i'm like, that is louis schaefer like, that is louis schaefer like, that's a crime. we're in a lot of trouble. i'm not going to comment because i don't want to get sued and i don't. i never even heard the guy, really. so i'm an intellectual. >> i don't know about him. is he does he does cooking, cookery shows. and i know working in television, we have a laugh. we have a laugh behind the scenes. we have a laugh in front of the scenes as well. wherever, wherever we are, we have a laugh. and some of this i'm not saying, i'm not saying. >> you know. >> you know. >> he was just having. >> he was just having. >> a laugh justifying his bad behaviour. >> from what i've heard, you're vile, rude and abusive. that's i mean, maybe to other people. that was incredibly funny. >> now, do i have to go defend the people who've made these accusations against him? you are the one who's supposed to do that. you're the host of the show. >> well. >> well. >> you didn't against the people who made accusations against you. >> we need balance. and i do agree with louis. at least itv is doing

not watching people like audrey schaefer up in front. there are too many to name who have been part of this. but i say thank you. and you know who you are. but the members are the ones who are actually having the authority. they are the ones who elected by the american people. so when they are putting these ideas out there, mr. cooper, chairman rogers, president trump, it is them who is putting their credibility on the line. them who are going to be voting by the american people who may have said that is a horrible idea and been voted out of congress. so the point is, i give a lot of credit to these individuals for those who made it happen along with members as well. i think people are so key and instructive. one is the bipartisan nature, where it was really both sides of the aisle that we are working together. it is so important. the american people don't see that. there are great americans working together at the staff level to make things like this happen. the second thing is this never started with the solution in mind. there is a qu

my question is specific, follow-up to professor space -- schaefer. it relates to directive that came out of the attorney general's office in the first day in office. her first egg in office in which she announced that she would be training the resources, the prosecutorial resources of the department of justice under the foreign corrupt practices act. organizations operating internationally with the criminal intent as opposed to focusing prosecutions on the private sector. i'm interested in your reaction to that announcement, whether you think it's consistent with congressional intent -- intent and whether there will be a congressional response. >> i think there's a pretty strong congressional record developed in a lot of places like the senate judiciary committee and the senate banking committee. and the bicameral members of the helsinki commission. this clash of civilizations that i'm talking about is a very serious national security threat. many of the really dangerous events and people's that we have had to fight in the last decades have emerged f

i will never forget marjorie schaefer mentioning, who is in my office in space policy. there was a different vision of what this actually looks like. which is true, now we all look at it and figure this is what everybody thought but there were a lot of different ideas. do you do it within the space corps model, so calm model, do an agency-like activity, include the intelligence community or not? it's interesting the more study that happened, the more clear it became to everybody. >> i think it was march 2018, president trump first publicly floated the idea of a space force. did you see that coming? you were in the white house. >> we had some tactical warning, there was a cabinet meeting a few days prior to that and for somebody to foia the discussion, but scott did give everybody warning we had not heard the last of a particular topic. that had been discussed. >> did you have anything you wanted to add? >> csis deserves credit for giving us credibility, brookings was not for us, adi was not for us. we needed respectful people. cameron was working both sides. someone who

i worked for the governor of our state at schaefer in the 1990's and he was a businessman who came in the politics and brought that perspective and talked about running government as a business, making it accountable, being in customer -- being customer service oriented, keeping it real and talking about things people care about, so that was a huge influence on me and how i try to serve people in my state, recognizing what is important to them and being on the same level as them. i actually work for them, not the opposite. >> one of the new members of the house is kristen mcdonald rivet. the democrat has experience in the education field. she served on the bay city commission in her home state and served two terms in the michigan senate. she talks about advice she received, retiring senator dan killed -- dan kildy. >> we are very alike so we tend not to get ruffled. what dan said to me is be yourself, lead with your heart, stay connected to the community. so that is what i do. i am new to elected partisan politics. i spent my entire career in public policy but never put my name on a s

the only thing i like about it, i was actually, i hate to sound like louis schaefer.i was in a gocompare advert when they went against this guy. they said, right, we've had enough of the singing guy. this is true. we'll put nick dixon in. and i acted very well, naturalistic acting, and we didn't have it. after that one advert, they said, okay, we're going back to the singing guy, but if they get rid of the singing guy, i'm back again. >> so you're going to sell us insurance? >> the question is, now with my brand, would they go back to nick nixon? >> good luck with that. >> good luck with that. >> with his current brand, it might be not a perfect merging. >> of i don't really know what he's done. did he put his hand on someone's waist? >> no. i heard we don't defame anyone. i heard it was, wasn't it, about a recording that emerged? >> yes. i think he has said something as well. >> hang on. you put if you're dancing, you put people's hands, your hands on people's waist. yeah. there was. >> a clip of. >> a clip of. >> them, you know, when they. >> them, you know, when th

i'm leo kearse and tonight's comedians are louis schaefer and nick dixon. look at them.hey're raring to go. this is headliners. but before tomorrow's news let's go to tonight's headlines with tatiana sanchez. >> ben thank you. the top stories. pope francis has had blood transfusions and is suffering more than yesterday. the vatican has said this evening the 88 year old pontiff has been in hospital for more than a week now, being treated for double pneumonia and chronic bronchitis. well, in an update this evening, the vatican said the holy father's condition continues to be critical, adding that this morning he presented with a prolonged asthmatic respiratory crisis. doctors just yesterday had said he was not out of danger but was not at risk of death. elsewhere, one person has died and two police officers have been injured after a knife attack in the french city of mulhouse. the suspect was arrested at the scene. the man injured two police officers seriously, one in the neck and one in the chest. a bystander had tried to intervene and was killed. the suspect is a 37 year

