and the labels bring the urgency to the point of sale. and so this is one of the problems of transportation emissions and the consumer just does not feel part of the problem because they are very much of a problem. because their contribution individually is small, but collectively they are part of this large problem and so the label locates the responsibility at that point of sale directly. so another problem with greenhouse gas emissions is that it does not bite us, it does not hurt and we don't get any immediate feedback and so the labels still feedback at the point of sale. and so the consumers is getting that oh, this is a problem message, and it is going to be durable, and be consistently there and every time that they are there, it is a reminder and it is going to be conscious and so the discounting is what i was saying earlier, it is a term psychological term, that we tend to discount the future threats. and it is a bias, and the climate change is a perfect storm of cognitive biass for human beings, we need tools, and the cities ne

multi bacteria tobacco was a major contributors to lung cancer so we regulated it we put warning labels on the car tens in exactly the is that you tobacco and sugar sweetened beverages are not the sole reason for heart disease the evidence is they're a major contributor to those diseases and as such we owe it to ourselves and communities to regulate them i will just close by reminding us all in the thirty years since warning labels and other forms of regulation were placed on tobacco over one billion lives have been saved that's the power of regulating unheath products over one billion lives we're saved thank you very much >> thank you (clapping.) >> i too feel ethnic if you hear something you like as powerful communicate it by silent communications dr. is that all you have perfect supervisor wiener has a few questions. >> dr. thank you very much for your work in trying to make our community healthier sometimes, we - i'm not a physician not a scientist i don't pass myself off as a medical expert but i have a met and spoken with and left hand to and read analysis from many different posi

the single labels people get tired of them and not notice them and graphic warning labels are more effective. >> you say graphic labs. >> yes. pictorial with the population using language and sometimes, people they're not going to read it or don't thinks there's a lot of research are pictorial advisement is better and more effective. >> all right. supervisor wiener new questions nope thank you for your presentation. >> okay. so now at this time i think we'll open up for public comment i have a few public comment cards i'm going to call up the four names they'll speak first and any other member of the public may speak afterwards chris in the american health association and alcohol justice and from the medical society and andrea yip just as a reminder two minutes. >> thank you good afternoon. thank you inspires for allowing me to speak i want to start by thanking supervisor mar and supervisor cohen and supervisor wiener as the chairman for the heart association for i stand here and say the heart association supports those two measures reducing the sugar sweetened beverages is a huge will have

the labels now contain that they do not have them. that's a voluntary martin o'malley made by companies trying to inform consumers and/or cash in on anti gmo sentiment. on the other side companies that products include gmos do not have an obligation to disclose that. that's because fda says such products are not different from their non-engineered counterparts. that brings me back to frankenfish and consumers who fear there is something fishy about it. the companies won't have to disclose that its genes have been engineered. that is one issue raised by the first genetically altered animal heading our way. >> reporter: these fish are as fresh and wild as you will find in any shop. king salmon caught off the coast of a larks ska. there could be competition in the future. >>> i think in the pacific north-west where ground zero salmon company, we would have a hard time selling such fish to the public. >> reporter: aqua bowdy technologies has been working on this concept for 20 years, using the fish farms. the company claims its man made s

the companies will have two years to update these labels with the new look.queline fell, ktvu channel 2 news. >>> new deals about a rare polio-like disease that has been discovered in at least 20 california children, including several in the bay area. now senator barbara boxer is urging the centers for disease control and prevention to investigate this mysterious disease. the disease causes paralysis and senator boxer is demanding answers. >>> b.a.r.t.'s board of directors is set to hold a discussion tonight about the future of b.a.r.t. strikes. joel keller is asking the public if transit strikes should be prohibited. he's proposing an advisory november ballot measure that will ask voters whether the state legislature should prohibit those strikes. commuters we spoke to today had mixed opinions. >> the fact that all of these stall i haves and -- salaries and everything is public record doesn't help their case. >> i don't think it's a good idea banning the strikes completely. i really think they are being large children. >> tonight's meeting begins at 5:00 p.m

labeling is a very crude instrument. if food has to be labeled, nobody would buy them especially regarding gmo's. we do not have the educated public that we would like. i think we need to ensure consumers that genetically engineered foods are safe. and then eat them. we need greater legislation to give the fda that authority. guest: democrats line, san mateo, california. host-- host: democrats line, san mateo, california. caller: i think the testing may be adequate, but the time span is not long enough. my question is there is a lot of labeling on the products when they reach the consumer. i do not read much about adding animal parts to foods that are fit to cows for example. does your group have any interest in that topic? guest:gmo's testing, there is no way to test it for 50 or 60 years. that is what you really need to see if there are any differences. you can with animal studies to see what the effect are. you can do chemical or nutritional testing, then we do not see any difference. the basic ingredients, high fruct

