mr. mccotter, do you have anything to add to that, mr.'brien and then i'll yield my time. >> i would not believe it's correct and go so far the holding itself should be limited to the terms that were before the court, which had to do with a treaty with china which is no longer in existence. >> i appreciate it, gentlemen, we now have another member of the committee and i will recognize my colleague and my friend from texas, mr. gill. >> thank you, mr. chairman. 160 years ago democrats were asking us if it weren't for slavely, who would pick our cotton and today they're asking a similar question, which is if it weren't for mass migration, who would pick our avocados. it's a similar pattern that they've established and to say that the united states is not in fact better off by importing a massive class of what is virtually serf labor which undermines our cultural fabric and our government as well. i'd also like to point out the admission that we need more and more unvetted illegal aliens pouring into our country is also an admission that the

mr. mccotter and i would also introduce into the record note by amy from the heritage foundation and alson op-ed in -- that was written by mr. cooper and paterson along the subject as well. without objection, i will insert that into the record. that concludes today's hearing, we thank the witnesses appearing before committee today. members will have 5 business days. without objection, the hearing is adjourned. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations]drawal but one approvalof the security council measure calling for peace without assigning blame to the conflict .