i'll explain why coney barrett.n why when we com an alternative to pills, voltaren is a clinically proven arthritis pain relief gel, which penetrates deep to target the source of pain with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicine directly at the source. voltaren, the joy of movement. getting to write your own. so get 10% off a jeep wrangler or get intoed is on road or off, where it's a front row seat to the city, or a second row seat, maybe even a third. life doesn't come with an owner's manual, so get out there and write your own. right now during the jeep celebration event. get $2,500 total cash allowance on 2025 total cash allowance on 2025 with fatigue and light-headedness, i knew something was wrong. then i saw my doctor and found out i have afib, and that means there's about a 5 times greater risk of stroke. symptoms like irregular heartbeat, heart racing, chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, or light-headedness, can come and go. but if you have afib, the risk of stroke is always there. if you have one or

barrett about amy coney barrett at the at that capitol hill event. what what say you? she's been an independent player in many respects. she and the chief justice sometime align on on rulings what to expect there. >> the king will defy a court order. >> that's the next piece of this. >> michael the king is going to defy. the supreme court. and then what does the republican party do? i mean. >> the king is not the party. what the hell does the country do? >> right? right now the king is standing with putin and standing against the free world. and the party's quiet when the king defies the supreme court, what does the country do? all right. >> eugene walsh. >> eugene walsh, listen. >> i feel like you, eugene, i just. >> i just merged the two of them people. i literally just looked so much alike. they look so much alike. it's the hair. it's the hair. i'm envious. same hair. joe walsh and eugene daniels, thank you both. coming up after the trump administration. stop sharing intelligence with ukraine. we'll get into that. we got more news this morning. that was music to vla

these are very gendered criticisms of justice barrett.t really done anything to undermine her conservative credentials here. those seem wildly inappropriate and out of line. >> well, i'm glad that you bring this up because i want to drill a little deeper here, bring back up the graphic on the screen of the way that this vote actually broke down, and you'll see that justice coney barrett is on the same side of this equation as the chief justice, john roberts. and yet she is the one being called a di hire evil, a closet democrat. those are direct quotes. so what do you think is behind that? i mean, is this just the latent misogyny that all of us have covered within trump world right now? the undercurrent of it that is just so palpable online. christi. >> i, i agree completely with that. the one other thing i would say is they also, i think the difference between justice barrett and justice roberts is that trump appointed justice barrett and or nominated her. and so i think given given that they expect that essentially she was going to be bo

barrett burger thank you. thank you.igging into d.o.j. new reporting on who some of the mysterious department workers are and the six figure taxpayer funded salaries they're drawing sometimes from the agencies they're cutting. plus, nbc news on the front line of the ukraine war in russia. what russia's government says about russia's government says about the path if you have heart failure or chronic kidney disease, farxiga can help you keep living life, because there are places you'd like to be. (♪♪) serious side effects include increased ketones in blood or urine and bacterial infection between the anus and genitals, both which may be fatal, severe allergic reactions, dehydration, urinary tract or genital yeast infections, and low blood sugar. stop taking and tell your doctor right away if you have nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, tiredness, rash, swelling, trouble breathing or swallowing. tell your doctor about lightheadedness, weakness, fever, pain, tenderness, redness or swelling between the anus and genitals. ask you

i think that we have seen justices barrett and the chief certainly go with the liberals, but i do not either of those conservatives, john roberts or any amy coney barrett, can be counted on for, you know, down the road to be giving a stamp of approval to challengers to the trump administration. i think we have to realistically say this is going to be a case by case enterprise. >> yeah, well, i definitely heed whatever warnings or analysis joan biskupic gives me when it comes to the supreme court. so i hear you loud and clear, and it's incredibly important right now. thank you so much, joan. good to see you. thanks. when we come back, two veteran pollsters will be here to break down president trump's address. the moments going viral and what will stick in voters minds beyond last night. >> twitter. that's a great name. >> we invented a whole new thing. >> no one could possibly have understood where it was going. >> twitter. breaking the bird premieres sunday at ten on cnn. >> you want high performance tools, long lasting tools. affordable tools. you want harbor freight tools. whatever