researchers say women who read labels weigh nine pounds less than women who don't read food labels. for men they weighed only one pound less. and also found being married and having a college education increases lakely hood a person will read the label autos you can work out while reading. too. >> and there is a big playoff hit. barry zito. >> yes. >>> coming up at 6:00 a little relief at the pump and how much prices dropped today and how long it could be until they come down. and also, cured meat movement. how you can get in on it and make your own salami. >> thank you very much. >> and a giant scooter made it to almost every corner of san francisco tonight. extending hours for fans to watch the home team play the reds. >> good stuff. today's showing courtesy of barry skpeeto and his team. >> yes. he worked out last minute plans so guests can see him take the mound in that game. >> the staff were fast to stream the game live. >> guests eating could watch the game right up to the final moment. it was a great gesture and a great time for them. >> great game, oh, my goodness. >> go, a

so is this idea of like embracing the labels.actly what my experience has been to find in the label incredibly liberating at first and then to be like, what is mean. i am wondering what that has been like for you and you write about this in the book for sure but it must give you relief because i think were providing a different outlet for people. and not through just your own experience but all of the incredible research that you do to put this together which is based on your ability to hyperfocus. it like i am so grateful for your ability to hyperfocus. as you have all this material together in a way that it was so not just easily and easily digestible but so yeah, i'm sure or incurious about this idea of labels now this is liberating then when does install becoming liberating or no longer necessary and how that has been for you and how it has been or how the leaders have dealt with it. jenara: thank you so much providing that thread inav a so-called here how it resonates for you and hopefully everyone was watching and listening

>> i think certainly when you are confused about what the cell by label means -- sell by label means,ou could have bad food being consumed, too. would definitely hear anecdotal stories of people opening up meat that had a certain label on it and it smelled bad. we just want to make this really clear for consumers. right now we do get the -- sorry, the opposition saying, we really want the u.s. to lead, we don't want california to impose these roles on our manufacturers and producers. but california leads in many areas. and this is an area where i think six years is long enough of a way to really clarify the issue for consumers. kristen: i think you are referring to the consumer brands association that is opposing it. i did read that it was siding, we need federal rules, we don't want to mishmash different rules state to state. that could hurt interstate commerce. i want to review think there's any validity to it at all given that california farmers and ranchers to produce a lot and sell to other states. >> we don't think there is validity to their arguments. we do think that californi

to label or not to label. we're debating genetically modified foods and if you want to see them on store shelves. >> gmos, it stands for genetically modified organisms, and dozens of states are looking at labeling requirements, but there are a lot of politics surrounding potential policies. while there is no shortage of opinions on this topic, my tweets have been lit up all day. >> our community is vocal and passionate and very opinioned. >> consumers have a right to know how their food is made. spencer said i agree about labeling. gmo does is to food as cloned humans are to humans. finally the sad thing about this debate it has become a political issue as and not, quote, what is best for the population issue. loyal streamers, you're the third host of the show. due to all your online contributions, engage us on twitter using the hashtag. >> they say you are with a you eat, and many residents in washington state want to know what they're eating. there is a battle brewing which would require retail food product

advertising we've done around alcohol that's similar to the issue we have here we also familiar with the labeling issue we've tried to get labeling on alcoholic beverages that are targeted for kids and producing produced around kids that's hard with the commission alcohol was instrumental in the banning of advisements on bart and in los angeles it is awful to advertise those products on public property it is like like to receive revenues from those advisements that cause harm to kids and turn around and spend it on unnecessary health costs like diabetes and other things that could be reduced bylaw plus the additional costs on the taxpayers with the electronic advertising it can have drastically effects out of alcohol advertising maybe high tech but not acceptable communities can hold the alcoholic straight and sugar industry accountable and strengthen and enforce the policies that is preventing the offer expose for those thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> good afternoon. i'm john mime a i'm a member of the board of directors of the heart association when we have en

