sarah pinder wrote for the website free movement. now the clue is in the name there.ugee law starter packs and even did some valentine's day activities for refugees, which is all very touching and in no way deeply weird. pinder specialises in immigration and family law and spent six years, apparently in the not for profit sector, as a specialist immigration caseworker. i accept thatjudges specialise in certain areas, but i would argue that there could be a political or ideological bias there, which she will no doubt deny. and if that�*s the doubt deny. and if that's the case, then she she should never have been allowed to become an immigration judge. of course, this is the judge who allowed a zimbabwean paedophile to stay in britain because he might face persecution in his home country due to his horrific past. she was also one of two judges to declare that a sudanese asylum seeker was a child, despite the home office saying that he was at least 23, had a receding hairline, a thick beard, wrinkles and crow's feet. i think every single immigration judge needs to be inv