now, trump appointee amy coney barrett joined chief justice roberts. what is basically the five votes here that are holding the line. so they're against trump and they're holding the line for her. and there's been a backlash, some saying barrett is a rino, a republican in name only, which is the kind of attack that admits that you don't even respect judges to be independent. you think they should be partizan. and then other attacks saying she was, quote, a die judge. this is how maga treats the person trump chose. now, justice barrett is very conservative in her ideology, which we can glean from things she has said and done. her confirmation hearing was protested by feminists in handmaid's tale outfits. her track record, a recent track record, has been spurned, though, because of this move. this one vote. now basically, the maga crowd worried that she won't be a reliable partizan vote for trump on everything. now here's another trump veteran, alyssa griffin, speaking about this issue. >> i didn't think i would live to see the day that amy coney. >> bar

amy coney barrett's suitcase briefcase into the united states supreme court.he is a brilliant woman who's a fantastic jurist. >> well, first, i mean, the worst thing that a concern that a trumper can call you is desire or woke. and that wasn't that being used for amy coney barrett, was it, in my bingo card? but i have a question. okay, so the supreme court has now sided against trump on this usaid. issue. how does he get compelled to actually follow the supreme court? >> that's where things get scary. so they what they did was they sent it down to the judge in washington, d.c., who originally said made this decision. and they told that judge, you give the instructions to the government what to do with the money. and if they don't follow the instructions. >> yeah. he and what army, the judge and what army are going to make him. >> do it? >> what the judge did is he said, you guys are taking too long to carry out my orders. so then he brought them in and issued another order that said, you have to pay this money out in 36 hours. that's why it went back into the

amy coney barrett was trump's last justice he put on the supreme court last time. come under some withering criticism on the right. tell me, has she gone rhino? what's going on? why are we seeing some of donald trump's most prominent outside supporters saying that amy coney barrett is bad? they're calling her a dei hire. what is going on? >> well, you're seeing a real fracture in the legal conservative movement, right? the federalist society was started in 1982 really as a response to the excesses of the warren court, the idea we had nine platonic guardians deciding what the law should be. the federal society says it is the emphatic role of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. the federalist society, the legal conservative movement was about process, not outcome. that's what originalism is, and textualism, and they kept putting judges and justices on the court that believed in process, and now you're seeing that now that they have six appointees on the court, some members of that movement are, like, but what about outcome? process? who cares

it's certainly encouraging that roberts and barrett joined with the three liberals here.hard to read too. too much into this. i think that we should give the chief and barrett credit for showing some spine here, but this doesn't mean that they've like joined the resistance or gone woke. they are still very conservative jurists who will mostly be siding with trump. >> well, and then there's a question of what happens now. so gregory meeks, who's a new york congressman, who's the ranking member on house foreign affairs, said that the committee met with the state department official, pete morocco. he was the guy who was actually at the capitol on january 6th, although i don't know if he went in or not. he's the one who's charged with dismantling usaid and said that morocco never did answer the question because the big question was, would they abide by the supreme court's rule? that question was never answered. he didn't respond to it all. he got to go back, and he's got to go back and talk to his people. so it remains unclear, like, will this actually shake loose the money f

and i think barrett must agree with that as well.w we have a couple of data points in that direction, so that the trust of americans is dependent upon the perception of the court, and that that's the way i see this decision. and it was a loss to trump, but it was also important to note. >> that when the. >> precarium was issued. they talked. >> about the. >> fact that trump and company. were acknowledging. >> the order. >> of the court, as opposed to, say, an andrew jackson thing in which they would just say, well, let them enforce it. that has not happened. so there are two things going on, and i hope and expect that we're going to see more of the same as necessary. and if i may add one other thing, i think if you if you read the dissent, which is eight pages by alito, imagine if you're. >> trying to. >> sell that. >> to roberts or to. >> barrett. >> which is what happens when they're figuring out who is going to issue a decision and what it's going to say. >> and the chief. >> justice always gets to assign the if he's on the side t

