of america, because this year the defense budget of the united states of america was approved he amount of 886. just imagine this figure: 886 billion dollars, this is 39% of the total world military spending, that is, the united the united states of america is a sufficiently strong, large state that can produce enough weapons and support countries such as ukraine in the war and... give this assistance without too much trouble for its defense budget. i will remind you once again 886 billion dollars per year is the defense budget of the united states of america. however, this is against the background of what the congressmen who flew to the ukrainian capital immediately after the vote on the bill on providing aid to ukraine and this euphoria reigning in washington said. completely forgot about another bill that was voted, or rather, it became a law, a document that was adopted by the house of representatives of the united states of america under the number 8038 on the use of frozen russian assets for the benefit of ukraine. it is about the fact that this one the document gives th

it's quite clear. that the world has changed in ways that are not good for either israel or the united states. thank you. iran: the world holds its breath. when will iran act? what will its allies do, and what will the israeli state respond with, and will the americans join the war? and if the americans join the war, what will russia and china do about that? in other words, dear viewers, are we on the brink of not just a regional war, but world war ii. have it out with gallowe, why don't you? if i stop, you must live to tell my story to sell my face. rings to buy a piece of cloth and some strings, make it one. lies with a long tale so that a child somewhere in gaza looking heaven in the eye awaiting his dad who left in a blaze and bit no one faill well not even to his flesh not even to himself these the... my kite you made flying up about and thinks for moment an angel is there bringing back love if must die let it let it bring hope, let it be a take. civilians fall victimed relentless israely attacks in gaza with the total death pool is top 40,000. iran says the us cannot be mediator for pea

[applause] ♪ united states air force. ♪ united states space force. ♪ united states marine corps. ♪ ignited- united states coast guard. ♪ united states navy. ♪ let's hear it for the united states navy ceremonial band. this concludes today's ceremony. thank you very much for joining us today. a special thank you to our boy scout troop for their support and for the national park service rangers and their fabulous volunteers in yellow for their amazing support of veterans today and every day at the world war ii memorial. [applause] ♪ ♪ ♪ this year's symposium focuses on korea the first forever war. and while americans think of the war as forgotten, intend to remember and to consider the

you can recognize that the united states doesn't the united states as plan a retail other country selected doke and they obeyed. uh, yeah, but, and they don't have a plan b. suppose you worked for the state department, then you just said, uh what you're saying that other countries have their own interest of the, of their bosses would say, well, you're not a team player. if you don't, we obtain a, if you don't think our team a is a plan, a is going to work that not a team player you don't belong in. the american doesn't have a plan be only a plan. and the reality is a plan b, but they don't have that. there is no room for reality and plan a i'm saying, you know where it's been, you know, in a central nation we can do whatever we want. but mr. hudson. uh, i think this is something that many people around the world are struggling to understand about the united states. you have so many universities, so many things. tanks about so many, so many research commissions and you know, when you, yourself work on long term historical trans. i'm sure these people in the state department, they, they, the

texas versus the united states, 40f2052022, the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit concluded that these t guidelines had, quote, every indication of being a general policy that is so extreme as to the amount of an abdication of statutory responsibility,," and that is replacement of congresses statutory mandates with concerns of equity and extralegal and plainly outside of the boundaries of the power conferred by the ina. number five, alejandro mayorkas willfully refused to comply with the detention mandate set forth in section 241a2 of such act requiring that an alien ordered removed shall be detained during, quote, the removal period. instead of complying with the mandate, alejandro mayorkas issued guidelines for the enforcement of civilat immigratn laws which instructs officials that, quote, the individual of removablee noncitizens should nt alone be the basis of an enforcement action against them and that dhs personnel should not rely on the fact of conviction alone. even with respect to aliens subject to mandatory detention and removal pursuant to section 241 a

