, something that is needed in so many laws and rules, but bringing greater clarity and transparency to the requirements needed for safe and secure distribution of

i ask my colleagues to join me in ensuring fairness for businesses and clarity for consumers. please reject this bill's unfair loophole and vote yes on this amendment and i reserve the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman from oregon reserves the balance of his time. for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, i rise to claim time in opposition. the chair: the gentleman is recognized for five minutes. mr. walberg: thank you, mr. speaker. i express appreciation to my

, i do not want my students to have a logical clarity. earlier, there was a comment about liking things that are a mess. the mess may be a little too much, but i don't want to give my students ideological clarity. that is not our job as professors. [applause] >> i would say two things. one is, find your allies. keep your allies with you. because we came out in a terrible job market. keep your allies with you, and why do you keep doing it? because you love the work. >> and with that, thank you. the organizers for this days.rdinary 2.5 thank you all. and thank you for your attention and participation. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2015] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] that concludes our live coverage of the african-american history conference. it was presented by the smithsonian museum of african american history and culture. in case you missed any of the panels, we will air the entire conference tomorrow

the game as dozens including clarity's wife and children honored his life. jennifer eagan reports. >> reporter: marlboro against before the game. >> right, left. >> right, left. >> reporter: everyone here paused and remembered fallen trooper thomas clarity was from this town. he raised 6 children here. >> i'm honored to be here today. it's a beautiful tribute for my husband. for my family. >> that's going to be the heads. >> reporter: 4-year-old noah did the ceremonial coin toss. >> great for my kids to see that everybody's thinking of us after this time and honoring my husband in a special way. >> reporter: for dejesus it's hard to talk about. >> it's still something i'm struggling with. >> reporter: he was at the scene along the pike that day back in march after another clarity in his cruiser. >> he had a way with people. it tells you something about someone when you have somebody that tom had arrested and they come out to baracks to pay their respects. >> i'd like to have all my braves in the state police know this is what we do. we will do it and take ca

in this new context of clarity of u.s. commitment, we should explore a genuine regional effort to strengthen afghanistan and promote peace. there are hopeful signs as we heard earlier at last week's meeting at the heart of asia process in islamabad. after the setbacks of last summer, president ghani deserves credit for renewing the effort to open doors with pakistan. the test will be whether pakistan takes concrete actions not only to support reconciliation, but to reduce the ability of the taliban and the haqqani network to plan and launch operations from pakistan, which greatly diminishing the prospects for real negotiations. the crucial task to ahead for afghanistan are exceedingly difficult, improving security, creating conditions for peace, building the economy, strengthening government, forging afghan political unity. for afghanistan to succeed, two mutually reenforcing processing much be continued. it must be clear adequate levels of military, political and financial support are available to that afghans will have t

the sooner we get to some kind of element of clarity -- francine: what kind of clarity?or example a buffer or transitional agreement? would that be the most helpful thing for banks? mr. flint: when we think it needs to be. in the sense when you think of the regulatory reforms we have them through, implementation so people can collect the information they are presented with without being required. it's difficult to think about something as significant as changing the relationship with europe, you can hardly say day zero, we move from the system and day one, you can accommodate everything that has changed within your system, so i think there has to be some transition. again, in terms of the planning, if there's not a belief that there will be some sort of transition, you have to plan for the fact that there might be none, and that accelerates decisions. francine: and you have not got in expectation that they have a transition very days they are planning for? mr. flint: nobody has clarified that, but at the same time, everybody recognizes the importance of making sure the a

do we have any clarity there yet? >> there's still no clarity there yet. that's been the big guessing game for the last 24 hours or so. we had big news this morning with u.s. officials for the first time confirming what some of the families had told us. that in fact the americans had left. and we have a statement, as well, it says, we can confirm that our detained u.s. citizens has been released and those who wish to depart iran have left. we have no further informationing to share at this time, we would ask that everyone respect the privacy of these individuals and their families. when we have further information to share, we will. that was from a senior administration official. and, you kind of hear there, a little bit of hedging. the fact that maybe not all four were on the plane. here's what i can tell you, amir, congressman said he will be coming home. that's how we know he is on that plane. syed, his wife tweeted that he would be coming home. jason, he is the washington post reporter, and his newspaper, fred ryan, the publisher there, put out a state

