since the arrival of the vessel is a display of military partnership and account with north korea and threats in the past, feel young has viewed such military deployments as provocative and responded with miss alt tests. as present though trumpets declared english, the national language of the united states by executive order will just be in the countries to start the dominant language. it hasn't had official status until now. how does your castro reports? the english is now the official language of the united states officially for president trump signed the executive action, addresses his long time complained of foreigners diluting the english language in the united states. to secrete just think they have languages that nobody in this country is ever heard of. 32 states have policies making english their official language. but this is the 1st time the federal government has taken the same action . the white house says designating english, the national language promotes unity establishes efficiency in government operations and creates a pathway for civic engagement, but not all agree.

north korea has viewed such military deployments as provocative and responded with missile tests in the past. it will still a hit here on the l just there. the latest, the if i come action on the way is full size, took their place in the quarter finals. that's coming up in school, the unit doc, chrome with no electricity. fact, my id shows us how she makes a living. she's displaced from come to has been missing since the war began. she's been shifting with has 7 children in a school room. she just had the income is 5000, so then he's pounds. that's just to us dollars. this is and he said custom says more than 70 percent of the people just based by the conflict women and children. most of them are really unhappy with those or are raising their children alone. aside from displacement, video, human rights organizations say they've had a just an endless cases of abduction and sexual abuse again. so then these women, local assistance committees organize workshops for hundreds of women and girls willing to acquire all types of skills that are on is hospitalization. but these women are showing

, date, north korea, russia, batteries, countries like that did not include china, did not include iran. iran upstate on this question. i think countries all over the world, whatever their ideology do not want a precedent of big naples coupling up smaller ones being seen as okay. i mean, i actually turned on it's had this motor wants to blame somehow for invading themselves. i mean, i mean, you government republicans in this town and you ask them privately who is inside the who's to dictate their, their own, say, put him in public, they are cowed. they will say they will refuse to say that russia invited you create lots of them. and so what, what the president is here for the transfer of another country sufferings, the parts of the, well we haven't discussed or thought about it is very ominous. do you think rushes back in the in the g 8 and do you think the donald trump is going to throw a state dinner celebrating by them recruiting in the white house? i think that the 15 is going to invite trump to the may nights, may day parades and moscow. oh, and that trump will find it very ha

i say the same point. >> george: you voted with north korea and russia -- you voted with north korea and russia and belarus in the united nations and against our western allies. >> so you know what -- do you know what the united nations resolution was? i'll tell you if you want to hear what it was. it basically said, this has been a horrible war. it's time for it to end. the job of the u.n. is to bring about peace in the world. i thought that's what the u.n. was created to do, to stop wars and to prevent them, and that's what the resolution did. was it antagonistic towards the russians? no. back to the point. but it also didn't praise the russians. all it said is, this is a bad war. it needs to end, and by the way, at the security council, which has not been widely reported, the first resolution on ukraine that has passed the security council in three years, passed this week because of the leadership of president trump and it's a resolution that says, bad war, needs to end, let's bring the two sides together. that's what the resolution is. again, what is the united nations for? isn't

china knows that i iran and north korea knows that and that's an important message to send. >> the unitedstands with its allies and what we saw there in the al office was the president and vice president berating. to put a fine point on this, is the united states abandoning ukraine? >> no. they're not abandoning ukraine. i was with the prd esident a da before this meeting and he was excited about this mineral rights deal and they believed it we all believed it it was in the best interest for the countries. i saw it the other way around. i saw zelenskyy stiff necked in the oval office instead of being gracious and saying thank you and looking for a way out of this mess he did quite the opposite. that's why people, members of congress are frustrated. that's why the american people are frustrated abouthis. we have to stand for america's principles and america's priorities, and i think this would have accomplished all those things and it is unfortunate the way that it developed. >> mr. speaker, senator lindsey graham floated that president zelenskyy may need to resign in order for there to be

of china, and it lost its way further east. bringing some of that winter weather to south korea, north korea, as well as on woods to central parts of japan. below it, we loaned the spells of rain running all the way down to east and pots of china to the very south as well. another wintery mix developing across small central areas, not cold blast, is going to bring temperatures down rather dramatically for the likes of so, and you know, the temperatures offsets to rise in paces further south, for example, ty pay will be 5 degrees above the average that on monday, now it's also a bit of a wintery mix. it's expected to bloss into northern parts of pakistan and india, which could potentially caused further problems here. okay, much of the country there for india is a largely dry and fine picture of the west to weather that developed in the south pushes its way across the mall. these, there's lots of heat to come with them on by seeing $35.00 degrees celsius on monday. the, the muslim community in diana, living in a 5 range caribbean culture, this country, we're blessed. we live in harmony with a