are you stunned at this five -- four decision chief justice roberts and justice amy quinn connie barretttunned by the judges move i think this dissent had it right. we have had growing concern with a growing number of supreme court's conservatives with justices overstepping the bounds. this seems a pretty striking to me. not just because this is a judge putting an injunction out saying you can't do something but whether a judge compelling the administration to take an action that you might not have a remedy for in the end. that's a different order of magnitude i think the decision is straight on i'm not necessarily surpri surprised tha split court. it is a reminder that this is a very varied court that has many views despite media and illiberal claims that it is somehow all wa walk step in some direction. paul: in another case the conservative direction which is against the environmental protection agency siding with the city of san francisco five -- four on a ruling. chief justice roberts sided with the other four conservatives. alexis was kind of an amusing case in which san francisco

. >> your supporters are attacking and so is justice in amy coney barrett you put her on the bench and the dei hired her and put her on the bench. >> she is a very good woman very smart and i don't know about people attacking her i really don't know. i think she's a very good woman and very smart. >> is there going to be a government shutdown at the end of this week. >> it could happen that's it the democrats want they want to destroy the country but it could happen. it shouldn't have happened and it probably won't. i think this er will get past we will see but it could happen you never know, the democrats are out of control you saw that the other night during the speech when they wouldn't stand up for two of the young ladies killed by illegal aliens one with the cancer and the young man with the cancer all you want to do is stand up and applaud the man a young boy. they're out of control they lost their minds. >> the chinese response to your tariffs and xi jinping about trade anytime soon they met they take that back as you know they were very tough. i said what's that all about. you

is and it does kind of fit in line with the 5-4 majority we have seen in the past, when amy coney barrett and chief justice roberts both seem to vote with the liberal justices. in a way that actually kind of essentially seems to take the line, much more about enforcing the separate separation of power, congress has the right of the purse, congress determines -- we don't know this because we don't of the reasoning behind it, but i think the significance, sandra, there are a lot of these cases, a lot of cases related to president trump's executive orders, related to some other things that d.o.g.e. has done, where those cases have been challenged, those decisions have been challenged, and it does look as though the 5-4, three liberals plus barrett and roberts, do look as though they are, a couple of cases we have seen so far, consistently siding with the view that congress has the right here, congress' authority, and congress that should be decide, which will be a big blow for president trump -- >> sandra: kerri, can you weigh in on that? how much of a setback is this for team trump? >> it i

. >> barrett. >> you put her on the bench. >> they're saying she's a di hired. >> you regret putting. >> her on. >> the bench? >> look, she's a very good woman. she's very smart. and i don't know about people attacking her. i really don't know. i think she's a very good woman. she's very smart. >> is there going to be a government shutdown. >> at the end of. >> this week? >> it could happen. i mean, the democrats want that. they want to destroy the country. so i can't tell you, but it could happen. it shouldn't have happened. and it probably won't. i think the cr is going to get passed. we'll see. but it could happen. you never know. the democrats are out of control. you saw that the other night during the speech when they wouldn't stand up for two of the young ladies were killed by illegal aliens, one with the cancer, the young man with the cancer. and all you want to do is stand up and applaud the man and the boy. the young boy and nobody's ever seen anything like that. they're out of control. they've lost their minds. >> mr. president. >> are you alarmed by. >> escalatory rhetoric

i also watched coney barrett and the chief at the end of the speech last night, and they were, excuseand they were talking and i saw what the president said to the chief, and i saw coney barrett shake his hand. there was a look on their face that kind of gave it away. they knew the next day, and i guess it was night before last. the next day there was going to be an opinion that was going to make him very unhappy. and that's exactly what happened. you kind of, you know, they were taking in the thank yous, but i think that we're seeing what might be a solid five person majority that may stand against many of the things that are going to make donald trump unhappy. >> poker faces. indeed, after what actually transpired, judge jeff schwartz, thank you for joining. >> nice to be with you. >> thank you. nice to see you. thank you all for watching. anderson cooper 360 is next. >> tonight on 360. what caused this

