacturing swing states, harris has been less specific on what are trade priorities would be, repeating that america must protect and build its competitive edge over china in critic

and of course, jenna is not. china is only shipyard. the csr, yes, reference is a leak from the u. s navy briefing saying that china is over roll ship, building capacity is 230 times greater than americans. yes, you heard that right. $230.00 times the west can build 100000 tons of ships, naval and civilian every year. china can build 23000000 us may have the edge in terms of quality in some areas. but on that front too, there's little doubt that china can catch up. this is now trump problem, and he won't be able to fix it on his own. you know, it's a very, very serious problem and united states in order to get this right is going to have to also rely on japanese and korean allies who are ahead in ship building it's, it's going to be multi off alliance effort to get to get allied ship building up to anywhere close to our china is okay. hold that thought for a moment. let's move on to that other big issue. trace trump made imposing terrace on chinese imports cents a piece of this election campaign, tariffs, downstairs. so, you did this before unleashing a war of what he saw as unfair

that's not what china's done. that's not where they have moved. that's not where this strangulation, the anaconda strategy, the cyber intrusions are all about. when you think about the narrative coming out of china, you've talked to the chinese, you're not going to shake hands with xi jinping again probably in your book you say. >> doubt it. >> how do you think about the chinese approach to the narrative on the taiwan issue? >> i think you're very right in pointing out that chinese are very much trying to erode the status quo, and we need reactions that are adapted to that, because there isn't really a status quo anymore. what we talked about, the median line of the taiwan strait, which is an informal military line. now that the chinese are crossing it with their airplanes every day. so that's what we need to think with our reaction, how do we respond to that? you can say it's on one-china policy more broadly, and it's been something that the chinese, where they have been lifting the bar kind of continuously. like they say don't go see the dalai l

presidents biden and xi of china meet as trump and uncertainty loom large. >> i would not want to invest too much in china. >> the play is america. >> that's right. >>> plus, king tides in oregon nearly sweep someone away as several states set for a blast of winter. we'll have the forecast. >>> later, driving on sunshine. >> how fast does this car go? >> cbs takes a spin in a car that's powered by the sun. >> this is the future. ♪ >>> this is the "cbs weekend news." from new york with jericka duncan. >> good evening, jericka is off. i'm david wade. tonight we begin with rattled nerves on a runway in dallas. a bullet pierced a southwest jetliner feet from the cockpit as it taxied for takeoff. it is the latest incident in a week of problems for planes and passengers. cbs' jason allen leads us off tonight at love field. jason? >> reporter: david, you know that there are all kinds of sounds you hear when a plane is ready to take off. southwest airlines tells me in this case the crew of the plane heard something above all of that that was out of place. it turned out to be a bullet hitting the

without china, russia would not be able to continue the war. china talks about the importance of sovereignty and internationally recognized waters. they have still not condemned russia for invading a sovereign state with internationally recognized waters. they have chosen the other side when i talk about these two systems. they want to set rules. that is fine but then you have to change the rules in accordance with the rules and they do not do that. there are a lot of missions that watch the war and the autocracies look at us, who will flinch first? that is a serious situation. not supporting ukraine is not only to the detriment of ukraine , but it is also dangerous for us. people have to understand this war is about much more than ukraine. >> can we have a mic for nancy? i want to underline what the admiral said. the stockpiles are very low. they are very low. we are close to the critical edge. we do not talk about that enough. >> artillery is getting better slowly. >> nancy? >> thank you. nancy. thank you very much, panelists. a great panel. s

not always want to show. and of course, the, the sad aspect is about democratic countries kind of 20 and the replying kind. i mean, russia as on the board, the infrastructure to china has to, but it's not in the character of our countries to think that ok, let's go on to some stuff with joshua. so in that sense, we are in a week of position. inevitably, it does sound like it really is quite a vulnerable system. nato has launched a maritime sensitive protect on the c infrastructure. but i mean, you know the question, beg, sweet to be off. what can they to do to improve the security of, of critical on the c cables given development, the over his phone ability. oh, yes indeed. and, and that's a question to me too. i mean, certain things are probably can to very uh, electronic surveillance mechanisms. i assume that we can improve it a little bit, but a 100 percent safety. i do not see how one could cheap. mm hm. the majority of, on the see cables are owned by private companies. i mean, should governments do you think, be taking greater controls to increase the level of safety here? i think so, because they don't. but uh, even if it this private though and it is, it is

