documents, but his comments were
really extraordinary, to me.
he said he actually left
basically bread crumbs.
he left some clues to indicate
which documents he actually saw
and which documents he actually
copied so that the n.s.a., when
they went back and did an audit,
would be able to determine that
he was a whistleblower -- in
other words, taking documents
that indicated they were
involved in domestic
eavesdropping, for example, as
opposed to documents dealing
with north korea or russia or
china or whatever.
so he didn't say how many
documents, but he said there
were considerably fewer than the
1.7 million that the n.s.a. has
alleged, and that 1.7 million is
basically based on the documents
he may have at one point seen,
but certainly not the documents
that he copied and by them
missing the clues he left, we