the fact that they're singling out barrett for this when mitch mcconnell, let's not forget, rushed to her confirmed after ruth bader ginsburg died in the middle of the 2020 election season. the fact that they're turning on her now is just a rich irony to me that this was the person they were like, this is so important. we have to go back and what we're saying, we have to go back to what we're saying about you can't have a supreme court justice confirmed during an election year to get her in, and now they're upset because she is not going according to plan. >> let me let me play for you. yesterday, governor glenn youngkin, the university of virginia governing board of directors, basically did away with the ice with the college's dei office. listen to what glenn youngkin, who supposedly a moderate republican, had to say about it. watch. dei is. >> done at the university of virginia. this is a huge step to restoring the values of mr. jefferson, who founded the university, who understood that we are all created equal. >> so on one hand, you know, thomas jefferson owned 600 slaves. and on

barrett's voice may be crucial in trump cases.ce amy coney barrett is who they are referring to. she is breaking ranks with conservatives. on wednesday she was one of the three justices appointed by mr. trump to vote against his emergency request to freeze foreign aid, joining the court's three democratic appointees and chief justice john roberts to form a majority. that is the front page of the new york times this morning. they note that these same five justices, they ruled against mr. trump on wednesday, rejecting his request. they voted wednesday, rejecting the freezing request and just days before his inauguration day where the same spare the president from being sentenced, who rejected his request, to be spared from being sentenced for those 34 felony counts in new york. so, that same five coalition, which includes amy coney barrett, voting against the president, one of three appointed by president trump. this is from the washington post this morning. their headline, justice amy coney barrett ignites anger on the right after

one vote flips either roberts or barrett the other way and it's a different decision. we knew they were wrestling with it, and the fact this lengthy descent has been written led by justice alito means the court really struggled with it. but it is a loss for the trump administration. of the nearly 100 cases pending, there's other stuff we are waiting for in the supreme court level is all. >> bill: my guess it is not the end of this. we shall see in time. thank you shannon. thank of her popping on air. appreciate that. shannon breen in d.c. we've got this in new york. >> fox news alert, mayor adams of new york city live on capitol hill he is there for a hearing this morning. quite a big hearing. he will be joined by the mayors of chicago, boston and denver. testifying before a house oversight committee. interesting moment. seems he was taking questions from reporters there, and he will head on in. now this. >> democrats radical policies will be on full display. >> americans will be reminded that democrats protect killers, and drug dealers who find safe haven in sanctuary

we had the chief justice and justice amy coney barrett, siding with the three liberals to give a 5 to 4 majority. and again, i think when we look forward, you're basically going to have three. the three liberal justices, jackson, sotomayor and kagan, they're generally going to be locked in against broad executive power, against the trump administration. it's a safe bet moving forward to count on elite justices alito and thomas and gorsuch basically being in favor of executive power. and so that leaves us, really, three justices in the middle, the chief justice kavanaugh and barrett, who are going to serve more or less as the middle of the swing. now, we know they're conservatives. but as you see in this case, if you can, if the liberals can win over two of those three, then they can actually pull out a decision here and there. >> all right, elie honig, as always, thank you so much. >> thanks, panel. >> and still ahead, we'll sit down with president trump's senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, peter navarro, on what a tariff compromise potentially would look like. >> and we'll

