they're against the muslim brotherhood. they consider home of the palestinian muslim brotherhood, but they, as you said, they don't want 4 or 5000000 more palestinian refugees. egypt is, has such a uh, you know, young focus demographic so much on employment, so much poverty. they exist off of subsidies. i'm academically from saudi arabia and the entire egypt sin military is. this is one of the biggest recipients of u. s. military aid. but they, they just can't do it. they can't absorb these refugees. they know they can't. right. and they don't want to be the ones culpable for the genocide. uh, you know, the, uh, inactive genocide or the ethnic cleansing of the palestinian people out of palestine. no matter how much pressure um trump towards on egypt, the, i simply can't see it happening. or the iranians have trolling tongue in cheek suggested in an alternative solution that instead, right to bring as, as donald trump finally have some piece in the region, right, we could simply move the israelis from israel and we could res

this counterrevolution this reaction for many of the governments against groups like the blunt muslim brotherhoodmple which up to that point in certain contexts was considered moderate in jordan for example rated fieldwork it was seen as a loyal opposition whereas in more recent years it's now characterized as problematic and potentially extremist. so in many ways i think the root of why that's possible the irony in the way the senate government misconceived is what religious freedom actually would be an supports with the same government has long think the support which is democratization and the rest of the world has to do i think the router that is islamophobia and his lack of understanding of islam which unfortunately was not addressed in the aftermath of 9/11 and which i would argue has contributed to why the united states and why europe have been willing to go along with what israel is doing to palestinians in the west bank and gaza i think israel has been able to benefit from pernicious islamophobia which is never been addressed in particular and europe. one question i wanted to discuss was

into power after the over throw of a president of our president morsey, who was backed by the muslim brotherhood. so there's a real concern here, a real delicate balance between the internal domestic politics and debates with an egyptian society and the broader ally and structure that exist. so it wouldn't be a, it would be a very big deal for egypt to take in all of these palestinian displays ethnically cleanse from guns up and they have to deal with the fact that they're still ongoing political and economic and social concerns that are still deep within egyptian societies that might come to the floor and create it might create a new situation of instability within egypt, which is also an important us ally in the region we out. can i put the overall point to what, what the team from supporters are saying though, conflict between israel and the palestinians has been ongoing for decades does is currently one big bottom side. violence is rinse and repeat in the region. so a disrupt or like trump is what's needed in order to transform the insight. do they have a point or is it short sighted? i, it'

coming up the top down, all slower, terry and solemn fist is fam, which will merge with the muslim brotherhood. and we are going to enter a new era. and also it will be in the secretary and this will have the rise of self as a price of secondary analysis. that would be the consequences of this worrying conclusions from allister trip. now every time a question is raised in washington about its global biological warfare program is the stock response. it's one of ridicule when independent journalist continue to amass what they say is incorrect or full evidence of subjectivity in next. one of those very reporter shares her findings without the a better late than never term secretary of state. marco ruby, oaks admits america's unipolar moment has passed viewers of this program understood this long ago. all of this emission make comes foreign policy different. will diplomacy make a comeback successfully so i would have to be using this. nobody's telling me that a human funding business, but yeah, and that's what it's available to what you still there are some of it from the umbrella data. so within

egypt is better than islamist trna, last thing you want is a huge influx of people who want the muslim brotherhoodhamas which are the same thing to take over your country. stuart: give me a end game here, where do you think they go? >> the end game shift the attention away from the palestinians to deter them militarily, degrade their capabilities. hezbollah is in big trouble because they are shiites and syria got taken over by sunni jihadists. but the attention iran which is the paymaster and the ideological support for all these terrorists groups that strike in europe and want to strike the united states which is what trump did the first time. the conventional wisdom is solve palestinian issue, trump said no, if you solve iran or put iran on the back foot you improve the middle east and he did once and we can do it again. stuart: it would be nice if one of the states returned to prosperity but it doesn't look likely, does it? thanks for joining us. appreciate it always. joe scarborough went off on elon musk's handling of doge. was this all about usaid? >> reporter: he said the move to end usaid w

many and their economy is not great, egypt is like we don't want them here, problems with the muslim brotherhood it is complicated, it's complex. what is not complicated is the issue of right and wrong when it comes to these hostages. what he is saying is we are not going to be like biden anymore. the bidens were slow walking weapons to the israelis, don't want you to go too far and actually actually win this thing. we want to draw out the pain for as long as possible. i actually do have a question for the president. does he mean it noon our time or their time because it matters. >> greg: what is the time difference? >> dana: seven hours peered. >> greg: 5:00 a.m., the middle of shabbat, i don't know what is going to happen on that front. hamas does not know how to deal with trump. you are going to give trump an ultimatum? i don't think so. try to out negotiate him? you think he is joking? i will end with this. i understand the sensitivity for the families of the hostages who we believe are alive because right now they are possibly in more danger than they have ever been in these next few days.

