it seems to me that what philosophers today will express or not express , will form or will not form, 2022, i would like to say this, by and large, from you, from your actions or the future in which we will live depends on inaction, i’ll just say that you remember how the crime ends, dostoevsky’s punishment, there’s raskolnikov’s dream, some kind of trinities have started up, that’s what we’re talking about here... obviously not about bacilli, but about harmful ideas, then there are these trichinas that start, multiply , but it’s not a problem, the problem is when they begin their dictatorship, when some idea, maybe even a crazy one, is adopted by someone and transformed, brought to the point of absurdity, brought to its own, maybe even an inversion, yes, is beginning to take root among the masses, like... the eighties, yes, but those ideas that were born within the framework of the new french philosophy, they are the ones that give us all, everything that is happening now in civilization, which and in those things that we don't like, and i i just really don’t want my children, for ex

letter, the first philosophical letter published... telescope, read. it is important to say here that chiadaev's legacy is not limited to the first philosophical letter, it is primarily known . but there were many more. there were eight of them. plus there was the apology of a madman and a number of unpublished articles, they very gradually reached the reading public. in the second letter, for example, chiodaev developed the idea of ​​the superiority of the catholic faith over orthodoxy further. this letter would probably have outraged, perhaps even to no less a degree than the first. builds a philosophy of history, as i have already said, a completely religious philosophy of history, in one of the letters, in my opinion, eh, in my opinion, in my opinion, in the sixth letter he contrasts aristotle with epicurus, speaking of aristotle as of the children of darkness, and epicurus the materialist, despite the fact that he himself is a religious thinker, chiodae is to a large extent a religious thinker, yes, he elevates the materialist epicurus to pedistal

correct thing, in my opinion, yes, look, it seems philosophers don’t know what they do and it’s nottv viewers know whether budryar has read them, and in general they will list french philosophers, well, from the sixties, seventies, eighties, yes, but... those ideas that were born within the framework of new french philosophy, they are the ones who give everything that is happening now in civilization, which... in those things that we don’t like, and i just don’t really want my children, for example, to live in this world, i i fear for them, yes, they came from french philosophy, although it would seem, especially people like me , say that it is not clear what they are doing, it is not clear the matter with which they are dealing, in france, in france there were worthy philosophers, for example, the current president of france was a student and secretary of the wonderful french philosopher paul ricoeur, who wrote about historical memory. what happened? i also had different students , not all of them, it seems to me that all of them, i don’t know, michel foucault, deleos, guatari, bad

on april 22, the great philosopher turned 300 years old.oday it’s easy for me, as they say now as a dream team, i can go from west to east. kant, as an event in the history of ideas, and what he created, it is a kind of work of art. a work of art requires some effort in order to understand it, and at the same time, any brilliant work of art is open to the viewer. on the one hand, kant is very aphoristic, sometimes very simple and clear, sometimes so complex that thought stops and stumbles. but at the same time it gives pleasure, you need to go back and think again, so if you answer mamardashvili’s challenge briefly, it will turn out like this: kant is complexity that strives for understanding. great, asiballovich, what will moscow university say? well, reading any philosophical text, if it is real philosophy, requires some effort, overcoming screens. as the same mamardashvili said, when we step over both the incomprehensible and our own inertia, because we live in the world of feelings, and kant begins his criticism of pure reason with this

who is a philosopher, what should he do , well, he’ll probably say, at best , that teaching the historyally answer anything else, we probably won’t get it, although this is strange, because well, how i don’t know if a person goes to study as an economist or a historian or a mathematician, he says: what will you do, i will be a mathematics teacher, a history teacher and that’s it, that is, as if everyone will only teach each other, that ’s how it all came down to philosophy. to the point that there aren’t any philosophers as such, or well, they don’t exist, at least in public opinion, but there are only some teachers of philosophy, so you, alexey, uh, actually, actually head the faculty of philosophy, well, so to speak, what do you think about this, you remembered my student, hermann, i know him very well, by the way he said, not only do i not know where i will work, but that i want to benefit my homeland, benefit the fatherland. that’s because - i ’m interested in our topic - the russian worldview, does it exist, but not the status there philosophically, because it seems to me that this

philosophers study.the world requires more than just seeing it, you need to know what exactly you are looking for in the distance. we straighten his pigtail, we straighten his bow, we fixed everything, now we have it together move to the royal gate, and there will be an exhibition dedicated to the anniversary of kant's geography. kant turned to philosophy as an adult; before that, his scientific interest was limited to the natural sciences, especially geography. for 40 years at the albertina, that is, the university of berg, he taught physics. talked about the whole world without leaving koeniksberg. he put forward hypotheses about the existence of other galaxies, the formation of the solar system from a gas cloud, and proved the slowdown of the earth's daily rotation. this royal gate, where a new exhibition opens. the large oval table is not just an interior detail. kant followed his diet, eating once a day, but with a generous taste. she gathered nine people at her table, believing that this was the id