. >> michigan republican congressman tom barrett wants va secretary doug collins to reconsider laying5% of his workforce. barrett writing any veteran who hangs up their boots and continues to serve their can country at the v.a. is cut from a different cloth. cloin says the cuts, while painful are necessary. >> look, the va was never perfect. it willner be perfect. we can and will make it better. >> today, a federal judge rejected an emergency request by two labor unions to block musk's team from accessing a payment system at the treasury department. last month a judge also blocked similar access to a program this is likely an issue that could end up before the supreme court before long. >> aishah: have a good weekend. u.s. ploicious added 151,000 jobs last month. the labor department reports up from revised 125,000 in january. the unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.1%. stocks were up today. the dow gained 223, the s&p 500 finished ahead 32. nasdaq up 127. for the week, the dow lost 2 and a third percentage points. the s&p was down 3. nasdaq down 3.5. the man charged with president t

him and amy coney barrett. we'll talk about her later. but he's got a new podcast, and he said, it's based. this is from politico. newsom said the creative inspiration for his podcast came from bill maher. >> oh, i'm just giving the news. i'm not. i'm just. >> telling the news. it's not that it's about me. the provocative hbo real time host who leans democratic but has increasingly taken flack from progressives in recent years over his eagerness to criticize the party's woke left flank. that's true. hey, they wrote a sentence about me in the press and got it completely right. that's exactly right, newsom said about maher. i watch him because i appreciate how he calls balls and strikes. he takes shots at both parties and and he's he said they asked him about females in sports. would you say no to men and female sports? he said it's an issue of fairness. it's deeply unfair. okay. i don't it's so funny, gavin. i do love this because i do think he's a great politician. i know he's he's slick. yeah. they said the same thing about clinton. he's

. >> barrett both. >> sided with the three liberal justices against. >> donald trump.xpert and court watcher. again, i said, this is more the tea than the substance, but we rarely see them interact like this. trump knows he's on camera. he's a performer. all politicians are, and he is a super performer. but he actually seemed to sort of, in that brief moment, say what was on his mind, which was like, i'll never forget that you saved my bacon before election day. >> yeah. >> well. the here's. >> the thing. >> about donald trump, no. >> one is. >> accusing him of. >> not like. >> saying out loud what. >> people would normally think. >> you don't. >> say so. >> you know, so. >> much of. >> what has. happened and the criminal. >> cases that he. >> was facing. >> are things. >> that were. >> out loud. i mean. >> this is not a complicated matter. >> this is i used to do. mob cases. >> those were complicated. >> you know. >> mob bosses don't tend. >> to just. >> announce they're going to kill somebody. >> and give the order out loud. with donald. >> trump. >> so much of. >> w

chief justice john roberts and justice amy coney barrett sided with the court's three liberal justices to uphold a lower court's order directing the government to unfreeze some of those funds. following the supreme court's ruling, the lower court judge who was presiding over the case, ameer ali, directed the government to pay up by monday, march 10th. now, to be very clear, this was a narrow ruling that did not address the core constitutional questions. and for now, it only applies to the plaintiffs who brought this case. the fate of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding remains unresolved. nonetheless, this case is an example of how the courts are standing up to this administration. and another good example of that occurred on thursday. judge beryl howell of the united states district court for the district of the district of columbia, rebuked president trump for firing gwen wilcox, a member of the national labor relations board. judge howell wrote that president trump did not have the authority to fire wilcox, and that his attempt to do so was, quote, a blatant violation

each one of my children in gauze, i can't afford to eat a comp, barrett. while the seizure was left with one hand, often usually attack the fit you were in a shelter in an owner, a school. and mister ronald to say, boomed to the school. my daughter was playing in the school yard rocket shot locates, and katya and israel hospital in the capital amount is now treating several children with similar injuries. this stuff. vanessa tyler and then we receive 6 cases of p t's the some of the, some of them had operations amputated, others lower lens. some cases may need to undergo additional surgery because onto taishan and was, and sometimes may not be totally precise. i mean even me, if i'm going to does it had the we need to do who was allowed to come here with her mother and brother jude's ride home was badly injured by shot. no. we off time what she dreams of i would do. i wish for a house that's not the end. oh, on the kitchen and a bathroom seed wrong as you would have a long journey to recovery. that afternoon with an idea of 4. have a glimmer of hope. donal

