far away, stop fast and l just see right at the german french border. prosecutors from the us justice department have been ordered by a federal court to explain why they want to dismiss corruption charges against new york cities. may eric adams. he was indicted last year and charges of bribery fraud excepting over a $100000.00 in legal campaign contributions. kristin salumi has moved from york of the us district court. judge dale ho has said that prosecutors must show up and explain their rationale for dropping the corruption and bribery charges against mirror. adams, adams himself will also appear and be asked to explain what if anything, he can send into an exchange for the charges being dropped. now, he has publicly said there is no quid pro quo oh here. but the acting us attorney who was overseeing the case resigned in protest saying it's set a dangerous precedent. this is a woman who had served under the conservative supreme court justice antonin scalia . some see the judge's summons to the parties here as push back to what the justice department is doing as well. but legal experts. questio

step size and l g c, right at the german french border. prosecute is from the us justice department, have been ordered by a federal court to explain why they want to dismiss corruption charges against new york city's mass. eric adams was indicted last year on charges of bribery fraud and accepting over a $100000.00 an illegal campaign contributions. this i'll move to dismissal charges against the mass spock, the wave of protests resignations among high ranking prosecutors is the justice department. chris, instead of me has moved from new york to us district court. judge dale ho has said that prosecutors must show up and explain their rationale for dropping the corruption and bribery charges against mer. adams, adams himself, will also appear and be asked to explain what if anything, he consented to in exchange for the charges being dropped. now he has publicly said there is no quid pro quo here, but the acting us attorney who was overseeing the case resigned in protest saying it said a dangerous precedent. this is a woman who had served under the conservative supreme court justice an

us now is sean brennan, an assistant u.s. attorney who worked on january 6th. prosecutions was just tonight been fired from the justice departmentreciate you being willing to come here and talk to us tonight on what i'm sure is kind of a surreal and traumatizing evening. thank you. >> yeah. thank you for having me. rachel. >> what's been your history at the justice department up until tonight? >> so, as you mentioned, i was hired to join the justice department in september 2023 as part of a group of assistant u.s. attorney ausa hires who were specifically brought on to investigate and prosecute the crimes that occurred at and around the capitol. on january 6th, 2021. that has. been basically my bread and butter every day for the past close to a year and a half watching videos, filing motions in court, going to trial to try to hold people accountable for the crimes that occurred that day. >> this letter that we've obtained says it was delivered to you via hand delivery. do you mind if i ask you who handed it to you tonight? >> well, you know, i can't say for sure whether it was hand delivered, because at least in terms of my rece

department of justice. this agreement can only be viewed as the politicization of the department of justice, because charging decisions hinge on political actions that is, by definition, a political useof the department of justice. so whatever you want to say about the bogus claims about weaponization under joe biden, and let's remember, the only support you have is donald trump and his supporters accusations. there's no evidence of any of that. everything was either grand jury or court authorized, etc. they're just projecting, as you said originally, whatever you want to say about that. this is the politicization of the department of justice in a really bad and dangerous way, and it has to stop, and somebody needs to put a stop to it. and if pam bondi is going to go and just flat out lie under oath, then every other single nominee who remains has to be very specifically questioned about whether or not they are going to follow what they said. kash patel has already been exposed to have lied during his hearing when he said he had no involvement in the purges going on at the fbi, and that there are many credible whistleblowers who have come forward to say that. so this is something tha

eric adams and the department of justice that the new york times reported on yesterday, essentially saying that the department of justice was feeding eric adams's lawyers. hey, tell usthe sort of thing that judge ho wants to understand, to determine whether or not there was a quid pro quo here. rachel. >> yeah, i mean, we'll see what the judge decides to do here. but there's a very real possibility that this saga is not over and that this, at the very outset of the trump justice department, may be something that haunts them seriously, for a long way, for a long way from now. lisa rubin, msnbc legal correspondent, working triple time, as always, lisa, thank you so much. so much. >> thank you. where ya headed? susan: where am i headed? am i just gonna take what the markets gives me? no. i can do some research. ya know, that's backed by j.p. morgan's leading strategists like us. when you want to invest with more confidence... the answer is j.p. morgan wealth management for more than a decade farxiga has been trusted again and again, and again. ♪far-xi-ga♪ ♪far-xi-ga♪ ask your doctor about farxiga. upset stomach iberogast indigestion iberogast bloating iberogast thanks

