trump campaign and the russian government and whether or not there was any coordination. >> correct. investigating and having proof are different thing. the acting cia director said there was smoke but not fire. senator tom cotton, not that i'm seeing. not that i'm aware of. clapper, not to my knowledge. a senator from delaware, i have no evidence of collusion. there is a point at which you continue to search for something that everybody who has been

an assumption on behalf of most people in the media about what investigation must mean. my point to you is despite the narrative that gets played over and over again with respect to what the investigation might mean in terms of collusion, every person, republican and democrat, that has been briefed on it has come to the same

interfering with the election. let me comment. following this testimony it's clear nothing has change. senior intelligence officials have gone on record to say there is no evidence of a trump/russia