, in which he _ himself as a french philosopher, in which he talks— himself as a french philosopher, about _ himself as a french philosopher, in which he talks about the _ himself as a french philosopher, in which he talks about the israel - which he talks about the israel tobby~ — which he talks about the israel tobby~ she _ which he talks about the israel lobby. she said _ which he talks about the israel lobby. she said that _ which he talks about the israel lobby. she said that she - which he talks about the israel lobby. she said that she did i which he talks about the israel. lobby. she said that she did like it, lobby. she said that she did like it. but— lobby. she said that she did like it. but in— lobby. she said that she did like it. but in nty— lobby. she said that she did like it, but in my mind _ lobby. she said that she did like it, but in my mind i— lobby. she said that she did like it, but in my mind i was- lobby. she said that she did like - it, but in my mind i was bookmarking it, but in my mind i was bookmarking it for— it, but in my mind i was bookmarking it for re

that's what a non-philosopher needs to know to understand about kant?believe in this methodological construction, it consists of two parts: criticism, abilities, judgments and in general the whole triad of criticism as a method. and the second thing, which gives the opportunity to work in project thinking, to create a project, to bring it to the end, on the one hand, for this you need a schematic effort, in fact, this thing, this was a decisive moment in the european history of ideas, when this thing was invented, and then many methodologists began to promote it, and the first thing is the construction of a protective mechanism for defense yourself from the influence of other people's thoughts. on the other hand, the ability to select, rejecting what you don't need, protecting yourself. excellent, alexey pavlovich, what would you add? well, a very important kantian intuition is, not intuition, in fact, he showed this in his work, this is the difference between reason and intellect, because the critique of pure reason is built, as it were, from three par

the entire world of philosophical science does not ignore kant, and even more so in kaliningrad, philosophicaludy his ideas. it is difficult to read kant, especially in the language of the 16th century. as a rule, people know. new ways of looking at this subject, it is because of this that he is considered a revolutionary of philosophical thought, it is because of this that he is one of the most cited philosophers in the world so far in russia, that is, everything that we are now talking about the nature of consciousness, neurophysiology, in many ways this begins from kant, well, before him from descartes, but kant here is certainly the most important milestone; to understand the world requires... something more than just seeing it, you need to know what exactly you are looking for in the distance, straighten his pigtail, straighten him... solar system from a gas cloud, proved about the existence of other galaxies, the formation of a slowdown in the daily rotation of the earth. this is the royal gate where the new exhibition opens. a large oval table is not just an interior detail. kant follow

philosophers study his ideas.ge of the 16th century, as a rule. know about kant’s three fundamental works: three criticisms: theoretical reason, practical reason and aesthetic judgment, so what is the greatness of kant? in the 18th century, young science entered the advance scene, explaining previously inexplicable natural phenomena; on the other hand, religious sentiments were growing. kant reboots philosophy. kant reconciles opposing positions and creates a new language for philosophy, gives it a new subject, gives it... new ways consideration of this subject, it is because of this that he is considered a revolutionary of philosophical thought, it is because of this that he is one of the most cited philosophers still in the world in russia, that is, that is all that we are now talking about the nature of consciousness, neurophysiology, in many ways, this begins with kant, well, before him with descartes, but kant here is certainly the most important milestone in order to understand the world... you need somethin

do agree that philosophical comparison? what that philosophical comparison?t philosophical comparison? what are you trying _ that philosophical comparison? what are you trying to _ that philosophical comparison? what are you trying to tell _ that philosophical comparison? brief are you trying to tell me?! that philosophical comparison? what are you trying to tell me?! i'm - that philosophical comparison? what are you trying to tell me?! i'm not i are you trying to tell me?! i'm not philos0phical_ are you trying to tell me?! i'm not philosophical comparison. - are you trying to tell me?! i'm not philosophical comparison. i - are you trying to tell me?! i'm not l philosophical comparison. i wouldn't take a weight _ philosophical comparison. i wouldn't take a weight loss _ philosophical comparison. i wouldn't take a weight loss pill. _ philosophical comparison. i wouldn't take a weight loss pill. you - philosophical comparison. i wouldn't take a weight loss pill. you look - take a weight loss pill. you look ureat! it take a weight loss pill. you look great! it i

