. >> before world war two, when germany went into sudetenland and took over a part of czechoslovakia, the understanding there was, okay, fine, you can have that, but no more. and of course, immediately thereafter they went into poland and world war two began. i the goal, then harold macmillan's goal in uk was appeasement. right. if you if you if you settle, if you just give hitler something, he'll calm down. that's not what was going on yesterday. what what was that. what was the goal of trump and vance lecturing zelensky. what's the end goal. >> so i think part of the end goal was to actually sign this deal, which they're ham handed and kind of absurd juvenile behavior undermined. they wanted to bully zelensky but still get a deal signed. what they didn't realize is in some in some how trump and vance both looked like bullies and they looked weak strangely that they managed to do something very, very strange like that. and zelensky looked very, very strong. he held his ground. his country is in a state of war, and he proved himself to be the world leader that he is. >> well, remind,

hitler went into sudetenland, went into austria without a single shot being fired.ose were reunited. they were taken back under german control because they were majority german ethnic territories. >> ukraine has fought back. >> ukraine has fought back. >> i think a fair amount of shots have been fired, and indeed a good deal of war atrocities have been committed as well. and so to compare that to appeasement is absolutely absurd, just demonstrates that people. >> i guess. >> i guess. >> it's talking about appeasement gcse. >> they're talking about appeasement now i think is as opposed to appeasement three years ago. yeah. but cresta. >> but it's not appeasement. if you've had a war for three years and then you go, right, let's come to some sort of peaceful settlement. you mean they've already had it? it's not an appeasement. that is how wars end. and they usually begin with some sort of unwarranted. they usually. >> end with a victory, usually. >> end with a victory, usually. >> no. >> no. >> or someone afghanistan. i mean, let's do another analogy would be afghanis

hitler went into sudetenland, went into austria without a single shot being fired.those were reunited. they were taken back under german control because they were majority german ethnic territories. >> ukraine has fought back. >> ukraine has fought back. >> i think a fair amount of shots have been fired, and indeed a good deal of war atrocities have been committed as well. and so to compare that to appeasement is absolutely absurd, just demonstrates that people. >> i guess. >> i guess. >> it's talking about appeasement gcse. >> they're talking about appeasement now i think is as opposed to appeasement three years ago. yeah. but cresta. >> but it's not appeasement. if you've had a war for three years and then you go, right, let's come to some sort of peaceful settlement. you mean they've already had it? it's not an appeasement. that is how wars end. and they usually begin with some sort of unwarranted. they usually. >> end with a victory, usually. >> end with a victory, usually. >> no. >> no. >> or someone afghanistan. i mean, let's do another analogy would be afghan