today was a six resignation day at the us justice department. because even though the acting deputy attorney general, trump's personal lawyer, emil bove, ordered that the charges against eric adams had to be dropped, he ordered those charges to be dropped on monday. we've been sort of watching all week wondering what's going to happen, because here's thursday and as of this morning, those charges still had not been dropped. he ordered them dropped on monday. what's going on? well, the reason they hadn't been dropped is because s.d.n.y said, no, we're not going to do it. the acting u.s. attorney in the southern district of new york said, talk to the hand. now, this was somebody specifically chosen by trump to fill this role until they got their own nominee confirmed. she is a registered republican. she's a prosecutor with what the new york times calls bulletproof conservative credentials. she's in the federalist society. she clerked for scalia. but when she was ordered by main justice to drop the charges against mayor adams, this acting u.s. atto

eric adams and the department of justice that the new york times reported on yesterday, essentially saying that the department of justice was feeding eric adams's lawyers. hey, tell usdge ho wants to understand, to determine whether or not there was a quid pro quo here. rachel. >> yeah, i mean, we'll see what the judge decides to do here. but there's a very real possibility that this saga is not over and that this, at the very outset of the trump justice department, may be something that haunts them seriously, for a long way, for a long way from now. lisa rubin, msnbc legal correspondent, working triple time, as always, lisa, thank you so much. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> we'll be right do your dry eyes still feel gritty, rough, or tired? with miebo, eyes can feel ♪ miebo ohh yeah ♪ miebo is the only prescription dry eye drop that forms a protective layer for the number one cause of dry eye: too much tear evaporation. for relief that's ♪ miebo ohh yeah ♪ remove contact lenses before using miebo. wait at least 30 minutes before putting them back in. eye redness and blurred vision may occur. what does treating dry eye differently feel like? ♪ miebo ohh yeah ♪ for r

you're not allowed to use the justice department as a as a cudgel, as a tool. if you do this, great. we will you will let you get away with corruption. if you don't do it, then we're going to come after you anyway. thanks to vice president jd vance addressing world leaders today and drawing some sharp criticism for his comments, why he criticized some of america's allies, plus why one state in the united states is now suing starbucks, and how the coffee chain is responding. that's ahead. >> the boeing. >> 747 has. >> crashed in the lockerbie area. >> trying to find out the why of it became everything. >> nothing is what it seems in the lockerbie story. lockerbie. >> the bombing of pan am flight 103. >> sunday at nine on. >> cnn. >> ovindoli wendy shaffer. >> cogitopraxis. >> to all those who never give a second thought to being the first ones in. thank you. >> servpro. >> a proud supporter of our nation's first responders. >> a sleep number smart bed is perfect. >> for couples. >> the climate 360 smart bed is the only. >> bed that. >> cools and warms on each si

and one that the justice department is going to have to figure out a way to make. right, if it's ever going to be the us justice department ever again when this is done. that's right. thank you chris. thanks my friend, and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. this is going to be a really good show. i'm glad you're here tonight. thanks for being here. so this was washington, dc today ahead of the big snowstorm that is rolling into washington right now. tonight that is a snowstorm big enough that it's already canceled some of the action we thought we were going to be watching late into the wee hours tonight on capitol hill. but ahead of that storm, this was washington today. tons of people in the streets. people turned out just outside the u.s. capitol, upper senate park to protest, to support the civil service, support the people who work for the government to protest our government being dismantled by president trump and, of course, by h

