but that is something that mike walters advising he do now. in terms of these differences that have been going on back and forth, the name calling that we know, but of let him his, unless he has referred to a donald trump is, is being sort of a referring to him and an unflattering language. saying that he lives in additional information space and donald trump is referred to vitamins. zaleski is a dictator of this been this.

mike walters comments, follow the sharp verbal exchanges between trump and zalinski island. fisher reports in washington, dc. the relations between ukraine and you guys haven't been this strain since the stopped of the war. in fact, just 2 years ago to fight and was actually in keith to meet with load them, use the landscape. but over the last few days, there has been award awards between the 2 countries. ukraine upset that the united states began peace talks with russia without inviting the ukrainians. let them use the landscape saying that donald trump has been talking more like a put in sort of gate than the president of the united states. donald trump accusing flooded me is the landscape of being a dictator and refusing the opportunity to end the war. like waltz, who is the us national security advisor says there's on types of like frustration in the oval office. what president trump is obviously very frustrated right now with president zalinski. the fact that i that he hasn't come to the table that he hasn't been willing to take this opportunity that we have offered. i think he eventu

zalinski for refusing to have a dialogue with washington and moscow. us national security advisor mike walter pointed out donald trump's frustration was the landscape behavior. the president, trump, is obviously very frustrated right now with present zelinski. the fact that i that he hasn't come to the table that he hasn't been willing to take this opportunity that we have offered. i think he eventually we'll get to that point and i hope so. very quickly, but present trump is as we made clear to our russian counterparts. and i want to make clear today he's focused on stop in the fighting and moving forward. and we can argue all day long about what's happened in the past. the more on the story now we're doing live in the studio by on us to see of a large enough on us to see. yeah. can you tell us a little bit about why the ukrainian leaders in such hot water with the white house? well, as you can see in the most recent space, donald trump doesn't even mention zalinski and leads that to hit support in this. and it's really a you tied in washington's policy towards the cave compared to the biden

so, ladies and gentlemen, please join me in welcoming walter isaacson and mike duffy. [applause] >> you want to hand me the mic? >> do you want to start? >> hi, michael came all the way from missoula. >> well, some events matter. this is one so welcome and thank you for coming and thank you, walter for coming. we're here to talk about the new elon musk book by walter. >> holder mike. >> i will get used to it. i've read this book. i love it. i don't know, i didn't know very much about elon musk when i started reading it. now, i feel like i know a great deal. it's hard for me to imagine going forward without having read it now that i've read it. so i recommend it. walter, talk to us first about your arrangement with musk, how it happened, how you found out that it happened, and whether your relationship with him about writing the book changed over the course of writing it. >> you know, i always like doing people who are pushing the edge of innovation and for elon musk, he was bringing us into the era of electric vehicles and he was bringing us into the era of space trave

ultimately, mike vujovich, then with the state's attorney's appellate prosecutor's office, and sergeant kelly waltero is now a colonel with the illinois state police, took over the investigation. they focused on a key question, who pulled the trigger? the forensic evidence was no help. was the weapon tested for dna? it was. was anything found? nothing. and no fingerprints on it at all? no. no fingerprints on it. were gun residue tests performed on the people inside that house at the time of the shooting? they were not. and no blood spatter was found on any of the family's clothing. investigators had no physical evidence proving any one person had murdered steven watkins, even though he was clearly shot to death inside the skinner home. all they had were statements from first responders, claiming that shirley skinner, an elderly woman who was very upset and agitated at the time, said she'd shot steven. did she really mean to say that? did they really hear her right? who was the shooter? to solve that mystery, they would look into the inner workings of the tight knit skinner family. and they say what