the sooner we get to some kind of element of clarity -- francine: what kind of clarity?or example a buffer? or transitional agreement? would that be the most helpful thing for banks? mr. flint: we think it needs to be. in the sense when you think of the regulatory reforms we have them through, implementation so people can collect the information they are presented with it being required. it's difficult to think about something as significant as changing the relationship with europe, you can hardly say day zero, we're move from the system and day one, you can accommodate everything that has changed within your system, so i think there has to be some period of transition. again, in terms of the planning, if there's not a belief that there will be some sort of transition, you have to plan for the fact that there might be none, and that accelerates decisions. francine: and you have not got any assurances in expectation that they have a transitionary phase they are planning for? mr. flint: nobody has clarified that, but at the same time, everybody recognizes the importance of

the sooner we get to some kind of element of clarity -- francine: what kind of clarity?or example a buffer? or transitional agreement? would that be the most helpful thing for banks? mr. flint: we think it needs to be. in the sense when you think of the regulatory reforms we have them through, implementation so people can collect the information they are presented with it being required. it's difficult to think about something as significant as changing the relationship with europe, you can hardly say day zero, we're move from the system and day one, you can accommodate everything that has changed within your system, so i think there has to be some period of transition. again, in terms of the planning, if there's not a belief that there will be some sort of transition, you have to plan for the fact that there might be none, and that accelerates decisions. francine: and you have not got any assurances that they have a transitionary phase they are planning for? mr. flint: nobody has clarified that, but at the same time, everyone recognizes the importance of making sure the

as we're starting to create more clarity and perceive more clarity, people are starting to migrate towards this asset class that they think may benefit in more clarity. banks are one of those, and there's one of many areas where there's perception that there may be greater clarity and it's an asset class that you want to own. so we're starting to see some rotation out of some technology names where people were comfortable owning them. into banks names. into industrial names. the truth is we're going to have to wait and see to what we actually end up with and what we get in the future. >> goldman specific. how do you think the bank fairs under president trump. you made a cameo in candidate trump's closing argument, if you will, bs and not in a good way. are you in the crosshairs, or are you in an environment where you think you can thrive? >> look, i'm very excited about the future of goldman sachs. i think we're in a great position to serve our clients. as we get greater transparency and greater clarity of what the environment is going to look like, what the economy is going to look like,

while there may be desire for clarity on the issue of the federal jurisdiction, providing clarity does not trump the need to stay within the limits of the law. bringing certainty to this, you know, that's a nice thing to say, hanging brings certainty but i'm not sure it's the result you want, which is what we've got here. the walters rule would expand federal jurisdiction far beyond what was intended by the clean water act. the provision in the clean water act bill in the energy and water bill does not weak then clean water act, it stops the administration from expanding federal jurisdiction and for that purpose, i strongly urge my colleagues to vote no on this amendment. and i reserve the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from virginia is recognized. mr. beyer: i yield to the distinguished ranking member of the subcommittee. the chair: the gentlelady is recognized. ms. cap spur texas ms. kaptur: i support the gentleman's amendment. without this amendment, the bill would contribute to delays, uncertainty and increased costs both for the government and

for clarity on what are the rules of engagement. the u.s.eems to be rather hesitant in delivering clarity. guest: i am not sure that's right. from the american perspective, there is clarity the legislation . where there is not clarity is how the legislation will apply to any single international business. that is so interconnected. international businesses and banks need to understand exactly what they touch upon in their daily business. are there u.s. persons in their management chain? are there u.s. services? to whom it be providing services? they need to do a great deal of due diligence on who they are doing business with. there is a lot of unpacking to do by the community itself before they can make a determination about whether legally they can go forward or not and that is going to take time. manus: the primary driver from the european perspective is to .o business the energy companies trying to renegotiate with iran. toi look at it, the risk europe is $24 billion of trade. there is a real reticent from the banks -- why is it such a di

