this project was initially submitted also noted that a project would not be eligible for hb 2011 if any of the proposed housing were located within 500ft of a freeway as defined in section 332 of the vehicle code. >> after the project was submitted in may of 2020 for a review of the ab 2011 eligibility criteria determined that the project was within 500ft of the on ramps and off ramps of u.s. route 101 at market street and octavia boulevard. >> as such, the project was determined to be ineligible for use of ab 2011. the project team requested the withdrawal of their project application in august of 2020 for in september of 2020 for governor newsome approved assembly bill 2243 which amended ab 2011. effective january 1st, 2025 ab 22 43 modified the definition of a freeway under ab 2011 to not include the portion of a freeway that is an on ramp or off ramp that serves as a connector between the freeway and other roadways that are not freeways. ab 2243 also authorized a housing development located within 500ft of a freeway to be subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process o

we saw that last year when blackrock bought hbs or agreed to for $12 billion.g massive wealth for the founders of these friends. vonnie: hbs, blackrock bought them. stephen nesbitt wrote the book on private credit. if we read it, i'll be able to do it? tom: possibly. i have not read the book so i cannot tell you that. it was an interesting one. he's been doing this for a long time, right about 25 years. started off just kind of advising high net worth individuals and institutions on making investments in the space. round about five years ago they started offering their own funds. following an external investment he's a billionaire as well. vonnie: give us more names of billionaires. there are a pair of brothers that are quite fun. tom: the golubs. they are running the firm. not one i was really aware of but they have $70 billion in assets under management in the private credit space. doing very well. worth $3.3 billion each. vonnie: congratulations to them and congratulations to you. great story. everybody should read it. i note on that, next thursday, sonali b

so let's take hb 56. so that was an alabama southern legislators had passed the beason hammon alabama tax payer and citizen protection act beason hammon alabama taxpayer and protection act, or hb 56, which was signed into law by governor robert bentley on june 9th, 2011. hb 56 required police to detain any person that they have reasonable suspicion is in the country unlawfully. it prohibited undocumented migrants from receiving any public benefits at either the state or local level. it prevented them from attending publicly owned colleges or universal is it required k 12 schools to determine students were in the country illegally? it prohibited landlords from renting properties to undocumented. i always need to end the k-12 one that's more punchy than the landlords. sorry. it's like mike. and then the landlords. anyway, the point is, is it makes it, like, impossible to be an undocumented person in alabama and alabama. you remember mucho trabajo. and russellville, alabama. remember that one, right? these a

the specific of hb 1181 have been tailored with sensitivity to the privacy concerns that exist. or for that matter to being adventitious and making sure meaningful protections that protect minors across the board. >> we start with strict scrutiny. >> could ask a question? is it-explained to me why the barrier is different online than in a brick-and-mortar setting? it seems like a lot of your concerns are driven by privacy concerns. which is a feature of the internet. you do not have privacy if you go into a bookstore and ginsburg or if you go to a movie theater displays pornographic movies. you have to show age verification. explained to me why this is uniquely burdensome here when it's not been in the real world context? >> me start with that with your question about why this is different. the answers you're creating a permanent record on the internet when you provide this information. it is being collected. it is a target for hackers. that is something different flashing than idm physical space. but i would also note you have constant filtering of the court is recognize that i

as found the district short we showed as imp by hb 181 will be invading privacy part on last point, this is that one third trigger. by your hon is a more targeted law. a more tailored law that says here's acular concern are regulating according to that. >> what you do but her statement those whong facial challenges have especially hard roll, not road, but row to h >> to think we've done what moody's would require any lenger to do we hav shown the heartland applications are unconstitutional. when it comes to a lack of iloring as you expand on these analysis only gets worse for xas but we do not rd moody's to transform part of first amendment so you can never bring fir amendment challenge when you're dealing with certain unknowns and a wide array of speech. plexus justice kavanaugh? >> the questions about what i before us, just whether we apply height and scrutiny do we go on to apply-scrutiny? you when you're opening asked us to restore the injunction order to reshe injunction as you are asking have to make an assessme likelihood of success on how the standard is applied not to do with th

uh, i guess i'm not going to repeat the hb handle, but talk about that vis a vis his personality.s personality. >> i think seven year old is charitable. i mean, one of the things that he has is he loves dank memes and jokes, and he loves to make jokes himself and then laugh at his own jokes. and then all the people who work for him laugh at him, and therefore he thinks he's funny and he's not funny. he's sometimes funny. i guess i never thought so, but, um, he likes to do this. he likes to engage in sort of these juvenile little pranks. and when he's not doing that, he likes to insult people. and all kidding aside, we don't mind being called these names, but it's a 53 year old man does not do this, i mean, or this one does. and so he just like, this is what he likes. he likes to to to to slag people. i guess it's part of video game culture or something. but it's i find it unusual for someone of his age to be such a, such a juvenile. >> scott, let's talk about what can be done about for people who don't agree with what is happening at the behest of and the leadership of elon musk,

