committee are expected to finally get the redacted version of their report. according to the a.p. which yesterday obtained new information on the still-classified report, the report concludes that the agency kept secretary of state colin powell as well as some u.s. ambassadors in the dark about the harsh techniques and secret prisons, and that some of the ambassadors informed about inter guyings of al qaeda detainees at black sites were instructed not to tell their superiors at the state department. the a.p. also reveals that while the report does not draw the legal conclusion that the cia's actions constituted torture, it makes clear that in some cases those actions amount to torture by a common definition. the timing of the declassification will be up to senator dianne feinstein. joining me now is senior national security and

some very angry senators on capitol hill today. senator udall issued a statement that says i have lost confidence in john brennan. i am concerned about the director's apparent inability to find any flaws in the agency he leads. the white house is defending john brennan, but one would imagine that the senators on this intelligence committee are not going to let it simply end here with an apology from john brennan. >> well, i suspect not. you've had several senators including senator widen demanding to know having a clear accountability of what happened, who, perhaps, ordered this intrusion. how it happened. i think there will probably be some internal wrangling over this because, look, the white house has said john brennan has said and a lot of people on capitol hill have said they want to get this report out and put this entire matter behind them, and i think that not just the findings of this internal cia

i'll just read a couple of highlights. at one point one of the questions is doesn't the report that the senate intelligence report make clear that at least some who authorized or participated in the rendition and interrogation program committed crimes? they asked again, whether the justice department will revisit the decision not to prosecute anyone. there could be criminal charges here, jonathan. >> we'll have to wait and see and the state department will have to answer overseas to other governments demanding to know what's in this report. there are governments that will be implicated in this report for hosting black sites and also it's very curious because you know, when the justice department issued its statement saying that it has no -- insufficient evidence to pursue criminal investigations and it added, quote, at this time, unquote. >> indeed. >> and so, indeed, it appears to have left the door open for possible -- for a possible

yesterday with john brennan's apology some. >> so according to the cia, john brennan, because of the seriousness of senator feinstein's allegations asked the cia inspector general david buckley to conduct an internal review of the buckley came up w number of cias, attorneys and specialists inappropriately accessed a database that was supposed to be accessed only by the senate committee staff by agreement of the cia. the cia will dispute the way a lot of people are interpreting the finding here as well as the

response -- the response by john brennan that you just played, the question is whether or not the cia had hacked into this computer in an effort to thwart the committee's investigation and john brennan said absolutely not. the definition of the word hack may be what's at play here because at least as far as the cia is concerned they can't hack into their own computer system. this was a system that the cia provided to the senate staff, but i suspect that a lot of people are going to say that's splitting hairs and indeed, the cia did hack into this system to determine whether or not the cia had an internal review of the interrogation program, that according to senator feinstein and others, actually confirmed the findings of the senate's own report. >> let me ask you, there are some very angry senators on capitol hill today. senator udall issued a statement that says i have lost confidence

turns out they did. according to mcclatchy, an internal agency review finds cia employees did, in fact, improperly access computers used by the committee while its staff was researching a report on the cia's highly controversial detention and interrogation program. so those claims by senator feinstein, the ones john brennan called beyond the scope of reason, it turns out they were dead on. so dead on that brennan himself actually apologized yesterday to feinstein and the committee's vice chair, saxby cham bliss. hours ago, a member of the senate intelligence committee tweeted, the cia broke into senate computer files and tried to have senate staff prosecuted and unacceptable in a democracy.