of america involved, even if the united states of america were declaring all along uh they don't want escalation, but they state in it very clear, once israel is in a war the united states of america will be there, and we notice... historically the united states of america fought every corner, every war the zilas entity were involved in, so we we witnessing very, very vertile region at the minute. thank you, mr. shoth, also joining us, if is jim ka political analyst and blogger out of uh new york and for our viewers that are just joining us, we're joined by mr. saib shot out of belfast and jim caven. out of new york and this extended coverage with respect to the martterdom of ismaal hany a chief of the political bureau of the hamas resistance movement to was assassinated in the iranian capital tehran on the morning of july 31st and that's just hours afterward shukur hizbullah top hisbolla commander for that matter was a martured in the uh lebanese capital beirot both by the israeli regime jim welcome to the conversation here um uh your initial thoughts on the shocking and bold as

williams, united states navy. [bell] major duane williams, united states army.petty officer marvin roger woods, united states navy, retired. [bell] captain john d. yemnicki senior, united states navy, retired. [bell] vicki yancy. [bell] petty officer second class kevin w. yokum, united states navy. [bell] chief petty officer donald m. young, united states navy. [bell] edmund g. young junior. [bell] lisa l. young. [bell] shu yen yung. [bell] and her husband. [bell] >> ♪ amazing grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me i once was lost but now i am found twas blind but now i see >> ♪ amazing grace amazing grace amazing grace the lord hath promised good to me, his word my hope secures; he will my shield and portion be as long as life endures. when we've been there ten thousand years, bright shining as the sun, we've no less days to sing god's praise >> ♪ amazing grace >> ♪ the lord hath promised good to me, his word my hope secures; he will my shield and portion be as long as life endures. ♪ >> ♪ amazing grace amazing grace ♪ ♪ >> ladies and gentlemen,

and as a consequence of the united states not recognizing the claims of independence, that for the philippines that emilio aguinaldo had stated. so we are telling the story of these events that happened 125 years ago through portraiture. why do we make that decision to do it that way? well, that way we can make this history personal. we can understand the agency of different individuals in this history. i think the us public is perhaps more familiar with figures such as theodore roosevelt. you know, who was second in command of the roughriders, for example. and there's a whole mythology around him, right? or president william mckinley. but what we do in this exhibition is that we put those portraits in conversation with portraits of figures from cuba, from puerto rico, from guam, from the philippines, from hawaii. in order to complete that narrative, to complete the history, to present the different perspectives, and really to provide a panoramic outlook into these history. well, we do start with president mckinley. he's right here, 25th, president of the united states. why is he important to

that the united states only in forces when it suits the interest of the united states. otherwise, things that we declare are the legal for us to do. we decide that other countries, it's illegal, but the ability of the united states to cool or other countries is starting to slip . they indicated that is, is destroying the economic power of the us dollars. the reserve currency and i believe the bricks is already on the road to doing that, creating an alternative so that the countries, particularly in the global south, no longer are going to be held hostage to us sanctions. they will have alternatives . and i think what we've seen with rushes moves of light now, particularly with north korea and iran, are creating a free space where those sanctions would no longer be relevant. why would i have to leave it and sort of interesting indeed, the latest developments always good to hear your insights and loudly adults and fullness. see i, let's see. oh, but this is a patient that thank you very much. thank. thank you. more on j, as long as we're going to shop criticism from the s

of course the united states has stated its position and we have stated our position on palestine and the prosecution of war there. so that's true. but at the same time, i think our position on palestine remains principled, anchored in the united nations security council resolutions. but right now we have different sets of priorities in pakistan. i think it should not directly or indirectly affect our relations with the united states. daniel: all right, i'm cognizant of the time, ambassador. i really appreciate you coming today. i hope to get to pakistan this year. i really appreciate you coming to visit. as i said at the beginning, i want you to consider csis second home in washington. i'm grateful to the folks who came out today. i thank my friend and colleague ambassador raphel for being here. and please join me in thanking the pakistani ambassador to the u.s. [applause] thanks a >> we

