though they tried to offer context. >> i don't think we can stress often enough that this is not a dragnet. >> they also offered proposals to tighten up. >> the regulations are designed to prevent the section 702 program from transforming over time from a foreign intelligence program to a means of effectively surveilling persons. >> on capitol hill, some liberals and conservatives have joined forces in recent months to speak out about privacy and civil libertys. >> a vigorous oversight over the intelligence field needs to get more attention. it's not something you can minimize. liberty and security are not mutually exclusive. >> some say it's only records held anonymously, only rarely accessed. what's your beef? what they rarely mention is that they don't believe any of your

and it's likely to leave many critics far from satisfied. here's chief congressional correspondent mikey m emanuel. >> all in favor, say aye. >> the oversight board has voted to adopt a report in support of some of the nsa's vasurveillanc programs. >> overall, the board has found they are valuable in providing some security. >> they said getting digital information from some companies is clearly allowed by statute as implemented. the section 702 program targeting foreigners outside the u.s. fits the fourth amendment, and they say they are troubled over the incidental collection of u.s. persons' communications, though they tried to offer context. >> i don't think we can stress