kim ledbetter suppued blank. then.edbetter supplied the list at the last minute, changed from which they would choose those said witnesses. she is in total control and supplied a list which was heavily weighted towards her bill passing. in fact, nine of the lawyers who were going to speak for this bill, seven of them are pro and two of them at very best are considered neutral. then let's actually look at who else they're going to invite. they asked whether or not they could invite the royal college of psychiatrists. seemed reasonable. they said no. under pressure, they quickly reversed that decision and then the heanngs that decision and then the hearings themselves. so when we went to the hearings and the question was asked whether or not people with disabilities or anorexia could be included under this bill, with an amazing clip of an answer that was given. let's look at that clip. >> if you're very concerned about terminal anorexia, i'm sure that there's some tinkering you can do with the bill so that people would n