that is according to the competition and markets authority. should be easier to compare prices between different brands. here's ben boulos with more. the competition and markets authority launched an investigation after concerns over surging baby milk prices. the regulator concluded that parents could save around £300 a year by switching to a lower—priced brand, but the thing is, the market is quite concentrated in the hands ofjust three companies, which between them control 90% of the uk baby formula market. they are kendamil, nestle, which makes sma, and danone, which makes aptamil and cow & gate. one big change the watchdog is recommending is that parents vouchers, that sort of thing. the competition watchdog will now pass these recommendations on to the uk, northern irish, scottish changes to the law are made. to hospital in rome for tests and treatment for ongoing bronchitis. the 88—year—old, who has been breathless in recent days and has delegated officials to read his speeches, pope francis has been pope since 2013 and has experienced o

samsung where he will deliver a speech outlining the governments plans for a refocused competition and markets authorityses regard as burdensome regulation. this comes after the sudden ousting of the cmas chair last month. michael field is european equity strategist at morningstar. hello to you. all of this happening on the same day, the growth figures coming out, the business secretary talking about growth and as way to reform regulators, cma in particular. reform regulators, (ma in particular-— reform regulators, (ma in particular. what difference will it make? _ particular. what difference will it make? it _ particular. what difference will it make? it is - particular. what difference will it make? it is a - particular. what difference will it make? it is a good l will it make? it is a good question, sally. in some ways you have to look at the motivation for doing this, obviously they do want to improve the growth profile of the uk so picking a day in which gdp was released and the figures not being spectacular is probably a good starting point but, like the other measures you have discussed that the

and small these support to realize the full potential of those infrastructure deployments. second, the fcc has, with congressional authority, experimented with new regulatory models to create competitive opportunities in the market and foster innovation. there is no greater example of regulatory innovation dems the success of wi-fi. wi-fi technology was invented in the 1980's. the fcc open spectrum for extreme mentation by engineers and inventors. this allows anyone to use any device for any purpose under rules authorized by the fcc to avoid interference with the services. wi-fi carries 53% of all internet traffic and almost 90% of wireless internet traffic. without supporting wi-fi and unlicensed spectrum innovation we would not have the global communications revolution we enjoy. in this century newer models for spectrum access are increasing access for small community institutions, rural and tribal communities and other private industry outside big wireless characters -- carriers. third and finally, congress is carefully divided between federal and nonfederal users. the in tia and fcc respectfully -- respectively requiring cooperation. the day-to-day operation of ntia and the fcc they do put their trust in gov

operate at a commercial pace required in our competitive power markets and approve the use of pro forma power purchase agreements and conditionally authorize the general manager to execute such power supply contracts. in 2021 the board of supervisors adopted ordinance number 170 6-22 which created section 2143 of the administrative code section 2143 authorizes the use of pro forma power purchase agreements, waive certain city contract related requirement rights that do not apply or is unusual to the power industry and delegates authority to the general manager to execute purchase contracts in excess in excess of ten years or requiring expenditures of 10 million or more in sales contracts with revenues of 1 million or more. >> section 21 43 limits the puc use of delegated purchase authority to contracts that do not exceed 25 years in duration. it also limits the delegated purchase authority to total expenditures of 200 million per year and sales authority of revenues of 20 million per year. >> section 2143 also delegates authority to the general manager to execute power purchase agreements for certain power products types with binding arbit