article on-line which would be the fall back position when something didn't get on television it was still a great story that could be circulated, i would publish it on-line and they would call about that are or a headline and the articles were defensible, legal, accurate, factual, legitimate, but we didn't defend them in this cases as strongly as we should when they call and bear that kind of pressure. it borders on inappropriate if it is part of a campaign that influences and manipulates reporting. >> what would the toy say to you? how is it more than working what goes on every day in washington? >> rather than providing the information they are required to provide that we own, it is just obfuscation and accusations and say things that are phony scandals, bogus, not real, and giving misinformation and false information is proven true in some indicates and modifying it when they are caught doing so if you try to go back at them for additional information and you say, you point out...