i'd like out professor schaefer begin the discussion with a quote from russia who also considers theidea of the state of exception. this weight of autocratization is different from wraps the purest way of use of populist narrative, and had to respond to one of the narrative which is that their attack on the rule of law was not an attack on the rule of law but a valid exercise of peoples sovereign to overcome this date of emergency, state of exception? is it any -- narrative or how can we respond to that? thank you. >> right. i think, this is the ultimate playbook is the state of exception with respect to declaring emergencies and usurping power because it's an emergency. it's a huge risk. as tom said we still have, the question is will courts review this as quote a political question? consequently the road politics or the realm of law? in the first trump administration they were very deferential but, of course, also the scope of the national emergencies have been relatively limited. if they become more expensive that would be the test going forward. i will just to in one of the think

schaefer. >> thank you, mr. chief justice. in this case, the fifth circuit the more lacked form applies to a haw that burdens constitutionally protected speech based on content specifically by imposing an age verification barrier before anyone can access a sexually oriented. and a judge explained in his dissent. the strict scrutiny ap to any content basden on web sites. texas' lmore problematic in its failed predecessors and entire web sites depending on one-third is deemed propriate for minors and has scntic health warnings that despite being enjoined texas' intention to deter alt assuming they clead the age hurdle. to abandon strict scrutiny could open a wave of regulations that imperil free speech. th court could restore the prelimar injunction. the district court found t this law's verification provisions are widely content fteng affords one alternativ is less restrictive. ashcroft teaches that a preliminary injunction should stand. that result your honor does not denigrate in protecting children nor does it prevent te as

schaefer. >> thank you, mr. chief justice. in this case, the fifth circuit the more lacked form applies to a taw that burdens constitutionallyrotected speech based on content specifically by imposing an age verification barrier before yone can access a sexually oriented. and audge explained in his dissent. the strict scrutiny appl to any content basedn on web sites. texas' law is re problematic in its failed predecessors and entire web sites depending on one-third is deemed opriate for minors and has scieif health warnings that intention to deter adustexas' assuming they cleare the age hurdle. to abandon strict scrutiny could open a wave of regulations that imperil free speech. this court could restore the preliminy injunction. the district court found tha this law's verification provisions are widely underinclusive. content filri affords one alternative s less restrictive. ashcroft teaches that a preliminary injunction should stand. that result your honor does not denigrate in protecting children nor does it prevent chs to ca

. >> louis schaefer, but i think even he would. >> turn up. >> turn up. >> to the wedding.. >> to the wedding. no. >> neither of. >> neither of. >> them turned. >> them turned. >> up for the wedding. they just said, we're kind of having a party with the families. and then actually, none of them turned. up a zoom wedding. i don't understand how you can have a wedding without just. >> like a. >> like a. >> sort of wedding vibey thing. >> sort of wedding vibey thing. >> she jilted herself an email. oh, can i stay in the country? yes. and it. >> still costs 30 grand. so? so basically what happened here was a ghanaian tourist was granted the right to live in britain under brexit marriage rules, even though she did not attend her own wedding. so yeah, it was a proxy marriage to a german citizen living in britain. it sounds delightfully cosmopolitan, but i don't really understand. any of. >> this at all. >> this at all. >> the gist. >> the gist. >> of it is. >> of it is. >> is that yeah, she played the system. crime does. >> pay well. >> pay well. >> technically it wasn't a crime.

going to tell who's non—binary and who's cat gender.7 i'm leo kyrees and tonight i'm joined by louis schaefer nick dixon to take you through sunday's top stories. there they are. look. happy. this is headliners. but before tomorrow's news, let's go to tonight's headlines with sophia wenzler. >> leo. thank you. these are your headlines at 11:00. donald trump has said many isis terrorists have been killed by us airstrikes. he ordered this morning, posting on his social media site, truth social. the us president said this morning i ordered precision military airstrikes on the senior isis attack planner and other terrorists he recruited and led in somalia. these killers, who we found hiding in caves, threaten the united states and our allies. meanwhile, sir keir starmer has been warned that cosying up to the european union risks dragging britain into a damaging tariff war with donald trump, according to reports in the telegraph. kemi badenoch urged him to resist growing demands from eu leaders for closer economic alignment, and said he should seek a trade deal with the us instead. the prime minis

i'm leo kearse and tonight's comedians are louis schaefer and nick dixon. look at them.hey're raring to go. this is headliners. but before tomorrow's news let's go to tonight's headlines with tatiana sanchez. >> ben thank you. the top stories. pope francis has had blood transfusions and is suffering more than yesterday. the vatican has said this evening the 88 year old pontiff has been in hospital for more than a week now, being treated for double pneumonia and chronic bronchitis. well, in an update this evening, the vatican said the holy father's condition continues to be critical, adding that this morning he presented with a prolonged asthmatic respiratory crisis. doctors just yesterday had said he was not out of danger but was not at risk of death. elsewhere, one person has died and two police officers have been injured after a knife attack in the french city of mulhouse. the suspect was arrested at the scene. the man injured two police officers seriously, one in the neck and one in the chest. a bystander had tried to intervene and was killed. the suspect is a 37 year