. >> there are anyone who thought that this wapping labour majority, which we know is very, very wideide, but sort of pond thin, would lead to some sort of political stability or consensus in westminster. well, that's been blown out of the water, hasn't it? repeatedly. >> big majorities can be very difficult for the person leading the party. >> they can be if you don't lead a disciplined party. and if 100 mps were to vote against the government, that would obviously be very problematic indeed, not least because it could set a precedent. i think one of the reasons why there is no government can just not have vote. >> they control the agenda. >> they control the agenda. >> one of the reasons, i think, why there is or seems to be so little stability is because of social media. so now we all have a voice, don't we? so even if there are only 121 conservative mps and only five reform mps, they on social media, but also their supporters or people who are just angry with politics generally can make a big noise. and why has labour got itself into this problem? partly naivety, partly because th