united states of america.the american legion. the national commander, military order of the purple heart. mr. timothy morgan, national calm it on and chief executive officer -- chief executive officer, marine corps league. retired united states army major general, executive director military chaplains association of the united states of america. mr. robert thomas, national president and chairman of the board paralyzed veterans of america. mr. michael peary, legion of valor of the united states of america. retired united states air force lieutenant colonel david j whirley, commander-in-chief military order of the world wars. retired united states navy chief . retired united states army colonel paris davis, medal of honor recipient, congressional medal of honor society of the united states of america. mr. daniel controllers, national commander become disabled american veterans. retired united states air force lieutenant general brian kelly, president and chief executive officer military officers association of a

the united states of america as being supportive and visitor it mand some vegetable protests against isn't really something that's about the nothing to stop set them and spending, which killed the possibility of the 2 state solution and create a new political power. and is it or a fascist, by hidden by smoking as i'm being viewed who are not controlling there? is there any government you have more than 31000 people that 100000 people injured infrastructure wiped out? i mean, i'm just sort of sitting here and watching this play out. and i'm also watching a president of the united states, joe biden, possibly laying out the framework for losing the next race because of antipathy inside the united states about these actions or the lack of action by that, by the president. so would love to get your thoughts and respond to dr. bar goody. well, i agree with so much of what the adaptability has just said, and i think that the listener we should understand 2 large things. and uh, 2 points that i want to make. one is litters. is it? yes, israel is certainly a creation of settler colonialism. it

williams, united states navy. [bell] major dwayne williams, united states army. chief petty officer marvin roger woods, united states navy, retired. [bell] captain john d. yamnicky sr., united states navy, retired. vicki yancey. [bell] petty officer second class kevin w. yokum, united states navy. [bell] chief petty officer donald m. young. united states navy. [bell] edmond g. young jr. [bell] lisa l. young. [bell] shu yin young. [bell] and her husband yuguang zheng. [bell] >> ♪ amazing grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me i once was lost but now am found was blind but now i see ♪ twas that grace that taught my heart fear and grace my fear relieved how precious did that grace appear the hour i first believed amazing grace how sweet the lord has promised good to me his word my hope secures he will my sin and portion keep as long as light endures ♪ through many dangers toils and snares i have already come tis grace has brought me safe thus far and grace will lead me home ♪ amazing grace amazing grace ♪♪ >> ladies and gentlemen, please stand for the

the united states political establishment leaves the bible. they continue to think that they are the most important country in the world by far, that they can see to call up their opponents because they are exceptional because they are destined to be different than god. why that sound? that's the most appropriate description of their perception. of themselves. so israel, this way the machine is very similar. they see themselves as gods chosen people. even those who are secular and israel a somehow are they believe in something which they don't believe exist, paradoxically, or they, they're not religious, but they somehow believe that they are exceptional. that sense of arrogance. and that sense of uh, exceptionalism in israel, i think, rapes a complacency that is similar to what we try to, to what we see in the united states. and so there's riley's, don't consider the palestinians to be human beings equal to them with capabilities. who can be brilliant, and i think that's what basically destroyed this whole narrative about this invincible is r

jimmy carter, president of the united. stateslarge arms industry is new in the american experience. the total influence, economic, political, even spiritual. in 1961, us president eisenhower made a shocking. confession in his farewell speech, that is, the military establishment leading us foreign policy and leading corporations in the defense industry have formed a symbiotic relationship exerting influence. blamed osama bin laden and his leadership of al-qaeda as the mastermind behind the terrorism. the us declared the war on terror and entered the afghan war on october 7th, 2001. november 13th, 2001, occupation of the capital kabul. on december 14th, 2001, the official declaration of victory in the afghan war was made. the us-afghanistan war seemed to come to an end rather quickly. the us is an extremely unequal society where the rich get richer and the poor continue getting poorer. the top 1% in the united states owns over 31% of the country's assets amounting to $36.8 trillion dollars. that assets held by the bottom 50% of the

it's the united states, cia and musad joint effort. they also declared publicly that they have joint teams in the assassination of. in damascus 2012, this is known, it's a general wisdom that the cia and the united states intelligence communities are involved in supporting israel, not just in assassination policy, but in all of israel, and here is the problem that we're facing today.