and one that the justice department is going to have to figure out a way to make. right, if it's ever going to be the us justice department ever again when this is done. that's right. thank you chris. thanks my friend, and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. this is going to be a really good show. i'm glad you're here tonight. thanks for being here. so this was washington, dc today ahead of the big snowstorm that is rolling into washington right now. tonight that is a snowstorm big enough that it's already canceled some of the action we thought we were going to be watching late into the wee hours tonight on capitol hill. but ahead of that storm, this was washington today. tons of people in the streets. people turned out just outside the u.s. capitol, upper senate park to protest, to support the civil service, support the people who work for the government to protest our government being dismantled by president trump and, of course, by his top campaign donor. >> this administration maintains that they're going to boost efficiency, but they are doing the most inefficient things imaginable. and

justice department. >> is going to have. >> to figure out a way to make. >> right, if. >> it's ever going. >> to be. >> the us justice. >> department ever. >> again when this. >> is done. >> that's right. thank you chris. thanks my friend, and thanks. >> to you at home for joining. >> us this hour. this is going to be a really good show. i'm glad you're here tonight. >> thanks for. >> being here. >> so this. >> was washington, dc today. >> ahead of the big snowstorm. >> that is rolling into washington right now. tonight that is a snowstorm big enough that it's already canceled. some of the action we thought we were going to be watching late into the wee hours. >> tonight on. >> capitol hill. >> but ahead. >> of that storm. >> this was. washington today. >> tons of people. >> in. >> the streets. >> people turned. >> out just outside. >> the u.s. >> capitol. >> upper senate park to protest. to. >> support the. civil service. >> support the people who work for the. >> government to protest our government being dismantled by. president trump and, of course, by his top. >> campaign donor. >> this administration maintains that they're go

today was a six resignation day at the us justice department.ecause even though the acting deputy attorney general, trump's personal lawyer, emil bove, ordered that the charges against eric adams had to be dropped, he ordered those charges to be dropped on monday. we've been sort of watching all week wondering what's going to happen, because here's thursday and as of this morning, those charges still had not been dropped. he ordered them dropped on monday. what's going on? well, the reason they hadn't been dropped is because s.d.n.y said, no, we're not going to do it. acting u.s. attorney in the southern district of new york said, talk to the hand. now, this was somebody specifically chosen by trump to fill this role until they got their own nominee confirmed. she is a registered republican. she's a prosecutor with what the new york times calls bulletproof conservative credentials. she's in the federalist society. she clerked for scalia. but when she was ordered by main justice to drop the charges against mayor adams, this acting u.s. attorney.

very to it very seriouslprecting black rights, using the army to protect black rights, using the justice department. so, for example, in early 1871, grant's administration had submitted a report to congress documenting the severity and far reach of klan violence in the south. the klan had begun to organize and emerged during the 1860s, was effectively a terrorist arm of the democratic party in the south. they used what was, in no uncertain terms, racial terrorism to intimidate and prevent african-american men from voting, to intimidate and prevent the organization of the republican party in southern states. and these force acts, and especially the ku klux klan act, essentially gave this newly formed justice department the authory prosecute inviduals and prosecute groups who violated the voting rights of african-americans in the south. and then grant could use his authority as commander in chief. he could suspend habeas corpus if necessary. he could in enact martial law, and then he could use the army to help protect black rights and prevent the klan from terrorizing african-americans. did he put to

very took it very seriously protecnglack rights, using the army to protect black rights, using the justice department. so, for example, in early 1871, grant's administration had submitted a report to congress documenting the severity and far reach of klan violence in the south. the klan had begun to organize and emerged during the 1860s, was effectively a terrorist arm of the democratic party in the south. they used what was, in no uncertain terms, racial terrorism to intimidate and prevent african-american men from voting, to intimidate and prevent the organization of the republican party in southern states. and these force acts, and especially the ku klux klan act, essentially gave this newly formed justice department the authority to prosete indivialand prosecute groups who violated the voting rights of african-americans in the south. and then grant could use his authority as commander in chief. he could suspend habeas corpus if necessary. he could in enact martial law, and then he could use the army to help protect black rights and prevent the klan from terrorizing african-americans. did he put t