and we know the strength of the middle class, we must make sure that america, not china, wins the competition for the 21st century. [applause] under my plan, we will invest in the industries that built america like steel, iron, the electric power industry. [applause] and we will ensure that the next generation of breakthroughs, from advanced batteries to cutting edge solar panels, are not just invented, but built right here in america, by american workers. [applause] by american workers. and as part of that vision, we will invest in manufacturing communities across wisconsin and across america. and we will retool existing factories. they've been built out, but we need to upgrade them. they are where the people are. and where those people are, they don't want to have to leave. they want to stay home. they want their kids and their grandkids to be where they are. so we will retool those factories. we will hire locally and work with unions to create good paying jobs, including, by the way, jobs that do not require a college degree. [applause] because here's the thing -- we got to really understa

so that we do not rely on china — trump. so that we do not rely on china to _ trump. liances and so forth, that would be a huge mistake. he hinted at that last time, didn't complete it, he didn't pull us out of thejc poa, which i think has allowed iran to rearm, but i think that are initiatives he could do, which one is to expand the abrahamic chords in the middle east, give him credit for that. joe biden was building on that, a major reason for hamas invading a show when it did. the middle east needs to get put back together. we cannot leave. us leadership and foreign policy continues to be absolutely crucial and bipartisanship is two. that conversation _ bipartisanship is two. that conversation was - bipartisanship is two. that conversation was a - bipartisanship is two. that conversation was a little i conversation was a little earlier. i still have our panel with us. we heard jane say that she would put a republican in her... do you think we will see donald trump reach across the island work with democrats question mckee already has. stephanie mentioned it earlier,

those might be, i think, this mutual benefit and in return china promises not to get involved in your politics no matter what. by the way, china's involvement isn't the same in every port. for example, it can vary from 100 percent ownership to a minority steak. but the pitch has been successful in the global south, especially in african countries, out of around 160 ports with china, head steaks and 53 are on the african continent. start shooting the point you soon . 56, i do a bit good. then this is almost dead good demo, cross the lot bunkerville niles on golf. i left this yonder job or the out the 6. yeah. a lot, shooting the alaska add to where it says that there are some guys you some so some point they say from $1.00 to 0 now to the key itself, which and i'm off at the pallet 5 building roads, railways and seaports. china wants to connect the world and one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects ever conceived. jones young man hold your dish bank. when the belt and road initiative launched in 2013, it was initially suppose to connect china and europe. just like china's anci

-china trade agreement because already in the first 12 administration one such agreement was a but that is not realistic to expect that china today is really thinking about moving away from its current economic system. if anything, the direction of travel is in a very different direction with more intervention in the economy, the dual circulation philosophy and trying to pursue technological hegemony by leaning more on its existing model. i doubly china would be amenable and a don't think there would be a realistic goal. the other potential objective of this 60% jeff would be to go back to what we saw in the first trump administration, which is a managed trade approach. pressuring china to buy more from us. that's what the first u.s.-china trade agreement delivered in a letter but it never really delivered and practice. so china agreed to $200 billion worth of u.s. products. it never really happened. so again we could engage in that negotiation. i imagine china is decide what it wants to do. will probably come up already with some kind of trade deal and the more, trying to negotiate something

and it's not china. and it's not saudi arabia. if someone says oil prices are going wrong, it's the saudi's fault -- no the u.s. and canada combined have the power. if they decide to exert it. first of all, that's just that awareness of where the u.s. fits. i was testifying before enc in this congress, and people were saying china is the most powerful in the world in energy. i go, just look at the data. you're just wrong. so that awareness, i think, is the first important point. the second is there's still domestic policy in the united states to maximize that energy posture, that really strong posture. obviously, there's been, in the last four years, a lot of limitations on the power on the footprint of the united states. it's been hard to rebuild additional pipelines, it's been harder to drill in certain parts of the country, on certain federal lands. it's been harder to move that energy to our military allies, who just haven't had the chance to sign a free trade agreement. so the ban that happened on lng, who did that hurt? it h

oh yeah, that makes well bed every tense relationship between the us and china, but that's not stopping to us all skiing china to try to prevent north korea sending troops to russia. craig, the question is, is china willing to do that? and indeed, kind of do that. you know, i don't think there's much china can do uh, to restrict, uh, the uh, any deployment by north korea to russia. whether it's our troops or weapons for that matter. since of course, china has been in the same thing directly supporting the rushes war. shooting you crying through uh, supplies and critical uh, technologies and also diabetes just in general way of important training partner for russia. and of course, the north korea. north korea overwhelmingly remains dependent on shawn or at least 90 percent of its trade. and so in that sense, china does have some limited leverage over north korea. and china also, as was mentioned, is, will not be enthusiastic to say, north korea, escalating tensions too much in the region, including through it's on this all testing. but ultimately, the is the kind of limits what shawn it

