i would also suggest that the packaging equipment be installed out at beaven rather than at tunnel. a few reasons for that and it's not you know the company has good reasons for why they want to put it at tunnel. one of the concerns that i have is that you need different types of trailers to convey the slurry material he water type trailers to convey the slurry material as opposed to the transfer trailers that they already have to convey the the co-mingled material that's dry air. and so i'm concerned that you would get into this and then incur additional expenses needing to buy specialized equipment to be able to transfer it. it's also the case that beaven is a site that handles more users than just san francisco and so potentially other users of that site would benefit from using that equipment and it could be amortized over a broader set of tons than just san francisco. so those are my primary rationale for suggesting we consider a different location there and then certainly consider recology proposal for tiered pricing. but we need to understand it better. it is very common in m