now he is acquiring philosophical topics. let's get to the goal of the program, that only the audience is going to get to know or not to get a critical insight and thinking . many of the schools that you said have a critical point of view, there are some of them that i am on the list. i was watching your program . they are a school of criticism. we are only supposed to get acquainted with the schools of philosophy, as you say, from the point of view of entertaining products or not, a viewer should also find a critical thinking. look at the structure of each episode , it has 3 parts, that is, we are in each episode. the conversations that have been designed and the item has 3 parts. first , we will analyze the first part. let's come now to this philosophy let's recognize this phenomenon of popular culture . the next phase is the critical phase. now let's criticize these debates . for example, sir, in ping floyd aria, do we believe in pluralism or not , do we believe in postmodernism or not? what criticisms? there is postmodern

letter, the first philosophical letter published in the telescope magazine, read.daev’s legacy is not limited to the first philosophical letter, they know him first of all, but there were... much more of them, there were eight of them, plus there were a number of apologies for a madman unpublished articles, they very gradually reached the reading public. in the second letter, for example, chiodaev developed the idea of ​​​​the superiority of catholicism over orthodoxy further; this letter would probably have outraged, maybe even no less than the first. he builds a philosophy of history, as i already said, a completely religious philosophy of history, in one of the letters, in my opinion, uh, in my opinion, in my opinion, in the sixth letter he contrasts. aristotle epicurus, speaking of aristotle as from the child of darkness, and epicurus materialist, despite the fact that he himself is a religious thinker, chiodaev, to a large extent a religious thinker, yes, he elevates the materialists of epicurus to the peedistal, only here it is necessary to note that epicureu

well, berdyaev is also a russian philosopher, he is from kyiv, and this, but he is a russian philosopherrdyaev, he has very dangerous works for us and for humanity in general , the russian russian idea, yes, this is this kind of russian proto-fascism, practically, modern russian. fascists and nazis, they rely on these ideas, in particular, although he also has a work that is very important for us, the original meaning of russian communism, and where it practically shows how russian communism grows out of russian orthodoxy, and how orthodoxy i is connected with russian totalitarianism and ultimately terror, but it is precisely for this work that he is dragged into the pantheon, as it were, again we have to understand what it means. it is not possible, we are not a totalitarian and authoritarian state, we cannot ban any writer or artist or philosopher, but even more, we must study the enemy, i generally believe that and i repeat this many times, that the main one of one of our main problems is that we still do not have an institute of russia, we do not have an institute that would systemat

today we gathered with thoughts about the great philosopher plato, doctor of philosophy, roman svetlovoctor of philosophy, dmitry bugay, candidate of political sciences, vladimir. or in 424 he was born in the circle where socrates was an extremely popular figure, that is, plato's great-uncle, plato's uncles, these are all people who in greek are called perigoi periton socrates, yes, those who are around socrates, those who communicate with socrates, in this sense it is all mythology, not mythology, these are the things that can really be very carefully felt when you read plato. and here i would say that the main things, again, the things that were for plato's motivation for his philosophical work was the enormous crisis of the entire greek culture, both political culture and intellectual culture, which he witnessed at the end of the pylapanesian war, because his youth, that is, the most important period for a person, the period when he is formed, came at the final... crisis of this world of the greek polis, yes, when this world, it was as if torn into two sides, which destroyed each ot

no, he is not a ukrainian philosopher, he is russian a philosopher, but the bolsheviks killed him, torturedfirst, he ended up on the curtain, then, then he was shot, we can't even know exactly where and how, but it is obvious that he is a victim of stalin's terror, but that he is not a russian philosopher, he is a russian philosopher , and he carries with him, despite the fact that he belongs to... a tradition that is mostly german-speaking, yes phenomenology, but he has all the signs of a russian philosopher, first of all why, because he writes in russian, and berdyaev, berdyaev is also a russian philosopher , he a native of kyiv, and this, but this is a russian philosopher, and even more berdyaev, he has very dangerous works for us and for russian humanity in general , the russian idea, and this is such a russian proto-fascism, practically, modern russian fascists and nazis, they rely on these . in particular, although at the same time he has a work that is very important for us, the original meaning of russian communism, the one where he, where he practically shows how russian communism

