when we take these natural advantages, and we prepare them with conservatives parties and limited government, we will unleash freedom and secure our future. it will take each of us working together to secure an even safer, stronger and more prosperous missouri. may god bless you, may god bless the united states of america, and may god continue to bless the great state of missouri. thank you so much. [applause]

so how does the conservative party get through this, and if they actually win the next election, how are they going to deal with donald trump, which would be a challenge, no matter who the prime minister is? >> away the conservative leader has framed it is, there's two options here. you go down the tariff route where you turn the oil ally into the reelected -- we have a weaker economy, we could growth, less strain, less investment, energy investment. or, we can build a much stronger north america together. more investment, more energy, more trade, a whole lot of innovation. there some regulatory harmonization's. we find it canada first, but it's about north american economic security and the military base. it sort of providing those two options. try to find that balance because his liberal opponents are shooting at them. the trumps stuff is being used as a political football, so i think it's just canada need some space to go through this election. we are having the selection of the exact same time that the tariffs are coming in so it's taking over. right now the servers are in the le

politicianfnot necessarily just from the ruling someone just from the ruling party, but any mp conservative partyl could have essentially their offer of ppe is applied to be tracked, looked more there's been a lot of quickly. there's been a lot of about that, controversy about that, critics saying as a result those saying that as a result those companies experience some i they were put favouritism; they were pet of queue compared ahead of the queue compared companies did with other companies that did not have connections. so not have those connections. so it something that this part 7 £h7e777777777 77 7 7 £h7e77777 77 7ti; 7 7 th7e77777 77 7love7inquiry7 of the company love inquiry will be at in detail 7tlheell . ll le 7777777�*7t7h7e7r71e7xt7 7 7 �*7t7h7e7r71e7x7t7thi7ee 7 7 �*7t7h7e7r71e7x7t7thi7ee or 7 7 �*7t7h7e7r71e7x7t7thi7ee or four over the next three or four weeks. there are some parts of 7777777n-7 i ry inquiry that for legal inq| will hat for legal inq| will have )r legal inq| will have to egal inq| will have to eg held reasons will have to be held behind closed doors because of behind

evidence will be looked at including the preponderance of suppliers linked to the governing conservative partyn bradford. bryonie gawith, her daughters denisty and aubree, and son 0scar all died after the blaze last august. 39—year—old sharaz ali, from bradford, appeared in court this morning accused of four counts of murder, and one of attempted murder. two other men have already been charged with the same offences. the government has announced plans to abolish the leasehold system for homes in england and wales. currently, third—party landlords own a building and leaseholders can buy the right to live in a flat for a fixed period of time. ministers want to ban the sale of new leasehold flats and start a move to a commonhold system — giving homeowners a share of the buildings they live in. 0ur reporter tarah welsh has more. the government is proposing to completely overhaul the way blocks of flats are owned. the leasehold system has been used for centuries, and it means that a freeholder or landlord owns a building and a leaseholder buys a flat and the right to occupy it for a set period of t

other side because this speech encapsulates why i believe jd vance is the thought leader of the conservative partyn terms of crucial issues, listen. >> i want to say a couple words about trump administration policy because while you are certainly not always going to agree with everything we do in donald trump's administration i feel confident in saying that between protecting the rights of pro-life protesters, between ensuring we have an opportunity to protect the rights of the unborn in the first place and importantly protecting the religious liberty of all people but in particular catholics, we can say donald trump though not a catholic himself has been an incredibly good president for catholics in the united states of america. we will always listen to people of faith and people of conscience in the united states of america, you have an open door to the trump administration, even and especially maybe when you disagree with us. peter:one of the things it baffles me is jd vance a week ago gave a speech similar to the one he gave at the national catholic prayer breakfast to european leaders talking

you know, we've had the sort of useless conservative party.nd they get taken. and if they get to the end they can become king. >> starmer has just. >> starmer has just. >> rolled this. >> rolled this. >> all just rolling into start. i mean, anybody can do what starmer is doing right now. i�*ll give him credit inasmuch as he is playing it how he should play it. but it's not as if he's doing anything clever right now. but should this, should this state visit? do you know what this reminds me of is? it reminds me of how excruciating it was watching david lammy and keir starmer and wes streeting and all the labour grandees protesting in the street cancel the visit. their children, student politics. and we�*ve got student politics. and we've got actually quite surprising people like dan hodges, even andrew neil turning around and saying that we should question the state visit. i mean, how utterly ridiculous. i'm in agreement with you, chris. it�*s ludicrous with you, chris. it's ludicrous to even consider that we shouldn't have trump over for shoul

