joining me now is democratic senator amy klobuchar of minnesota. senator, it's great to see you. there are so many things i can always ask you about, but i want to start there because i think americans are trying to understand. i'm sure people in your state are trying to understand what exactly the impact is of these tariffs on your state borders, canada. you obviously know what a key trading partner the country country is. what concerns you most and how to make it real for people. are these tariffs going to impact people in your state. >> this is just the latest example. >> of you. >> as you've detailed. >> every day chaos. >> up. >> corruption up and sadly prices of eggs up. and we're going to see more of this if he follows through on this 25% tariff on canada, mexico, 10% on china, what does that mean? it means that the average american family is going to have their costs increased by $1,200 for one year. he hasn't even acknowledged that this is going to happen, that we're going to see these prices go up for so many things because canada, of course, is hitting back with a 25%

but the democratic senator, amy klobuchar, an experienced prosecutor herself, made it the main focus of her line of questioning. watch this as she effectively made her point by entering patel's own words into the record and not allowing him to obfuscate. >> did you. >> say this when trump wins in 2024 and is in power in 2025, we can prosecute them. referring to justice department officials for an actual rico statute violation for criminally. >> organizing the united. >> states government to break the law. >> to rig. presidential elections. >> did you say. >> that yes or no? >> again. >> senator, you're reading a partial. >> statement. >> so i'm unable to. >> fully respond. >> okay. again, we'll put it on the record. have you referred to the media as the most powerful enemy of the united states that they have ever seen? is that right? >> again, you're reading. >> a quote i take it you're reading. >> it accurately. two 2324 you said. >> we're. >> going to come after the people in the media who lied about american citizens who helped joe biden rig the elections. we're going to come afte

you know, you got the democrats out here, got amy klobuchar out here talking about, well, we're goingh them on like, why nobody wants you to work with fascists. amy. like don't do that. right. we've got oh, god is on the throne. really? god's on the throne. if so, i can't see him. if god's on the throne, somebody needs to find me the ark of the covenant and call him up and wake him up, because i don't see it. right. but that's what the response is right now. a bunch of platitudes, while they wrote down exactly how they were going to steal power. and they are stealing power. >> okay, so i'm over the hand-wringing as well. i feel like it's kind of those stages of grief, and i kind of feel like we should be appropriately in the anger stage of it. so the question is, if you think that the courts are impotent, then even though there have been good, strong rule of law rulings coming out of federal judges across the board this week with this federal spending freeze issue, what are people supposed to be doing? what role then do the courts even have anymore? what role does the judicial system