>> markets like clarity.ll beoks like it hillary clinton and donald trump, that will get some clarity. however, i don't think until we get closer to the actual election, later part of the summer, that we will see people take larger positions. hillary being good for wall street, donald a wild card. we're not sure about some of the things that come out of his mouth these days. until we get more clarity, i don't anticipate large biases upside or downside until we get closer to that november date. rishaad: let's have a look at markets in this part of the world. is the volatility now over with? do you think markets have momentum? >> i think so. as you get more clarity, especially out of china, the national people's congress is ending today. it helps to calm currency turbulence, overall volatility in the stock markets. as long as we continue on that path, i think were looking for to at least have some stabilization near-term, which helps the overall economy. things are so intertwined these days, china, europe, and

that, we are able to give clarity, and we will do solj through that, we are able to give clarity, andhy it is so difficult to answer questions whether parliament will have a vote or not given that we know the european parliament will have a vote on the deal. why can you not see the british parliament will also have a vote? there will be an opportunity for parliament to consider when more details become available how this is going to operate. there is a question about the timetable in relation to the agreement of the deal and the necessity, how the timetable will operate in relation to the european parliament as well. what i am also clear about is ensuring that when we come to the point were actually delivering on the vote of the british people, which is that we will leave the eu. talking about the timetable. the negotiations are expected to be completed by october 2018, indeed to provide scrutiny of what has been agreed. do you expect these negotiations to be done sequentially, or in parallel?” negotiations to be done sequentially, or in parallel? i am working on the basis that we've

i would say number two, clarity of purpose. would say number three, implementation of the reforms that have then identified. and for all of us, a bit of patience with the massive undertaking. >> [indiscernible] >> i'm honored. i'm very grateful, and i'm extremely pleased to hear that, and i thank you. >> ray just said that china is, on the margin, a negative contributor toward growth. i was thinking -- who in your mind would be a positive contributor of the margin toward growth? >> to be clear, i'm saying as the rate of growth slows and the complexion of the economy changes and the demands on the margin that's a negative to growth. right now, i don't think that we have a locomotive. i think with the exchange rate rising in the united states and with the negative wealth effect we will have because of the stock record going down, that we are going to even in the united states experience a lower level of growth. my concern is that we do not have a locomotive. >> that's what i wanted to say as well. in this world, in fact, we have

the average of those 35 measurements a year is what determines lake clarity. the lake hasn't been this murky since the efforts to began -- to fix it began in the 90s. the shift from human impacts to global change will raise concerns and a lot of questions. >> with climate change, we are looking at changes we haven't experienced before. we have always been focused on the human impacts. now we have to deal with the climatic impacts and the long- term effects. >>reporter: so, how does this specifically affect you? the swimmer, this is nice for you but if you are a skier, the warmer water temperature will keep everything more temperate in the area and effect snowfall in the coming year. this will all very likely be a major topic in tomorrow's lake tahoe summit were president obama will be speaking. we will bring it to you live so tune in to channel 5. live on lake tahoe, emily turner kpix 5. >>> right now, two hurricanes are churning toward hawaii. hurricane madeleine is currently a category 3 and expected to pass the big island tomorrow. behind it, hurricane lest

we are seeking basic clarity of this.ause the executive branch does not have the power to interpret law. that's the power of the judicial branch. an that's what we're seeking. but what the attorney general has done now with her new ruling is basically all employers of the united states of america and all universities in the united states of america based upon her letter of interpretation is saying that all employers must allow gender identity in the private sector for any employer over 15 employees. that means a man who believes they're a woman would be able to go into a woman's rest room, locker room or shower facility. an that's where the dispute. is and we're asking for basic clarity of that. it is a very complex and emotional issue. and i think the courts are the right way to do it sooner or later i think the u.s. congress has to get clarity on this whole issue also. >> woodruff: we will see how it plays out legally. but i'm sure you heard the attorney general say today that this amounts to state-sponsored discriminat

plus clarity on their claims. mike schell kicks things off live where cincinnati police just happen to be getting public input on crime... mike you're in schell remote mayor john cranley is holding a town hall meeting of sorts in order to get input from the community on how to reduce crime and shootings in cincinnati. the mayor also had some stern words today for the hacker group that published police officers' personal information. 1nat music the video that was posted to you-tube opens up with apocalypic music before going into the message the hacker group anonymous.. wants to send. their spokesman... a masked man with a digitally altered voice. 1anon "the following clip you about to see are three seperate cell phone clips of cincinnati police department murdering a black man named paul gaston while he held his hands up." paul gaston was shot and killed by cincinnati police officers in cheviot last week when, according to police, he reached into his waistband to grab a bb gun while officers tried to place him und

