persons. and he hints that if you want the loans thatyou need to rebuild your nation , you've got to help me out here. i've got lots of jewish floaters and i need their support and its the humanitarian thing to do and then he lets this further argument which is just tragic . he says to the british he says you don't have to worry the way you did before the war. he said 6 million jews were killed and their dead. so the european jews aren't going tooverwhelm palestine . where not talking about millions here. we're talking about a couple hundred thousand. the british would not budge. they say to truman look, you care this much about european jews, take them into the united states . he actually knows, he's much smarter about domestic politics than british politics and international politics. truman knows he can't do that . that's not possible. that the hostility, that the european jews misunderstanding of what has happened is such that congress is never going to allow this into the country. >> on t

it was personal papers. the main point i would make his whatever presumption this court has previously applied in cases that involve separation of powers, it should not put a finger on the scale for congresses legislative power in this case. separation powers cases, the court has declined any presumption that congress that.legitimate power and this is not the first conflict between congress and the president as many of my colleagues have pointed out. we have never had to address this issue and the reason is because congress and the president have reached accommodations with each other and sometimes one has got more and sometimes the other has gotten more. but there has always been this accommodation seeking. it seems to me what you are asking us to do is to put the kind of 10 ton weight on the scales between the president and congress. essentially, to make it impossible for congress to perform oversight and carry out its functions where the president is concerned. you're quite right and what you said before

for a person. it's not possible to predict so you are part of the thing depending on the me so it's only for an kook it's like understand moment no well i try to explain if i say men are longer then women. are quite a number of students here in the lap who are longer than i am still for coop i can say men are longer than women. the statistics yes it depends what nations you're talking about know everybody everywhere yes for the whole coop in the same environment men women but from the size of somebody's if i get only the size. 85 i cannot say with some men or woman. so for coop you can make predictions but not for the individual ok so it's a really rough overall or statistics is for sale if you called it off statistics well it's important to note that what if a property. talking about it has an availability huge favor the latino. that's holds for everything not only for talent in some direction but for a whole our properties and the variation was the basis of evolution i think that evolution for ou

the fact of the matter is health care is personal to me. obamacare is personal to me. when i see the president of the united states try to eliminate this health care in the middle of a public health crisis, that's personal to me too. we've got to build on what we did because every american deserves affordable health care. i'm joe biden and i approve this message. >> president trump: we want them to go back to school, parents want them back to school, we want them to go back safely but they have to go back. >> neil: classic example of that is young maverick style, is currently employed high school. he was suspended for violating the schools hybrid learning plan. he wanted to go to school in person. they told him to turn around and go back and he didn't, comes back the next day and off he went, i think to jail. i don't think he was arrested per se but they did file them up and all that. member joins us now. what's the latest, do you plan to prove return tomorrow to pursue the same thing? they say you are disturbing things and making very difficult for those who are going

gate bridge, this person was closed and again they were stuck on a rock so they believe that the person must have fallen off the cliff and landed on a rock or landed in the water and swam to the rock it's unclear. so that's kind of what they'll be doing in the next coming hours of course making sure this person gets medical treatment and then filling in some of the blanks that we still have from the story still a lot to figure out but in the end this person survived and you can see how dark it is out here they had to use flashlights all eventually got my video and i'll show you. it's dark video, but it will show you just how intense this was with flashlights and boats and helicopters i mean it was a very active scene again starting at one 30 ending around right now 5.30 yeah who knows how many that they could have been there for hours before people recognize that they were you know stranded started calling 911. >>all right we'll learn more about that in check back with you throughout the morning. 5.35 in another big story more than a 1000 inmates at san quentin state prison could be tra

i was the seniormost person in the white house. so with my expertise i know the community really well and the thing that i know a lot about on with lots of other people to describe in the book is an amazing group of people there were a lot of us but to carry the water there is attention that i feel all the time and i never understood if i got the balance right or not that there are those that don't necessarily know what you know and to do the job well but sometimes your job is to hold back a little bit it isn't to be an advocate 100 percent of the time that we serve the whole country well. and to be understood and to lift up her stuff and let her have her five minutes of talking then we will go on and do everything. so he will have to represent, calibrate so they can hear you know what they just don't know it will be uncomfortable. in which of the times we are pushing too hard it's a constant calibration. but there is a sense if you screw it up it will be harder for the next person after you. and what we tried to do like people lik

