70,000 us dollars per month, and then you had the ministry of foreign affairs in hong kong which also put out a statement which is also quite unusual, saying they did not consider this to be freedom of speech. they liken him speaking to have an nazi speak in germany, terrorist speak in the united states, so they were putting a lot of pressure on the foreign correspondents cloud. as the talk went ahead and they responded by saying that hong kong has these freedoms of freedom of speech, which are enshrined in their constitution, and that they were going to let him speak. they have let supporters of the communist party speak, they have let supporters and advocates of brexit speak, so for them it was very much an issue of freedom of speech and they would let this go ahead. let's get the context because his party is not that well supported in hong kong. yes, let's be clear, people who support independence in hong kong are not the majority. he is the leader of a very small political party....