not china, not foreign governments, not foreign cmpanies.hat's going to come down to your wallet. >> reporter: brian peck teaches international trade law at usc and says trump's tariffs could also be a negotiating tactic. >> if he doesn't like a certain practice or a certain policy initiative, he can use it as leverage to threaten them. >> reporter: a recent study suggests trump's proposed tariffs could cost middle-income households more than $2,600 a year. in 2018 when trump slapped tariffs on imported washing machines, prices jumped almost $100. but foreign appliance makers also moved some production to the u.s., and a year later they had created 1,800 new jobs. still other countries retaliated with tariffs on u.s. exports, which led to job losses. you import air fryers. why can't you just make them here? >> well, there's no factory in america. a factory that could potentially produce hundreds of thousands of air fryers in one year, same quality, there's nowhere in the world other than chinese. >> so what if someone said it's about time we

and of course, jenna is not. china is only shipyard. the csr? yes. references a leak from the u. s. navy briefing saying that china is over roll ship, building capacity is $200.00 and such e times greater than americans. yes, you heard that right. 230 times the west can build 100000 tons of ships. naval and civilian every year. china can build 23000000 us, may have the edge in terms of quality in some areas. but on that front too, there's little doubt that china can catch up. this is now trump's problem and he won't be able to fix it on his own. you know, it's a very, very serious problem and united states in order to get this right is going to have to also rely on japanese and korean allies who are ahead in ship building it's, it's going to be multi off alliance effort to get to get allied ship building up to anywhere close to our china is okay. hold that thought for a moment. let's move on to that other big issue. trace trump made imposing terrace on chinese imports. sent a piece of his election campaign dot or upstairs upstairs. so, you did this before unleashing a war of what

china and u.s. part -- the way we train the data for the large models, we are not completely separated. l for china. there's a different model for what we are doing in the u.s. a lot of it has to do with history. we have systems we've been preparing for the past decade. great preparation, organizing the data, to make the computer feel like human. the u.s. has a huge a vantage. -- advantage in time. caroline: the supply chain. you talk about efficiency built in in the u.s. we potentially see tariffs. a lot of things are imported even at the most high-end technological element. will that put pains to efficiency in the u.s.? alfred: there was already pain. more pain to the people not allowed to be importing stuffer nvidia. supply chain is not like what it used to be before covid. we had to slow down. we are still behind in this country. we are dependent on taiwan. this codependency between countries -- i have great hope, the great reasons to continue to progress mankind, we don't stop. which i don't think we do. ed: the environment. this week, my colleagues reported data bricks is doing a t

china? of course we did not. what we got was an expensive boondoggle and the makings of a corrupt mafia state where companies that paid tribute to trump got more favorable exceptions in the trade war. as bloomberg reports, public companies whose executives donated to republican candidates had a higher chance of winning exclusions from president-elect donald trump's first term tariffs on china, while those who gave to democrats other odds fall according on studies in 2000 applications for relief. as with all things trump, it's largely patronage. in fact, his allies, now that he's won the election, have stopped pretending they care about bringing down prices. >> you think this is in any way going to spark inflation? this is a worry about detractors on tariffs. >> it is going to create some winners and some losers. >> the other component of this is a consumer prices. are they going to go up? >> maybe they will, but i think it is up now to these two countries anti-china as well. >> maybe they will. did everyone -- di

china. yeah, it's going to hurt, but it's not going to be faithful. and that's the issue i hear you started looking at global growth as are saying it's relative. if you look at, i see on in china and they're growing very well developed countries, part human the us, they say that it was going very well. that was the narrative coming out of the bite and white house. but the fact is 70 percent of americans felt that they were living paycheck to paycheck and they voted in donald trump because they had more faith in his ability to write the economy. so that us is not doing all that well. and when it starts, as far as i said, it's going to have a rebound effect, and we'll have to see what happens after that. i'm hanging in beijing that scene. i'm kind in washington dc and then single for graham on was it's been a fascinating discussion. thank you to all 3 of you for your insights. we really appreciate it and thank you to for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website, which is 0. don't com. as a further discussion to go to our f