galileo was a very complex personality. he had a very complex personality. want anybody to get the impression that he was the nicest person. he could be nice and support these two members of his own family, but when it came to people who objected to him in science or otherwise, he had an extraordinarily sharp tongue. an even sharper pen. and he really could be very, very strong. his sarcasm is almost unparalleled. he wrote in a very witchy way. and one way he mocked somebody who told the story of the ancient babylonians cooking eggs by whirling them on swings like this. and he said oh yes that is the interesting story you know. but we also have slings, and we have strong people who can or were the eggs. and we have eggs. and yet they don't cook. so what is it that we lack that the babylonians have? he said the only thing we seem to lack is being babylonian. so it must be that the eggs are cooking because there are baloney ends. these type of things, i wanted to convey this personality of galileo. not the nicest person. a genius. intellectual freedom extremel

today we turn to david nasaw's supportive not one person but 1 million persons who emerged brutalized yet alive on the day, april 1945. "the last million: europe's displaced persons from world war to cold war" is an epic story the texas to the heart of europe during and after world war ii. it describes the movement of millions of people amid shifting borders and general chaos. about war and its aftermath. it describes life at a discreet level in the highest reaches of government. millions of people were displaced by world war ii, most known were those sent to concentration camps but also migrant laborers, political prisoners and pows. when the war ended many if not most displaced persons returned home yet as the title suggests 1 million did not. this book tells the story of their search for a new home. thanks for joining us. a simple question, how did you come to this story, how do you see the last million as a singular story to be told? >> it had to do with tony just's extraordinary book postwar. i had learned not to take the common sense view of historical events as necessarily trut

now the same shot of with a black person shoving a white person now 75 percent that is violent. >> i remember about reading that study the action was the same the only difference was and then how do you get to 75 percent. >> they are more inclined to say the white person who shoves a black person was just fooling around with only 6 percent characterized the black person's actions in that way so when he shows that they say that's playing around that's a huge difference the difference that race makes. >> how do you take that information that clearly are no extenuating factors this is not a situation in a straight street or neighborhood this has been set up how do you take that information? even if you use that as a training tool how do you take that information and then to understand that scenario? >> you want to understand how race can play a role in how people respond . . . . and repeat the study and tighten it up and controls in the movement precisely i and all of that is a sometimes that's good to hear because it allows us to the approach was with more vigor. if you keep doing the

three, persons seeking work.our, persons with a job but temporarily absent from work for a specified reason. these reasons are illness, strike, lockout, vacation, bad weather or a layoff not exceeding four weeks with instructions to return to work on a specific date. if each enumerator incorrectly reported five employed persons as seeking work, the extent of employment in the united states would be understated by more than 500,000. persons not in the labor force would be further divided into the following groups. one, home housekeeper. two, student. three, persons unable to work. four, inmates of prisons, asylums, and so forth. five, persons not in the labor force for other reasons. >> was your husband at work for pay or profit, in private, or nonemergency government work, during the week of march 24-30. >> that was last week. no, he wasn't working for any private company or the government. >> was he at work on or assigned to public emergency work last week, like wpa? >> no, he didn't have any of that either. >>

person to person c. and person c. pass to deliver the share to person b. because that sales already happened. person finally gets their share. and mistakenly they also get a certificate from their bank as if a real dividend had been paid just like with a person. and there you have it in the whole scheme there's only one share but 2 certificates the share is traded back and forth between parties a b. and c. so quickly that it 1st glance the state no longer knows who owns it and mistakenly to tax certificates are issued. so 2 investors get a tax refund from the state even though only one of them actually paid taxes the profit is then shared by all 3 parties. that's the general structure which shady investors have built up into towering profits because what works on a small scale can work on a large scale to single shares are said to have been pushed back and forth up to 12 times comics became a real industry one that all of our shrooms reporting began to shed light on. with his investigation the journalist unleashed a tidal wave in the banking world one that

a person with that response looks like in that actual crisis you know varies person to person day to day but you know on a very fun foundational level with the cahoots response that we have here in eugene in springfield oregon when that call is made to the public safety dispatch center and the coots goes our objective is to support and stabilize somebody providing the least intervention necessary to really get them through that that initial period of crisis you know we're not going to be able to solve every problem you know we're not going to be able to implement long term solutions but what we can do is work with that individual recognizing that they're the expert in their experience and that we as as responders really need to listen to that experience listen to their expertise and then engage in a collaborative process that keeps that person empowered and that keeps them in the position of autonomy you know really being able to figure out what is it that that is the most emergent unmet need you know and what can be done to address that maybe it's 3 in the morning and there's not yo