slides to devising gluco temperatures anyways, across carry a has dealt himself career days off to north korea, tested cruise missiles. the south korean navies has the arrival of the vessel is a display of military partnerships aimed at country hills. queens threats in the past few and young has viewed stops. military deployments has provocative and responded with miss sol. tests also the full of a sod regime and serial off to some of the thousands of severance, a pretense of the homes. but many have been destroyed. and even amongst the ruins, families are observing, ramadan and upholding natural nations. as will set out reports from damascus. it's been a bit too sweet homecoming for many cities, fill out the violence and tell us of the civil war. what they found. often the return has been heartbreaking. here in the neighborhood of damascus investigation is over whether these children have come back to leave you the home, which is barely standing to the father of what i'm jets says. he knows living here . he's dead. just busted better. that'd be another feature. so what else? his oldest son wa

russia today as china and north korea, as iran and those for regard themselves as an access of resistance against what, against the united states. i believe definitely they are not going to succeed, but so much depends on the leadership of the united states and how well the new leaders of the united states are going to do on the world scene. >> 20 minute slough with marvin cal this morning. the book we've been talking about a different russia. russia, khrushchev and kennedy on a collision course. we will take viewers to don in fall river massachusetts on the republican line. fall river by the way, broadcast home of the lizzie borden murder case. go ahead from massachusetts. are you with us? got to stick by your phone, line for democrats, republicans and independents as usual. you were just talking about vladimir putin and where russia is today. let me take viewers to the final paragraph of the book. this is what you write, russia clearly is not ready f democracy, putin stands in its way. they thinkhetruggle land in a historic struggle between east and west, a powerful tugowds thoritariani

china, iran, north korea and. yeah. great, great question.so a little bit of definition that's required. the the cartels are not an insurgency. the cartels do not want to govern mexico. what the cartels to do is to keep the government out of their business. okay. through fear, through through whatever tactics they need. but do they want to take over mayoral positions they want to become. no, that's not what they do. you know, if you go back under the clinton administration, the united states worked very closely with the with colombia during plan colombia, they were dealing with the farc, which acted like a terrorist organization, but they were actually insurgency. they were a political party. they wanted to govern colombia. we're not dealing with that with mexico. now, with respect to china, we've seen a 20 500% increase of chinese nationals coming into the united states. we just heard the director of the fbi reiterate in exit interview the other night on 60 minutes that he believes i agree with this, that china, the gravest threat to the uni

you mentioned transnational fraud rings, terrorist nationstates, north korea, nuclear weapons programs funded by tax dollars. china, iran, romania, russia, not our friends being funded by taxpayer dollars. can give you -- can you give examples of how this is happening? mr. talcove: think about what happened during the pandemic. $1 trillion was stolen. 78% of that money went overseas and i can give you some examples. a western state had more people applying for unemployment insurance benefits that they had individuals over 18. the people that were stealing the money from romania were using it to facilitate other fraud schemes that include fentanyl and other things that impact our democracy. on the insider threat, the first thing you have to say is 99% of people that work in the public sector are honest and hard-working individuals. but, there are some. what you need is data and technology to root that out. there were examples during the pandemic. there were some examples even last week. people got into the medicaid system in a western state and still $50 million in less than four months

malevolent players whoever they may be sometimes foreign influence china russia iran a little bit north korea so i'm not sure what's going to happen. i do think my sons tend to be a little smarter in my surprised at what they understand. >> the thread here is that people can run social media and on facebook and the news comes than the people have a hard time if something looks good and it looks like it's the real thing but how do you know it's not a real thing and what they are doing often is looking to someone they trust to tell them is this real. one of my main jobs of parents asked me if this is real and should i be worried about this and they are asking and they trust that i will tell them if they should worry about that particular thing. how do we get people's trust in institutions which projected on the health side which was totally destroyed during the pandemic so to say they go to the ddc and they are like i don't trust those people anymore. how do you develop a relationship when they will track whatever experts they are putting out. it's tough because stuff looks real when it's not a

