rechetskaya and vitebsk furniture factories.isov woodworking plant was reconstructed. the enterprise mastered almost all types of products that could be made from wood, millions of square meters of fiberboard, veneer, parquet, furniture, thousands of cubic meters of plywood, almost 2000 cubic meters of lumber, it really was. special orders, some of special importance. in 1959 , the quality was such that the enterprise performed and in that year the general director of bobruisk-drevo, alexander alexandrovich sanchukovsky, was urgently summoned to the central committee of the communist party of belarus. this factory was considered one of the best cabinet-making factories in the country. the furniture was made of mahogany, which was imported from many countries, primarily asia and africa. then the order was completed on time, approved by management, and the hall turned out to be solemn. glory. responsible orders for the manufacture of furniture and accessories at lomonosov moscow university. the warsaw palace of culture and science

new production was put into operation: mozorsky woodworking plant, rechetskaya and vitebsk furniture factories, borisov woodworking plant was reconstructed. the bobruisk fondok remained the flagship. not in vain fondok, called the flagship of tereobrabotka. you can imagine that beaver from drev at that time, say, the eighties i take, when i worked, represented a very large association, these are two fiberboard plants with a capacity of 1.11 million square meters, the second 15.2, this is a plywood plant, which produced about 3000 plywood, the furniture factory khaltorina, which today under penzdrev, magilevska. types of products that could be made from wood, millions of square meters of wood fiberboard, veneer, parquet, furniture, thousands of cubic meters of plywood, almost 200 thousand cubic meters of lumber, these were really huge volumes for those times. the sawmill production plan was 160 thousand cubic meters of lumber, i mean the annual figure. in one day, let's say, the heads of the shop had to saw a thousand cubic meters of round timber per day. at the same time, when the ve

new production was put into operation, the mozor woodworking plant, rechetskaya and vitebsk furniturethe borisov woodworking plant was reconstructed, the bobruisk fondok remained the flagship. the company mastered almost all types of products that could be made from wood: millions of square meters of fiberboard, veneer, parquet, furniture, thousands of cubic meters of plywood, almost 200,000 cubic meters of lumber, these were truly huge volumes at that time. the production plan for the sawmill was 160 thousand cubic meters of lumber in one day, let’s say, to the bosses in the workshop, i had to cut a thousand cubic meters of roundwood per day, at the same time when the phonon plant consumed 750 cubic meters, two dvf plants consumed about 1,500, the fondok could process from two to 2,500 roundwood per day. the quality is such that the company also carried out special orders, some of particular importance. in 1959, the general director of bobruisk-drevo, alexander aleksandrovich sanchukovsky, was urgently summoned to the central committee of the communist party of belarus. the workers o

already said, and thereby changed the world, this is how our fellow countryman, the son of the rechetskayae learn right now from our regular column. mitrafan davnar zapolsky was born in 1867 in reshitsa. at the age of 22 he entered the faculty of history and philology of kiev university. after graduating, he worked in archives, taught at universities in moscow, kiev, kirch, kharkov, baku and minsk, and headed the department of history of belarus at the belarusian state university. davnar zapolski was still a high school student. began publishing articles about the history and ethnography of his native places. in 1888 , his essay on the belarusian past was published in six issues of the newspaper minsk leaflet. in it, the author argued that belarusians have their own history, culture, ethnographic features and language. davnar zapolsky visited many ethnographic expeditions to the most remote belarusian towns, studied primary sources in russian foreign archives and libraries. the collected material became the basis a significant essay on the history of belarus, published in the publication r