or the person hired? >> the person that you would be hiring. they would have the same constraints, right. they couldn't go to you commissioner cook and say president sanchez wants this and commissioner collins thinks na about this request. they can't do this anymore than staff can. they, to the extent their role is to -- i was talking about exiting personnel and talking about the theoretical new person. so i'll stop and then i'll come back if i have more questions. >> commissioner lamb. i wanted to further explain some of the rationale that's been very about the capacity piece of building up for the board, especially during this time of covid. it's also a relationship-holding position as we are embarking in really new paths in working with the city in new ways and daniel, they're living in the implementation relationship holding of the various agencies as we go through for example like d.p.h. right as well as dcyf and on going relationships but i think this position would hold our relationships with the b

and then one contact, you test that person, leads you to another person. solet's racing investing -- tracingcing -- so the investigators is assembling an army that does not exist. i spoke to the white house this morning about it. i understand the federal government is not eager to get involved in testing. i get that. but the plane reality here is we have to do it in partnership with the federal government. you are talking about supply chains that go back to china. state does not have the capacity to do that, and there is no reason why you would have 50 states each trying to figure this out on their own, competing with the federal government, competing with the private sector. so, i am very much looking forward to the federal government's willingness to tackle this, understanding that it will be imperfect at best. but if we work together, we can do better than any of us could do alone, and that is what this is all about. you are not going to achieve optimum performance. you cannot put together this national system with perfection. are understandably relucta

will it be safe to vote in person come november >> yes, voting in person can be safe, but we have tonsure and make it safe it won't happen naturally. it will take concerted effort to use the best public health guidelines. >> reporter: in 2016, 60% of voters voted in person the m.i.t. voting unit says the number could drop to 40% this year but expect fewer polling places and longer lines despite president trump's warning that mail-in voting is ripe for fraud, election researchers insist that is simply not true >> voter fraud in the united states for many years has not been a widespread issue either by mail or in person it really is not an issue. >> reporter: to minimize potential covid exposure health experts urge states to set up drive throughs or secured drop boxes for people who want to deliver their ballots in person. lester >> a lot of good information there. thank you. >>> up next the major shakeup at the ellen degeneres show >>> we're back now with ellen degeneres apologizing to her staff after allegations of a toxic work environment our miguel almaguer on the shakeup for her s

it got fairly personal and i don't think i was ready for how quite how personal it got but i understoodan advocate is to push the people governing. i know that as well as anybody because i did it for so long. the way i grappled with that when you walk in the building on the first day you hope and believe you're good to be able to do the very best you can every day you understand that the tools are not going to be perfect, you're not to be able to do a perfect job and the law especially in the case of immigration the law is badly broken so the tools are terrible. but you can use the tools in the most constructive possible way i decided on the first day you i was gonna try to put myself in the mirror every day i think there's a lot of levels of criticism that are fair but that comes with the territory mostly because i went to and understanding how it was going to happen and mostly didn't involve me much. about criticism to help you do a better job or that lifting up something you got to fix because it's broken and criticism that's about just being righteous. if you want to be there is no

sheba says there is a non-jewish scholar, and hires that person, why shouldn't that person count? mr. fisher: justice kagan, we do not think that the co-religion-ism is an on office switch.an on/off we think it is a strong factor in the column in this case, and it should be an important factor. i think the way that you put it earlier in the argument is whether was not -- whether the person was not just a member of the member of that faith, but a special person who is the head of stewardship over that congregation or religion. it is a very odd thing to say that somebody who is not even a member of the faith, who may fervently believe in a different faith, is somehow a minister of that religion. justice, i think that hypothetical is what does a good job of prying apart the two different strands of constitutional law in the first amendment that are relative. absolutely, when a school hires a teacher to teach religion to our students, and do it devotional he if you can, that is something of which the school has a very strong pre-exercise interest in. so they can immediately fire that

i voted in person. i was born in 1932. i will be 88 years old at the end of the month, the 28th of november. i do not trust the mail and i want to vote in person. i want to make sure my vote is counted. i don't trust -- i live in a democratic city and a democratic state and believe me, this city i don't trust anyone so that is , why i am voting in person. thank you very much. host: clearly a lot of people are trusting mail-in, absentee and early voting. guest: yeah. there has been a trend, but obviously our country has different states in different places. in recent years we have united -- we have had states out west almost 100% voting by mail. other parts of the country are looking more traditional with most voting on election day. i see already the trend that many people are voting very early this time. some who worry about the mail have decided they want to vote either early in person or on election day. there are still -- you are very likely to have the same polling site as you usually do although you might want to che