there inert in the oval office today saying nothing, looking green, and then put out a boilerplate north koreaake about hope for republicans showing any sort of resistance here? is there any? >> you know, again, this is a shift in our politics that the senate used to be a place where, right or wrong, people would criticize a president when they stepped out of line, even one of their own party. and here is a situation that is so grave. and my colleagues know this because we meet with these leaders. i was in communication today with an estonian leader. this has struck and struck fear in their country because estonia, latvia, lithuania, moldova, these countries know the threat of russia and worry because putin is using the same rhetoric with them. he used about the ukrainian people. this has grand implications beyond just ukraine and we know our history, but yet our failing to learn from it. if there's ever a time for political courage, even if it means undermining one's ability to get reelected, this is a time for courage. and we know from our history when good men do nothing. that is the ingred

has there ever been such a vote where the united states votes alongside russia, north korea, belarus and other west african hunters, including also, by the way, israel was always also part of it against a un general assembly resolution condemning the aggression. >> we are in a new era. how long the era lasts, i think is up for grabs. you know, fundamentally, donald trump won the election with 30% of the vote, of the total vote he got about, i think, 49% of the electorate. that turned out, you know, donald trump, like all of us are here today, gone tomorrow. politicians, right. you know, whoever occupies the white house doesn't indefinitely represent the united states. we all come and go. same for number ten, same for the elysee palace. >> and you're a former military person yourself. and we will hope to have you back as this progresses. ben wallace, thank you so much. indeed. former uk defense secretary. up next, as gaza's future hangs in the balance, the painful price of this war for israelis as shiri kefir and ariel bibas finally returned home to be buried. >> learn how to experime

he tried to do a deal with north korea.and he also talked about the usmc deal there and the afghans deal. there's one constant in all of these. he put publicity ahead of principle. he is actually the worst negotiator. and we should be actively pointing out and saying, here's the other course we would take. you never leave that field for him. i would not do that because he has to be confronted. now, i would be more selective. i would not go. as i've said before, i wouldn't go sit there in my first protest, be in front of usaid office. i would pick a place that matters to the american people. i would go to a grocery store and show all the open shelves on eggs. the fact is, we have no eggs and inflation is way up on eggs. and he's now fired. everybody that will keep. >> he said he was going to have this great strategy to end the ukrainian war. you know, we couldn't hear what it was. and then when he got into office, what was the strategy? give up. just give up. he just surrendered everything immediately. that's i've never seen

first time, you see the united states of america voting with russia, north korea and iran. yes, in answer to your question, it changes the diplomatic world in where we've been for the last 80 years. >> one more question on this, and i have to ask you about what's going on here in new york. the likelihood that the next step from president trump in the trump administration is to withdraw american troops from europe, from the big base at ramstein in germany. >> i'm very concerned about that. i'm very concerned what he will say on tuesday night at the state of the union. you know, it is everything is up in the air here. you know, this guy is clearly not with our allies. just think about what he's done in the first month or so that he's been in the office, all of our allies he has dealt with as adversaries, all of our adversaries he's dealt with as allies. it just makes no sense. and i don't think that the american people will stand up for that. and i think, and i would hope that congress, because we supposed to be the oversight of the executive branch, that congress stands up i

we voted against it, along with russia, north korea and iran. the reason the united states voted against that is because it named russia as the aggressor. and for all of these concessions, all these moves towards russia, if you look in the last three weeks, the president has not gotten a single thing from russia, a benefit to the united states. in fact, the russian position appears to be hardening. this is not the way to deal with kremlin. not the way to deal with vladimir putin. putin just sits back and says, i'm getting these concessions. i'm going to wait for trump to make more because he sees trump as weak. >> thought provoking there. and you're right to point out all those things that have happened of late. let me ask you, peter, about the sound that we played earlier and what you make of top republicans like lindsey graham and marco rubio doing these. 180 on supporting ukraine. with few exceptions, republicans have all fallen in line with trump after yesterday's confrontation. will it last? >> well, i think it's a measure of how much the r