so he calls it the nutrition facts label. and his label is focused on facts that will be spending money effecting candidate races. what we did was we focused it on the ballot measure races. and but he argues that it will provide, or an alert to voters, and with a large speech is coming from a few entities so if you saw a label that said, and let's say that you received a mailer and said that it was supported by three people and you can assess that there is not a lot of popular support for this measure, and also the portion of financial support that is generated by the top x, you know, five, contributers, for instance. and so you can see that if the majority of the money is come froming a few individuals. so in our version, we made a few changes which i will go over. and let's take a look at it. so on the side here i have a list of the committees that have failed as of the june deadline and what i can do is i can actually click on one of the committee and rebuild the label and show us who the top contributers are and how many

we regulate the labeling including labeling on the foods under the food and drug act. we established that the food is disbanded if it is labeling, false or misleading in any particular. the act also provides that labeling is misleading if it fails to review material facts to the representation made by suggestive of labeling or number two fails with respect to consequences whether that is a labeled use or customary use. historically they are taking the position that the use of the genetic engineering and the food is normally not by a self material information in a meeting of the food and drug act. the courts have held that absent of the facts are the difference fact or the difference in the food derived from the source. the act doesn't require labeling indicating that it's been developed for the genetic engineering. .. is the agency more or less confident today in the safety of the underlying technology? >> it's confidence remains strong. it has been and remains strong. >> how do you know that genetically engineered foods are no different in terms of safety than their c

telling us that fewer and fewer people read warning labels.ohn: have you ever seen the warning label on a birth control pill? >> i haven't. john: both sides and if you did read this. >> nobody reads these. >> we do this contest every year and we get reporters from japan and germany, all the people that we were competing with for jobs, they want to know why americans have these warning labels. it's just unbelievable to them the one i asked my twitter audience where there's justice for stupidest warning label and one person printed a label on a child's shirt that says remove child before watching. [laughter] and how about the one that says don't iron clothes while wearing them. and aaron gibson cemented the label on a bottle of sleeping pills that says warning, may cause drowsiness. >> he keeps running the contest. so what are your other finalists? >> we had this 1 inch tall toy, kids love these, it expands to about 10 times the size, but the warning label says that this is in no way intended to represent living people. any resemblance is coinci

the misleading labels found on some organic food. >>> and this was no escaping it. the massive dust storm that to everyone by surprise. >> it's been a trifecta here in the bay area. good evening, it's been a combination of fog, heat and thunderstorms. your pinpoint forecast as eyewitness news continues. ,, a bill in >>> california could soon be the first state in the nation with the legal definition of a hot dog. it's going to be defined as a whole cured cooked sausage that's skin less stuffed in a casing or served on a bun or roll. the sponsor says the definition is needed to give health inspectors more oversight over the vendors who sell wieners, red hots, franks and similar meat. >>> if you have been buying natural and organic hot dogs thinking they are healthier, think again. on the consumerwatch, julie watts explains why some of those labels can be misleading. >> reporter: they say all natural, uncured, no nitrates or night rights to added. >> i would assume it was healthier. >> i would think that there were no nitrates in this. says it right there on the label

juan dean is as like a label.ittleses for example, isle another. >> the serving size for ice cream has been a half a cup. they've changed it to say one cup. the calorie campers can be very different. >> reporter: back at farmer joes. >> forty traction from fight down and what the nutrition label is oakland, mike mcbike. >>> researchers say girls diagnosed with autism appear to have more gene -- >>> on wall street three major stock index have all posted gains today. the dow was up 74 points the that is dad added 26 and the s & p50 index closed at an all time high. >>> janet yelland said the harsh winter may be to blame for weak volunteers shows. the federal reserve would consider that as it puts bag on its bond program. she says next fall is still the target date though to end the federal stimulus. >>> wells fargo says it is cutting 700 jobs from its home lending unit. the workers got notes today. fewer people are refinances. and the owner with >>> munni made it $3.50 a gus. the 16 monday old private contest when t

telling us that fewer and fewer people read warning labels. john: have you ever seen the warning label on a birth control pill? >> i haven't. john: both sides and if you did read this. >> nobody reads these. >> we do this contest every year and we get reporters from japan and germany all the people that we were competing with for jobs they want to know why americans have these warning labels. it's just unbelievable to them the one i asked my twitter audience where there's justice for stupidest warning label and one person printed a label on a child's shirt that says remove child before watching. [laughter] and how about the one that says don't iron clothes while wearing them. and aaron gibson cemented the label on a bottle of sleeping pills that says warning, may cause drowsiness. >> he keeps running the contest. so what are your other finalists? >> we had this 1 inch tall toy kids love these, it expands to about 10 times the size, but the warning label says that this is in no way intended to represent living people. any resemblance is coincid