persons. went to ask you a little bit about truman as it relates to the story. so the way i am reading it in the narrative is he's willing to confront the brit british. to say you need to open up palestine. it's a paiul process but he confronts the brish and gets there in that direction. he is not willing to confront the u.s. is tha fair? [laughter] >> guest: truman believes in the very beginning with this naÏve optimism, the state department says don't go there. but truman says i'm going there. and he confronts churchill and says you've got to open up palestine for the jewish displaced persons. and he hints that you need to rebuild your nation. got to help me out here. have got lots jewish voters i need their support. and it is the humanitarian things to do. then he let's go this further argument that is just tragic. he says to the british, he says you don't have to worry they waved in the cold war. he said 6 million jews were killed. so the european jews are not going to overwhelm palestine.

personal behavior is really important. we have to follow the public health guidelines, wear masks, social distance, do those things to protect yourself and others. but it is not just about two individual behavior. we are hearing from elizabeth cohen earlier about black americans, latinos being hit hard. that's not just personal behavior. it is the systems and structures. so when you look at who are essential workers, very high proportions of black and latino americans, when you look at people who live in housing where it may not be possible to socially distance if someone is infected or had contact, high proportions of people of color, so we have to encourage personal behavior and that has to start at the top. but we also have to look at our systems and say, how do we ensure that everyone in america who is out there working has the personal protective equipment to be safe and how do we ensure that every person in america who is infected or exposed has a safe place to go, where they're getting income support and food suppor

all preparing to go to in person.hey hired an amt to be on campus and they hired an emergency response planning company, at is guiding some 1800 schools across the country. so if you do ha a case, what is your communications protocol with parents? those are things that money can buy that take some of the burden of planning logistics off of you. and helps you solve that problem. >> districts are struggling already with their budget problems that they are spending money on this ppe, and state aid and federal aid, there is still a budget crunch issue there. the resource issue. >> you yourself are a parent with two kids in e oakland unified school district, are you pushing for in person learning there? >> yeah, i think it's really important to consider developmental age range and risk of transmission. i have a 17-year-old is actually doing better with distance learning that she was in person. we know there is high rates of transmission amongst high school students. my nine-year-old on the other hand is really struggling w

or the person hired? >> the person that you would be hiring. they would have the same constraints, right. they couldn't go to you commissioner cook and say president sanchez wants this and commissioner collins thinks na about this request. they can't do this anymore than staff can. they, to the extent their role is to -- i was talking about exiting personnel and talking about the theoretical new person. so i'll stop and then i'll come back if i have more questions. >> commissioner lamb. i wanted to further explain some of the rationale that's been very about the capacity piece of building up for the board, especially during this time of covid. it's also a relationship-holding position as we are embarking in really new paths in working with the city in new ways and daniel, they're living in the implementation relationship holding of the various agencies as we go through for example like d.p.h. right as well as dcyf and on going relationships but i think this position would hold our relationships with the b

as chattel and held that person in bondage. there's no reason to try to make that an excuse because of a person's color. and in reference to the democrats and republicans, in 1868, when lincoln was assassinated, it was a radical republican who pushed for some sort of reform for african-americans. africans in america at that time. and were fighting for the 13th amendment which freed -- actually freed the slaves. emancipation proclamation was a help. but these were not the same people in terms of mind-sets. the philosophies of the political parties has changed over the years. and you can't associate that the republicans at that time are the republicans of today, and the democrats of that time are the democrats of today. so, i still contend and really want people to understand that this systemic discrimination that exists is something that black people have to cope with and contend with. there is a mind-set in this country, and it very prevalent among many in the const stastab. black people can't talk back to the police. you can't

they are not personal papers. all those cases have to do with papers that belong to the office of the president. again, these are personal papers. chief justice roberts: briefly, counsel? mr. strawbridge: eastland was not -- did not even raise eastland. i guess the point i would make is that whatever point it has made previously, it should not put any finger on the scale for congress' assertive legislative power, and in numerous legislate a power cases, starting with kilborn, stating that congress had a legitimate power. that was also below in the d.c. circuit in tobin and even in the at&t cases. chief justice roberts: justice kagan? justice kagan: good morning, mr. strawbridge. this is not the first conflict between congress and the president, as many of my colleagues have pointed out. we have never had to address this issue, and the reason is because congress and the president have reached accommodations with each other , and sometimes one has got more and sometimes the other has gotten more. but there has alway