voted with russia and north korea instead of its european allies in refusing to blame russia for starting the war. it's all rather embarrassing, unless it results in a deal. see, this is the true test of a transactional president. can the art of the deal bring about the end of the war? i think it's offensive to ask ukraine for reimbursement. backward looking for american aid. that sets a bad precedent. telling a friend threatened by an invading force and no friend of ours. well, we'll help you, but only for a price. if, however, there's a deal to be struck in our mutual interest, let's do it. and if, after striking that agreement, trump can resolve a three year old war in a way that biden could not, and which protects ukraine's sovereignty, i'll be the first to say this was all worth it. and maybe you deserve a nobel prize, mr. president. but until then, i'm going to keep thinking that the the bullying and the browbeating of the ukraine president by the american president and vice president was unnecessary and out of bounds. one more thing occurs to me. yesterday, a conservative journalis

the way i view this is that china, russia, iran and north korea are engaged in a new axis or axis powers, and they are not on america's side. let's be crystal clear about that. you have to walk circumspectly in these in these perilous times in the world stage. but america is back. america is strong again. and that is good for us and for freedom loving people around the world. >> mr. speaker, i want to talk about your plans for what you and the president call one big, beautiful bill. you had a big win this week in the house. you narrowly passed a key vote for that sweeping budget plan to do a lot of things, including extend trump tax cuts, slash federal spending that at least give the parameters to do that. when you met with the president and the senate majority leader, john thune this week, did you get a sense from the senate leader that he is going to continue with the plan that you proposed because there's, as you know, some pushback in the senate? >> well, there was a little initial pushback just on the strategy. but i'll say this very clearly. there is no daylight between the house r

sided with north korea, with russia against our allies, against ukraine, and then. i today, earlier today, proceeded to try to berate the leader of a country that's been fighting for for its own independence, its own sovereignty for three years, but also really defending the west, a bulwark against russian aggression. beating up russia in a way that makes us safer and makes the europeans safer. making sure that russia doesn't pose the same kind of threats. and we what do we do? we we beat them up for it. and i'm i'm pretty proud of the fact that he held his own against that room of sheer hostility. um, what's sad about this is, you know, i my book released this week, it talks about the history of 30 plus years. republican administrations from george h.w. bush all the way through to the democratic administrations. we've made mistakes along the way, but nothing like we've seen today. >> you know, just to just to reset expectations here. i mean, it seems to me the biggest, uh, issue here, and it's linked to what alex just said, is that the trump administration wants to

xi in china, kim in north korea, the rulers of iran are watching. and what trump demonstrated is weakness, pathetic abandonment of an ally who has been bleeding and dying. and then the audacity to say that zelenskyy doesn't want peace. this man has led the country bleeding and dying. he's lost friends. he's gone to visit the amputees. i've been with him at times when he has mourned and really. indescribably grieved for his country, and he's led it with courage and determination. in the first russian assault, they came within just miles of his bunker. i visited bucha, where women and children were shot through the head and buried in mass graves. so he wants peace, but it has to be peace with freedom and independence. and that's why we should be supporting him. because putin will keep the aggression going. >> well, putin has said there's no such thing as ukraine, and there's no such thing. >> by the way, this is just to add, is this it's the if you look at russia today. so this is it's a it's a giant military camp from kindergarten to the top of the g

voted with russia, voted with north korea. and then voted, actually abstained from its own resolution because there was a effort to define the reality of the ground that russia was the aggressor. so the europeans know this and feel this very, very acutely. it's in their own backyard. the brits have been, you know, they were also our allies during the cold war. they understand what the threat of a russian empire and russian resurgence means. they understand that russia's aspirations don't end with regards to just ukraine or belarus. it's it's looking to rebuild that russian empire and the soviet union. so what they're doing is they're sending a strong message. and that's only going to go. yesterday was a clear break that the u.s. wasn't going to be there. that's only going to be clearer as the europeans continue to embrace ukraine, demonstrate ironclad support for ukraine, because russia needs to be warned off, because ukraine needs to exit this war with security guarantees, long term peace, and with its territorial integrity i

and that's why you see russia reaching out to north korea for troops, reaching out to iran for weapons. those are signs of conventional weakness on putin's part, not signs of strength. and at the same time, we've seen that the ukrainians are able to absorb the capabilities, the training that the united states, europe and 50 countries have provided and have fought with incredible bravery, holding off a much larger military. so i do not count ukraine out, but what they will need, and i think this is core to any peace through strength type of deal that i think the administration wants. they will need continued support from the international community so that they can defend themselves. >> yeah. maya. treasury secretary scott claimed that zelensky wanted to reset after that episode in the oval office. he wanted to stay to sign that agreement, but white house officials demanded that he leave. what are you hearing about all that? >> yeah, i mean, look, this was just a stunning moment. i mean, the reaction around the world has been, you know, incredible. i mean, among ukraine's supporters, bo