>> distinguished guests, the president of the united states and dr. distinguished guest, the national anthem of the republic of kenya, followed by the national anthem of the united states. ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ["star spangled banner] playing] ♪♪ ♪♪ >> distinguished guests, please be seated. ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ >> halt! >> distinguished guests, the president of the united states. pres. biden: good morning. [applause] president ruto, mrs. ruto, and your three lovely daughters who are here to my left, welcome, welcome, welcome. and all the distinguished guests. on behalf of myself and jill, vice president and the second gentleman, and the american people, it's an honor to welcome you to the white house to celebrate 60 year, 60 years of partnership between kenya and the united states. at the stroke of midnight -- [applause] that's worth applause. at the stroke of midnight on december 12, 1963, the world changed. many americans and many people around the world watched with great hope and great anticipation as hundreds of thousands of kenyans came together

as if it is the imperial power and the united states is the colony, somehow the united states is in a subordinate position, supplying 85, i saw some literature saying that the bombs that hit where nasan hazralla was, that complex, that huge complex were between 2004 pounds, these weapons are unusual, 85 of these... into that uh structure, i don't see anything like that happening in tel aviv, i don't see any, mass murder of civilians taking place in tel aviv, so that's what i mean, there's still seems to be foot on the break, incrementalism that is doesn't correspond to how israel is acting, israel is behaving, israel and the united states together are behaving, so... it it's uh in a sense more of the same, but the anti keeps being raised, the stakes keep being raised, as i saw that display of uh all that technology over tel aviv, uh earlier today, i thought this is major transformation in the state of the world right now, there are going there is going to be uh very dramatic response. from uh us israel that uh that partnership, that partnership. okay, let's cross over now to m

and zionism has been fostering over the last few decades. that israel is invincible, united states, israel together, they are invincible, nothing to touch us, they the palestinian people showed on that day with great heroism that this is false, and since then the zinanism has never really recovered, they have not one year later they have not been able to defeat hamas and they admit that, all right, stay with me, arnold, well, did you expect this level of rela atrocities to take place by the israeli regime after the october the 7th operation? i don't think uh anyone did, because as much as we have witnessed israeli crimes since 1948 and even before that, in the 30s, you know, zionist militias have carried many massackers against our people in palestine and in the arab world. i mean, but to this level uh, no, because i think that without a full us and western support to israel, i don't think uh, you know, that could have been possible. "this is a us genocide, this is the united states war crimes against the palestinian people, and it's israel is backed up by this full military, finan

to expand the war, he this a failure of this function state to be the tool of hegemony for the united states of america and the west cannot counter resistance in god. a strip in a slether of land and is this resistant groups showed this is the the this state it's it's not able even to protect itself not to be the hijomany tool in west asia and this is very strong message united states of america got involved in the genocide in gaza the uk and the west behind to sustain the power and the strength of the zinist entity so it can't function as as as hegemonical tool for the united states of america and the west, otherwise the balance of power globally will tilt and then a newcomers will come in. okay, well let me cross back over to massud, hopefully that audio issue has been resolved. tehran says the israeli regime targets the military advisers who were in syria to actually help defeat terrorist group, and according to iranian officials, this is part of organized terrorism by. the israeli regime which has a history of supporting tacfury terrorists in syria and elsewhere, your take on this? well,

this week we are sitting here in the south china sea of the united states, philippines, japan and australiand maybe some operations during the practice. at the end of the state visit, you have the first ever leaders trilateral meeting between the united states, japan, and the philippines. that is like a bookend with the state visit in the middle. that tells you how the u.s. approaches change. when you project forward, from the administration's standpoint, and as you said, we had the australia rok, you've had the indian leaders, now the japanese leaders. four of the five states come from the end pacific area. the conflict for the united states in this architecture is japan. while we talk about defense and everything else, i want to say one thing that's valuable for the relationship. if you look at any of the public surveys in the region, japan standing is the highest civilian nation. that's a huge amount of political goodwill and capital that comes to the alliance as we work the diplomatic front, let alone the collective deterrence for us in the region. i do think our efforts in this state v