and so the large cities, the search for the right person, the big shift to greater personal freedom when time to her within months of socially people. it's around the time of the industrial revolution around the time that men start working for wages that people start working in industrial jobs outside the home, all these massive social changes that take place around the time of the french, an american revolution. we start to see these new family farms and this new ideal of romantic love, right? that people should choose their partner, the freedom of choice, apply to men, only women how to work her to influence. marina moved from better circles, then begin the so for improvements culture once it ceases to be that men come to the woman's home, invited by her and supervised by her parents and becomes the case that men invite women out right. men invite women to go to a bar, dance hall, or a movie. courtship starts to take place in a men's world in the world of the market in the world of work. the stories do you think is also one of them once a patient. the 1st women to agree to go in dates

and those dominating personalities the desire person all power and also have other traits. >> and then donald trump is a poster boy he will never pass that personality test. and that they have the weaknesses of somebody walks like a duck or? like a duck and looks like a duck be pretty sure it is a duc duck. but then you see people just conspicuously display these personality qualities you can be sure where they fall. with that medical analysis. that personality type is a little different with that psychiatric analysis. that is conspicuous. >> and for those authoritarian presidents were dominators. >> and that where is andrew jackson and richard nixon and the is the incumbent president. they also show social domination. also those traits that follow and this is one of the things that got attention when my book came out excuse me but then to show those personality traits of people and it looks like donald trump with social dominators. and back in 2006 social dominators are intimidating that are exploitive and manipulative highly prejudice working like i described trump i had no idea he w

different person. when people ask me about this, what i usually say, i grew up in a small town just south of boston, across the bay from plymouth, where the pilgrims landed going on 400 years ago. i would say, of course i am interested in history. people would ask, why are you interested in history? but i had the same experience of a remarkable teacher in junior high school, was a retired military officer. so, i am embarrassed to say, i believe his name was james truden, but he was known to all students as colonel truden. he was someone who was embarking on a second career when i had him as a teacher. he was a mature man, a person with a long military career, but someone just starting out as a teacher. he was excited and interested about everything, trying to find his way into this second career. i think that him thinking of this as an adventure sort of brought his students along with him. while i suspect i was probably, in that small town, probably categorized as the student most likely to end up in r

or the person hired? >> the person that you would be hiring. they would have the same constraints, right. they couldn't go to you commissioner cook and say president sanchez wants this and commissioner collins thinks na about this request. they can't do this anymore than staff can. they, to the extent their role is to -- i was talking about exiting personnel and talking about the theoretical new person. so i'll stop and then i'll come back if i have more questions. >> commissioner lamb. i wanted to further explain some of the rationale that's been very about the capacity piece of building up for the board, especially during this time of covid. it's also a relationship-holding position as we are embarking in really new paths in working with the city in new ways and daniel, they're living in the implementation relationship holding of the various agencies as we go through for example like d.p.h. right as well as dcyf and on going relationships but i think this position would hold our relationships with the b

so this type of thing, i wanted to convey his personality of galileo. not the nicest person. a genius, intellectual freedom. extremely important to him. at the same time a lot of self-righteousness. he was very very feisty even when he was wrong and he was wrong. but this is part of the things that wehave to learn today . scientists are actually the first that science is only provisional. it's only as good as the data at least at a certain time. but the good thing about science is that it's self corrects. sometimes the self correction happens fast. sometimes you have to wait even centuries for it to self-correct but it does self-correct and this we have to understand . science is the best guide that we have. there is no other way to follow the science. you have to follow whatthe scientists are telling us . because that's the best guide that we can have on this . to bet against the judgment of science at a time when human life or even the pollution of the biosphere of the earth is at safe is just unconscionable. wehave to follow the science . so thank you very much for this ev

vote before election person iny early person voting. million people vote early this -- as of last night. we are going to see more before election day. michael mcdonald really deserves credit for keeping these numbers , which just keep expanding and expanding. we will see almost 50% of americans voting by mail. maybe another 23% or 24% voting early. just a little bit voting on election day. 23% or 25%. it means big changes in states that are doing very different things. some of them casting ballots in a new way. one other thing to note is in the past, a lot of votes and in person votes were very close to election day. this started very early. as early as the methods opened up, we saw lots of ballots coming in early, several weeks before. there are going to be some problems with counting. perhaps some issues and delays. but i do think we are going to run this election, we will see record turnout and we have seen lots of voting by mail and early in person voting. host: what do you think the driving forces are behind the mail-in voting, the