. >> in the uk's interest to give clarity as soon as possible to get clarity on future relations between the eu and uk. if there's one thing investors don't like is uncertainty about their future. >>> shares accelerates after strong second quarter. and when you cut the purchase on the top of the stocks 600 in hopes the new ceo will simplify the lender's structure. >> welcome to "street signs." we're going live on facebook this week as we've been saying. thank you for those who have been watching and joining us online as well. we have have extra content during the breaks with you. so do make sure you tune in. i'm just figuring how to get your comments live. so i can be with you on all of these social medias. so do join on facebook live this week. >>> let's get to markets. stock share up 600. just hanging on to slight gains here in europe. let's show you what's been going on in the states as well and our general european markets. interesting story is what's taking place in general in these record highs that are being set in the states we saw wall street closing at a record high. we have a

they seek resolution.ns' they seek clarity. but because republicansty unprecedented obstruction they can do neither. going they are not getting resolution and they're not getting justice, already it's creating long-term issues for nation's highest court. this term only 12 cases for itst next term which begins in should october and runs through june of 2017. this the court court continues to accept our i should say not accept cases at this glacial pace. the next term of justices hearing fewer cases than it's been heard by that court in more than seven decades, seven years, seven years. to it stands to reason justice rubber tire chief justice is calling accepted cases according to the ability to hear and process them. supreme a gridlocked court can accomplish the same. it's not the supreme court's fault.alf the blame belongs to senate republicans for their blocking o merrick garland's nomination. for seven happier senate republicans have blocked anything recent obama has proposed. who is behind this?t t right-wing organizations l

congress to bring clarity to our national anti-discrimination provisions under title vii and title ix. let me repeat that one more time our u.s. representatives and the leaders of both the republican and parties in congress. ultimately, think it's time for congress to bring clarity to our national anti-discrimination provisions under title vii and title ix. the obama administration is bipassing togress by attempting rewrite the law and set basic policies, locker room policies and even shower and private public employers across the country, just north carolina. now, i am still asking the north legislature to reinstatement the ability to sue termination for discrimination in state court. i encourage them to do this and do it quickly. welcome additional dialogue with the city of charlotte and our state legislature which has been ongoing for the past week and i want to ensure the people of our and our country that north carolina has long held of ensuring equality. the majority of our citizens in this great state and this governor did not seek out this issue. however, the state of north ca

all this gives clarity, as did her assertion that the u.k.ould have stability at the time of the exit, so you wouldn't see a chaotic situation. there's still a long way to go on things like tariffs in terms of trade on labor market and eu workforce. there's so many things that still need to be decided. francine: we don't really know what the reality would look like. we don't know what negotiations will look like. has donald trump changed everything for brexit? adam: i don't think it has changed everything and i don't think the high court decision has changed everything either. i think the high court decision has basically given rise to how brexit will take place, either process,liamentary rather than whether it will take place. businesses are under the assumption that this process will work its way through over that two to three-year timeline. the election of mr. trump could have interesting impacts on u.k.-u.s. relationships and trade. perhaps we can go to the front of the queue rather than be at the back for future trade deals. that would b

get clarity. to that part of article 50 that ofvides negotiation, flexibility on the operative leaving is not going to be exercised. it is not the intention of the government to try to make use of that for stability. -- whatnister may: once article 50 allows for is, if there is an agreement that the period of negotiation of the withdrawal and relationship with the european union is extended, agreed with them and restate u.k.rn, i.e. in this case, , we are not setting out to expend -- to extend that period. >> ok. >> good afternoon afternoon, prime minister. this week marks six months from the referendum. theyou tell us when government's plan is going to be published? the publication of the plan, when will we see that? prime minister may: as i've indicated, i will make a speech early in the new year that will explain more of our approach. , as il be setting out indicated, more details of our approach. i haven't set a date when the plan is going to be published, but you will hear more about our appr

did the market get some clarity last night or not quite yet? >> i think, you know, on the democratic side i think we can say there's enough runway in front of hillary clinton to say that this is hers to lose. so you sort of put that aside, but that's not the contentious race. on the republican side we started with 16 or 17 candidates, we're down to, call it four today and that's still not enough clarity. at the end of the day, i think there is a -- there's a belief that there is somebody other than trump that can make a run at this, but it can't happen if we continue to have, you know, three people splitting up the other 2/3 of the votes. so right now that's still the untold story. now, that said, let's say we get through the next two weeks and you got rubio not winning florida and kasich not winning ohio and michigan. you know, both of these guys can make a pretty strong case to not have a path to victory and get out of the race. then you got a two-man race or, you know, really lot easier sledding for trump going forward. then the market can s