on april 22 , the great philosopher turned 300 years old.ander alexandrovich fedorov, rector of the kant baltic state university, alexey pavlovich kozyrev, dean of the faculty of philosophy of lomanosov moscow university. i, vladimir ligoida, will try to talk about kant, his life and teachings. actually, dear friends, i would like to. art is open to the viewer, on the one hand the verse is very aphoristic, sometimes very simple and clear, sometimes so complex that thought stops and stumbles, but at the same time it gives pleasure, you need to go back and think again, therefore if we briefly answer mamardashili’s challenge, it will turn out like this: kant is complexity that strives for understanding, excellent, asi balovich. what will moscow university say? well, reading any philosophical text, if it is real philosophy, requires certain efforts, overcoming screens, as mamardashvili said, when we step over the incomprehensible and through our own inertia, because we live in the world of feelings, and kant with this he begins his critique of p

i can’t say, he made it possible, april 22 is coming soon, it’s the birthday of the great philosophere president visited the university on student day the russian federation, who made a very correct emphasis, we, russia, read the world heritage, he said, saying this, here we are talking about the fact that thinkers of this caliber set an example in what humanists should actually do to shape the future, good luck to you, success, thank you , thank you so much for taking the time, i understand how busy you are now and that... alexandra first, be happy.

this is what a non-philosopher needs to know and understand about kant?nsists of two parts: this is criticism, abilities, judgments and in general the whole series of criticism, as a method namely, the second one, you are talking about three, just in case, for our viewers, about three main works. to create a project and bring it to completion, on the one hand, this requires a schematic effort, in fact, this thing, this was the decisive moment in the european history of ideas, when this thing was invented, and then many methodologists began to promote it, and the first thing is building a defense mechanism to protect oneself from the influence of other people’s thoughts, on the other hand, the ability to select, rejecting something you don't need from... protecting yourself. wonderful. alexey pavlovich, what would you add? well, a very important kantian intuition is, not intuition, in fact, he showed this in his work, this is the difference between understanding and reason. after all, the criticism of pure reason is built, as it were, from three parts: fir

immanuel kant was a wise philosopher, he thought a lot about what is good and what is bad, he believed should be treated with kindness and respect, no matter who neither were they. all human actions should be determined by an awareness of duty and a moral compass, let everyone live by their own mind and make their own decisions. youtube shorts in anime style, the shortest possible summary. event, all because they decided to celebrate the anniversary on a large scale in his homeland. kant was born all his life, minus several years of study, and lived in köniksberg, now russian kaliningrad. during those 4 years of the seven years' war, when east prussia was part of the russian empire, the philosopher became its subject. baltiin the federal university named after kant organized a major international congress to coincide with the date. german chancellor olaf schulz responded jealously, putin has no right to the cant, because russian politics contradicts his ideas, and the german embassy in moscow hung a huge poster for the anniversary, in general, it hurt. our guest is andrei teslya, he is

on april 2, the great philosopher turned 300 years old.s they say now, a dream team. i can be from west to east, geographically. alexander alexandrovich fedorov, rector of the baltic state university. lomanosov moscow state university, i am vladimir ligoida, let's try to talk about kant his life of teachings. actually. dear friends, i would like to start with this quote from mamardashvili, as always, like mirab konstantinovich, provocative, and at the same time it seems you can’t find fault, or can you? you know, kant, as an event in the history of ideas, and what he created, is a kind of work of art, and a work of art requires a certain effort in order to understand it, while any. brilliant work of art is open to the viewer. kant , on the one hand, is very aphoristic, sometimes very simple and clear, sometimes so complex, that the thought stops, stumbles, but at the same time it gives pleasure. it is necessary to go back and think again. therefore, if we briefly answer mamardashvili's challenge, it will turn out like this. kant is complex

age, the best writers, philosophers, church figures, priests, they gathered - in this religious-philosophical society to discuss the most important problems russian life of the pre-revolutionary period, this is the very beginning of the 20th century, and prishim dreamed of being a participant in these meetings, but they did not want to accept him, they ruled in these ... meetings - such was the wonderful married couple zinaida kipius and dmitry merishkovsky, she was a poet, critic, so quite evil, bilious, who wrote under the pseudonym anton krayniy, he was a philosopher, thinker, author of historical novels and author of poetry, symbolist, dmitry merishkovsky, it was to them that prishvin showed up with his first two books with such, as with a certain a pass to great literature, but they didn't let him go further... they said: get out of here, young man, read the captain's daughter. but prishvin wasn't simple either, he chose a very good place for his third journey, it was lake svetloyar, a famous lake in the history of russian literature and russian culture and in russian history in general,