katya: it's an issue within his party, many are fiscally conservative and they have the debt break, itermany cannot do much so any extra spending would have to come out of the existing budget so everything they have to do is declared as emergency as with olaf scholz when russia invaded in 2022, creating an extra budget and they would need the two thirds, so this is a big issue to convince people to do that. tom: what -- what -- what -- what -- what is your expectation of when the coalition is formed? cocktail: look like they were going to the motions at a pedestrian pace with silence around coalition talks and nothing happened for a while and they expect a coalition by easter which would be quick. given the situation, there is understanding now because of the talks of zelenskyy and tromp, this needs to be done quickly and needs to be urgent so this coalition, one would hope that they have something in place. tom: is the german public putting german boots on the ground? cocktail: the public is split, in terms of ukraine there is more split than beefing up parliament. overrule, in terms

kind of real opposition and the republicans were able to leverage that because of the conservative in roosevelt's own party nicole hemmer it it feels this first 100 days was pretty breathless and a very, very pace. absolutely. because there were new huge bills coming out on a regular basis. you mentioned like 15 giant pieces of legislation. and, you know, dozens of other piec of legislation were coming out at the same time. there was sense of real activit and it was being reported on. and actually it was being on in a ratively approving way and most newspapers in the united states during the 1930s were owned by republicans. and later on in presidency even by 1934 a lot of those newspapers hadurd against the new deal had turned the roosevelt administration. but again, in those first 100 days, that's probably it's calledhe honeymoon period. there is a sense that they shouldn't hit too hard. you do get some editorials that say your roosevelt is going too far. have we opened our door to a dictator, but you had many more that were like we have opened our doors to a dictator and maybe that's america needs. there

kind of real opposition and the republicans were able to leverage that because of the conservative in roosevelt's own party nicole hemmer it it feels this first 100 days was pretty breathless and a very, very pace. did the media feel that way? did the media it that way? absolutely. because there were new huge bills coming out on a regular basis. you mentioned like 15 giant pieces of legislation. and, you know, dozens of other pieces of legislation were coming out at the same time. there was sense of real activity an was beingted on. and actually it was being on in a relatively apovg way and was surprising because. most news in the united states during the 1930s were owned by republicans. and lateon in presidency. even by 1934 a lot of those newspapers had turned against the new deal had turned the roosevelt administration. but again, in those first 100 days, that's probably it's called the honeymoon piod. there is a sense that they shouldn't hit too hard. you do get some editorials that say your roosevelt is going too far. have we opened our door to a dictator, but you had many more that were like we have

will be so was usaid be ice by the biden administration by some of the power to attack any party that was conservativeted not have an resume little so it happened very pro america poland and hungary as well. >> one of the most examples that ever regimeiv change operation feel the way of sandy is that of the role in the syrian civil war and it toppling bashar assad and reports from the politics of sources estimate the acidity funneled over 15 billion it is syria over a decade and kimberly funding opposition groups and mercenaries into government networks and the cover and humanitarian aid and this inclua for militant factions of propaganda efforts and often in collaboration with the national endowment for democracy and the operation culminated in the overthrowing 2024 by wester back broken with usaid financial trails, documented in congressional budget reports criticized by syrian officials, this interference mass the system it is roman to these kinds of activities carry out by the american agency make america safer at home or the risk putting us more of a deadly costly foreign conflicts. >> when the a

you may remember that one of the big fights jerry ford had as president was with the conservative wing of his own party of the republicans because he was vice president to richard nixon and richard nixon was the author of detente. remember detente. detente was the idea that the united states could live with soviet communism until then, the belief had been either democracy or communism was going to win. they couldn't coexist. but detente was all about peaceful coexistence, by the way, i will add this when germany was on the brink of apparently of defeating when it did defeat france in 1940, this is back to the earlier debate, he said that the united states might have to learn to live with dictators and franklin roosevelt and roosevelt's allies said what an insane thing to say. what a malicious thing to say, to learn, to live with dictators. well, that's exac only what richard nixon said, what they taught and among republican concerns, there were some hawkish democratic conservatives as well. he said detente, is a terrible idea. we need to sort of get back on the ball and just fight the next vietnam war

states attorney, former law clerk, one of the pillars, the idols of the conservative movement in the united states, the republican party the current president purports to represent. antonin scalia a was interim u.s. attorney daniel sassoon mom -- mentor. and she felt the quid pro quo of the trump administration in the trump justice department trading the termination of this prosecution in exchange for eric adams cooperating on immigration issues in the city of new york. she felt that mirror image quid pro quo was so odious that she was compelled to resign. her resignation letter, if you have not looked at it, and six other senior prosecutors left with her, also a number of them quite conservative. and her resignation letter is part of a response to your question. she said it was a strong case, there is no grounds to drop it in order to do a quid pro quo. it has changed for immigration policy. and i think this message to the world is, and the donald trump administration, we are open for business when it comes to foreign influence. and it is not just this message. it is donald trump himself has a meme coin. any foreign g