the muslim brotherhood in egypt, and dangerous chaos in libya to this day.o one ever mistook move barack or qaddafi as the little sisters of the poor. the world is a dangerous place, not a church picnic. miss gabbard understands this, which is why she also saw the problem of the regime change interventions in these places. the vast number of government throughout history and still today are not democratic. we may wish it were different and we can work to improve it, but that is the way the world is. if we only befriended nations that shared our system of government, and our social and cultural sensibilities, we wouldn't have many friends. in a fallen world we have to take our friends where we find them. no question stable democracies make the most stable friends, but what matters in the end is less whether a country is democratic or nondemocratic, more whether the country is pro-american or anti-american. i will confess that those views may be somewhat unconventional, but look at where conventional thinking has gotten us. maybe washington could use a little

they came out of the muslim brotherhood tradition, which started way back in the in the 1930s and the arab world. but they evolved. and this is one of the critical things about hamas, which people don't understand. and hezbollah is similar. it's remarkable how similar they. but the evolution of hamas from its origins as an islam movement to one that focused heavily they had made a decision on that they're not going to get into politics. they're not going to have a military wing. they're going to do social justice, kindergartens, bakery is a women's literacy group. so whatever they were focused on the ground and this is, as you know, starting this was in the early 1980s, the late 1980s, when they came into being very focused on social side of of of life think that if we just strengthen the vitality and the integrity and the capabilities of our people we will achieve what is our right eventually. but eventually they turned to resistance because after first intifada and the second intifada, they saw that they existing palestinian political under the plo, under yasser arafat was not doing

hamas is the extension of the muslim brotherhood. geography is destiny. egypt has a core interest. and for jordan, more than half of the population. palestinian stability. the hashemite kingdom at stake. and again, a jeremy, i think broke the code here. it would be recognition that the palestinian problem is essentially resolved. and that's not, um, politically acceptable. even while arab states have in many instances, undermined palestinian interests, particularly jordan and egypt. >> yeah, well, they're worried about their own internal stability. danny, you've been speaking to people close to president trump who have their own reservations about this proposal. >> well. >> look, there's a. >> couple of things. >> one is. >> a theory from somebody i talked to who has been involved in these issues. and certainly is is. a an. ally of president trump, who has said that one potential theory is that something along the lines of what you wrote a book about jim, the madman theory, which is that perhaps what president trump is doing is putting out there the most outlandish idea in the hope

one of the intellectual heavyweights of the muslim brotherhood understood ironically and colorado studiedre came here, hated it, and said it was part of his radicalization. so they do not understand a political islam, they don't understand how to fight it, they don't understand that giving up money should enhance our national security when we do it. >> will: incredible. i will ask you guys pulled this very quickly about 30 seconds. we have established through the study and you guys both life experience what we have done here, what we have funded with these taxpayer dollars. you both just listen to elon musk and to trump just to hear the way we waste money. tim, not even as part of the war fighter class, just as a taxpaying american your thoughts? >> i am a small business owner and i know in the small private sector we have to count every single kernel every single being untaxed. when i store stuff i, stuff i taxed the property on it, i'm taxed on every imaginable way and then to see the waste, fraud, and to be is happening in our own government with those tax dollars that is heartbreaking

everybody's you know, all the all the all the moderate nations at war with hamas or the muslim brotherhood or whatever iteration there is. everyone knows them mahmoud abbas is a crook. he's corrupt. he he he takes money, gives it to his friends and deprives i mean, there's nobody in the palestinian world who looks at mahmoud abbas and says, you know, we hope you get a state and you rule us. it's not it's not what people want. so it's a lot of a lot of it is is stagecraft, how to put this together in a way in which there's face saving. and, you know, people can stand up and and feel good about the outcome from all perspectives. but again, i can't emphasize this enough like we wouldn't even begin to start about this with the the arabs until we knew that this is something was interesting to the to the --. like, you know, like that's what's the point what's the point of getting going down the road if you're not going to if. and so that's that's really the issue. i mean, the first issue is to really just look at, again, if if the people of israel by some you know by majority it is a democracy.

muslim. >> brotherhood in jordan is making a recovery as a consequence of what's happened in jordan. palestinians and the hundreds of thousands, scores of thousands even, is going to strain jordan's stability. look, i think the king is trying to square an impossible circle. a lot of it is up to the president. if he follows through on his threat to suspend, restrict or withhold the $1.6 billion that the us gives to jordan, the jordanians are are are really have a major problem. i have a feeling, though, that the king may well find a way to sort of dodge this proverbial bullet. a reuters reporting that he's offered to take several thousand palestinian children's children, and he may up his interest and support for the palestinians in gaza. the president isn't going to give this up, though. so the real question, i think, is trump's, because jordan will not agree under any circumstances, circumstance to basically resettle on a permanent basis, thousands, scores of thousands of palestinians in jordan, thereby basically sending a signal to the arab world that the palestinian problem has no

what you have in here is islamist muslim brotherhood, and they control the narrative in various stuff. for example, the grooming when it happened of the children and all that, and the raping of children in britain because of certain members of the muslim society. why didn't we have a protest as much as we had it for gaza, in the street, in the street, and raising their pictures and asking the justice to bring them back into prison at least, or at least put the trial back and so on. why didn't we have that? that's because you have the muslim brotherhood, who are the party that organised this protest and controls community. when to go out and not to go out. and it controls everything. when you have illegal immigrants coming all the way to britain, for example, the way to britain, for example, the muslim brotherhood, all the way in iraq, all the way in somalia, all the way in birmingham, in sheffield. well, they do they actually bring them lawyers, change their cases. they literally work on changing their cases where it fits the home office that they give, going to guarantee them citizen

and the muslim and the muslim brotherhood and the islamists are do when he came he said he would do when he came in, which is then these wars and the war in gaza and the war in ukraine. he's really looking at short term outcomes here. and i think that that's what we're going to be seeing going forward with this potential forced peace deal >> an irony, a paradox as far as i'm concerned. donald trump is putting america first, but apparently happy to see russia, the historic enemy, triumph in europe. i mean, triumph in the short term by getting, you know, a good result for putin in ukraine. but, i mean, if europe is to be defenceless, there's been quite a lot of talk this morning about what russia's next move might be. is this really in the interests of the united states? >> i don't think it's in the united states interest at all to be negotiating with a bully and an authoritarian like vladimir putin. i think it's a very worrying moment for europe. as you say. it feels like we've been left defenceless on our own. america clearly no longer going to stand up for europe and for the for the sha