ekaterina evgenievna dmitrieva, vadim vladimirovich polonsky, i’m vladimir ligoido, today we gatheredilovich dostoevsky, the influence of his work on the culture of the 20th century. if you like to collect your thoughts with us, you can find all episodes of our podcast on the website of the first channel 1tv.ru. and you know, let ’s go back to cinema for a second, if uh, it’s clear that there are film adaptations, there are brilliant readings, like kurassawa’s, yes. but i suddenly discovered that there are traces of dostoevsky, but i don’t know there are cinematic children, as they say about literary children, where this is not a film adaptation, i talked with john luenfeld, this is one of the modern american translators of pushkin, and i, i don’t remember, or he, in short, is lieutenant colombo, this series, and he says, well, this is porfiry petrovich, here i am finally i realized why i adore the series about the lieutenant so much. these are not direct film adaptations, precisely where dostoevsky becomes the occasion, or dostoevsky’s text, and where on this basis something is creat

ekaterina evgenievna dmitrieva, corresponding member of the russian.onding member of the russian academy. genius but a giant, and he says that this is a unique situation, since in national literatures, at least european ones, there is either one person or one book, well , for the british it’s shakespeare, for the spaniards it’s don quixote and so on, here in there are three giants of russian literature in one century, as yuri pavlovich says, dostoevsky, tolstoy is half of chekhov, because chekhov is a playwright on a global scale, how much are you ready to agree with this assessment? well, probably, if we talk about, we’ll start with the director, please forgiveness, no, no, that’s just it, i’m violating , we have a hierarchical structure, thank you, well, if we talk about the world taboo or about ranks, about the hierarchy that has been established in the modern world view of russian literature, then this is so, undoubtedly, but this hierarchy, it still does not quite coincide with our internal russian ideas and things, because those you named, evgeni

ekaterina evgenievna dmitrieva, corresponding member of the russian academy of sciences, head of the classical literature of the institute. my dear teacher palovich vyazimsky once said or repeats that in russian national literature there are three giants, not just a genius, but a giant, and he says that this is a unique situation, since in national literatures, at least european ones, there is either one person or one book, well, for the english it’s shakespeare, for the spaniards it’s don quixote and so on, so in russian literature in one century there are three giants, as yuri pavlovich says, dostoevsky, tolstoy is half. chekhov, because chekhov is a playwright on a global scale, how much are you ready to agree with this assessment? well, probably, if we talk about let's start with the director, i beg your pardon, no, no, this is it, i’m violating, thank you, well, if we talk about the world taboo about ranks, about the hierarchy that has been established in the modern world view of russian literature. then this is so, undoubtedly, but this hierarchy, it still does not quite coinci

ekaterina evgenievna dmitrieva, corresponding member of the russian academy of sciences, vladimir vladimirovich the influence of dostoevsky’s work on the literature and culture of the 20th century. hello everyone, on the first channel of the podcast everyone wants to fly, and i am the host of this podcast leonid yakubovich. today, my friends, you and i will not fly anywhere, we are in the debriefing area, we let's talk to people today like... a movie, because i thought it would be another action movie with shooters, bullets, burning in the cockpit, with wild screams and so on, you somehow moved away from this, you showed, perhaps, almost the most difficult part of this life on earth. leningrad block. i gave them time to master it, gave me an order, protect the road, any valuable one, why didn’t you kill the german, well, i can’t live. go into the clouds, seventeenth, what are you dreaming about? how i dance, how i go out on stage alone, zhenya, i still need love, you could fall in love with me, everything okay, we attack, attack, but loving your homeland is death? what is more important, the na

thank you very much for this wonderful, unfinished, let’s consider it a conversation, ekaterina evgenievna dmitrievaonsky, corresponding member of the russian academy of sciences, i’m vladimir ligoida, today we were gathering thoughts about the influence of dostoevsky’s creativity on the literature and culture of the 20th century. this podcast is a must read. i am the leader of the attackers, my guest is the writer andrei gelasimov, and we will discuss nikolai leskov, his stories and stories. andrey, liskov is such a controversial author, on the one hand he is a classic. on the other hand , he is a little lost against the background of his contemporaries , dostoevsky, we are talking about the 19th century, this is what determines his somewhat strange place, and he seems to be in parallel with the main classics, but at the same time , he is underestimated by many, as explain this? well, this can be explained simply by the feast of literature of the 19th century, it so happened that this art turned out to be so socially in demand that very large... maybe 100 copies, something like that, 300, i guessed

thoughts about the influence of dostoevsky’s work on the culture of the 20th century, ekaterina evgenievna dmitrievaell, it’s clear that, so to speak , a phrase in an interview, he says, dostoevsky is an american writer, but in the sense that in general, all american literature of the 20th century is literature that also grew out of dostoevsky, permeated with dostoevsky. with his reading, if i understood him correctly, he still links this with religious themes in many ways, and then, of course, the interpretation of the authors, that’s how far one can agree with this, i would say that without the underground complex and without everything set of basic dostoevisms, american the literature of the 20th century is, in principle, unrepresentable until belluu, up to i don’t know kirouac, selenger bolqueras and so on, complexly self-defining in relation to this endless american space to the shining city on the hill, it is similar to dostoevsky, you understand, that’s why you can talk a lot about it, i i’m also not very ready, i don’t know american literature so well and deeply, but this seems to me like th

well known among us, this is erodevai in christ, this is just such a remake of an idiot, ekaterina evgenievna dmitrievaadimir vladimirovich polonsky, i am vladimir ligoido, today we gathered our thoughts about fedor mikhailovich dostoevsky’s influence of his work on the culture of the 20th century. if you like to gather thoughts with us, you can find all episodes of our podcast on the website of the first channel. 1tv.ru, you know , let’s go back to cinema for a second, if, of course, there are film adaptations, there are brilliant readings, like kurassawa’s, yes, but i suddenly discovered that there are traces of dostoevsky, yes, i don’t know , there are cinematic children, yes, as they say, about literary children , where this is not a film adaptation, i talked with john luenfeld, this is one of the translators of pushkins, modern american ones, and i don’t remember something, whether it was him.. ... in general, in short, lieutenant columbo, this series , and he says, well, this is porfiry petrovich , uh-huh, here i finally understand why i adore the series about lieutenant columbus so much, because