correspondent, and dave leventhal with the center for public integrity. good morning. i want to start with the attorney general planning to redact information from the mueller report that he determines may damage the reputation of people peripheral to the investigation. michael, is there a national security argument behind this? is this mainly a political question? >> i think when it comes to the reputational aspect for certain figures, peripheral to the investigation, i don't think that there's necessarily a national security element to it. there's a national security element to some of the sensitive intelligence that the attorney general says has to be redacted. that was expected. the parts that were unexpected are to your point. the extent to which reputations are going to be protected, grand jury information that's going to be withheld, there is precedent for that information coming out. obviously, watergate. democrats reciting that in their effort to get barr to issue a court...