articles at the time of fashion for him, i had the absolute opinion that of course this is not philosopherwell, back when it was fashionable, well, in circles, then i saw him, volodya, i remembered, remember, well, these are only people of our age, i apologize to the audience who did not see this, do you remember the wonderful duet on soviet... because in it, well, there is complete incoherence, exactly, complete incoherence, meaninglessness, they can’t tell me that this is postmodernism, but at this point, yes, we can’t discuss this further, or in the words of zizek, or this one from france, who keeps going to revolutions, he’s relivi, yes, yes, yes, that’s it the main revolutionary, this is western philosophy, you know, how interesting this is. philosophy, here they are all presented , well, this is what we are dealing with, by the way, all three, supposedly philosophers, are simply, on the one hand , inveterate russophobes, on the other hand , those people who laid down their lives at a great price, so they are not poor in justification all three of this very western hegemony , there’s

the roof of the heart of the mind, the philosophical works of imanuel kant, just like the feelings ofhe skin, and if anyone is older, it would be a couple of old ones. kali is a palazhenne, what kind of thought is iago neabhodnastsyu, then geta apriyorny merkavanne. if all this palazhenne is taken out of order, as it is not necessary, then i am crazy apriornae palazhenne. pay for your address krytyku. the edge is extremely raking and will only be captured. no one from the apanenta understands my opuses of goodness, like herr salamon maimon. the compliment goes to the boy from the military school "mir". the university does not finish this, but in this case, it is important to learn the thought of the signs of the philosopher. sennya zhukaў barok is an extraordinary weight, and there was some come on, hang out. on neman , cargo from the baltyka arrived there. prices, barges, and bags carried the most varied goods. you have a face and a book. the house of khayman's books had a full house, and everything was on the line. galava is not here at this hour. he doesn’t care about business, whi

that's a good philosophical bent _ philosophical?al bent for a friday night. nothing wrong with that. on the weather rather than chronic sunshine last couple of days and cheered the mood for quite a lot of people. people will be out trying to spot the auroras.— spot the auroras. they definitely will. i spot the auroras. they definitely will- i won't _ spot the auroras. they definitely will. i won't be _ spot the auroras. they definitely will. i won't be able _ spot the auroras. they definitely will. i won't be able to _ spot the auroras. they definitely will. i won't be able to offer - will. i won't be able to offer philosophical musings of the weather. britts, for all we complain about the weather and we do that a lot it is obviously very mild in comparison. it felt like a very long autumn winter and spring. we have finally had some sunshine over the last few days. people i'm sure our feeling that their moods are being buoyed by beer gardens filling up for that is only it would last longer than it is forecast to. gettin: longer than

work, his dad, a philosopher, religious scholar, worked as a priest and brought people great spiritualn various military conflicts, he also knows where his dad’s friends work, one works as a professor at the russian state university, the other somewhere else - that. says, apparently, at some point they all turn to the right, begin to smile and say something according to the principle, probably about three, they all start to admire, about three they all start to admire, we should not go this way, that is, it seems to me , that it is precisely the russian view of the world, including russian philosophy, that we cannot find a more precise term than omnisensibility, that is, it really is the ability to be enchanted. with a wide variety of things without prior agreement, we do not need to tune ourselves in, for example, in order to, say, appreciate ancient sculpture, or renaissance painting, or the japanese technique of contemplation, mono noawa, contemplation of the tip of a pine needle, they themselves speak for themselves, but in the same way, suppose, russian classical literature of the

, german poet, playwright, philosopher and art theorist friedrich schilla.ssage of venus near the solar disk on the island of teiti in 1769, the next year, when the philosopher kant finally arrived... this is cook, james cook, he landed on the east coast, what is eastern australia, and australia, australia, is an english naval sailor, explorer, cartographer and discoverer who led three expeditions around the world, called james cook landed him in 1770. on the east coast of australia, absolutely right, the order. question number one. under frederick the great, in comparison with his predecessors, there was, by the way, very broad freedom, because... i am very glad to see you, benjamin berliner, school number 1586, he said, reason about anything, but obey, reason, about anything, but just obey, medal, please, well, i don’t like it that you ’re sitting here. question number two: according to kant's principle, there is only one life, only she alone is true service to the deity, and what kind of life is, in a word, an adjective. hello, aristarkh nalesny, school n