i give you vivek ramaswamy, when the hb one.isode. >> blew. >> up. >> who was the first. >> to go? >> that brown. >> skinned guy. >> who. >> was talking about bringing. >> more brown skinned people of intellect into the country? so i think we need to be very clear about what this is and what it isn't. as you set it up, this, yes, is focused on a little bit on musk. >> but at the. >> end of. >> the. >> day that. >> that lens. >> has to be crystallized and. >> clear. >> on donald trump. >> and that makes a lot of sense because, yes, the hype of it and some of the sheer rule breaking which draws attention and scrutiny, gets people thinking about him as his personage. the new york times reporting. musk is focused on the bureau of fiscal service, which is america's checkbook. access to that data would give him insights into the contracts of his competitors. i mean, a lot of this is pretty brash, and you would think that there'd be a heck of a lot of opposition, even even from business friendly interests. >> well. >> that's the bargai

last year, idaho passed hb 710.orbids minors, anyone under the age of 18, from accessing books with content that the state has deemed, quote, harmful to minors, end quote. notably, the law doesn't distinguish between a 17 year old and a toddler, forcing libraries to hold high school seniors and babies to the same standard of maturity. the ban applies to many sellers, many bestsellers, classics and previous. velshi banned book club features like kurt vonnegut's slaughterhouse-five, toni morrison's the bluest eye, margaret atwood's the handmaid's tale, maya angelou's i know why the caged bird sings, george r.r. martin's game of thrones, judy blume's forever. the ban has an impact on nonfiction books, restricting kids and teens from books about puberty and body changes, which every young person is going to go through. penguin random house, one of the plaintiffs in the suit, says the ban affects some history books as well and could restrict minors access to books about the holocaust and other major historical events. in

as soon as that hb one visa thing blew up, they got rid of him real fast.cus the target and the energy on the man who is responsible for all of this, from the from the rising of the sun to its setting, its first and always donald trump. period. end of story. and everything that happens in this country is his problem. it lands on his desk, not elon musk, not some 25 year old crazy racist, but the president of the united states who empowered elon musk to hire that racist. that's how this process should work. and that's what the dems need to focus on. >> david, when i hear michael getting fired up, i think back to 2017, immediately after donald trump's first inauguration, people took to the streets in march after march. that was not the case. two weeks ago, there was sort of this overwhelming sense of exhaustion, but we didn't get donald trump 1.0. we've gotten donald trump 2.0, and it feels like things are starting to feel different. people are getting fired up again. what do you think? >> well, he came in in an extreme. you're exactly right. there was a lot

search engines you o through social media can access the same concept the way the kids are likeliest too hb 1181 by f designed is nothing i do mean nothing to address this. >> againsking those questions because you are asking us restore the perimeter ju. therefore we need to have a sense of the question. >> i appreciate the question. how do you with a cike ashcroft as to evaluation of the facts on the ground as opposed to the legal staar articulation? >> ashcroft was on point here is the way of the world for all time. >> think is permissible looking at it n the technology has ev with the smart phones, with the experience the problems caused by chires access to pornography we now sentially agree with justice breyer's evaluation of how to apply t standard progress asked respectfully know. we are here on up limiter injunc. >> the likelihood we would agree too. i think the district court has work too as reflected in its undisturbed, on challenge well substantiated findings abohat the record says that. >> you agree to restore employment injunction by this court we would have to find have a likel

of all thank you to the provider and guardian for bringing forward legislation i was watching when hb 1033 was getting approved i think it was last year and curious to see how this would play out at different local levels. i know that berkeley has been talking about this as well and i also i want to also thank staff for a really excellent analysis of how this kind of conversion of either use or allowing you to use to be condos interacts with the different types of ada use which ones have rent control and which don't, what the incentives are and ensuring that we're protecting really going pretty far to protect rent controlled units. i have a few questions. i might be a little all over the map today but let's see one question i was little confused about as i said, the the requirement for the areas to which this would apply. there are certain dates and so i'm not sure who can respond to this but basically the the date for the state program aligned with when the state program went into effect so that that seemed to make sense to me. but what what's driving the application of units that co

hb cic was proactive and escalated the matter all the way to washington d.c.the navy at first was unresponsive but the cac reached out to, as i said, oci and speaker emerita pelosi's office and our local and minority contractors. >> the speaker imperative pelosi made an emergency meeting and trip and came out with the navy secretary and the caa. senator padilla's official chief of staff to the shipyard as a result, the navy procurement division was able to address the case concerns including a 23% requirement for local contractors and a 23% requirement for small business people. yes, they did enact that. >> this is an ongoing endeavor. we're encouraging all of you to attend cac business and economics subcommittee meetings as we delve more into the details and provide updates to the public. and lastly, i'm going to ask all of you please to work with the cac to get more done for our stakeholders. please no more of the division and self inflicted paralysis and misinformation. you want information, come to the cac, get the information from us. we are ready. we are