might seem, if not paradoxically, in fact, russian-american relations have existed longer than the united states itself as a state. back in 1698, peter ii within the framework of the great embassy. usa. these were the first bilateral political contacts. it was under peter i that american goods appeared on our market. during the great embassy, ​​peter ii met with the quakers, quaker representative william pen. quaker in general is a religious movement of the united states that spoke out, let's say . for independence from the catholic church, from the official church, in general he paid quite a lot of attention to the development of the pacific ocean and in general the problem of where asia ends and where america begins, and maps of the 16th century, which are at the disposal of historians, show that at that time there were already ideas that asia and america were connected either by a land isthmus or by a small one. later, in the first half of the 16th century, active migration of russian traders to north america began. the movement went in two directions: along the aliud route and through the be

as a result, what was at stake with the victory of chaves, the continued domination of the united statesover the material and natural resources of the venezuelan nation, and what happened then ? affiliated to the states. the united states is coming under control, nationalizing it, injecting the income from this for health, for public education, for you see the government of venezuela, this is good, the nation should know, our people should know, in the same period of how many years of bolivarian revolution, they will build 5 million houses, this is 5 million for the people. housing, another 3 million housing putting it on the agenda until 203 to do this, the level of education , healthcare and other needs related to social welfare that we consider despite the very tough sanctions that the united states imposes on the venezuelan government brewery has been able to enjoy such achievements in this field, well , it is dangerous for you, this self-belief for america, you consider self-belief and self-reliance dangerous for america, it makes such scenarios go forward. this is absolutely true a

does not care. at all about international law, the united states only cares about its colony, israel, and on that note, i appreciate both of you uh being with me khalid barakat out of beirout, arnold august, out of montreal. my pleasure, thank you viewers for staying with us on another spotlight. i'm marza hashim, hope to see you right here next time. goodbye. headlines and press tv: one year on, since the israely holocous in gaza, more palestinians including children are killed in the gaza strip. israeli occupation force continues air raids sent a ground invasion against lebanon killing more civilians. german police clash with anti-israel ralliers while protester held around the world in solidarity with

my friend patty his life in the united states began through criminal acts, legal entry into the united states. all other criminal actions into the united states but without that moment, she never would've entered the lives of almost two decades of work of new york city high school students. not only do i embrace people like patty with all of their complexities in all theiri contradictions, i celebrateem them. i celebrate those criminals and that is why i wrote this book thank you. [applause] i am happy to take any questions anyone has. yes? >> you mentioned in your book, even though. [inaudible] small country compared to the united states. what do you think the united states can learn? the impact he has? >> i think the legacy policies is something we are going to have to be as they evolve for the next few years. certainly there is much to be said about reducing the level of criminalityla established in communities. the only possible way of doing that is not through mass incarceration. through locking up people whose ties to criminal activity and to gang activity. certainly some of anti

he was not a citizen of the united states. he was not in the united states when this felony is what they say was who his credit. he did not steal the information assigned his homeland australia, expects him to return there after the final us hearing. and that's of the serious concerns that his health was due to a rating in the k prison. the police use water cannon and tear gas to stamp out the mazda demonstration in kenya as the public speak south against the government, raising taxes to pay off debt to the us base. i am at the party of watching our team to national, reaching you from the russian and capital of michael quarter with the latest. now this is the latest photo of julia and assign, just skis en route to finalize, a plea bugging to secure his freedom of the founder of the media organization which it leaks has been released from the british prison. and i slowed out the 3 after a lengthy legal battle. now sanchez agreed to plead guilty to a single criminal, a charge in the us to end his bundle against expedition. accor

when is the united states going to do with the united states pledged to do. defend democracy andy tate -- and dictatorship. >> europe still needs to do more. as of last summer only 11 of the nato allies, that still needs to be done and applaud what germany is doing to get there hopefully this year. there are so many european allies. with regards to the united states, we are democracies. it takes time to get there. so for example the europeans haven't gotten to 2% yet. it takes time to bring democracies along. we will get there with regards to making adjustments. there may be different paths to get there. i'm reminded of winston churchill's quote americans will do the right thing after exhausting all other possibilities. i do think we will get there, it's just democracies take time to process. >> is there enough time for the democratic process. >> hearing about the two europeans here. what senator angus king told me that the united states is 15th in terms of defense spending. and other european countries are spending more frankly. giving all to the 2%. that's