they used the justice department to go after their political opponent, which in itself is illegal. and obviously it didn't work. reporter: [indiscernible] pres. trump: what does that mean? reporter: [indiscernible] pres. trump: you are asking me a question. am i going to impose tariffs on the european union? you want the truthful answer, or shall i give you a political answer? absolutely. absolutely. the european union has treated us so terribly. reporter: you promised americans to try to reduce cost. and so many of the products we tariffed, when they come into the country, the ongoing country is not paying the tariff. the buyers in the united states pay that. then that is passed on to consumers. pres. trump: right, sometimes. reporter: how would you expect to have prices come down if you have such a broad plan for tariffs? and what do you say to the voters who want to see you reduce everyday costs? pres. trump: i got elected for a lot of reasons. number one was the border. number two was inflation. i had almost no inflation and yet i charged hundreds of millions of dollars of tari

chinese communist party is now going after apple for the service stream, almost as hard as the us justice department did under biden. oh, and anything chemicals. those need chinese orders desperately. second, can the gop just one drug stop the craving for their product? hershey bars, donuts, candies, all the johnnie walker's, jack daniels, casamigos oreos, twinkies, lay's potato chips, frosted flakes, froot loops if it tastes good, the stocks of these creators are out there. department stores of any kind. doesn't matter. kohl's. oh boy. try saving that one. macy's no thank you. although i sure wish it weren't. so let's expand it. does it sell in department stores capri pvh tapestry. sold to you. so nothing's foolproof. i wanted to put a video on the always right story, but what if amazon says tomorrow that it's developed its own chip? the lessens dependance on nvidia after the deep sea scare? i thought ferrari might work, but that thing's got way too high in the end. it is a car company to fit the bill because of its data center affiliation, but that's become a battleground, too. we don't need no st

us. a showdown between the trump administration and its own justice department prosecutors, at least six doj officials resigned in protest because they were ordered by the acting deputy attorney general to dismiss the new york city mayor's federal criminal charges. acting attorney for the southern district of new york danielle sassoon told attorney general pam bondi that dropping the corruption case against eric adams would be, quote, inconsistent with my ability and duty to prosecute federal crimes without fear or favor and advance good faith arguments before the courts. end quote. so soon refused to sign the document dismissing that case. so too did other prosecutors working on it. acting deputy attorney general emil bove then turned to officials in the doj office of public integrity. they too resigned. rather than comply. bove, you'll remember, represented donald trump during the new york state case in which he was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records. the president has denied any involvement in the adams case. >> the u.s. attorney has resigned over the doj s request

he's sick, the justice department against his critics. he's usedartment to protect his supporters and potentially illegally frozen billions of dollars in spending that has been approved by congress. trump is systematically toppling the dominoes of checks and balances, usurping congress's power, de-legitimizing the judiciary and rejecting federalism, all things that were designed by the framers of the constitution to prevent absolute executive power, which was held by the king, which they didn't like. just this week, trump escalated his unconstitutional power grab by signing an executive order that claims the authority to seize control of independent federal agencies agencies that were specifically set up to be insulated from political pressures. these include the federal election commission, the securities and exchange commission, the national labor relations board. that order is sure to face a legal challenge as an overreach of presidential authority. but breaking the law might very well be the point. trump's sweeping power grab is designed to adv

you see it in him using the justice department to. >> basically clear. away obstacles for. >> his agenda. those obstacles used to be leaders in places like new york, like california, and he's trying to find leverage over them again in order to make sure that he is the final rule and he is the final voice. and so this is something that people inside the department are starting to articulate in, i think, a new way, which is they are seeing in real time, faster than the american public, just a little bit faster, faster than the american public. what it looks like when a president tries to supplant. >> the rule of law with. >> his own whims. >> and speaking of mollie, trump was asked about the adams motion to dismiss today. take a quick listen to what his response was. >> what's your reaction to that. >> and to the overall. >> implication that politics. >> were at play here? >> well, i don't know about it. i mean, obviously i'm not involved in that, but i would say this, that if they had a problem and these are mostly people from the previous administration,