party, and sanford is the man. [cheering] he had become a darling for fiscal conservatives. who had moved to south carolina just kind of quietly to begin forming what was going to be potentially a national-level bid for him. [cheering] you know, if mark sanford is a stock, like, in spring of 2009, you're buying, right? anybody who knows anything about politics or about republican politics, you're buying mark sanford's stock in spring of 2009. then father's day weekend of 2009 was when everything started to fall apart. because the governor disappeared. it was honestly one of the most bizarre things i have covered in 20 years of journalism. he left. he was gone from the state and didn't leave anybody else in charge. it seemed totally out of character, but his constituents would soon learn that they did not know the real mark sanford at all. it was a thursday. so i had a scheduled meeting with him in the morning, except he didn't show up for the meeting. ♪ i remember i was standing outside the state house, and mark sanford told me personally that he was gonna be gone for a few

what this reflects is a conservative view in the role of courts and their ability to bind parties that are not litigants to the case before it which is a mainstream view with debates and captured and, you know, 140 characters on a tweet. >> bottom line, should an elected official be allowed to defy a federal court order? it would be too specific for me to send a blank statement about that. a legal court order should not be followed under some circumstances. >> what i'm saying is that there are some instances in which a public official is lawfully bound by the holding of a particular court. i cannot think them for all instances in the dynamic for a certain lawsuit. the hypothetical. such a hypothetical. a direct court order that binds a federal official. >> an exception that would be to you. i cannot think of a hypothetical one way or another. i just suppose one could handle in extreme cases. you think they are relieved officials from obeying a court order. >> i believe that there was a court order there that were repelled which has not been correctly repudiated by virtually everyone. j

party. despite a growing trump year and more america first over the years, there are still those reaganite conservatives who prefer a muscular foreign policy are supportive of allies overseas. it's just a question of how loudly are they going to want to use their voice again in this atmosphere that is so dominated by the america first philosophy. >> and we'll see how much that is influenced by whatever comes out of the summit in europe today. let's talk about the democrats response here. their fundraising off this, and politicians and parties, fundraisers off almost anything. but how fertile do they think this is for them? >> look, i think that that's going to be the question with everything going forward, really, because of course, all this campaigning and all this messaging is in preparation for the 2026 midterm elections. we are very far away from november of 2026, particularly when you talk about political timing, where we could be in eternity. so what ends up being the salient message going forward? i think that we're still trying to figure that out. but again, as republicans or as democrats, i mea

conservatives were going to win this election. they pulled at double the polling levels of the governing spd. the question was how many parties would he have to govern with and that was settled late last night with the real nailbiter of the counting of votes. bs, the extreme left party, led the firebrand missed entry into the parliament -- missed the 5% threshold 13,000 votes. it will not surprise you to learn they are going to go to the courts over this and demanding a recount which is unusual in germany, but there we are. i think we are catching up with other countries. so friedrich merz, and the less is on oh -- overturned by the courts, which i have a hard time seeing because we all use paper plow paper ballots. -- use paper ballots. pretty much going to govern with the social democrats in a coalition. i don't think he will have any compunction supporting ukraine. i think he intends to be a strong player in it. the reservations i have about that is last night also saw a doubling of the afd seats in parliament, with extremely high shares in eastern germany up to 37%. benjamin: the neo-nazi party. constanze: that is not pre

what this reflects is a conservative view in the role of courts and their ability to bind parties that are not litigants to the case before it which is a mainstream view with debates and captured and, you know, 140 characters on a tweet. >> bottom line, should an elected official be allowed to defy a federal court order? it would be too specific for me to send a blank statement about that. a legal court order should not be followed under some circumstances. >> what i'm saying is that there are some instances in which a public official is lawfully bound by the holding of a particular court. i cannot think them for all instances in the dynamic for a certain lawsuit. the hypothetical. such a hypothetical. a direct court order that binds a federal official. >> an exception that would be to you. i cannot think of a hypothetical one way or another. i just suppose one could handle in extreme cases. you think they are relieved officials from obeying a court order. >> i believe that there was a court order there that were repelled which has not been correctly repudiated by virtually everyone. j

party because he saw him as betrayal of the left. we have views of left, central left, everywhere there's conservatives.t media company and come on in conservatives. >> you've obviously gone, independent, part of the whole appeal. are there things you can say now that you're independent now that you're at nbc? >> that's a good question. i don't have to check with anyone. you have my old boss sitting up here. there's not a lot of bus at msnbc. >> word like genocide scares people. the new york times didn't want the report in genocide. watch multiple holocaust historians have all said genocide, i think the it's worth more of media people willing to say the g word without saying a melttown. >> are there things that you check before you want to say them that they said, no, you can't say that? >> when i was at msnbc? >> we always had internal discussions in the company i'm sure you have discussions as well about what's in the rundown, who are your guests. msnbc has fired, got rid of progressive hosts. various people in this room, do you think that's an effective way for them to build trust? >> similar to what