i am i am i am not the 1st person to describe this the 1st person was there a sato and he described very well as fame one of his famous questions when he asked why is it that all great men in politics poetry and philosophy have melancholia but yeah i'm saying something different and some things that i've seen not only in general but also in some of the interviews you've done with other psychiatrist oxana people's heart about how symptoms are bad and symptoms are a problem i'm actually saying the opposite i'm saying the symptoms are good and the illness is not and the illness is actually helpful in some way when the symptoms are severe they can be disabling and deadly but they also have a positive i have to say i am very partial to a psychologist and psychiatrist in fact i've been into its any myself over the last couple of weeks by reading a lot of the union and alchemical as psychology at which talks a lot about prima materia base that cave is the crap in our psyche outweighs the refined substance or gold as they refer to it is produced but i guess to most people the idea that being a b

so if we have one person be a point person on that particular topic, could that person essentially have an informal community -- you know, a work group that included a set of meetings with stakeholders and that sort -- so the member is sort of the official person on that topic or that area of activity and then meets with people in whatever way and has to staff that on their own, but then come back and having a informal work group structure. it's not officially a subcommittee, but still a duty of the commission? >> mr. givner: yeah, that's exactly how that works. you sign a person a job, and they can go out and have regular meetings that she sets up on her own with regular members of the community and then comes back and reports about it. >> okay. >> member reggio? >> so i think it's obvious from the first couple of comments, i would agree, that setting up a point person system is a lot more manageable, not just manageable, but preferable, and it keeps it from being written as much some stone. with respect to what jennifer is saying about the need to codify it, could it be codified in te

galileo was a very complex personality. he had a very complex personality.on't want anybody to get the impression that he was the nicest person. he could be nice and supportive to members of his own family, but when it came to people who objected to him in science or otherwise, he had an extraordinarily sharp tongue and he was really strong. almost unparalleled he wrote a very witty way in one case he mocked somebody who told the story and he said that's an interesting story but we also have eggs and people that can do this and they don't cook so what is it that we lack that the babylonians had. he said the only thing is being babylonian so it must be that they are cooking because they are babylonians. so, this type of thing i wanted to convey this personality of galileo that's not the nicest person, a genius, intellectual freedom, extremely important to him. at the same time, a lot of self-righteousness. he was very, very feisty even when he was wrong and he was wrong a good number of times. he was not always right but this is part of the thing we have to l

has this person travelled in the last few months or years?of picture we have seen with other people who have carried out the sort of attack. these are the sort of issues that the police will be urgently addressing now. the fencing will be to find out who this person is, where they have come from and to try to to the address that they have last used. whether that is their own property or somewhere they have stayed. we have seen attackers previously who have used a staging post, if you like, may be having come from somewhere out of london but stayed in london. is that the picture here? how many addresses that they need to investigate, explore, search, to see what other equipment and evidence there may be? are there other weapons to be dealt with? is there a potential suicide vest he was wearing? are there chemicals, are there exposures to be dealt with? also is of things for the emergency services to consider. that is the sort of thing they will be urgently doing novels of this will be going on across london, maybe even in other cities as well

i'm a fairly small person. so in my case, they didn't need to the bought tire of as often as i sometimes they lie about their age to off or they try to pose as someone who's looking for a serious relationship. but really, but then they don't follow through and it ends faster than the national imus and asked for all out of it. since women cheat to me included, i miss the sleep of it's because of my age. found in my experience, the older a woman is the less attractive she just because of the number that showing it might afford us. my pictures are all real and up to date only for i know that i look younger than my age. so i'm not embarrassed to say i'm younger than i really am. i make myself about 4 years younger max, obviously, and i do tell them that when we 1st meet. so just imagine you speak to 5 men every week. could it be that one was nice and you had 2 or 3 good chats with someone you never see again, but with whom you had a good time. someone that has things in common with you, or a buddy for whom you migh

it's safe to vote in person. if you vote by mail you have to worry about the post office, whether you filled out the ballot correctly, if it has to be notarized. if you accidentally voted twice for one line instead of one person. you don't have to worry about that in person. you get a second chance, when you vote in person it's safe. you run it through the scanner, the vote has been cast and your vote matters. >> i appreciate it. mr. chairman, i yield back my time. thank you. >> the chair now recognizes mr. foster for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. and to our witnesses, especially those who have highlighted the fact that voter suppression is a problem that is orders of magnitude larger than any concerns over potentially fraudulent voting either by mail or in person. as many of you know, my father was a civil rights lawyer who wrote much behind the civil rights act much 1964 and it's great to see the struggle for voter enfranchisement for every voter is taken up today. i'm a scientist. it's a scientific