they use the justice department to go after their political opponent. >> of trump's picture on the fbisenate confirmation vote he has already earned the support of gop leaders with his pledge to clean out the bureau. >> kash patel knocked it out of the park he is the anecdote a crossfire hurricane party is going to go and clean the fbi out to make sure it's never abuse like it was in the past. and crossfire hurricane was one of the saddest and most dangerous chapters in fbi history. he is the guy who's helped expose it and he will be the solution not the problem when it comes to the fbi. how do you expect the fbi to change if you keep everybody in place that's in part of the problem? >> it's a really good question. another question i'm going to ask you. were going to look at some of the most recent focus of the fbi if you will. generate six attendees per light activist, parent school board meemeeting crossfire hurricane, russia collusion the carter page pfizer war. what if i have to fighting a responsible himself up and kill hundreds of thousands of people in times square which literal

and he is now using the justice department to go after people who were his opponents. also shows that he'll use the power of the presidency to pardon people who committed very serious crimes. 1600 people, of course, were pardoned and those included pedophiles. that included a person who had previous crimes. and when he got out was in a violent altercation with police and includes a drug dealer who was actually going online soliciting someone to do a hit job for him. so the vengeance is a tool that the president uses quite energetically. >> senator peter welch of the great state of vermont, thank you very much for coming to the sunday show and joining me now. joining me now, norm eisen, executive chair of state democracy defenders fund, publisher and co-founder of the contrarian and white house ethics czar in the obama administration. he's part of a part of several lawsuits challenging the legality of elon musk's role within the trump administration. thank you very much for coming to the sunday show. so is trump with all? i think the senator said it a rampage of illegal

and so what we are really hoping is that the new leadership at the justice department assures us, andpen in court tomorrow. we would like nothing more than for the department of justice lawyers to come in tomorrow and say to the court that the department of justice is not going to be publicly identifying any agents, that there won't be any disciplinary proceedings other than the normal disciplinary proceedings, and we can move past this, but we are not going to allow agents of the fbi to be targeted and be the subjects of political retribution simply for having done their jobs. >> i'm sure you know that the acting deputy attorney general, emil bove, sent a memo to agents today, and it says that no fbi employee who follows orders and carried out their duties, quote, in an ethical manner with respect to those investigations, is at risk of termination or other penalties. what's your message to the agents you represent in response to what emil bove wrote? >> well, we're looking forward to hearing what the department of justice has to say in court tomorrow before a federal judge. i mean, i

will change the the narrative about the the legal fights, wolf. >> evan perez over at the justice department for us, thank you very much. cnn's senior legal analyst elie honig is back with us. elie, walk us through what we know and do not know about the department of justice's actions against the state of new york and new york state officials. >> so, well, first of all, this is not a criminal case. this is a civil lawsuit. and there might be some misunderstanding, because in the very first sentence that she spoke today, the attorney general, pam bondi, said she had, quote, filed charges against kathy hochul and letitia james and others. now, ordinarily, that type of terminology suggests criminal charges, but that was a bit misleading. this is a civil lawsuit brought against the state level officials in their official capacity. and what doj is seeking here is not money. they're seeking an order from the judge that new york's state and local sanctuary cities policies are unconstitutional and unfairly undermine doj's efforts to enforce immigration law. so they're looking for a judge to basically order

the united states supreme court has ruled the united states department of justice overcharged many of the january 6 defendants, using an enron-era obstruction of justice statute. i do not see anything wrong with the department of justice under new leadership finding out, or trying to find out, why that happened. i am curious. i know you are a good lawyer, you should be curious, too. that is the only point i wanted to make. >> before you speak, i think i want to clarify the point i have been trying to make. i want to run this mark up the way chairman durbin did. he told members to wait until each nominee is called if they wish to make a comment. he also asked members not to speak on matters that were simply being held over and to wait until a matter was "right for consideration to debate." we routinely were afforded the opportunity to speak on nominees who were simply being held over. we were not, i should say. we are not going to have a double standard. for the last two years too many republicans did not make democrats hold over a nominee. >> i just wanted to address the letter the three of us sent to you related to

