you write on page 88, the famed marshall mcluhan wrote of time's rapid fire. prose encouraged a sub, a rational response. that sounds to me like an old timey version of trump adviser steve bannon's flood zone strategy and also way that a lot of the very online people engage with politics today maybe were not uncharted waters after all. what if that's the first time everybody, anybody ever put marshall mcluhan and steve bannon in the same sentence? i think bannon would appreciate it and mcluhan would have been mortified, but i'd be mortified. but in any event, i think that there something going on there with the, i guess, the mcluhan approach to our time magazine. and time did lean hard in for eisenhower at luce's explicit direction. some of the staff members did not want to be as supportive of eisenhower. but luce recognized that an opportunity in eisenhower and he wanted to have a who he was friendly with in stark contrast to roosevelt, but whom he hated and he, even after roosevelt died, lucille said, it is my duty to on hating him even beyond the grave. he