as another question for both of us, what helps you integrate your label? you have recommendations for supporting someone who is beginning process of integrating different aspects of neural divergence? you want to go first? >> helping integrate people, people say the same person, there was a moment i told my husband, you can leave. if i could leave me, i would leave me him be careful to say you're crazy. this is not a new development for you, now you have a label for it but you are not a different person, that was one thing that was helpful to me. >> that's interesting. what helps me integrate it? i mean, it's a gradual process. in the beginning for me it was a lot of like -- i remember the day i did research popping up in my facebook feed about how women are being left out in the research and adhd and i read these things and i was like up next me to a t, i have never heard of this? there are additional moments of oh my gosh and then being a very curious person, a journalist and writer and you've got that right of okay, let me dive into this. what is this a

is confusing they're spending more money than ever spend on labeling telling people that labeling is too expensive they're pretending that the labeling bill has been created by trial lawyers to force lawsuits and that it's going to be bad for farmers and small businesses and it's going to cost a huge amount of money for california bureaucracy in reality all of these are manufactured. and this is very simply a right to do were label be affixed to a a package indicating whether a product is genetically engineer. and some of the opponents of prop thirty seven jeffries say that the food choices will decrease and prices will increase how do you respond to that. there are sixty one countries that have labeling requirements for genetically engineered foods and not one has increased the cost of shoots to consumers in fact the same companies that sell g m o's in the united states kraft nestle is hershey's and have either labeled it overseas or removed it entirely at no cost to consumers if they wanted to trust the entire cost of hiring an artist to place the actual label would cost about seve

melody: it makes me think about the labeling.the book where you know that to be able to finally give a name to this is liberating. at the beginning and then towards the end you say that one time i have my own labels and identifications and truly embrace them and for family friends and colleagues on board, i almost didn't need them anymore. once i learn about them, we all jested and now have a thriving life will downs and all. this idea, like embracing it will i find this what my experience has been. the find the labels incredibly liberating a person to be like this me and i'm wondering what that was like for you and you write about this in the book for sure. and i think you are providing a different outlet for other people to see the self reflection in the book. not just through your own experience and all the incredible research that you do this together, based on your ability right like i'm so grateful tenants hyperfocus rated he managed to put all of this material together there was not easily digestible. so yeah, i'm curious

we decode the supermarket labels. and -- >> they are breaking out in song as the san jose band gets the first honor of its kind after four decades. abc 7 news at >>> the terrorist group isis. follows president obama's promise to be relentless to the militant who is invaded iraq and beheaded an american journalist. the cia failed to see the threat from isis. >> the first thing that we have to evaluate is why our intelligence on the ground. why the cia was not well positioned to recognize how swift they could move into iraq and take over the northern part of the country. i think they were underestimated in terms of their capability, their training and the money they had acquired. >> she says it iraqi army has to step up and u.s. officials say isis may have a 17,000 men army and enough weapons for a 200,000 man army. >>> appeal a court ruling about the death penalty. california's death penalty took too long and was difficult to impose. more than 900 people have been sentenced to death in california. only 13 have been exe

labeling and california said no thanks no thanks to labeling our food we don't need it now i guess that's what our food contains g.m.o. . your reaction i guess really as a california girl i was really really sad to hear that but on the other hand the issue was made about money it wasn't a right to know issue we had a forty seven million dollar disinformation campaign coming from one fan to another biotech giants saying hey this is going to cost families four hundred dollars a year more in food and people are just like hey i don't want to pay four hundred dollars more you're in in the food that i'm eating when really i mean the cost was really in consequential it would really just cost a one time amount to these companies to change their labeling and so when you make the argument about money and costing more to consumers it's really hard to to sort through all of that people are reading about their bottom line they don't want to buy their groceries i think you know a lot of people who saw these as i mean i will agree that the messaging war from these big companies like monsanto is it was e

stan that was mentioned enforcing warning labels very is the enforcement of the deterrific association and as tobacco in the past you'll probably hear if a dietician paid for by the bench industry we'll have the entire association in support keep in mind and 74 percent of san franciscans said they'll support warning laborious and democrats and renders this is about a right to know san francisco's residents deserve to know what the drinks are and the danger and i appreciate our vote on this measure. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> make madam chair and supervisor cohen i'm not sure i can corporate that i represent the out media billboard companies and the comments were 8 hundred millions on the targeted of communities of color those numbers are awe skew if you look at those problems one half of less than one percent of those dollars go to the trying to make ends meet and other amazes to print supervisor i mentioned you wanted to regulate the persecutes in san francisco we have at chronology but don't want to address the problem from the media addresses it address the media we don'