i don't think we've got any real clarity on that. it would certainly be a good thing if there were clarity there. but i think you'll see big events in the next few days, even. so i brought some out of the money calls, you know. i have to decide, all right, what am i willing to risk? because it is all at risk money for sure. absolutely could go to zero. so for me, ten basis points in something that i think could make, you know -- could qui quintuple to make 50 basis points. >> so some sort of resolution, something that will get the shares to move higher. >> in the near term. >> yes. back to the larger question, though, on the markets. it seems like, you know, there have been worries upon worries upon worries, and the month ended flat. >> of yeah, well, i think it's really important to remember, though, how this week went. we actually had -- there was some trepidation about donald trump's, you know, gaining steam on hillary clinton. and i think that debate changed everything. so here we are at the end of the week. and i think we all fe

to the frankly that's something on which we have to wait for clarity. the house, the senate and the library of congress build little are now open for routine business. this is brand new and just into fox news channel. the house, senate, and he library of congress building are now open for routine business. the u.s. capitol building is open for official business only, which is the case whenever they're not in session elm u.s. capitol visitor center will remain closed until further notice. obviously. there was a shooting there. an active crime scene now. they have a lot of ballistics work to do there. have to speak to witnesses. it would be completely imfrom open it at this moment and capitol police are not doing that. the next topic of discussion will most likely, be as it was in europe before i left there a couple days ago, what do we do about areas around security zones? what do we do about airport security areas? how do we increase security in the enormous halls where we go in to check in especially four international flights, even domestic flights. t

the question here was clarity. would donald trump finally provide clarity after a few weeks of speculation of softening on immigration. do you think he provided clarity tonight? do you think that clarity he provided, will it attract new voters that weren't already with him? >> he provided clarity from the beginning of the day to the end, i think, steve. it was his very best day of his presidential campaign. when you start with the morning, bad news for hillary clinton all over the place. her negatives are down in "the washington post" poll. obamacare is falling apart. 30 new concealed e-mails on benghazi. donald trump goes down to mexico, has a normal diplomatic engagement with the president of mexico, has a great press conference afterwards, takes questions, which secretary clinton won't take from the press in any setting, and then comes back and gives a very sophisticated speech that i think mirrors -- i did 170 interviews with active republican presidential candidates. that was the mainstream policy what he arti

i would say, number two, clarity of purpose.ay, number three, implementation of the reforms that have been identified. and for all of us a bit of patience for this massive undertaking. francine: germany has backed you for a second term. can you say, you would consider it? madame lagarde: look, i am honored and very grateful and extremely, you know, pleased to hear that and i thank you. i thank those who have come out like that. thank you. mr. xinghai: they just said that china is on a margin, a negative contributor toward growth. i was thinking, who in your mind would be a positive contributor? mr. dalio: just to be clear. what i'm saying is, as the rate of growth slows and the complexion of the economy changes and demands on the margin, that's a negative to growth. i don't think right now that we have a locomotive. i think that would be exchange rate rising in the united states, and also, with the negative wealth effect we're going to have, because of the stock market going down, that we're going to -- even in the united states

dollar and is probably where it should be trading and will be trading until we get the clarity. >> doneed to see these bills approved by houses of parliament ? will that delay things? see you and the team have the knowledge on the markets and a thing that caught my eye was that return for the banks. you have deutsche bank and credit suisse taking it home. trump triesand, if to roll back on any of dodd-frank, is this what is driving the banks higher? it ishink that some of having to do with that and we are seeing a deregulation that would take pressure off of the theing sector, except for triangle of trouble. we have negative interest rates and overregulation. changes to the dynamic help the profit margin and my opinion is that the banks are relatively stable and they are just not very profitable. >> i have to jump in the here. hashe bond trajectory, it arrived with a slightly better yield curve. >> the net interest margin is helping out and we are seeing a bit of volatility. anything with that, you see the revenues creep up and the trading revenues are up. mainly, the products have mo