because his read is not responding well to the united states. and it's ultimate, that is what it does, not us, it was funding was to american desires and advice. and as a matter of looking like a for every time a secretary of state or of secretary types come to the region this time around again on the line appointed. james just made secretary blinking is attending the walk up and some walk of it. yeah, no, the 1st time, not the 1st to even find him at the end of the walk at which means they are bought some bar still to the decision making behind this war. that me is if in fact is there and still goes on with it. i mean, i'm not, i cannot really take pay the innocent or do you know we started our best, what it didn't work, because it's ottoman, it's financing, and it's shielding. israel in the international arena. it's, it's thoughtfully completed in the united states. must bring is read not to, it's nice. what's bring, is there a, it's senses? do you not have a stable, essentially, and what spring is what to assess because i mark as much packed t

can i have a partners really threaten the unipolar strength of the united states as well? i was going out to you that you're absolutely correct that we are the most powerful state on the planet. but the argument i'm making to you is there are 2 other great powers on the planet, and although they are not as powerful as we are, they still qualify is great powers. but the fact is that china is a pure competitor, and china is bent on dominating asia, and the united states has been on preventing china from dominated nation. so we have an intense security competition now taking place between china and the united states in east asia. so in that sense, china is a threat to the united states with regard to the russians, as you will know, in ukraine, we are effectively involved in a war against russia. so we have these 2 other great powers in the system, russia and china. and in both cases, we are competing with them at the security level and very serious ways. with regard to russia, one could make an argument that were more with russia in the past when countries have attempted to ch

the united states go? what does the united states trying to achieve? what, what, what is the, you know, what, how does the united states envisage the world in the next 1015 years? and that's what least what you had back, you know, 3040 years ago when at least you had a, you know, a president who was thinking in those terms. so i think there's been a drastic decline in us foreign policy leadership. and the both of us as a whole of this is by the bite and was they get all hopelessly incompetent is head filled with some of the logical platitudes that you never really understood the go back to the 19 ages and i think now you list all of these things, you know, we had the, the bite and meeting with the japanese prime minister and the with, with the philippines. the problem is that, um that's, that's directed at the china. we got the whole, the zalinski thing, ongoing, still demanding that the more of them will be sent to your grades. and now we've got this. so it's a, you know, a past, you know, complex of, of

as i said earlier, it destroys the united states image abroad. but it also destroys the image of the united states for the younger generation. young americans who were taught to believe that this was the land of the free and the home of the brave. now they are waking up to a reality, which is almost ex, exact opposite of what they were told. yeah. yeah, there because when they realize that they are brave but they're, they're governed by cowards. that's what they are. cowards. ok, it's interesting, robert, you to be up until october 7th is if that should be the center of everything. it was, it was an important day, but there's a long history before. but before october 7th, at least for the western world, particularly americans that are intentionally on an on educated about this is that remember the phrase, it's complicated that was always it of, oh just because it's been going on along to its complement. that's no longer the case. people are being educated, they're educating themself. it is easy to do that. and this is what the leads were afraid o

they don't just received the balls thrown by the united states, we lead the united states -- come to the middle of the plate. no, don't, less is more. low down, offspeed pitch. in between the pitcher and catcher, we welcome the game strategy together with our teammates. we are a good regular catcher. i am very interested and strongly hope and believe that there is no limit to human ingenu and the u.s.-japan alliance can go further ahead. chris: thank you. i love the baseball metaphor. i find myself thinking of o htani shohei, a japanese baseball player who can both hit and pitch. let's talk about where we have been. there have been profound changes in the international system during the time you all have been involved in the relationship from the end of the cold war, collapse of the soviet union, war on terror, conflicts in iraq and afghanistan, great power competition between the united states and china. the war in ukraine of course. when you think about the evolution of this alliance and where we are today, how important do you think structural factors were in driving us? the backd

