but yeah, i mean, zaluzany is an incredible military leader.o he would probably play much harder ball with, with russia and with and with trump. and the idea that, you know, that ukraine is a spent force and, you know, russia could roll over it in a matter of days. i mean, putin has been saying that since the war started. i think russia is now a spent force. it's sending donkeys and horses and men to the front, which is never a sign of, you know, overwhelming success. >> and there's some videos of, like the challenger two tanks that we sent over. absolutely. taking out an entire column of soviet era things. and the quote i heard was, it reduces them to nuts and bolts. you think, all right, so we know who's got the bigger tank there. but if you have this peace deal and some time. to restock and get some extra. >> tanks in. >> tanks in. >> that's the that's the risk further along from the horizon. >> isn't it. >> isn't it. >> yeah. yes. it was true that russia didn't win this in a couple of days. it looks like trump might. finish this in a couple

you think ukraine is going to have to go to elections and possibly zelenskyy will be replaced with zaluzanyer at handling this kind of thing. i mean, he's the envoy to the uk at the moment. >> i don't think so because i. think he could go to europe. >> and. >> and. >> europe because they saw america being this way. could say, we'll take care of you, zelenskyy. of course they can't because it's europe and they're a bunch of worthless, horrible. >> oh see, nick, this is the thing that makes me mad. i mean, europe has just we've had weak leaders for so long. we've had these absolute, you know, like wimpish leaders who've let our military be hollowed out. we've got absolutely no deterrent effect. without america, we've completely relied on america as a crutch to protect us. and so, you know, europe can make all the bluster it wants to about about, you know, picking up the slack with ukraine. but we know that without america, you know, ukraine isn't viable. >> and that's what really bothered trump in his follow up tweet that he's saying zelenskyy is using america to inflate their position and th

but yeah, i mean, zaluzany is an incredible military leader.o he would probably play much harder ball with, with russia and with and with trump. and the idea that, you know, that ukraine is a spent force and, you know, russia could roll over it in a matter of days. i mean, putin has been saying that since the war started. i think russia is now a spent force. it's sending donkeys and horses and men to the front, which is never a sign of, you know, overwhelming success. >> and there's some videos of, like the challenger two tanks that we sent over. absolutely. taking out an entire column of soviet era things. and the quote i heard was, it reduces them to nuts and bolts. you think, all right, so we know who's got the bigger tank there. but if you have this peace deal and some time. to restock and get some extra. >> tanks in. >> tanks in. >> that's the that's the risk further along from the horizon. >> isn't it. >> isn't it. >> yeah. yes. it was true that russia didn't win this in a couple of days. it looks like trump might. finish this in a couple

but the i mean, the likely successor to zelenskyy would be zaluzany, who's been sort of exiled to the. i think he's the ambassador to the to the uk at the moment, who's who was the head of the military and would be an incredibly robust president. i mean, if zelenskyy is a sticking pin. yeah. then zelenskyy would would certainly he's loved by the army. he's an incredible military leader, much better than sursky who's leading the military right now. >> with a view to carrying on the war or still ending it, but machiavellian. come in and go. yeah, i'm the guy who's here now. you don't hate me because i'm the new guy. yeah, you don't mean carry on killing each other. >> yeah. no, i think i mean under under zelenskyy. i think they would have had much more military success. i think sursky is as much more cavalier with the lives of his troops. and they face it, you can't go much lower than a comedian. oh, yeah. one of my friends, one of my friends said, because they're. trump described zelenskyy as a mediocre comedian who tried tried his best but failed. and that's like what don ward would s

but the i mean, the likely successor to zelenskyy would be zaluzany, who's been sort of exiled to the. i think he's the ambassador to the to the uk at the moment, who's who was the head of the military and would be an incredibly robust president. i mean, if zelenskyy is a sticking pin. yeah. then zelenskyy would would certainly he's loved by the army. he's an incredible military leader, much better than sursky who's leading the military right now. >> with a view to carrying on the war or still ending it, but machiavellian. come in and go. yeah, i'm the guy who's here now. you don't hate me because i'm the new guy. yeah, you don't mean carry on killing each other. >> yeah. no, i think i mean under under zelenskyy. i think they would have had much more military success. i think sursky is as much more cavalier with the lives of his troops. and they face it, you can't go much lower than a comedian. oh, yeah. one of my friends, one of my friends said, because they're. trump described zelenskyy as a mediocre comedian who tried tried his best but failed. and that's like what don ward would s