you and i are persons what does that person at the artist is need to do that's what i get so sometimes bill t. jones has wanted to make sure the woody make something is like a contemplative object to be looked at and enjoy sometimes bill t. jones has wanted to raise hell. and talk about what it means to be this black man standing on stage with a shirt off. for a bunch of white people sometimes i want to talk about how i loathe them but men i lived with men this is my husband now arnie zane was my person both men are jewish i want to talk about the complexity of loving someone across your race or. ethnic lines so that art can do whatever i have the courage to do and i can not tell another they should do just to wrap this up because i know you have to go. on ardent which you love so much and i also have a great deal of respect for a famous ad that a man cannot be free as he knows that he has necessities. this is the same without i meant it's about self-expression yes but it really depends on reaction and response to it so can it ever really truly be free in that sense know anybody who be

of the year is simply according to time magazine is the person or persons who most affected the news. our lives for good or ill and embodied what was important about that you're either looking at that criteria i think is crazy that you give a comma i think it does go to the covert 19 front line workers and those people who you know really done their best to try to hold back the tide and this isn't taking anything from you know from them or their campaign or you know the importance of this election actually when it comes to the criteria you just mentioned i would probably also have expanded the candidate you know territory to include people like latasha brown who was able to organize and get black people across america to vote who had never voted before and i might include you know stacey abrams in their fight with they've been able to do in georgia there are a lot of things i think that have changed the course of how we look at america and american politics i'm not necessarily sure that candidates themselves especially this year would have been the choice and i will just say this tha

contact person has been in china of course but this person has been tested negative for the virus and the person claimed that he had no symptoms at all so. this makes it more unlikely that this is a contact person however this one posted with explanation depends on when the meeting between these 2 persons was maybe some days ago and maybe at this time the persons there was positive or that i was recovered in the meantime and the only explanation i have worked up to now to explain this cluster. fair ologist function speaking to me. turning now to some other news making stories making news around the world and earthquake has killed at least 8 people in eastern turkey along the border range into iran on a 1000 buildings have collapsed turkey's interior minister solomons says dozens more were injured after getting stuck in rubble the tremors had a 5.7 magnitude. police in stuttgart germany a searching for a gunman after another apparent attack on a shisha shots were fired at the window of the bomb which was closed at the time the incident comes just days after 10 people were killed in a f

for example, a person who is handicapped.hy should the minister -- isn't it enough to have the ministerial exemption applied to that kind of thing, that is whether a person holds a position of religious leadership for authority in this different kind of evidence that would show that. so, why did you need more than that? >> i think it is because of the establishment clause, your honor. it's not just a sort of bilateral interaction between the employer on one side and employee on the other. there is also a third one which is the society's interest bought controlling religious functions. we have a system separation of church and state and the process of teaching schoolchildren what to believe -- >> on the basis of what you've said so far i take it to my question which is what do the religious organizations need other than the exception in the statute and ministerial exemption combined to leadership in your answers in his tv they don't. >> they absolutely do, justice breyer. it wouldn't address the question of whether the school

trump while he was a private person. they are not asking for these records, posting president, they're asking for these recor records. >> i think that makes the problem worse, not better, they are targeting the personal life of the president before he was a candidate for office, that is somewhat different but deeply troubling and deeply problematic constitutional concern -- >> i would like to go back to your use of clean b jones, because i had read that case differently, of course clinton said that you are supposed to treat the president's request with respect when the president says i need a deposition schedule at a different time or can we have written in the target tories rather than a deposition but the fundamental claim of presidential immunity or even presidential difference was rejected in that case, i suppose what i like to know about your argument, i read your brief and i read the presidents own brief that no place do you make a case as to why these particular subpoenas place a particular burden on the president

you can return them in person. at this late time, i think that is the way to go and your options can vary from state to state whether there is a dropbox near you or whether you can bring into the polling place or the election office, it is worthwhile figuring that out. as you are states allowing ballot to be postmarked before election day with a certain number of days after to arrive. but given the possible long times of delivery and depending on what your deadline is in your state, it is wise to drop that off if it is a possibility. that gives you more peace of mind that your vote will be in by the deadline. host: what methods have states and using to verify it is you that is voting, to verify your identity attached to that ballot? guest: the typical way is related to your signature. you sign the envelope on the outside of a ballot that the ballot is included in. in some states there is a more rigorous process for comparing that signature to an earlier signature. there also states that have requirements such as a