juan dean is as like a label. littleses for example, isle another. >> the serving size for ice cream has been a half a cup. they've changed it to say one cup. the calorie campers can be very different. >> reporter: back at farmer joes. >> forty traction from fight down and what the nutrition label is oakland, mike mcbike. >>> researchers say girls diagnosed with autism appear to have more gene -- >>> on wall street three major stock index have all posted gains today. the dow was up 74 points the that is dad added 26 and the s & p50 index closed at an all time high. >>> janet yelland said the harsh winter may be to blame for weak volunteers shows. the federal reserve would consider that as it puts bag on its bond program. she says next fall is still the target date though to end the federal stimulus. >>> wells fargo says it is cutting 700 jobs from its home lending unit. the workers got notes today. fewer people are refinances. and the owner with >>> munni made it $3.50 a gus. the 16 monday old private contest when

what helped you integrate your labels? do you have recommendations for supporting someone who is beginning that process of integrating the different aspects of neuro divergence? do you want to go first? >> well, i probably integrate my label with the people and you're the same person. there's a moment where i actually told my husband, you can leave. if i could leave me right now, i always leave me and him being able to say you're crazy from day one. this is not a new development for you. now you have a label for it, but you're not a different person. that's one of the things that was most helpful to me. how about you? >> that's interesting. what helps me integrate it? >> it's a gradual process. i think in the beginning for me, it was a lot of moments and i remember the day that this was popping up in all places how women were held left out in autism and adhd and i read these things, and this captures me to a t. how come i've never heard of this. and there were the initial moments oh, my gosh, and then being a serious perso

to label or not to label genetic processed food. this stateould be the first to require mandaty labeling. y>>> plus, the works of enginee ard rickard. they shed l lht on communities not often seen. cominght up next. >>> good evening. i'm belva davis, and welcome to this week in northern california. joining us is lisaif krueger, science reporter. and regional political reporter. and cory cook, political scientist. cory, let's start with you you teachyohis stuff, you study thea stuff. tell us, what are we seeing tha is so new this t year? >> i think the sheer amount of money we're talking about is new. you had in september alone both tt romney and president obama raised the most money individually than the two candidates spent in 2004 combined. on the presidential level, we're talking about 2 or 3 billion spent for a local election, magnitudes increase over previous years. >> give us the roots. >> a lot comes from outside roups. ourro new campaign finance syst encourages groups to spend money despite the campaigns. american crossroads

and it has zero trance on the label and the new christos has zero chance on the label. so we'll take a sample and homogenize it. and that's what will be analyzed for the transparency efforts. from. the. summer. months and. from. every food sample that we had. asked it was labeled us i mean zero grams of trans fat per cent of it unfortunately all of these foods contain the deadly gradient the most surprising the strongest margarine which contains zero point four six grams of trans fat person serving. and so if the savvy consumer looks at the ingredients they see it partially hydrogenated vegetable oil and i know that that means trance fats so how can it say zero and still contain partially hydrogenated vegetable oils computers and it's not a good thing i think we really probably should not be allowing zero there i'm less there is no partially hydrogenated vegetable product after i started really reading labels i noticed some truly disturbing processed foods. to sort of ours are designed specifically for people with diabetes. or will it near stampfer you know those two ha

i first asked her why the labeling law is needed for more. they shared a victory in vermont and it's really the culmination of a grassroots movement across the country that can really going on for twenty years but has been building in tenth place in the last few years i like it and it turned out well when we ran about in michigan california. this is information that consumers want to have over ninety percent of people. i'm consistently same poll after poll that came on gmo to be labeled in the us like they already are and sixty four other countries but we haven't been able to get labels here because of huge money during campaigns by monsanto and the pesticide companies that are desperate to keep this information on food labels to vermont is really a huge breakthrough. i think it's really the beginning. the crack in it down that's good result and i it was simple information going to consumers that we want about the food everything will be good to go skiing in california and one and one in washington back in two thousand tiles were narrowly def