as you can see, so much reaction, so much lack of clarity. that is why we are seeing sterling extend its fall off. erik: what might nicholas sturgeon do in scotland to stop the u.k. from leaving the eu? we are hearing, further complicating the matter, is that nicola sturgeon has adjusted scotland could block a brexit because the necessary legislation might have to be a approved in its parliament in edinburgh. it is worth pointing out that this entire referendum is not legally binding. parliament does not have to follow it legally. that is another thing that is being talked about a lot in the u.k. papers. at the moment, it does look like it will happen. it is just a question of exactly how. erik: thank you very much. from london, we take you to spain where the result of the elections today are just coming in. this is a country that has not had a functioning government since last december's indecisive vote. it does appear that the caretaker prime minister and his people's party has made gains. there are celebrations taking place in madrid. fill

how much clarity is there in the recovery in macau?t say there is clarity, but the signs are good. we are very confident about the long-term future for macau. august was the first month where we have seen increases, modest. we are cautiously optimistic. we are very optimistic about the optimisticcautiously about the near-term. we have seen new properties come on board as well. we are looking for demand to grow little bit. about aave talked potential ipo in your property trust. is that likely to happen, how soon, and what is holding it back? d we have announced the e-merger. it's not unusual for these processes to take 6-9 months. are on schedule with the regulators and agencies. it does take time. we think it will all come together in the timeframe we indicated. >> by the middle of next year? ofyeah, in the first half next year, and hopefully earlier. has been valued at -- is that a safe amount? >> australian dollar is very safe. have not formally announced which properties would be included in a reit vehicle. people are speculating it

simon: more clarity.uestions she would wait until after the election but we learned she will start before the first quarter. what we do not have his details of exactly what the british are seeking about a future trading relationship with the eu. people want some clarity, and the warnings from francois hollande and andrew -- angela merkel that it is not going to be an easy negotiation. priority isse their cracking down on immigration. at the same time, that might mean losing access to the single market if the european leaders stick by their warnings. this prioritizing emigration over things like bank passporting and access, over easy trade for exporters. that is a lot of reason you see this selloff in the markets, this feeling that the economy is not necessarily the priority. they are playing with the short-term economy in hoping that the long-term is better, but the gamble is that they can get control of immigration in the meantime. against have sterling 16 major currencies, down against all of them at 1.

>> yeah, clarity, i don't think we'll get clarity. that much. when you look at yellen, she has nothing to say. europe is where the surprise is. very immediate term. we're setting ourselves up for a small, if not intermediate term sell-off. if there's any screwup with the ecb or bank of japan. yellen can say i'm responsible for two-year yields, i can't be responsible for ten-year yields. liz: we'll know when she makes her big speech in jackson hole in between fly fishing and schmoozing. thank you so much. >>> the nasdaq is one and a teeny, teeny bit away. it's above that record high. we're going to be watching that very closely with 49 minutes before the closing bell rings. nike again in the leadership position, up a buck 02 for the dow 30. smuckers in a jam, not because of jelly. pet foods dragging smuckers down, the packaged food company blaming spot and whiskers for not gobbling down more kibbles and bits as pet food sales sag 5%. pets want the fancy pants foods anymore. revenue down 7% but the stock down 8%. had been up 20% year to date. >>>

certainly hasn't done anything to really bring clarity to investors.hat's having something to do with the fact of the way the market has been reacting. >> 100%. you're talking to a gentleman who made a lot of money on the fixed income, credit side. i want to hear from them, they're the most relevant managers right now. >> pete, people will be keying off of what gundlach has to say. the yield on the ten-year what did i see, 1.55 earlier? >> yeah. then you look at where the volatility is trading, trading about 20, even though we had this rally, over 21. a lot on the plate still. i wouldn't be surprised -- we were talking about going positive into green, how about a selloff. >> we'll see what happens today. look forward to that interview tomorrow. that does it for us. "power lunch" picks up the story right now. ♪ >>> a lot of british punk this week, we're one week away are that landmark decision by the british. should they stay or should they go? i'm michelle caruso-cabrera, melissa lee is on assignment, brian and tyler are out. mike santoli is here. ther

we want some clarity out of this meeting, don't we? we don't won a series of vague promises. are we going to get that? as early as last week we saw with the change in the pboc governance that there will be more communication and transparency. that was affirmed over the weekend by the g-20. , clearat investors want direction from chinese authorities regarding policy and more on the national people's congress in terms of the long term thinking. they are looking to see what is the growth target for gdp, which we think will be 6.5% for 2016. rishaad: it is probably the only country in the world that hits its target and knows about it in march. tell me something, what would you particularly like to see out of this. people have talked about as so