is indian businessman gautam adani, a key supporter of modi, who has been indicted by the us justice departmenta has gone from being one of the best performing markets last year to among the worst performing in 2025. no doubt on these trade tensions. guys will be watching this meeting very closely. >> i was i was looking into some of those statistics. and you just mentioned that russia is still a big trading partner. why do they buy most of their oil from russia if india has become such an important ally geopolitically with the us? why not buy more from here? >> you know, india's argument, sara, has always been that the oil and the energy they're getting from russia is a lot cheaper than other importers, and therefore they're going to continue to buy from from russia. but i think the question is, depending on how these discussions go with trump at the white house, how much more india is willing to buy from the us. it's already, i think, one of the fifth biggest buyers of liquefied natural gas from the us. names like cheniere energy, among others. so that energy relationship will certainly play

the united states supreme court has ruled that the united states department of justice overcharged many of the january 6 defendants using an enron-era obstruction of justice statute. i don't see anything wrong with the department of justice under new leadership finding out or trying to find out why that happened. i'm curious. i know you are a good lawyer, you should be curious, too. that's the only point i wanted to make. chair grassley: before you speak, i think i want to clarify what i have been trying to -- point i have been trying to make. so i want to run this markup the way chairman durbin did. he asked members to, quote, wait until each nominee is called. if they wish to make a comment on a specific nominee, end of quote. he also asked members not to speak on matters that were simply being held over and to wait until a matter was, quote, right for consideration to debate. we routinely were afforded the opportunity to speak on nominees that were simply being held over -- we were not, i should say. we are not going to have a double standard here. as i mentioned for the last two years, committee republicans didn't m

the united states supreme court has ruled that the united states department of justice overcharged many of the january 6 defendants using an enron-era obstruction of justice statute. i don't see anything wrong with the department of justice under new leadership finding out or trying to find out why that happened. i'm curious. i know you are a good lawyer, you should be curious, too. that's the only point i wanted to make. chair grassley: before you speak, i think i want to clarify what i have been trying to -- point i have been trying to make. so i want to run this markup the way chairman durbin did. he asked members to, quote, wait until each nominee is called. if they wish to make a comment on a specific nominee, end of quote. he also asked members not to speak on matters that were simply being held over and to wait until a matter was, quote, right for consideration to debate. we routinely were afforded the opportunity to speak on nominees that were simply being held over -- we were not, i should say. we are not going to have a double standard here. as i mentioned for the last two years, committee republicans didn't m

the us apprehension and arrest of libyan terrorist suspect abu agila mohammad masud is the first tangible step made by the us department of justice in 34 years to hold any suspect accountable in us courts. after 35 years, it's like, i have friends that actually say, "when is it gonna end?" i say, "it never ends." suse: he was the bomb maker, so he was part of the puzzle. we have him, so try him. and i hope we have a different experience in trying him and incarcerating him, and keeping him there. (sirens wail) nic: lockerbie was a huge tragedy. nothing had happened on a scale like this before. the biggest terrorist attack in the skies, targeting mostly americans. this was unimaginable back in the late '80s. terrorism had just not reached that type of level. when you've seen the aftermath of something like that, you just can't get it out of your head. i was terrified every time i got on a plane. it was a constant and real threat. pan am 103 was one of those terrorist attacks on commercial aviation that drove pan am, pan american airways, the stellar carrier in the united states, drove it out of business. nic: this was a wake-up cal

. >> coming up for us, the justice department is now going after new york, taking legal action over immigration enforcement. the new attorney general of the united states declaring this is a new doj. new york. you're next. president trump campaigned and won the election on a promise to beat inflation and bring prices down on day one. he even said what he's now saying that inflation numbers show it hasn't yet happened. plus, as the country celebrates the return of marc fogel wrongfully detained for years in russia, another family is now begging president trump to do the same for their son. the fight to bring home travis leak ahead. >> the boeing 747 has crashed in the lockerbie area., trying. >> to find out the. >> why of it became everything. >> nothing is what it seems in the lockerbie story. >> lockerbie, the bombing of pan am flight 103. >> sunday at nine. on cnn. >> i don't play for money. >> my ambition is. >> to play big. >> to. >> help and inspire others. >> that's why. >> i joined sofi. >> they help people. >> earn more. >> and save more. >> so they. >> can realize. >> their ambitions.