telling us that fewer and fewer people read warning labels.ohn: have you ever seen the warning label on a birth control pill? >> i haven't. john: both sides and if you did read this. >> nobody reads these. >> we do this contest every year and we get reporters from japan and germany all the people that we were competing with for jobs they want to know why americans have these warning labels. it's just unbelievable to them the one i asked my twitter audience where there's justice for stupidest warning label and one person printed a label on a child's shirt that says remove child before watching. [laughter] and how about the one that says don't iron clothes while wearing them. and aaron gibson cemented the label on a bottle of sleeping pills that says warning, may cause drowsiness. >> he keeps running the contest. so what are your other finalists? >> we had this 1 inch tall toy kids love these, it expands to about 10 times the size, but the warning label says that this is in no way intended to represent living people. any resemblance is coinciden

brandy is still represents a coalition against the labeling requirements. debt with the proponents wanted to believe it's a simple measure but it isn't the only to believe it's about the right to know but if you dig into its about the right to sue. new speaker he says the measure will unfairly tarred as california businesses will increase food costs and open the door for frivolous lawsuits. >>> what happens is a will put a huge burden on our family farmers, are small grocers and larry says the time is come. >>> im excited. sisterly overwhelming it's been quite the right and it's so amazing to see some of people around the state coming together. all the signatures collected to the division on the ballot will be turned in a series of rallies next wednesday including what san francisco really hall of expected to take a month for the signatures to be validated. they found 91 percent of californians want labels on genetically modified foods. >>> uc berkeley is no stranger to budget cuts. the campuses face significant layoffs in recent years and raise tuition sub

labeling. a lot of questions there so like a lot of companies we lobby on behalf of our parmer customers to make sure that the that you know the their issues are understood and appreciated i don't think there's anything unusual or atypical about about our lobbying efforts in terms of the of the food lately and i think those numbers are are very clear in terms of what the industry and what monsanto contributed you know both in california and by how much can house how much i have and both cases because you didn't answer my first question i don't really have the specifics but it is important i'd be happy to follow up with wow ok i got it you know why don't you kid that's like a missouri man it's like her polish and a sly are sorry rob what's wrong. if they label it. not a big thing in fact you know it's a great starting point for the conversation because a lot of people think that we're against lately the reality of it is we've been very supportive of the voluntary labeling approaches that i think

-- entire eu now has labeling for gmo's.hink it is a big mistake for the food manufacturers of saying let them decide. tavis: what reason have you been given by the industry for not having done this voluntarily? >> i really don't know the answer to that. i can only speculate that they fear that -- they're concerned i believe is that, when you label, it is passing a judgment. i don't believe that to be the case, but they would argue that you are suggesting that when food is not as good or as fulsome as the other. i know there are people who believe that and they have a right to know. and there are a lot of americans who don't believe that. as governor of a state where i am getting overwhelming , weensus from constituents are 625,000 people appear to my seermonters --, i wantnters every day game i to know what is in my food grade let us have that right. vermont has led in the past. we were the first state to pasish slavery, twto marriage equalitys, we have the best small farmers and best ag products being shipped all over the

label. coffee. so that the chance has become. like that which. is why there are more there see transfer. to the major scientific equipment to determine whether or not this translates into probably what you're supposed to do take the equipment to a restaurant with you and test the food to see if it's got transcribed and if it's zero doesn't mean zero that food companies might be lying when they put zero grams of trans person serving on the front of packages. i had to spend a weekend at the university of maryland chemistry lab to find out. i have been presented with these five samples of. nicer rebel films and they asked me to analyze them for transfer content. first one is a margarine and it has zero trans on the label and the new christo has zero chance on the label. so will take a sample and how modularize it. and that is what will be analyzed for the trans fatty acids. and. every food sample that we had tested was labeled as having zero grams of trans fat her cervix unfortunately all of th

label was not always as described.t the stores, we found the same wine maker and varieties but with a different vintage year. does it matter? our wine expert, david said, not usually with local wines. >> california, you know, yes we have differences. but it is, it is much more subtle of a difference from year to year. >> that is because the climate here is more consistent. but he said, that is not the case in other regions. >> yes. >> and the classic example is champagne. it's the coldest, wettest fine wine region of france and the vintages vary greatly, not just the quality but the style of the wine. >> in our spot check at one safeway store, we counted 47 wines with the shelf label that described a different vintage be than what was on the shelf. that is out of 88 ratings. so, more than half were wrong. and sometimes the vintage was not just off a year or two. here, we see a shelf label describe ago 2009 merlot. it received 87 points from wine enthusiasts but on the shelf next to it was a 2014 vintage that received 8