person -- it's not the person she actually is. actually is for you after going through the process. and so i would say maybe the biggest difference for me would be the difference between how vulnerable she was and how nervous and insecure she was behind the facade of assurance and majesty. she just looked so certain and she was so impressive and so cosmopolitan and so sophisticated. and just really a tiny little scratch beneath the surface and you found this other person. >> very vulnerable, yeah. >> very verbal. -- very vulnerable. that's white she is so interesting. she seems so intimidating to people, and people were put off by her. when i was teaching at ucla when i was doing this research there i was teaching a class on latin american literature which was really fun. this girl in my class said, oh, i talked to my bauer but susan sontag, and the mother said, you know, i never really identified with her because she is like i'm just a middle class mexican house wife from california. she always seemed like this enormous figure an

tests to determine a person's psychological traits are cold ocean tests they measure personality based on 5 criteria. openness conscientiousness extroversion agreeableness and neuroticism. it's done with seemingly innocuous questionnaires that can be completed online like these. in 2008 michelle kosinski created the most famous of these tasks on facebook called my personality a questionnaire to learn more about yourself. became really popular we had over 6000000 people to take the question there and a large fraction of these peoples who donated their facebook profile information to us and from this information you can use. algorithms to transform this information into a very detailed and very i curate intimate profiles. as a result of michelle kosinski hospital largest psychometric database in the world. a database he can cross-reference with the facebook profiles of the 6000000 people who respond it's. so basic you can turn your facebook likes into an accurate prediction of your political views religious views your personality intelligence happiness sexual intake or even whether your

both in person and absentee. third, make voting on election day easier by extending the hours. >> thank you very much, i go back. thank you so much. >> the chair now recognizes mr. kaine for five minutes. chairman, wemr. appreciate you pulling this together. are you and other medical professionals able to protect the magnitude of the virus and where exactly it will be? >> thank you for that question begging for that question. i personally -- i can tell you that we are very concerned that over 40,000 confirmed infections per day, things are not going in the right direction right now. we are also concerned with what twindemic when coronavirus blends with an increased number of coronavirus cases we are seeing in coast -- when we start sending students home, there could be an increased number of cases. i cannot predicted by there are done rightings being now. >> i share all your concerns. known in this country is going to be able to perfectly predicted this. predict this.y viruses can spread very quickly. it could be

a person's health. labor. other persons. it was protected. now in the act of abolishing it. it is in the constitution. hasn't lincoln freed all of the slaves. no actually. another three quarters of a movement. they were in the union. there was still in the union. what you really need to get rid of slavery is to abolish all of the state laws. it is created by state law. they're still on the books. freeing people is not quite the same thing as abolishing slavery. the 13th amendment eradicates slavery throughout the entire country. and it has a second section which is an extremely important. congress well have the power to enforce this amendment what does it mean to enforce the 13th amendment. nobody can be bought and sold anymore. but it includes all sorts of things. denial of education. denial of the right of marriage. all sorts of rights are taken away when you were a slave. does it restore the rights to everybody. what about the racism that is essential to slavery in this country. does abolishing slavery also give them the power to attack racism as a relic as a residue of s

personal drama competition rivalry marketing numbers atmosphere power fight at times intuition love hate money. stands for arms fire stamps and. on you tube joining us. according to what i've already taken 2628 steps today and i got 7 hours of deep sleep that's about average this devise can even determine my mood seriously but is that really a good thing how healthy is self optimization autopsy today on shift. do it get enough exercise eat the right food head. i had enough water today and i relaxed enough according to a recent survey about 33 percent of the global population has already tried out digital health records the market for fitness wearables has tripled since 2017 and it looks set to grow much more say experts why are we so obsessed with self improvement and is there something wrong with not according to a psychologist you would have minus doth. the principle self optimisation is a part of our developing further which is one of the human fundamental needs it's a part of all of us but there is a difference when we talk about self optimization this entails reaching optimum capaci

if you see a person, mr. floyd, pleading for his life, pleading, calling for his mother who has pre-deceased him, if you see an officer with his neon tknee on neck of the person knowing this person is suffering, if that doesn't make you angry, i will accept your lack of anger, but i hope you will accept that i am very angry about that. i'm angry because only one person has been arrested. i was a magistrate for many years. i know probable cause when i see it. the probable cause exists. i want to see a trial, and i want to see a conviction. yes, innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. if wrong and committed a crime, you have got to wanted him arrested. and if you believe a crime was committed, you have got to want a trial and a conviction. logic dictates this. so i am absolutely with you. i'm very upset about it. but the question is this, what do i do with my anger? i don't take my i think aer to the streets and throw bricks. i don't try to destroy property. i don't try to hurt people. i'm going pass le