in fact, putin has even turned to north korea for extra troops on the battlefield. zelenskyy was by far the most composed leader in that room. he made it clear that he was trying to set the record straight, something he has to do. and honestly, can you blame him? i mean, the journalists there are those cosplaying as journalists were throwing ridiculous questions like this one. >> in this country's. >> office. >> and he refused to. >> wear a suit. >> just want to see if. >> you. >> own. >> a suit. >> yeah, yeah. >> i a lot of americans. >> have problems. >> with you not. >> respecting the dignity. >> of. >> this office. >> i will wear a costume after this war. will finish. okay. yes, maybe. >> maybe something. >> maybe something like yours. yes. maybe some. something better. i don't know. >> yeah. >> trump sycophant reporters cosplaying as white house journalists are the new norm. and yet, no one has ever bothered to ask elon musk why he doesn't wear a suit when he's around trump and in the oval office. now, some commentators are calling this a setup. the white house

the north koreans will get emboldened and they might try to invade south korea and japan will be at risk. and america's alliances around the world will fall pieces. so that remains the argument for. american engagement in places and conflicts, faraway the anti-interventionist argument today is that there is no end to the number of places the united states could engage. and for america to mortgage its future on what vladimir decides to do tomorrow, what kim jong un decides to do tomorrow, this is silly. you cannot control people who are beyond your control. and even if the united states could assist, for example, in ukraine's efforts to hold off russian advances, suppose ukraine wins this war. well, russia is still going to be a very large country with a very long border next to and the russians still consider that ukraine ought to be part of the united states. and so unless unless well, and this is exactly what lindbergh said, unless the united states is determined to defend ukraine forever, then you just got to cut your losses. and i've been very good have said and i'll go there in the

do you want to side with, as the marco rubio pointed out, north korea and, you know, iran designed dronesthe ukrainians have just shot down. is that who you want to be with, or do you want to be with the other countries of the free world, our allies, our trading partners? they're going to matter in all of this. the italian prime minister, who is a conservative, a friend of president trump, just called for a summit and she actually has stood with ukraine. so that's the second thing i think that will matter with our european allies. um, and then the third thing to get it back on track is just to remember what is at stake here for american leadership across the world. and everything is on the table. so, no, i don't think we should be in a war. i think we should be in a. in america, moving forward with our allies. and i would hope that the tomorrow that we can start resetting this again, instead of dividing everyone. and i am very appalled by what happened. but my view is we need to go forward. >> yeah, we'll see what that looks like. senator klobuchar, as always, thank you for your time. >>

the same as just 11 other countries, including russia and two of its closest allies, belarus and north korea. the u.s. also abstained from its own separate resolution, which contained no criticism of russia. after france, whose president happened to be at the white house at the same time, successfully amended it to include verbiage calling out russia as the invading aggressor. on thursday, the u.s. and russia conducted another round of meetings, this time in istanbul, discussing, among other things, restoring direct flights between the countries and issues dealing with diplomatic missions. that's according to the russian foreign ministry. putin, who has repeatedly ridiculed the united states and western democracy, later publicly praised the trump administration's, quote, pragmatism and realistic worldview, saying things so far are, quote, inspiring a certain degree of hope. end quote. joining me now is the retired army lieutenant colonel alexander vindman. he's a former director of european affairs for the u.s. national security council. he also formerly served as a political military affair

the same as just 11 other countries, including russia and two of its closest allies, belarus and north korea. on thursday, the u.s. and russia conducted another round of meetings, this time in istanbul, discussing, among other things, restoring direct flights between the countries and issues dealing with diplomatic missions. that's according to the russian foreign ministry. putin later publicly praised the trump administration's, quote, pragmatism and realistic worldview, saying things so far are, quote, inspiring a certain degree of hope. joining me now is ben rhodes. he's a former deputy national security advisor in the obama administration. he's a co-host of the important podcast pod. save the world, is an msnbc political contributor, and is the author of the important book, after the fall the rise of authoritarianism authoritarianism in the world. we've made ben, ben about 24 hours since this went down. a little less than that. your thoughts? >> well. >> i think that you put your finger. >> on the fact that this is not just a shift in u.s. foreign policy. this is a complete transformatio