today we gathered with thoughts about the great philosopher plato, doctor of philosophy, roman svetlov, doctor of philosophy, dmitry bugay, candidate of political sciences vladimir ligoy, yes, we continue. what do you think, in the formation of personality, well, in addition to the fact that we understand that the meeting with socrates, the death of socrates, well, a lot, if not everything, in the life of plato was determined, yes or in many ways determined, here. what would you highlight from those personal characteristics in which we more or less can we be sure? again, the problem of personality in assessing earlier cultures is a rather complex problem, because for us, such words, these categories of thought, they seem natural, but the greeks did not use them, yes, in this sense, always, when we talk about the personality of plato, then firstly, this is a bit of a conversation in... that he supposedly meets socrates there in 477 bc, this is such a late antique mythology, because plato belonged to a family that socrates communicated, and roughly speaking, when plato was not born there

no, he is not a ukrainian philosopher, he is a russian philosopher, but the bolsheviks killed him, torturedn the beginning, he was on the curtain, and then he was shot, we cannot even know exactly where and how, but he is a victim of stalinist terror, obviously, but that he is not a russian philosopher, he is a russian philosopher, and he carries with him, despite the fact that he belongs to the tradition. to a greater extent of german language and phenomenology, but he has all the signs of a russian philosopher, first of all, why? because he writes in russian, and berdyaev, berdyaev is also a russian philosopher, he is from kyiv, and this, but he is a russian philosopher, even more berdyaev, he has very dangerous works for us and for humanity in general, a russian idea, this is such a russian anti-fascism, practically modern russian fascists and...

published a petition against one of the rsu research centers being named after the famous russian philosopher ivan ilyin. according to the authors of the petition, ilyin allegedly approved of fascism and justified hitler’s crimes. but such a point of view can only be shared by those who have not... read a single work of the philosopher ilyin to the end, have picked up such knowledge, stumbling upon something on the net. all this hostile fuss around ilyin at the russian state university for the humanities flared up, perhaps, for three reasons. first, putin quotes ilyin quite often. lien's compromise ricochets against the president. that's the goal. secondly, the lyan center at rsu was headed by one of the most famous influential modern thinkers in russia, professor alexander. dugin is a bright figure with infectiously uncompromising views. dugin is also a target. third. the ilyin center, under the leadership of dugin, was created as a kind of cradle of modern liberal westernism in our country, the russian state humanitarian university. the fertilization thus threatens to be lost. hence the sla

philosophers 500. his novels, this frenchman brought out a married couple of philosophers under the recognizable pseudonyms of “jean, sol parterre” and limona de boudaar. boris vyaan. in the picture in 1775, amateur artist alexander duplicy depicted him entering the sleep of the gods while still alive. he died 3 years later at the age of 84. philosopher from atrist. this russian philosopher of the 20th century is ivan ilgin, that’s right, pushkin’s things are 500. auction 2400 for you yuri 1300 for dmitry 2600 for konstantin’s bid vabank vabank konstantin well, we play vabank in 1828 on a walk through the peter and paul fortress pushkin vyazimsky picked up several pine chips and stored them as relic in a sealed box of wood chips by american sculptor hareisho greenough depicted this president on a throne modeled after a statue of olympian zeus, although the depicted himself refused to become a monarch. george washington, that's right. pushkin's belongings 400. during the trip to arzrum, the commander of

actually, we were not just talking and not only about the great, in my opinion, philosopher ivan ilint the trend that exists, the division of society into whites red, that in my opinion, the thing is quite dangerous, which is surprising, what is it based on... this is an irreconcilable criticism, it is always based on pulling out certain phrases, expressions, words, taken out of the context of the article or book itself, i will quote an article by the already mentioned veronika kroshenennikova, in 1948, when the crimes of the third reich against humanity were known to the whole world in the article. about fascism, iliin gives a long series of justifications and arguments and sums up: finally, fascism was right, since it proceeded out of a healthy national patriotic feeling, period, that’s all, nothing more, mrs. krasheninnikova does not quote from the mentioned article: notice how... the phrase “fascism was right” was specially inserted. wow, now listen to the other part of this article. fascism should not have despised other races of nationality and began to conquer and eradicate the

