all that i'm saying is if it was
a brown dude with an
anti-government ideology, our
american entire society would be
calling it an act of terrorism
which it is.
and i think that paul ciancia
should be called terrorist.
>> we were interested in how the
fb ichli defines terrorism.
it involves acts dangerous to
human life.
appears to intimidate or coerce
civilian population.
and occur primarily within the
territorial jurisdiction of the
united states.
and all of these things
certainly seem to fit what paul
ciancia is accused of.
but isn't there a difference
between someone having mental
illness and using something as
an excuse, you know, as opposed
to someone who like goes to
another country, is trained by
terrorists overseas and then
comes back into the united
states to commit an act of
terrorism?
>> it's important to keep in
mind fbi and law enforce him me