orla: though smiling face of the rebels on the march in the drc.ed liberators coming to clean up corruption. he says they will take the fight all the way to the capital k inshasa if the government keeps attacking them. how did the antigovernment m23 rebel group get this far? with backing, weapons, and 4000 troops from neighboring rwanda, u.n. experts say. that is something the rebels deny. >> i don't know anything about rwanda. if they say that there are 4000 fighters from rwanda, i don't know why we see them. orla: so you don't receive any assistance? >> i don't see any military assistance from rwanda. orla: even though there is photographic evidence of rwandan troops in drc, you say they are not here or fighting with you. >> they can have the evidence. i say that they do not have that evidence. i have my fighting area and we have our own reason why we are fighting. orla: the m23 have been rounding up recruits to join their fight. willing or otherwise. it does not pay to disagree. here, police officers who surrendered to the rebels when they took

the us whose companies source strategic raw materials from rolanda materials that are looted from the drc. see and smuggled to rolando while our populations are massacred, to purchase them directly from us, the rightful owners. and it's not just for the us, the offer is also extended to europeans and to all parties involved in sourcing smuggled blood stained raw materials from lawanda. echoing the same sentiments please. the interest it gives you criticized existing. you rotate negotiations, which one the describing, the agreement, the bronze access to minimal like to, and goals as the maximum scandal. the present a says that those minimal, i'll be planned to. so i'm calling it also remember the european union has contended that this agreement will flushed a bit for regulation off conflict materials. and very recently the you parliament cold for the suspension of the deal until one that is, it's into feel risk uncomfortable, but haven't listened to place of interest to get it. and it's a publication and very bad taste for one that continues to hide behind the m 23, which is why l do not t

there's racism that exist -- it goes by a bunch of names, equity, drc, you can go on and on, but whatever you want to call it is wrong and has to stop. stop discriminating on the basis of race. that's one of the reasons i like you. i think unlike most quote, unquote major civil rights organizations today you oppose racial discrimination in all forms. so i want to ask you, is reverse racism still racism? >> thank you for the question, senator. i don't even use the term reverse racism. it's just racism to discriminate on the basis of race. >> i agree with you. >> and do civil right protections apply to all races? >> in my view yes they do, senator. >> okay, in my view we have to root out this wokism and this discrimination that's been under the cultural marxism of dei, you have seen this play out in the privateer sector as well. title 7 prohibits employment based on sex, national origin. does target practice raise flags for you. >> i believe the practice is illegal and unconstitutional. >> one of the things that i find fascinating from the last administration against companies like spacex,