“i have more than once turned to the philosophical heritage of ivan aleksandrovich ilyan, who made aiotism. 7 years later in 2003, when gennady andreevich was already 59 years old, and he remained the leader of the communist party, he writes about again." already in another essay, this is a quote from the works of holy russia and koshcheev's kingdom, that's what was written there, among religious thinkers. ivan ilyin had a greater influence on me. and the metropolitan of st. petersburg, ivan snychov, whom i met several times and whom i sincerely and deeply respected. the first communist in the country, who was raised in an atheistic society, names those who had a special influence on him : a clergyman and a religious russian philosopher. against ivan ilyan, the great philosopher and, as it were, the flame is fanned, dividing people into whites on the red, just after our graduation we receive a letter, like this: i am a student of the faculty of philosophy of moscow state university, named after lomanosov, i want to express my deep gratitude to you for protecting the good name of ivan

the philosophical— really believe that? the philosophical debate . really believe that?sed on genuinely unending life, and i think given the prospect of eternity, we would either have to become something very different with a very finite creatures we are now with a limited set of interests or we would become terribly bored and fall into... but that doesn't mean it applies to the real prospects of life extension, a few decades. but it is worth bearing in mind that hundreds of millions of people right now are already depressed. this is worth taking seriously. there is an old joke about two ladies in a canteen and one says, the food here is terrible, and the other one says, the portions are so small. why would you want a larger portion of terrible food? i want a larger portion of terrible food?— want a larger portion of terrible food? ~' ., ~' terrible food? i like the 'oke and i get i terrible food? i like the 'oke and t get the i terrible food? i like the 'oke and i get the message h terrible food? i like the joke and i get the message but i terrible food? i like the joke

this is the "daily show-ography" of eric adams: philosopher king of new york.c adams is a philosophical genie has, because he tells us he is. >> so i am gandhi like. i think like gandhi. i act like gandhi. i want to be like gandhi. >> desi: but it wasn't always apparent that adams would grow up to be one of the great thinkers of our time. born in 1962 a butcher and house cleaner, he was a typical new york teen when he had a run in with a law that would change the course of his life. >> i was arrested in south jamaica, queens, what i was coming from school, after going into an apartment of a go-go dancer, who owed us money. i. i have out of nowhere, they say, do you feel like a beat down? so i had a demon in me. the only way i could get it out was to go in. >> to go into the police department. >> to go into the police department. >> desi: you know what they say, if they can beat you, join them, and join he did. it was during this sojourn in the urban wilderness that he said he was granted a vision of his future. >> 30 something years ago, a god spoke to my heart

you talk about the philosophical objections that you have as well.could live much longer and posit the notion of forever, ie, immortality, it would be extremely bad for us — bad for us because it would drain us of motivation, we would all be bored and we would be unhappy human beings. do you really believe that? the philosophical debate about immortality has been focused on genuinely unending life, and i think given the prospect of eternity, we would either have to become something very different to the very finite creatures we are now with a limited set of interests or we would become terribly bored and fall into ennui. but that doesn't mean that applies to the real prospects of life extension of, you know, a few decades. but it is worth bearing in mind that, you know, but it is worth bearing in mind that hundreds of millions of people right now are already depressed. this is worth taking seriously. there's an old joke about two ladies in a canteen and one says, "the food here's terrible," and the other one says, "yeah, and the portions are so small

liang, remember, at the beginning of april this year a rather powerful campaign against russian philosophergher political school named after him. at the russian state humanitarian university, it all started with the fact that students were allegedly indignant at the fact that the higher school was named after the fascist ivan ilyan, quite a few, fiery fascist fighters, patriots, young guys who are going to a rally under the common sign of down with fascism, well, maybe can you argue with that? quite dangerous, which is surprising, on what is this irreconcilable criticism even based, it is based all the time on pulling out some certain phrases, expressions, words taken out of the context of the article or book itself, i will quote the article of the already mentioned veronika kroshenennikova, in 1948, when the crime of the third reich against... and sums it up: finally, fascism was right, since it came from a healthy national- patriotic feeling, period. that's all, nothing more, mrs. krosheninnikova from... notice how the phrase “fascism was right” was specially inserted. wow, huh? now liste

vyadomy philosopher johann fichte writes: may pavaga and maimona is not the limit.sophy from head to toe. not a lot of money, what is this adzin with... for a hard campaign and a good drink, that i was aiming for health, navat dziўna, as i grabbed an hour, as for the next pisats, you are not less, the collection of maimon there are 10 places, adzin s іkh - autobiography, dzyakuyuchy oy, kant, mindelssohn, fichte, goethe were given by neman, zhukaў barok, world, this belarusian meat, pa this is what some of the blues are intended to be. the television news agency presents it in the public domain. we have no secrets from our people. delegates from another assembly of the writers of savetskaya belarus gathered at the new capital of the republic. here is the oldest belarusian writer, winner of the stalin prize, people's poet of the bssr, jakub povas. with the right-hand report, the speech of the gallery of the sakratar of the union of savetsky writers of the bssr, paet pyatruts brouka. we are sorry to say that the belarusian savetsky literature has been successful, sayi

