now available at gnc. ♪ >> sean: today josh halle proprosed a measure to dismiss the house articles of impeachment if they are not sent to the senate within 25 days of their adoption. send the articles or he will start the impeachment trial without her permission. first i want to applaud you. the idea we will just hold them indefinitely. we will lecture the senate how they will do their business or

they never accepted his election. they never wanted him in office. they wanted to get him out. now when it's time to put up or shut up and put their evidence forward they are afraid to do it because they don't have any evidence. it's a joke and a fraud. >> sean: they had all of their witnesses. the house manager is supposed to present their case before the senate based what they came up. they are talking about no we want to add other witnesses they didn't call or fight to get. to me, they are asking now the senate to do the job they should have done. at the end of the day. when you eliminate opinionnd witnesses, you only have one fact witness. that was ambassador sonland. what did the president? nothing. i want no quid pro quo. it's a slam dunk and the idea of an obstruction charge when there is a conflict between the executive and legislative branch and they seek remedy through the judiciary and the supreme court is reviewing, that's not reason

they will do their business or arguing the president is not the commander-in-chief. this is important. that means that if i read my dates are right, this case can be disposed of by january 11th. am i reading that right? >> that's right. this is day 19.ha this is so important. the house speaker is trying to run the united states senate. she is trying to hijack the trial and obstruct the trial. she is subverting the constitution. the constitution is clear. the house has the power to impeach. t they have done that. the senate has the power to try the case. it's time for the senate to fight back. >> sean: what happened to all of the urgency it had to be done in record time? >> exactly. we heard how urgent it was the president had to be removed. the only urgency on the part of the democrats and pelosi was to pursue their personal vendetta against the president of the united states. they never accepted his election.

president for obstructing the house when she is obstructing the house of the united states senate. how democrats got addicted to impeachment. now they can't shake the craving. they are even talking about getting another fix before the election. one of my colleagues on the democratic said they may have additional articles of impeachment. m 2020 is a new year, it brought no new agenda for democrats. the trump economy is roaring and the american people are doing better. they are using impeachment to distract the people. they need that distraction. we don't. which is i am so glad you laid out a trump doctrine in iran that doesn't require boots on the ground. kill the terrorists and bring our troops home. >> sean: 100%. we have the military capability of to do it. coming up disturbing allegations about zero experience hunter biden and sleepy joe not getting a billion dollars.

not hearing china or russia. the only ones mourning the loss of soleimani are our democratic leadership and democratic presidential candidates. no one else in the world. they saw the destruction and the

is reviewing, that's not reason obstruction. >> no, never has it been in the past. they have no case and they know it. they are afraid to proceed to a trial. the senate is ready to have a trial. the president deserves to have a trial. the american people deserve to have a trial to put this to rest. and speaker pelosi wants to go on for who knows how long? >> sean: they want to live in a constant state of impeaching the president. where is mitt romney? where is murkowski and alexander and susan collins? >> i can't speak for anybody but myself. when i introduced my resolution, we got 10 co-sponsors in the senate.

senate. the senate is sick and tired of what the house is doing and sick and tired of the democrats antics and ready to stand up for the constitution. i believe they will. >> sean: good for you, senator. between you and lindsey graham and others, we are talking about the president. this is not a game. they have lowered the bar fort. impeachment to spitting on the sidewalk or jay walking. thanks for being with us. reaction house judiciary committee member and a fox news contributor. jason, we gave gates my radio microphone. we can't pay him. he did it for free. >> i loved it. >> sean: you did great. what i want to know jason, this is the game they are playing. they want to be able to hold this in perpetuity. the senate can't allow the house to dictate the terms?e >> no, the constitution says they have the sole power to

>> no, the constitution says they have the sole power to control their destiny.et i go back to what nancy pelosi said. they rushed this through. they didn't allow matt gates to investigate and have a minority day of hearings. they didn't let him and jim jordan do their job. they produce a sub-par work product. and nancy pelosi is challenged why it was rushed through. she said we have been working on this for 2.5 years. that gives more insight to her motivation. it was always about impeaching the president. >> sean: you pointed this out every day, fighting for the ride for the fairness that newt gingrich offered bill clinton and his attorneys when he was speaker of the house. >> it's crazy to think that nancy pelosi impeached the president for obstructing the house when she is obstructing

what i can't understand is why the liberals are celebrating soleimani. they can't accept that this president has a solid strategy for iran. it's been clearly articulated. we continue to apply maximum pressure so they quit exporting terrorism throughout the region and the world frankly and stop building nukes. s they can be a nuclear country like japan but without nuclear weapons. quit oppression our people and we continue to defend our u.s. vital interests in the region. the president has been clear about his goals. >> sean: and ben, the other countries if you told me 5 years ago that the israeli and the united states and the jordanians and egyptians would be aligned and shared intelligence, i would not have believed.

will respond. when that took place, thisil president showed more patience. i never thought giving i never thought giving $150-billion dollars in cash would buy good will. like the 9-11 commission report. they were at war with us. the iranians have been at war and threatening america and israel and the region since 1979. >> yes, sean, happy new year. it was a failed?-- that president obama had. he was a bad guy, soleimani was a terrible guy. killed a lot of soldiers. i am glad he is dead. what i can't understand is why the liberals are celebrating

democrats and the stupid commentators on tv media mob, the military experts agree the president's strategy is affective. general said this is a bigger deal than killing bin laden. >> the president appears to have decided that it was necessary to shore up deterrents to show we would not accept this. >> the administration understands there is a serious risk of consequences here. they understand it's unlikely the iranian regime will come to the negotiating table. >> the president showed restraint and put a redline outi there. he said if you kill americans ig will respond.

iran has to regroup and figure out: now what? make no mistake, they are shaking in their boots. the president showed great resolve. i think it was a long time coming. if you look back 2 years ago, i gave a speech at the u.n. on soleimani and talked about the threats. the president has had restraint all of this time since we gave that speech. i will tell you, we said then ht was not by the entire security council, he was banned from leaving iran. what he was doing in iraq? >> sean: good question. i always liked general petreus. he said soleimani was the architect, commander of the iranian effort to control the shi'ite stretching from iran toi