today we ask you whether the united states of america recognizes russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. yes, no , please vote on youtube, either with the button yes or no, write your comment below this video if you have your own opinion. if you watch us on tv, grab your expensive smartphone and vote. if you believe that the us recognizes. russia as a state sponsor of terrorism 0800-211-381 no 0800-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. people's deputies of ukraine are visiting us today. feder vinislavskyi, people's deputy of ukraine from the servant of the people, member of the verkhovna rada committee on national security, defense and intelligence. mr. fedor, i congratulate you. thank you for being with us today. glory to heroes. iryna friz, people's deputy of ukraine from european solidarity, member of the supreme committee national security, defense and intelligence councils. ms. irina, i congratulate you, thank you for joining our broadcast. good evening! oleksiy kucherenko, people's deputy of ukraine f

"the united states is not interested in international law, the united states government for decades has held the united nations and all its programs in contempt, using them only when it serves its own geopolitical goals and purposes. so the fact that over 150 unra workers have been killed, that many un sponsored refugee centers have been bombed, despite the fact that israel knew the coordinates that they were the the centers were very clearly marked. these are of course are war crimes crim'. against humanity, the united states isn't interested in that, the united states is only interested in supporting the apartthide regime of israel and keeping that as its uh kind of satellite nation in the middle east to control other countries there uh through the us military power and the ec the combined economic and and combined economic power of israel and united states, the idea of justice, international law, these sorts of things are not of concern. in the united states when it concer when the palestinians are the ones who are suffering. well, let's talk about that. craig, you heard what robert

and zinanism has been fostering over the last few decades that israel is invincible, united states, israel together, they are invincible, nothing could touch us, they the palestinian people showed on that day with great heroism that this is false, and since then the zionism has never really recovered, they have not one year later they have not been able to defeat hamas and they admit that all right, stay with me arnold. well khalet, i mean did you expect this level of relentless atrocities to take place by the israeli regime after the october the 7th operation? i don't think uh anyone did, because uh, as much as we have witnessed israeli crimes since 1948 and even before that, in the 30s, you know, zionist militias have carried many massiker. against our people in palestine and in the arab world, i mean, you know, but to this level, no, because i think that without a full us and western support to israel, i don't think you know that could have been possible, this is a us genocide, this is the united states war crimes against the palestinian people, and it's israel is backed up by t

one of our senior united states senators from the state of new york, chuck schumer said yesterday, i believe that we have to continue to fund the ukrainian efforts for us soldiers. citizens could wind up fighting there. how do you assess that? this is a publication and a cheap publication. if that i do not understand why american soldiers should fight in ukraine. there are most scenarios from the united states. they're, the biggest number of mercenaries comes from poland, with most scenarios from the united states. and 2nd, place and mercenary is from georgia in 3rd place as well. if somebody has the desire to send regular troops, that would certainly bring humanity on the brink of a very serious global conflict. this is obvious to the united states need this. what for thousands of miles away from your national territory. so you don't, you have anything better to do? you have issues on the border issues with migration issues, with the national debt. more than $33.00 trillion dollars. you have nothing better to do. so you should fight in ukraine. wouldn't it be better to negotiate wit

, can lead to a major escalation, which the united states does not need now.m the point of view of hamas, there is already a leader there, that is, the hamasites have decided on the direction of their movement, because the election of sinwar as the head is precisely that. of the political wing that united, that is, before there was a political wing, there was a military wing, now all this has formed in one person, and in fact it radicalized the situation, because sinwar is a man more so sharp, more risky, more prone to some adventures, and to hope that this will lead to a decrease in tension. the same agreement that the united states wants to reach on hostages, and through this agreement to actually end the gas conflict and... freeze the situation, israel does not agree to such a development, even if it goes to an agreement, but only on the conditions of a possible extension in the process of liquidating hamas as a structure, because only this can prevent a repetition of what happened on october 7. on the part of hizballah, israel now understands that the exis