it is rarely used because the justice department takes care of it. and the presidents comply with the law. but that is where we may be headed if they refuse to comply with the law. >> but but forcing it, what is that involving u.s. marshals through the justice department? >> let's wait to see, first of all, if in fact they're going to comply with this law when push comes to shove, because right now some of the money is going out through the grant. but it's my understanding that some of them isn't. and one of the things that is most important here is jd vance and donald trump know better. they know what the law is. they know those supreme court justices. we know they know them. they appointed a good number of them. but the point is, the constitution is the constitution. and if they start running amok with this, we will be in a crisis. but i am not yet ready to say that because a tweet is not the same as failing to comply with the law and actually saying to a judge, no, you've held me in contempt and i'm still not going to release the funds. that is a

us. another top prosecutor at the department of justice has resigned after refusing an order from a trump official as a new letter from prominent doj alum urges staffers to stay true to the rule of law. we'll tell you about that story next. and later in the program, brand new reporting on an oval office meeting with golf people, executives talking about golf. it shows how donald trump is using his presidency to advance his own business interests. dramatic departure from all the presidents who came before him. we'll have all those stories and more when deadline. white house more when deadline. white house continues after a quick zyrtec allergy relief works fast and lasts a full 24 hours so dave can be the... deliverer of dance. ok, dave! let's be more than our allergies. zeize the day with zyrtec. a chewy order is on the way for radar — who knows that sounds means... kibble... squeaky toy... ...and birdseed. delivered fast — at prices everyone loves. for low prices. for life with pets, there's chewy the rest. it's super beats. discover why more cardiologists recommend super beats for. >> h

as demonstrated by us department of justice itself, china will file a lawsuit with the w t o and will take corresponding counter measures to family safe. got its own rights and interest. sounds like just about the only thing missing from these happy trade. marriages at this point are the flying dishes and chairs don't know about you, but i really can't wait for the next step is so that this particular reality show the real house wise of the trade wars us by countries and organizations worldwide, all relaying and mid the trump, administration shock suspension of for an a programs. however, some influential figures have welcome to move this thing please. really those el salvador and a, he's accused the notorious us agency for international development of destabilizing states, under the pretext of financial assistance. most governments don't want usa, the funds flowing into their countries because they understand where much of that money actually ends up well marketed as support for development, democracy and human rights. the majority of these funds are funneled into opposition. groups

what we are seeing in the early days of this administration is that trump is not afraid to use the justice department means he has at his disposal in the white house to send a very strong message to people that if you assist, you know, people he views as his enemies, you. yourself are going to pay a price. >> elon musk tweeted about it too, making the point that, you know, the law firms that helped these people are the folks who are part of the problem. >> i think you make. >> a really here. >> you make a really good point in terms of this is meant to basically as a shot across the bow for any other law firms don't represent these people or don't bring on anyone. i mean, this is the most high profile one, obviously, with it being jack smith. >> yeah. >> yeah, yeah. >> and it's also, you know, the impact right now is sort of limited just because jack smith hasn't been charged with a crime. um, he's not really entitled to representation at this stage anyway. if you play this out, if they kept this going at a certain point, they have to let him get a lawyer. if they want to prosecute him. you can't take

. >> use of justice. department resources right now, particularly. >> when you. >> have a new fbi. director who ought to be getting acclimated, ought to be getting his footing. why is he going back and forth with the attorney general. over this maga fever dream of what's happening. >> with the jeffrey. >> epstein files? so, no, nothing really new was released. >> there's no client list or anything like that. >> i mean, it's flight. >> logs that people were aware about. no bombshell name or anything like that. >> that came out at trial. >> came out at trial or in the public record in some other way. >> i mean, just when you see the right wing influencers who are at the white house today holding up these binders and grinning in some pictures, which was odd just given, i mean, obviously there are victims at the heart of this in a very real way, as we all know from from covering the epstein case and the ghislaine maxwell trial. um, what do you make, though, of of what's happening inside the maga world tonight? there's a lot of anger over this. >> so. >> i'll be honest. i try and pay as