the state legislature, state senator pete kelly and john coglieu who asked for the bill to be codified. the alaska chapter of the safari club opposes it because its landscape level approach to land management planning has the potential to withdraw and lock up even more land in alaska. alaska's energy, mineral and timber producers are united in their opposition to the rule and their support of our disapproval resolution. we've heard from the resource development council, the alaska oil and gas association, the alaska forest association, the council of alaska producers, the alaska support industry alliance, the 40-mile mining district in the alaska miners association all oppose b.l.m.'s planning 2.0 rule because it reduces economic opportunities for alaskans, those who actually live near these b.l.m. lands, who know the most about them, and who depend on them to provide for their families. and it's the same story in many