vyadomy philosopher johann fichte writes: may pavaga and maimona is not the limit. up what this adzin is from the most important days of our time. maimon is self-interested in his actions. no, we’re not in the career mats. myslyar is happy to give a shout out to high topics, for a fun campaign and a good drink, which he strived for in good health. navat dziўna, yak yago grabbed an hour, kab neshta write. you are not less, the collection of maimon’s creations is available 10 there. adzin s ikh - autography. dzyakuyuchy oy, kant, mindelssohn, fichte, they gave the right... for several reasons , the young man was conceived, being a distinguished philosopher. only for our tv viewers, we choose the best routes. and we set off on an exciting journey. he is like a magician, controls the light, extinguishes and lights the lanterns, thereby marking the beginning and end of the day. permanent, like the sun and the moon. are you entitled to leave, or do you have a double? to show how unusually wonderful. our country. please note that the top of the gate is decorated with a scu

bakersfield was provoked to break off contact with the philosopher herself. this indicates that the fbi has lost interest in the philosopher, otherwise bakersfield would have sought further contacts to collect information. we also consider it necessary to inform that the fairy and the philosopher are painfully ending their joint residence, while maintaining a partnership and business relationship. well? seryozha, your career in the us was bright but short, i went upstairs and blasphemed, and then, ask to go back to moscow yourself, it will be better for everyone, zero you they'll kick you out, and not just from washington, but from intelligence in general, we've cleared out the entire apartment, and if they saw you in the city, old lady orinoir, 2 +2 the fbi knows how to put it together, we'll never clean up the mess, where do i sign? you'll write the report yourself, here's a sample, if necessary, maybe for the better, definitely for the better, i was afraid you wouldn't come anymore, what are you saying, my dears, where would you go? without you, we'll see

actually, we were not just talking and not only about the great, in my opinion, philosopher ivan ilinnd that exists, the division of society into white and red, which in my opinion the thing is quite dangerous, it’s surprising what it’s built on at all. the phrase “fascism was right” was specially inserted. wow, huh? now listen to the other part of this stage. fascism should not have despised other races of nationality and began to conquer and eradicate them. patriotism does not call for the conquest of the universe. moreover, if you look at ilyin’s other works, you will not find a single one anywhere. a word that justifies expansion, the extermination of other peoples, genocide, the enslavement of peoples, the reduction of the world's population, all that past fascism, modern nazism, revived in europe, is so loud, as we know very well, about which we talked a lot, yes, it hated bolshevism, it’s true. well, you must admit, just imagine, he survived the revolution, the civil war, the murder of the royal family with their children, with the heir, the murder of stalypin in kiev in the th

is much more than a philosopher for the city. hello, welcome from the information service of the ntv television company, this is today’s program, its host is vladimir chernyshov. the kremlin today talked about security in the caucasus, strong ties between moscow and baku and the baikal-amur mainline. all these topics were on the agenda of vladimir putin’s meeting with ilham aliyev. opening negotiations with the president of azerbaijan, putin especially... noted the contribution of his father heydar aliyev to the construction of bam, and the leader of azerbaijan thanked putin for the invitation to the celebrations dedicated to the fiftieth anniversary of the legendary railway . well, from the conversation with obama we moved on to new paths in the broadest sense, in relation to the economy, this is international north-south transport corridor, which russia is currently building. according to the plan, it should connect europe and asia. this is a grandiose project, in fact, a whole network of sea, railway and road routes from the b

on april 22, the great philosopher turned 300 years old.xey pavlovich kozyrev, dean of the faculty of philosophy of lomanosov moscow university, i’m vladimir ligoido, let’s try. at the same time, any brilliant work of art is open to the viewer, on the one hand, the outline is very aphoristic, sometimes very simple and clear, sometimes so complex that thought stops, stumbles, but at the same time it gives pleasure, you need to go back and think again, therefore if you briefly answer mamardashvili’s challenge, it will turn out like this: kant - i read the criticism of pure reason, it was in the ninety-first year, i returned from the army not very long ago, after 2 years of service, and don’t believe it, i was sitting on an island fishing in lake lazoč and i read the criticism of pure reason, so i read it for 2 weeks, this is already a picture, but i read it for two weeks and came to the conclusion that no, this is not my philosopher, why is it like that, when you call someone your philosopher, you know, how metaphysical judgment, you share hi