be such an incentive to put the very young justices on the court, so i think we could make an argument that the framers view was that service on the supreme court would be kind of a capstone and not something that would come early in somebody's legal career. we want to talk a little bit more about this, because people may not be completely up on the various proposals of that are circulating. we will leave aside that two years, but looking at the 18 years, there is at least an argument that could be done without a constitutional amendment if somebody got life tenure on the supreme court, but the actual active job of serving and working day today as a justice -- day to day as a justice would be for the nine