each one of my children in gauze i can't afford to eat comp. barrett who would not a seizure was left with one hand, often usually the attack. and if it were in a shelter in an owner, a school and this arrived, once they boomed the school, my daughter was playing in the school yard rocket shot locates, and katya hun israel hospital in the capital amount is now treating several children with similar injuries. still vanessa tyler, and then we receive 6 cases of p t's. some of some of them had oper, limbs amputated, others low lens. some cases may need to undergo additional surgery because onto taishan and was things sometimes may not be totally precise. i mean even me, if i'm going to does it had the we need to do with who was allowed to come here with her mother and brother. jude's ride home was badly injured by shrapnel. we off tie what she dreams of i would do. i wish for a house is not the end of an a kitchen and a bathroom in seeds wrong as you would have a long journey to recovery. but often more than idea of for have a glimmer of hope. donald trump is hosting the 1st wife house c

because watching roberts and coney barrett, one of whom trump appointed to the court, is going to be something we are all going to be doing throughout this entire administration, in every ruling that comes down, how those two justices position themselves on things that will come before them from this administration, that is the ball game. >> to watch, especially knowing how conservative she was when she was chosen. >> it's remarkable. and when you're not talking about abortion, the death penalty and sort of some of these social issues, a lot of these, um, executive power questions make very strange bedfellows in the law. and i think they're going to surprise you. over the. >> years, i worked on both confirmations, roberts and alito going two different directions on this. that dissent was pretty wild. and conservatives, conservatives are. >> really both proud and both proud. republicans beforehand. >> what wasn't david souter appointed by a republican president? >> oh, let's remember that. all right. up next, the u.s. >> and ukraine agreeing today to another meeting on ending russia's

undermining electric, executive branch from president trump and what are john roberts and associate roberts barrett up to? i'll see you tomorrow night on life, liberty and levin. ♪ >> hope you're having a great saturday night. welcome back to my view. when it comes to president trump, it's simple. promises made, promises kept. immigration to the economy to the world stage, the trump administration is moving to make much-needed changes for our country. orders are closed, public safety is a irony, transparency is in and government waste is out. both sides of the aisle getting high marks for progress seen so far. this week we heard more of what's to come during the next four years of the trump presidency. >> this will be our greatest era with god's help over the next four years, we are going to leave this nation even higher and we are going to forge the prettiest most advanced dynamic and most dominant realization ever to exist in the face of this earth. we are going to create the highest quality of life and build the safest and wealthiest and healthiest and most vital communities anywhere in the worl

amy coney barrett was included in that. i would like to tell you why they did this but i cannot.w docket. anchor: what did the dissenting justices say? >> they said today the court made an unfortunate misstep. anchor: what happens now? >> the money does not start going out the door immediately. they will decide which get unfrozen and win. conceivably be there will be another hearing. about which get unfrozen. what about the foreign aid groups to handle all of this funding? how are they reacting to this? >> they said they welcome the supreme court's rejection. they said this ruling was not enough. they want to reinstate staff. anchor: there was a moment last night they got a lot of attention. an interaction between president trump as he left the podium and greeted the supreme court justices for the microphone picked up some of what they had to say. >> thank you. thank you very much. thank you again. thank you. i won't forget. anchor: thank you again. won't forget it. >> we don't know what the president was thinking chief justice roberts four. these are rare events in washington or

undermining electric, executive branch from president trump and what are john roberts and associate roberts barretton life, liberty and levin. ♪

republican appoint years amy coney barrett and john roberts, the chief justice voted with the majorityhat two billion dollars in dubious foreign aid will start flowing again. now, for the dissent, justice samuel alito was his usual brilliant self-writing does a sing quell district court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the government of the united states to pay out and probably lose forever 2 billion taxpayer dollars in the answer to that question should be an emphatic no. but a majority of this court apparently thinks otherwise. i am stunned. well, again, that means part of the usaid slush fund is back, back on. and we deserve to know where that cash is going according to the white house the agency had spent 17.9 million to teachly is alan can journalists thousand avoid binary gendered language, 1.5 million to rebuild the cuban media ecosystem more than 1.5 information to kazakhstan and 2 million for sex changes and lgbtq activism in guatemala. so much more. joining me now someone hobby documenting all of this along with what doge has been doing a