is that country which ultimately as a madeline albright one said the united states stands taller and looks further. and therefore, it is essentially superior to the rest of us. we, we are less, are people then lesser states, them the united states. and therefore, when they send that, that they sense that they are superior, then they have exceptional rights. and when they do something, which we consider to be evil, they don't consider it to be able at god most i'll say it's a mistake, like any rock by invading the country and destroying the company. they invaded and destroyed the country. they never said that we did evil at most. so say there was that there was a mistake. now i know that you were born and spend your formative fortune h here, send the united face. and then at a certain point of time, you return to iran, you're also volunteer. it's uh, 25 in the iran iraq war you were subjected to, to a chemical weapons attack. and i want to ask you, it's a personal question, but i think it's a very valid in this day and age. did you ever have to face a moment the choosing of making

jimmy carter, president of the united states said, the united states has only had a period of 16 yearsnce. the total influence. economic, political, even spiritual. in 1961, us president eisenhower made a shocking confession in his farewell speech, that is, the military establishment leading us foreign policy, and leading corporations in the defense industry have formed a symbiotic relationship exerting influence over the united states. 엄청난 그 복탄을 이렇게 쏟아붓기 시작하죠. 평양 전쟁 기간보다 더 많은 폭탄들을 이 땅에 쏟아붓고 심지어 이제 세균 전쟁과 네이탄 실험 이런 것들도 한국 전장에서 이루어지고 이제 그 과정에서 무수한 그 민간인들이 학살 당하는 거죠. burn them out, scorching the place with nepon, and we go in, or this is korea, chums. 미국의 역사 자체가 전쟁 범죄의 역사예요. 남미의 수많은 나라들이 그 모든 쿠테타에 사실 미국의 cia이라든가 미국 정치가 다 다 그 관여했지 않습니까? 다 개입했잖아요. 중동의 역사는 어떻습니까? 중동의 수많은 분쟁들 미국의 석유 지배를 위해서 1차 중동 전쟁 2차 중동 전쟁 그 모든 전쟁은 사실은 미국이 다 중심에 있지 않습니까? 그것뿐이겠습니까? 베트남 전쟁 어떻습니까? 통킹 사건, 사실 다 전쟁은 날조했잖아요. 기만 거짓 술책으로 자신들이 자작극을 해 놓고, 공격받은 것이라고 발표하고, 전쟁 쳐버리고 수십년 이후에 사실은 그것이 미국의 날조 조작했다. 지금 들어나면 뭐 합니까? 그 전쟁 속에서 수십만 수백만들이 희생됐는데. 수도 없이 많은 어 전쟁 범죄를 자행을 했죠. 뭐 여지가 없는 거죠. 수도 없는. 그런데 전쟁 범죄를 다루기 위해서 일제 형사 재판소를 만들잖아는데 미국은

and sadly, 2400 to never made it back home to united states. lots and more than 20000 were wounded in action. what good was there sacrifice? because within a year of the united states pulling out the taliban regime has almost again to full control of afghanistan. again, the same could be also said following the withdrawal from many american troops interact as well. now, but following the attack, which killed 3 american soldiers in jordan, us military started a series of strikes, including $125.00 munitions against $85.00 militia targets in syria interact. and this might just be the beginning, as more and more pressure as being formed on the current administration to take more action. now this is all while the united states troops station in the middle east, are there with the permission of each country's government. well, that's except for syria, and was more than a $160.00 recent attacks on us troops across a rack and serious since october, it's apparent, the residents of the country are not as happy. so what exactly is united states doing wit

the united states. so this focus on, the drugs coming in outside, of course, ignores role of demand in creating the drug problem that we talk about a bit in american society and as historians. more problems. however, this focus on drugs as originating outside the states and coming in to pose a threat means that you to engage in a policing surveillance and militarizing approach the control of drugs. at least have to control them at the border leading to militarization of borders and that and a much more likely as happened ever increasingly over course of the 20th century, you had to go to the place where the drugs were produced and try to eliminate them there. those are outside the united states being in u.s. policing and surveillance efforts are taken outside the united states. we see this already in the 19 tens and twenties since the united states engaged in surveillance and exchange of intelligence and placing of secret agents in spaces around you, around world that were not controlled by the united s