if you look at the pattern of behavior of voting against with north korea and russia against our alliesondemning russia for the invasion, it is an alternate reality. how come republicans continue saying russia hoax, hoax, hoax? all we have to do is not look at these as one-off situations but a pattern of behavior. will not criticize russia. guest: the president said this week, what good would it do if i call putin evil and all of these other words? it would not help us make a deal. there is a point to be made about that. the other part is you cannot deny what he has done. you do not have to call him names to acknowledging he ordered the invasion of a sovereign nation, ukraine. that is just a fact. you can do that without name-calling. if the deal is the ultimate objective, i think that is the wrong objective. going back to 1938 and neville chamberlain, he made a deal but it was a bad deal. you can make a good deal or a bad deal. unless you acknowledge truthfully what putin has done and what his objectives are and make him pay a price for this, it is not a good deal at all for ukraine or

if you look at the pattern of behavior of voting against with north korea and russia against our alliesdemning russia for the invasion, it is an alternate reality. how come republicans continue saying russia hoax, hoax, hoax? all we have to do is not look at these as one-off situations but a pattern of behavior. will not criticize russia. guest: the president said this week, what good would it do if i call putin evil and all of these other words? it would not help us make a deal. there is a point to be made about that. the other part is you cannot deny what he has done. you do not have to call him names to acknowledging he ordered the invasion of a sovereign nation, ukraine. that is just a fact. you can do that without name-calling. if the deal is the ultimate objective, i think that is the wrong objective. going back to 1938 and neville chamberlain, he made a deal but it was a bad deal. you can make a good deal or a bad deal. unless you acknowledge truthfully what putin has done and what his objectives are and make him pay a price for this, it is not a good deal at all for ukraine or t

deterrent to adversaries that are working together like they've never done before, iran, russia, north korea, and communist china? mr. phelan: thank you for the question, senator. i know it's an issue important to you and we spent some time together when we met in the office. i think this is a critical task. the president has been very consistent when he spoke with me. ship building, ship building, ship building. i think if confirmed i intend to go visit the shipyards, i look forward to hopefully visiting it with you in nfip because i know -- in mississippi because i know you've done an exceptional job in the ship building there. i think we need to take some of the best practices from those yards, some of the best practices from some of the foreign yards as well, to learn. but we have to reinvigorate the industrial base in america. that could come from a couple of different angles. i think in the ships act i know is something that's being considered. i think there's some very good ideas in the ships act in terms of trying to reinvigorate the industrial base. such as opportunity zones for shi

is when under this administration the united states is voting with russia and north korea and hungarynd voting against every single one of our democratic allies. that makes a dangerous world infinitely more dangerous. i yield to the gentleman from california, ranking member of the natural resources committee, mr. huffman. the chair: the gentleman is recognized. mr. huffman: i thank the gentleman. four weeks, in just four weeks, donald trump has sewn chaos. his stimulation is defying court orders, firing federal workers and freezing, impacting wildfire preparations to water security and health and housing programs and a lot more. all of this under cost savings. but the reality is there are no meaningful savings or benefits for average taxpayers. real people's lives are being turned upside down. our national park service, workers at a number of federal agencies, farmers, firefighters, everyone who depends on federal services is feeling the squeeze of this reckless agenda. republicans are preparing their budget reconciliation bill which is going to cost at least $4 trillion. our republic

yeah. >> north korea then they. >> north korea then they. >> banned the hub. >> banned the hub. >> overy. >> but look. >> but look. >> it�*s, you know, they turn up >> it's, you know, they turn up on the front line, they google. >> for. huge 1607 00:08:00,38

yeah. >> north korea then they. 1601 00:08:01,042 --> 00

so they�*ve been getting men from they've been getting men from north korea.they�*re getting donkeys. it�*s you know, it's not really going particularly well for russia. they�*ve been, you for russia. they've been, you know, gradually getting land bit by bit. but at the at the same time as russia's running out of tanks, running out of men, running out of machinery, ukraine is getting f—165, is ukraine is getting f—igs, is getting all this new kit and is actually starting to retake. justin actually starting to retake. just in the last couple of weeks, they've had two major successes around, i think toretsk and pokrovsk. and obviously they�*ve still they've still holding the russian land around kursk. they've actually gone into russia, seized some land. so i mean to say gone into russia, seized some land. so i me