r stay with me.e republican appointees amy coney barrett and john roberts chief justice photo with theeaning $2 billion in dubious foreign aid will start flowing again. now, for the dissent,ng qsamuel alito with usual brilliant self writing "as a single district court child whop likely lacks jurisdiction heavy unchecked power to compel the o government of the united stateus to pay out and probably losebe forever $2 billion taxpayer?" the answer should be emphatic no but majority of this court apparently thinks otherwise. .agaii am stunned." that means part of the usaid/bond is back, back on, we deserve to know where the cash is going. according to the white house,t the agency17 spent 7.9 million o teach sri lankan journalist how to avoid binary gender language. $1.5 million to rebuild cuban media ecosystem.azak $1.5 million to combat this information in kazakhstan, $2 million for changes in ldgjo cutie activism iinn guatemala ad so much more.ee joining me now, someonear documenting all ofli this along with what doge is doing is charlipoine kirk, founder of th "turning point usa." charl

it was a 5 to 4 ruling, with chief justice john roberts and justice amy coney barrett joining the liberalinority. they refused to block the lower court's order, instead asking the judge to clarify his order. the money at issue is from the state department and usaid, and is intended to pay contractors for work that's already been done. president trump issued what he called a last warning to hamas to release all remaining hostages being held in gaza. as the ceasefire with israel remains uncertain tonight. the president posted on truth social release all of the hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered or it is over for you. the white house says it's engaged in talks with hamas, in a reversal of the long held u.s. policy of not engaging with the militant group directly. israel says it believes about 24 living hostages, including one u.s. citizen, and the bodies of at least 35 other hostages, are still in gaza. ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy sent a letter to the white house expressing regret about friday's oval office meeting wi

but chief justice roberts justice barrett they went with a liberal block saying that that federal judgewer. so justice words were it happened so get it done. lara: by tomorrow is that correct? wow. shannon: a hearing after the supreme court decision to say you know this may involve things that were work that's been performed contracts that have been already obligated to so get the money out. but you know that there are billions more in federal aid that aren't involved here. but yeah that payment has to get out. get out the door. >> okay shannon you've got a beg show coming up. by the way, i also want to promo this she's a music fan i don't know if they know she's a big deaf leopard fan which i convict shannon on maybe she'll sing for us but tell us what's coming up on the show today. >> best of their songs. she really likes pyromania. >> that one too that's a good album. shannon: but we have no one from deaf leopard on the show this morning although i was gifted a deaf leopard signed guitar by my friend scott hamilton couple of years ago that also will not be on the show nor is scott ha

>> no, i do not think that is alonehat is at issue, justice barrett. the we cite is a better description. in this opinion, we asked the department for oral argument and my friends on the other side also asked for oral argument. the court came out with this decision two month after -- might have been sloppy and was not stated but you agree that if it means what it says, what justice kagan read to you, that you agree it is wrong? >> ohio agrees it is on to treat people differently. >> so if we said, someone like es who is a member -- it doesn't maf she was gay or whether she was straight, would have the exact same burden an be treated the exae way under title vii if she sued as someone who gay and argued that they were discriminated against under title vii, same? >> i think she should have the same burden and the best read of what -- >> no, no, just asking what you think of the statute. so that is what you think, same discrimination, someone who brings a woman or a man who brings a sex discrimn su discrimination against the basis of sex, all of those who

and what are john roberts and associate justice barrett up tol with their pathetic decision the other. si see you tomorrow night. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> hello everyone i'm molly line along with joe conger, taylor and steve hilton. welcome to the big weekend show the big story tonight, house republicans are in a bit of a hurry to pass a spending bill backed by president trump and or thedeadline to avoid a govert shutdown is at midnight friday about five days might not be enough time to get behind it. there are vowing to block it. the president, president trump telling fox this morning he does not understand why. kush always like to understand where opponent is whether it's in business or anything else. is there something i don't understand am not going to touch social security, medicare, medicaid. now were going to get front out there for their companies coming into the united states they have been announcing on a daily basis they're going to build their plants they are going to create tremendous numbers of jobs. and so many other things. we're going to have growth like you've never seen before. qui

speaking of the supreme court, chief justice roberts and justice barrett dealt a blow to the presidenthis administration yesterday when they sided with the liberal wing to rule that the administration must spend nearly $2 billion in foreign aid that was already committed pretrump's order to stop foreign aid payments. and example, usaid, the government agency shouted over the past month, responsible for providing food, medicine and other essentials to struggling countries. critics say the money was not spent properly. the justices say to billy and must be dispersed. justice alito was pretty upset, he said he was quote stunned by the majority ruling. they want district court judge in washington to make a decision about how this morning will be split up. both sides of the organ mint will be in court today at 2:00 p.m. eastern here in washington, expect a fight in the courtroom. we will be there and watch it over how this morning will go out. that is just one of the many cases. >> bill: thank you so much, david. nice to see you at the doj today. thank you. ♪ ♪ >> president trump: [inaudibl

from california said this, that he was in the airport, chased down by flight attendant named jim barrettm a democrat, but the way the partys embarrassing. it made us look heartless. i don't care who is up there, you stand for the boy with cancer, be more rational, and get your act together. did you stand for that boy with cancer? >> i made a conscious choice at the last minute to watch it on television. i saw my colleagues and what they were going to do here i didn't want to be a part of that. from my perspective, we should celebrate a boy with cancer who is living out his dream of getting sworn into the secret service. you should always celebrate someone being able to go to west point. again, i want america to be successful. if donald trump's tariffs being prices down, raise drops, at the stock market up, great. i'm not going to root against america. i just think his policies are going to hurt folks. i'm happy to take those policies. >> dana: jamie raskin is a democrat from maryland. he said to the censure vote was outrageous to my mind. what they've done is completely watered down the

this is hue -- it is hubris, it is not legit, so again the chief justice and justice barrett sided withee democrat appointees. what they told this lower court judge is now the supreme court's sending it back saying, okay, you need to exactly spell out which of this foreign aid has to go out and when, so now the trump administration waits for that guidance. stuart: a bit more complex than i thought. we need a legal eagle to sort it out, and you did. shannon bream, thanks so much. >>> back to the markets, please. a very small gain for the dow, 50 points up. very small loss for the s&p and for the nasdaq, down 7 and 17 respectively. eddie ghabour watching the markets this morning. a couple of weeks ago you said what trump is trying to do to the economy is ronald reagan 2.0. same playbook. that would be beat inflation, get interest rates down and then look for prosperity later. is that what you think's happening now? >> our conviction on that base with case going into 2025 has increased substantially because it's not just words now. they're actually following through with action. this admin

and what are john roberts and associate justice barrett up tol with their pathetic decision the other

chief justice john roberts and justice amy coney barrett siding with their liberal colleagues in the five four split decision. chief legal affairs correspondent paula reid joins us now. so, paula, walk us through the court's decision. >> this is a technical decision, but it really reveals a lot about the internal partisan divides at the court. now, here, the trump administration had asked the court to allow this foreign aid to continue to be frozen, not force them to disperse it as a lower court had. but the supreme court declined to intervene on behalf of the trump administration. they didn't say when this money needs to be sent out. instead, they sent that all back down to the lower court to be hashed out. but in this dissent, four conservative justices took the time to write an opinion disagreeing with the majority. and that's notable because, again, this isn't a huge decision. this isn't the constitutional opinion on whether trump has the power to reshape the federal government. this is a pretty technical issue, but these justices felt very strongly that a lower court judge shoul